Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are fundamentally reshaping computing, with large language models (LLMs) now effectively being able to generate and interpret source code and natural language instructions.
Alice: Rapid prototyping system for virtual reality
Randy Pausch, Tommy Burnette, AC Capeheart, Matthew Conway, Dennis Cosgrove, Rob DeLine, Jim Durbin, Rich Gossweiler, Shuichi Koga, and Jeff White. 1995 · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment
John Biggs. 1996 · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods
Michael Quinn Patton. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Teaching Objects-First in Introductory Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Reno, Navada, USA) (SIGCSE ’03) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 191–195
Stephen Cooper, Wanda Dann, and Randy Pausch. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Plagiarism: A Lie of the Mind
Maurice Isserman. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Techniques to Identify Themes
Gery W. Ryan and H. Russell Bernard. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
A Multi-National Study of Reading and Tracing Skills in Novice Programmers
Raymond Lister, Elizabeth S. Adams, Sue Fitzgerald, William Fone, John Hamer, Morten Lindholm, Robert McCartney, Jan Erik Moström, Kate Sanders, Otto Seppälä, Beth Simon, and Lynda Thomas. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Signature Pedagogies in the Professions
Lee S. Shulman. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Most Difficult Topics in CS1: Results of an Online Survey of Educators
Nell B. Dale. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
What Do Teachers Teach in Introductory Programming?. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Computing Education Research (Canterbury, United Kingdom) (ICER ’06) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–28
Carsten Schulte and Jens Bennedsen. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cyber Cheating in an Information Technology Age
Karl O. Jones, Reid Juliet, and Bartlett Rebecca. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Going SOLO to Assess Novice Programmers
Judy Sheard, Angela Carbone, Raymond Lister, Beth Simon, Errol Thompson, and Jacqueline L. Whalley. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scratch: Programming for all
Mitchel Resnick, John Maloney, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Natalie Rusk, Evelyn Eastmond, Karen Brennan, Amon Millner, Eric Rosenbaum, Jay Silver, Brian Silverman, and Yasmin Kafai. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Introductory Computing Course Content: Educator and Student Perspectives. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Information Technology Education (West Point, New York, USA) (SIGITE ’11) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 55–60
Joseph V. Elarde and Fatt-Fei Chong. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Computer Science Curricula 2013
ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Raxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome)
John B Biggs and Kevin F Collis. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Blackbox: A Large Scale Repository of Novice Programmers’ Activity. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (SIGCSE ’14) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 223–228
Neil Christopher Charles Brown, Michael Kölling, Davin McCall, and Ian Utting. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Recurring Rainfall Problem (ICER ’14) . ACM, NY, NY, USA, 35–42
Kathi Fisler. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Structuring flipped classes with lightweight teams and gamification. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education . 392–397
Celine Latulipe, N Bruce Long, and Carlos E Seminario. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Exploring lightweight teams in a distributed learning environment. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education . 193–198
Stephen MacNeil, Celine Latulipe, Bruce Long, and Aman Yadav. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate
Brent Daniel Mittelstadt, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Artificial Intelligence in Education: What Is It, Where Is It Now, Where Is It Going
Brett Becker. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deepfix: Fixing common c language errors by deep learning. In Proceedings of the aaai conference on artificial intelligence , Vol. 31
Rahul Gupta, Soham Pal, Aditya Kanade, and Shirish Shevade. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Strategies for Maintaining Academic Integrity in First-Year Computing Courses (ITiCSE ’17) . ACM, NY, NY, USA, 244–249
Judy Sheard, Simon, Matthew Butler, Katrina Falkner, Michael Morgan, and Amali Weerasinghe. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Blackbox, Five Years On: An Evaluation of a Large-Scale Programming Data Collection Project. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Espoo, Finland) (ICER ’18) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 196–204
Neil C. C. Brown, Amjad Altadmri, Sue Sentance, and Michael Kölling. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Predicting Academic Performance: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Larnaca, Cyprus) (ITiCSE 2018 Companion) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 175–199
Arto Hellas, Petri Ihantola, Andrew Petersen, Vangel V. Ajanovski, Mirela Gutica, Timo Hynninen, Antti Knutas, Juho Leinonen, Chris Messom, and Soohyun Nam Liao. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Active learning: a new assessment model that boost confidence and learning while reducing test anxiety
Arshia Khan and Janna Madden. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Introductory Programming: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Larnaca, Cyprus) (ITiCSE 2018 Companion) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 55–106
Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Simon, Ibrahim Albluwi, Brett A. Becker, Michail Giannakos, Amruth N. Kumar, Linda Ott, James Paterson, Michael James Scott, Judy Sheard, and Claudia Szabo. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Metacognitive Difficulties Faced by Novice Programmers in Automated Assessment Tools. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Espoo, Finland) (ICER ’18) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 41–50
James Prather, Raymond Pettit, Kayla McMurry, Alani Peters, John Homer, and Maxine Cohen. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Informing Students about Academic Integrity in Programming. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Computing Education Conference (Brisbane, Queensland, Australia) (ACE ’18) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 113–122
Simon, Judy Sheard, Michael Morgan, Andrew Petersen, Amber Settle, and Jane Sinclair. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Plagiarism in Programming Assessments: A Systematic Review
Ibrahim Albluwi. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
An Analysis of Using Many Small Programs in CS1 (SIGCSE ’19) . ACM, NY, NY, USA, 585–591
Joe Michael Allen, Frank Vahid, Alex Edgcomb, Kelly Downey, and Kris Miller. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Compiler Error Messages Considered Unhelpful: The Landscape of Text-Based Programming Error Message Research (ITiCSE-WGR ’19) . ACM, NY, NY,USA, 177–210
Brett A. Becker, Paul Denny, Raymond Pettit, Durell Bouchard, Dennis J. Bouvier, Brian Harrington, Amir Kamil, Amey Karkare, Chris McDonald, Peter-Michael Osera, Janice L. Pearce, and James Prather. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
What Do CS1 Syllabi Reveal About Our Expectations of Introductory Programming Students?. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE ’19) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1011–1017
Brett A. Becker and Thomas Fitzpatrick. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
50 Years of CS1 at SIGCSE: A Review of the Evolution of Introductory Programming Education Research. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE ’19) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 338–344
Brett A. Becker and Keith Quille. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Research This! Questions That Computing Educators Most Want Computing Education Researchers to Answer. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Toronto ON, Canada) (ICER ’19) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 259–267
Paul Denny, Brett A. Becker, Michelle Craig, Greg Wilson, and Piotr Banaszkiewicz. 2019a · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Spoc: Search-based pseudocode to code
Sumith Kulal, Panupong Pasupat, Kartik Chandra, Mina Lee, Oded Padon, Alex Aiken, and Percy S Liang. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A Collaborative Practicum Targeting Communication Skills for Computer Science Researchers. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE ’19) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 845–851
Lori Pollock. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scratch and Google Blockly: How Girls’ Programming Skills and Attitudes Are Influenced. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research . ACM, New York
Mazyar Seraj, Eva-Sophie Katterfeldt, Kerstin Bub, Serge Autexier, and Rolf Drechsler. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Computing Curricula 2020 Paradigms for Global Computing Education
Alison Clear, Allen Parrish, John Impagliazzo, Pearl Wang, Paolo Ciancarini, Ernesto Cuadros-Vargas, Stephen Frezza, Judith Gal-Ezer, Arnold Pears, Shingo Takada, Heikki Topi, Gerrit van der Veer, Abhijat Vichare, Les Waguespack, and Ming Zhang. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Data Feminism
Catherine D’ignazio and Lauren F Klein. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Towards a Competence Model for the Novice Programmer Using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy - An Empirical Approach. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Trondheim, Norway) (ITiCSE ’20) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 459–465
Natalie Kiesler. 2020b · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
What Do We Think We Think We Are Doing? Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Programming (ICER ’20) . ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2–13
James Prather, Brett A. Becker, Michelle Craig, Paul Denny, Dastyni Loksa, and Lauren Margulieux. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
AI Authorship?
Pamela Samuelson. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Developing Students’ Written Communication Skills with Jupyter Notebooks. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Portland, OR, USA) (SIGCSE ’20) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1089–1095
Alistair Willis, Patricia Charlton, and Tony Hirst. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Program synthesis with large language models
Jacob Austin, Augustus Odena, Maxwell Nye, Maarten Bosma, Henryk Michalewski, David Dohan, Ellen Jiang, Carrie Cai, Michael Terry, Quoc Le, et al · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Virtual Event, Canada) (FAccT ’21) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 610–623
Emily M. Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Thematic analysis: a practical guide
Victoria Clarke and Virginia Braun. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Patterns of Academic Help-Seeking in Undergraduate Computing Students. In Proceedings of the 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Joensuu, Finland) (Koli Calling ’21) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 10 pages
Augie Doebling and Ayaan M. Kazerouni. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
AI-Driven Development Is Here: Should You Worry?
