Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The use of AI assistants, along with the challenges they present, has sparked significant debate within the community of computer science education.
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Woolf, “Intelligent tutoring systems: A survey,” Exploring artificial intelligence , pp. 1–43, 1988
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. R. Anderson and K. Gluck, “What role do cognitive architectures play in intelligent tutoring systems,” Cognition & Instruction: Twenty-five years of progress , pp. 227–262, 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. A. Chapman and T. Ferfolja, “Fatal flaws,” Journal of Intellectual Capital , vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 398–409, Jan. 2001, publisher: MCB UP Ltd. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006087
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. K. Coll and D. F. Treagust, “Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners’ mental models of ionic bonding,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching , vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 464–486, 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. D. Lee and K. A. See, “Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance,” Human factors , vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 50–80, 2004
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Conati, “Intelligent tutoring systems: New challenges and directions,” in Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Ma, J. Ferguson, M. Roper, and M. Wood, “Investigating and improving the models of programming concepts held by novice programmers,” Computer Science Education , vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 57–80, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2011.554722
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Juárez-Ramírez, R. Navarro-Almanza, Y. Gomez-Tagle, G. Licea, C. Huertas, and G. Quinto, “Orchestrating an adaptive intelligent tutoring system: towards integrating the user profile for learning improvement,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences , vol. 106, pp. 1986–1999, 2013
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Worrell, C. Brand, and A. Repenning, “Collaboration and computational thinking: A classroom structure,” in 2015 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) , 2015, pp. 183–187
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Repenning, D. C. Webb, K. H. Koh, H. Nickerson, S. B. Miller, C. Brand, I. H. M. Horses, A. Basawapatna, F. Gluck, R. Grover et al. , “Scalable game design: A strategy to bring systemic computer science education to schools through game design and simulation creation,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) , vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–31, 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. J. Guo, J. White, and R. Zanelatto, “Codechella: Multi-user program visualizations for real-time tutoring and collaborative learning,” in 2015 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) . IEEE, 2015, pp. 79–87
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. J. Guo, “Codeopticon: Real-time, one-to-many human tutoring for computer programming,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology , 2015, pp. 599–608
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Wineburg and S. McGrew, “Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning,” 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Lazar, J. H. Feng, and H. Hochheiser, Research methods in human-computer interaction . Morgan Kaufmann, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. López-Nores, Y. Blanco-Fernández, J. F. Bravo-Torres, J. J. Pazos-Arias, A. Gil-Solla, and M. Ramos-Cabrer, “Experiences from placing stack overflow at the core of an intermediate programming course,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education , vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 698–707, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. G. Feijóo-García, S. Wang, J. Cai, N. Polavarapu, C. Gardner-McCune, and E. D. Ragan, “Design and evaluation of a scaffolded block-based learning environment for hierarchical data structures,” in 2019 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) , 2019, pp. 145–149
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Selwyn-Smith, C. Anslow, M. Homer, and J. R. Wallace, “Co-located collaborative block-based programming,” in 2019 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) , 2019, pp. 107–116
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Leeder, “How college students evaluate and share “fake news” stories,” Library & Information Science Research , vol. 41, no. 3, p. 100967, 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell et al. , “Language models are few-shot learners,” vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Paper.pdf
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
OpenAI, “Chatgpt,” https://openai.com , 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
GitHub, “Github copilot,” https://copilot.github.com , 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
ZeroGPT, “Zerogpt,” https://www.zerogpt.com/ , 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Closest in time.
E. MOLLICK, “My class required ai. here’s what i’ve learned so far.” https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/my-class-required-ai-heres-what-ive , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
P. Denny, V. Kumar, and N. Giacaman, “Conversing with copilot: Exploring prompt engineering for solving cs1 problems using natural language,” in Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 , 2023, pp. 1136–1142
2023
Closest in time.
E. Castillo, “These schools have banned chatgpt and similar ai tools: Bestcolleges,” https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/schools-colleges-banned-chat-gpt-similar-ai-tools/, Mar 2023
2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Pöial, “Challenges of teaching programming in stackoverflow era,” in Educating Engineers for Future Industrial Revolutions: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL2020), Volume 1 23 . Springer, 2021, pp. 703–710
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Card, W. Wang, C. Martens, and T. Price, “Scaffolding game design: Towards tool support for planning open-ended projects in an introductory game design class,” in 2021 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) , 2021, pp. 1–5
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Zhu and J. Van Brummelen, “Teaching students about conversational ai using convo, a conversational programming agent,” in 2021 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) , 2021, pp. 1–5
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Y. Wang, Y. Chen, J. J. Y. Chung, C. Brooks, and S. Oney, “Puzzleme: Leveraging peer assessment for in-class programming exercises,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , vol. 5, no. CSCW2, pp. 1–24, 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Hackerrank, “Hackerrank,” https://www.hackerrank.com/ , 2021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Khurana, P. Alamzadeh, and P. K. Chilana, “Chatrex: designing explainable chatbot interfaces for enhancing usefulness, transparency, and trust,” in 2021 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–11
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Closest in time.
H. Face, “Hugging face chatgpt-detection,” https://huggingface.co/spaces/imseldrith/ChatGPT-Detection/ , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
M. Wermelinger, “Using github copilot to solve simple programming problems,” in Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 , ser. SIGCSE 2023. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, p. 172–178
2023
Closest in time.
E. MOLLICK, “One useful thing,” https://substack.com/@oneusefulthing , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
A. Al Darayseh, “Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers’ perspective,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence , vol. 4, p. 100132, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
X. Wang, L. Li, S. C. Tan, L. Yang, and J. Lei, “Preparing for ai-enhanced education: Conceptualizing and empirically examining teachers’ ai readiness,” Computers in Human Behavior , p. 107798, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
S. Lau and P. J. Guo, “From” ban it till we understand it” to” resistance is futile”: How university programming instructors plan to adapt as more students use ai code generation and explanation tools such as chatgpt and github copilot,” 2023
2023
Closest in time.
F. Shi, X. Chen, K. Misra, N. Scales, D. Dohan, E. Chi, N. Schärli, and D. Zhou, “Large language models can be easily distracted by irrelevant context,” 2023
2023
Closest in time.
S. Mirhosseini, A. Z. Henley, and C. Parnin, “What is your biggest pain point? an investigation of cs instructor obstacles, workarounds, and desires,” 2023
2023
Closest in time.
A. G. Zhang, Y. Chen, and S. Oney, “Vizprog: Identifying misunderstandings by visualizing students’ coding progress,” in Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2023, pp. 1–16
2023
Closest in time.
B. A. Becker, P. Denny, J. Finnie-Ansley, A. Luxton-Reilly, J. Prather, and E. A. Santos, “Programming is hard-or at least it used to be: Educational opportunities and challenges of ai code generation,” in Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 , 2023, pp. 500–506
2023
Closest in time.
S. MacNeil, A. Tran, A. Hellas, J. Kim, S. Sarsa, P. Denny, S. Bernstein, and J. Leinonen, “Experiences from using code explanations generated by large language models in a web software development e-book,” in Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 , 2023, pp. 931–937
2023
Closest in time.