Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Computing educators face significant challenges in providing timely support to students, especially in large class settings.
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Intelligent assistant for helping students to learn programming. In 2015 38th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) . IEEE, Opatija, Croatia, 924–928
Mario Konecki, Nikola Kadoic, and Rok Piltaver. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Intelligent tutoring systems for programming education: a systematic review. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Computing Education Conference . ACM, Brisbane Queensland Australia, 53–62
Tyne Crow, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, and Burkhard Wuensche. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A Systematic Literature Review of Automated Feedback Generation for Programming Exercises
Hieke Keuning, Johan Jeuring, and Bastiaan Heeren. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evaluating large language models trained on code
Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Comparative study between automatic hint generation approaches in Intelligent Programming Tutors
Mariam Mahdaoui, Said Nouh, My Seddiq ELKASMI Alaoui, and Mounir Sadiq. 2022 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Python-Bot: A Chatbot for Teaching Python Programming
Chinedu Wilfred Okonkwo and Abejide Ade-Ibijola. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Duckbot: A chatbot to assist students in programming tutorials
Margot Rutgers. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pyo, a Chatbot Assistant for Introductory Programming Students. In 2022 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) . IEEE, Coimbra, Portugal, 1–6
Gustavo Carreira, Leonardo Silva, Antonio Jose Mendes, and Hugo Goncalo Oliveira. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
CodeT: Code Generation with Generated Tests
Bei Chen, Fengji Zhang, Anh Nguyen, Daoguang Zan, Zeqi Lin, Jian-Guang Lou, and Weizhu Chen. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
The robots are coming: Exploring the implications of openai codex on introductory programming. In Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference . 10–19
James Finnie-Ansley, Paul Denny, Brett A Becker, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, and James Prather. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Who Uses Office Hours? A Comparison of In-Person and Virtual Office Hours Utilization. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - Volume 1 (Providence, RI, USA) (SIGCSE 2022) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 300–306
Zhikai Gao, Sarah Heckman, and Collin Lynch. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
A Survey of Automated Programming Hint Generation: The HINTS Framework
Jessica McBroom, Irena Koprinska, and Kalina Yacef. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
An empirical evaluation of GitHub copilot’s code suggestions. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories . ACM, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, 1–5
Nhan Nguyen and Sarah Nadi. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Revision-Bot: A Chatbot for Studying Past Questions in Introductory Programming
Chinedu Wilfred Okonkwo and Abejide Ade-Ibijola. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Sajed Jalil, Suzzana Rafi, Thomas D. LaToza, Kevin Moran, and Wing Lam. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Enkelejda Kasneci, Kathrin Sessler, Stefan Küchemann, Maria Bannert, Daryna Dementieva, Frank Fischer, Urs Gasser, Georg Groh, Stephan Günnemann, Eyke Hüllermeier, Stepha Krusche, Gitta Kutyniok, Tilman Michaeli, Claudia Nerdel, Jürgen Pfeffer, Oleksandra Poquet, Michael Sailer, Albrecht Schmidt, Tina Seidel, Matthias Stadler, Jochen Weller, Jochen Kuhn, and Gjergji Kasneci. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Studying the Effect of AI Code Generators on Supporting Novice Learners in Introductory Programming. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 455, 23 pages
Majeed Kazemitabaar, Justin Chow, Carl Ka To Ma, Barbara J. Ericson, David Weintrop, and Tovi Grossman. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Comparing Code Explanations Created by Students and Large Language Models
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations Using Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research V.1 . ACM, Lugano and Virtual Event Switzerland, 27–43
Sami Sarsa, Paul Denny, Arto Hellas, and Juho Leinonen. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
A Chatbot for Teaching Secure Programming. In Proceedings of the EDSIG Conference ISSN , Vol. 2473. 4901
James Walden, Nicholas Caporusso, and Ludiana Atnafu. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Taxonomy of Risks Posed by Language Models. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (FAccT ’22) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 214–229
Laura Weidinger, Jonathan Uesato, Maribeth Rauh, Conor Griffin, Po-Sen Huang, John Mellor, Amelia Glaese, Myra Cheng, Borja Balle, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Courtney Biles, Sasha Brown, Zac Kenton, Will Hawkins, Tom Stepleton, Abeba Birhane, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Laura Rimell, William Isaac, Julia Haas, Sean Legassick, Geoffrey Irving, and Iason Gabriel. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Programming Is Hard-Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities and Challenges of AI Code Generation. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 . 500–506
Brett A Becker, Paul Denny, James Finnie-Ansley, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, James Prather, and Eddie Antonio Santos. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
The Future of Computing Education Materials
Peter Brusilovsky, Barbara J Ericson, Cay S Horstmann, and Christian Servin. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Policy Solutions: Policy questions for ChatGPT and artificial intelligence
Jonathan E Collins. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Exploring the Responses of Large Language Models to Beginner Programmers’ Help Requests
Arto Hellas, Juho Leinonen, Sami Sarsa, Charles Koutcheme, Lilja Kujanpää, and Juha Sorva. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Conversing with Copilot: Exploring Prompt Engineering for Solving CS1 Problems Using Natural Language. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 . ACM, Toronto ON Canada, 1136–1142
Paul Denny, Viraj Kumar, and Nasser Giacaman. 2023a
Cited in the paper.
Juho Leinonen, Paul Denny, Stephen MacNeil, Sami Sarsa, Seth Bernstein, Joanne Kim, Andrew Tran, and Arto Hellas. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Learning gain differences between ChatGPT and human tutor generated algebra hints
Zachary A. Pardos and Shreya Bhandari. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Transformed by Transformers: Navigating the AI Coding Revolution for Computing Education: An ITiCSE Working Group Conducted by Humans. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2 . 561–562
James Prather, Paul Denny, Juho Leinonen, Brett A Becker, Ibrahim Albluwi, Michael E Caspersen, Michelle Craig, Hieke Keuning, Natalie Kiesler, Tobias Kohn, et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Thrilled by Your Progress! Large Language Models (GPT-4) No Longer Struggle to Pass Assessments in Higher Education Programming Course. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research V.1 . ACM
Jaromir Savelka, Arav Agarwal, Marshall An, Chris Bogart, and Majd Sakr. 2023a · 2023
Closest in time.
Is ChatGPT the Ultimate Programming Assistant – How far is it?
Haoye Tian, Weiqi Lu, Tsz On Li, Xunzhu Tang, Shing-Chi Cheung, Jacques Klein, and Tegawendé F. Bissyandé. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Red teaming ChatGPT via Jailbreaking: Bias, Robustness, Reliability and Toxicity
Terry Yue Zhuo, Yujin Huang, Chunyang Chen, and Zhenchang Xing. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.