Neil A. Ernst and Gabriele Bavota. 2022 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS
Dan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Saurav Kadavath, Mantas Mazeika, Akul Arora, Ethan Guo, Collin Burns, Samir Puranik, Horace He, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Professional Competencies in Computing Education: Pedagogies and Assessment. In Proceedings of the 2021 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Virtual Event, Germany) (ITiCSE-WGR ’21) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 133–161
Rajendra Raj, Mihaela Sabin, John Impagliazzo, David Bowers, Mats Daniels, Felienne Hermans, Natalie Kiesler, Amruth N. Kumar, Bonnie MacKellar, Renée McCauley, Syed Waqar Nabi, and Michael Oudshoorn. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
SynShine: Improved Fixing of Syntax Errors
Toufique Ahmed, Noah Rose Ledesma, and Premkumar Devanbu. 2023 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (FAccT ’22) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173–184
Abeba Birhane, Pratyusha Kalluri, Dallas Card, William Agnew, Ravit Dotan, and Michelle Bao. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Rishi Bommasani, Drew A. Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S. Bernstein, Jeannette Bohg, Antoine Bosselut, Emma Brunskill, Erik Brynjolfsson, Shyamal Buch, Dallas Card, Rodrigo Castellon, Niladri Chatterji, Annie Chen, Kathleen Creel, Jared Quincy Davis, Dora Demszky, Chris Donahue, Moussa Doumbouya, Esin Durmus, Stefano Ermon, John Etchemendy, Kawin Ethayarajh, Li Fei-Fei, Chelsea Finn, Trevor Gale, Lauren Gillespie, Karan Goel, Noah Goodman, Shelby Grossman, Neel Guha, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Peter Henderson, John Hewitt, Daniel E. Ho, Jenny Hong, Kyle Hsu, Jing Huang, Thomas Icard, Saahil Jain, Dan Jurafsky, Pratyusha Kalluri, Siddharth Karamcheti, Geoff Keeling, Fereshte Khani, Omar Khattab, Pang Wei Koh, Mark Krass, Ranjay Krishna, Rohith Kuditipudi, Ananya Kumar, Faisal Ladhak, Mina Lee, Tony Lee, Jure Leskovec, Isabelle Levent, Xiang Lisa Li, Xuechen Li, Tengyu Ma, Ali Malik, Christopher D. Manning, Suvir Mirchandani, Eric Mitchell, Zanele Munyikwa, Suraj Nair, Avanika Narayan, Deepak Narayanan, Ben Newman, Allen Nie, Juan Carlos Niebles, Hamed Nilforoshan, Julian Nyarko, Giray Ogut, Laurel Orr, Isabel Papadimitriou, Joon Sung Park, Chris Piech, Eva Portelance, Christopher Potts, Aditi Raghunathan, Rob Reich, Hongyu Ren, Frieda Rong, Yusuf Roohani, Camilo Ruiz, Jack Ryan, Christopher Ré, Dorsa Sadigh, Shiori Sagawa, Keshav Santhanam, Andy Shih, Krishnan Srinivasan, Alex Tamkin, Rohan Taori, Armin W. Thomas, Florian Tramèr, Rose E. Wang, William Wang, Bohan Wu, Jiajun Wu, Yuhuai Wu, Sang Michael Xie, Michihiro Yasunaga, Jiaxuan You, Matei Zaharia, Michael Zhang, Tianyi Zhang, Xikun Zhang, Yuhui Zhang, Lucia Zheng, Kaitlyn Zhou, and Percy Liang. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Exploring the Implications of Openai Codex on Education for Industry 4.0. In International Workshop on Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing . Springer, 254–266
Robert W Brennan and Jonathan Lesage. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
GitHub Copilot AI Pair Programmer: Asset or Liability?
Arghavan Moradi Dakhel, Vahid Majdinasab, Amin Nikanjam, Foutse Khomh, Michel C. Desmarais, and Zhen Ming (Jack) Jiang. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Robosourcing Educational Resources – Leveraging Large Language Models for Learnersourcing
Paul Denny, Sami Sarsa, Arto Hellas, and Juho Leinonen. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Net impact of large language models trained on code. In Conferinţa tehnico-ştiinţifică a studenţilor, masteranzilor şi doctoranzilor , Vol. 1. 189–192
Pavel Gherciu. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Kompetenzförderung in der Programmierausbildung durch Modellierung von Kompetenzen und informativem Feedback
Natalie Kiesler. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
On the Lack of Recognition of Software Artifacts and IT Infrastructure in Educational Technology Research. In 20. Fachtagung Bildungstechnologien (DELFI) , Peter A. Henning, Michael Striewe, and Matthias Wölfel (Eds.). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., Bonn, 201–206
Natalie Kiesler and Daniel Schiffner. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
CS1QA: A Dataset for Assisting Code-based Question Answering in an Introductory Programming Course
Conversing with Copilot: Exploring Prompt Engineering for Solving CS1 Problems Using Natural Language. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Toronto ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1136–1142
Paul Denny, Viraj Kumar, and Nasser Giacaman. 2023c · 2023
Closest in time.
Experiences with Remote Examination Formats in Light of GPT-4
Felix Dobslaw and Peter Bergh. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Thomas Dohmke, Marco Iansiti, and Greg Richards. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Scratch Copilot Evaluation: Assessing AI-Assisted Creative Coding for Families
Stefania Druga and Nancy Otero. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Changyoon Lee, Yeon Seonwoo, and Alice Oh. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Competition-level code generation with alphacode
Yujia Li, David Choi, Junyoung Chung, Nate Kushman, Julian Schrittwieser, Rémi Leblond, Tom Eccles, James Keeling, Felix Gimeno, Agustin Dal Lago, et al · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Programming Education: Theories and Exemplars of Use
Dastyni Loksa, Lauren Margulieux, Brett A. Becker, Michelle Craig, Paul Denny, Raymond Pettit, and James Prather. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Dataset of Student Solutions to Algorithm and Data Structure Programming Assignments. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference . 956–962
Fynn Petersen-Frey, Marcus Soll, Louis Kobras, Melf Johannsen, Peter Kling, and Chris Biemann. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Github Copilot in the Classroom: Learning to Code with AI Assistance
Ben Puryear and Gina Sprint. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Programming Pedagogy and Assessment in the Era of AI/ML: A Position Paper. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM India Compute Conference (Jaipur, India) (COMPUTE ’22) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 29–34
Arun Raman and Viraj Kumar. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Examples of Culturally Responsive Teaching in Computational Thinking Curriculum. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (Providence, RI, USA) (SIGCSE 2022) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1055
Dana Saito-Stehberger. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations Using Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 (Lugano and Virtual Event, Switzerland) (ICER ’22) . ACM, NY NY, USA, 27–43
Sami Sarsa, Paul Denny, Arto Hellas, and Juho Leinonen. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
My AI Wants to Know If This Will Be on the Exam: Testing OpenAI’s Codex on CS2 Programming Exercises (ACE ’23) . ACM, NY, NY, USA, 97–104
James Finnie-Ansley, Paul Denny, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Eddie Antonio Santos, James Prather, and Brett A. Becker. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
ChatGPT: A new study tool shaping the future for high school students
Norbert Forman, József Udvaros, and Mihály Szilárd Avornicului. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Creative Use of OpenAI in Education: Case Studies from Game Development
Fiona French, David Levi, Csaba Maczo, Aiste Simonaityte, Stefanos Triantafyllidis, and Gergo Varda. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Exploring the Responses of Large Language Models to Beginner Programmers’ Help Requests
Arto Hellas, Juho Leinonen, Sami Sarsa, Charles Koutcheme, Lilja Kujanpää, and Juha Sorva. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Decomposed Prompting to Answer Questions on a Course Discussion Board. In Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky , Ning Wang, Genaro Rebolledo-Mendez, Vania Dimitrova, Noboru Matsuda, and Olga C. Santos (Eds.). Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 218–223
Brandon Jaipersaud, Paul Zhang, Jimmy Ba, Andrew Petersen, Lisa Zhang, and Michael R. Zhang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users’ Views. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 111, 15 pages
Maurice Jakesch, Advait Bhat, Daniel Buschek, Lior Zalmanson, and Mor Naaman. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
ChatGPT and Software Testing Education: Promises & Perils. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW) . 4130–4137
Sajed Jalil, Suzzana Rafi, Thomas D. LaToza, Kevin Moran, and Wing Lam. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation
Ziwei Ji, Nayeon Lee, Rita Frieske, Tiezheng Yu, Dan Su, Yan Xu, Etsuko Ishii, Yejin Bang, Andrea Madotto, and Pascale Fung. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Ethical AI is not about AI
Deborah G Johnson and Mario Verdicchio. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Enkelejda Kasneci, Kathrin Sessler, Stefan Küchemann, Maria Bannert, Daryna Dementieva, Frank Fischer, Urs Gasser, Georg Groh, Stephan Günnemann, Eyke Hüllermeier, Stepha Krusche, Gitta Kutyniok, Tilman Michaeli, Claudia Nerdel, Jürgen Pfeffer, Oleksandra Poquet, Michael Sailer, Albrecht Schmidt, Tina Seidel, Matthias Stadler, Jochen Weller, Jochen Kuhn, and Gjergji Kasneci. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Studying the Effect of AI Code Generators on Supporting Novice Learners in Introductory Programming. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 455, 23 pages
Majeed Kazemitabaar, Justin Chow, Carl Ka To Ma, Barbara J. Ericson, David Weintrop, and Tovi Grossman. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
AI-Generated Code Not Considered Harmful. In Proceedings of the 25th Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (WCCCE ’23) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 7 pages
Tyson Kendon, Leanne Wu, and John Aycock. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models to Generate Formative Programming Feedback
Natalie Kiesler, Dominic Lohr, and Hieke Keuning. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Why We Need Open Data in Computer Science Education Research. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 1 (Turku, Finland) (ITiCSE 2023) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA
Natalie Kiesler and Daniel Schiffner. 2023b · 2023
Closest in time.
From "Ban It TillWe Understand It" to "Resistance is Futile": How University Programming Instructors Plan to Adapt as More Students Use AI Code Generation and Explanation Tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot (ICER ’23) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA
Sam Lau and Philip J. Guo. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Using Large Language Models to Enhance Programming Error Messages (SIGCSE 2023) . ACM, NY, NY, USA, 563–569
Juho Leinonen, Arto Hellas, Sami Sarsa, Brent Reeves, Paul Denny, James Prather, and Brett A. Becker. 2023b · 2023
Closest in time.
CodeHelp: Using Large Language Models with Guardrails for Scalable Support in Programming Classes
Mark Liffiton, Brad Sheese, Jaromir Savelka, and Paul Denny. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Jiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, and Lingming Zhang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Is AI the better programming partner? Human-Human Pair Programming vs. Human-AI pAIr Programming
Qianou Ma, Tongshuang Wu, and Kenneth Koedinger. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
The Implications of Large Language Models for CS Teachers and Students. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (Toronto ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1255
Stephen MacNeil, Joanne Kim, Juho Leinonen, Paul Denny, Seth Bernstein, Brett A. Becker, Michel Wermelinger, Arto Hellas, Andrew Tran, Sami Sarsa, James Prather, and Viraj Kumar. 2023a · 2023
Closest in time.
Experiences from Using Code Explanations Generated by Large Language Models in a Web Software Development E-Book (SIGCSE 2023) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 931–937
Stephen MacNeil, Andrew Tran, Arto Hellas, Joanne Kim, Sami Sarsa, Paul Denny, Seth Bernstein, and Juho Leinonen. 2023b · 2023
Closest in time.
Automatically Generating CS Learning Materials with Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (Toronto ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1176
Stephen MacNeil, Andrew Tran, Juho Leinonen, Paul Denny, Joanne Kim, Arto Hellas, Seth Bernstein, and Sami Sarsa. 2023c · 2023
Closest in time.
A large language model-assisted education tool to provide feedback on open-ended responses
Jordan K. Matelsky, Felipe Parodi, Tony Liu, Richard D. Lange, and Konrad P. Kording. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
In-IDE Generation-based Information Support with a Large Language Model
Daye Nam, Andrew Macvean, Vincent Hellendoorn, Bogdan Vasilescu, and Brad Myers. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Here are the Schools and Colleges That Have Banned the Use of ChatGPT over Plagiarism and Misinformation Fears
Beatrice Nolan. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Authorship and AI tools
Committee on Publication Ethics. [n.d.] · 2023
Closest in time.
Detecting LLM-Generated Text in Computing Education: A Comparative Study for ChatGPT Cases
Michael Sheinman Orenstrakh, Oscar Karnalim, Carlos Anibal Suarez, and Michael Liut. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Large Language Models (GPT) for automating feedback on programming assignments
Maciej Pankiewicz and Ryan S. Baker. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Exploring the Potential of Artificial Intelligence Program Generators in Computer Programming Education for Students
Carrie Anne Philbin. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Generative AI for Programming Education: Benchmarking ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Human Tutors
Tung Phung, Victor-Alexandru Pădurean, José Cambronero, Sumit Gulwani, Tobias Kohn, Rupak Majumdar, Adish Singla, and Gustavo Soares. 2023b · 2023
Closest in time.
Many bioinformatics programming tasks can be automated with ChatGPT
Stephen R Piccolo, Paul Denny, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Samuel Payne, and Perry G Ridge. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
AI-assisted coding: Experiments with GPT-4
Russell A Poldrack, Thomas Lu, and Gašper Beguš. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Learn AI-Assisted Python Programming With GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT
Leo Porter and Daniel Zingaro. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
“It’s Weird That It Knows What I Want”: Usability and Interactions with Copilot for Novice Programmers
James Prather, Brent N. Reeves, Paul Denny, Brett A. Becker, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Garrett Powell, James Finnie-Ansley, and Eddie Antonio Santos. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Neural Task Synthesis for Visual Programming
Victor-Alexandru Pădurean, Georgios Tzannetos, and Adish Singla. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education. In 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) . 1–9
Junaid Qadir. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Exploring ChatGPT’s impact on post-secondary education: A qualitative study. In Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education (WCCCE’23), May 04–05, 2023 . Simon Fraser University
Parsa Rajabi, Parnian Taghipour, Diana Cukierman, and Tenzin Doleck. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
University students as early adopters of ChatGPT: Innovation Diffusion Study
Raghu Raman, Santanu Mandal, Payel Das, Tavleen Kaur, Sanjanasri JP, and Prema Nedungadi. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Evaluating the Performance of Code Generation Models for Solving Parsons Problems With Small Prompt Variations. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1 (Turku, Finland) (ITiCSE 2023) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 299–305
Brent Reeves, Sami Sarsa, James Prather, Paul Denny, Brett A. Becker, Arto Hellas, Bailey Kimmel, Garrett Powell, and Juho Leinonen. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
A Case Study in Engineering a Conversational Programming Assistant’s Persona. In Joint Proceedings of the ACM IUI Workshops 2023, March 2023, Sydney, Australia
Steven I Ross, Michael Muller, Fernando Martinez, Stephanie Houde, and Justin D Weisz. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Lost at C: A user study on the security implications of large language model code assistants
Gustavo Sandoval, Hammond Pearce, Teo Nys, Ramesh Karri, Siddharth Garg, and Brendan Dolan-Gavitt. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Jaromir Savelka, Arav Agarwal, Marshall An, Chris Bogart, and Majd Sakr. 2023a · 2023
Closest in time.
Large language models (gpt) struggle to answer multiple-choice questions about code
Jaromir Savelka, Arav Agarwal, Christopher Bogart, and Majd Sakr. 2023b · 2023
Closest in time.
Jaromir Savelka, Arav Agarwal, Christopher Bogart, Yifan Song, and Majd Sakr. 2023c · 2023
Closest in time.
Evaluating ChatGPT and GPT-4 for Visual Programming
Adish Singla. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
ChatGPT for Education and Research: A Review of Benefits and Risks
Sarin Sok and Kimkong Heng. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Harnessing llms in curricular design: Using gpt-4 to support authoring of learning objectives
Pragnya Sridhar, Aidan Doyle, Arav Agarwal, Christopher Bogart, Jaromir Savelka, and Majd Sakr. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Exploring the Role of AI Assistants in Computer Science Education: Methods, Implications, and Instructor Perspectives. In 2023 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)
Tianjia Wang, Daniel Vargas Dıaz, Chris Brown, and Yan Chen. 2023a · 2023
Closest in time.
Towards Adapting Computer Science Courses to AI Assistants’ Capabilities
Tianjia Wang, Daniel Vargas-Diaz, Chris Brown, and Yan Chen. 2023b · 2023
Closest in time.
Using GitHub Copilot to Solve Simple Programming Problems. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Toronto ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 172–178
Michel Wermelinger. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Addressing Compiler Errors: Stack Overflow or Large Language Models?
Patricia Widjojo and Christoph Treude. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Lixiang Yan, Lele Sha, Linxuan Zhao, Yuheng Li, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Guanliang Chen, Xinyu Li, Yueqiao Jin, and Dragan Gašević. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Large language models meet NL2Code: A survey. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) . 7443–7464
Daoguang Zan, Bei Chen, Fengji Zhang, Dianjie Lu, Bingchao Wu, Bei Guan, Wang Yongji, and Jian-Guang Lou. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Generative AI in Computing Education: Perspectives of Students and Instructors
Cynthia Zastudil, Magdalena Rogalska, Christine Kapp, Jennifer Vaughn, and Stephen MacNeil. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.