Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Automatic program synthesis is a long-lasting dream in software engineering.
A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales
J. Cohen · 1960
Earlier work this paper cites.
A deductive approach to program synthesis
Z. Manna and R. Waldinger · 1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
Algorithms & data structures
N. Wirth · 1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation
K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W.-J. Zhu · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
How long did it take to fix bugs?
S. Kim and E. J. Whitehead Jr · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pair programming productivity: Novice–novice vs. expert–expert
K. M. Lui and K. C. Chan · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Nlp (natural language processing) for nlp (natural language programming)
R. Mihalcea, H. Liu, and H. Lieberman · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the automation of fixing software bugs
A. Arcuri · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
An interpretation of the results of the analysis of pair programming during novices integration in a team
I. Fronza, A. Sillitti, and G. Succi · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Role of collective ownership and coding standards in coordinating expertise in software project teams
L. M. Maruping, X. Zhang, and V. Venkatesh · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dimensions in program synthesis
S. Gulwani · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Generating formal system models from natural language descriptions
R. Drechsler, I. G. Harris, and R. Wille · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Experimentation in software engineering
C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst, M. C. Ohlsson, B. Regnell, and A. Wesslén · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
An empirical study on factors impacting bug fixing time
F. Zhang, F. Khomh, Y. Zou, and A. E. Hassan · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Syntax-guided synthesis
R. Alur, R. Bodik, G. Juniwal, M. M. Martin, M. Raghothaman, S. A. Seshia, R. Singh, A. Solar-Lezama, E. Torlak, and A. Udupa · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cyclomatic complexity: The nesting problem
M. M. S. Sarwar, S. Shahzad, and I. Ahmad · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Knowledge transfer in pair programming: An in-depth analysis
L. Plonka, H. Sharp, J. Van der Linden, and Y. Dittrich · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cyclomatic complexity
C. Ebert, J. Cain, G. Antoniol, S. Counsell, and P. Laplante · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Glast: Learning formal grammars to translate natural language specifications into hardware assertions
C. B. Harris and I. G. Harris · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Impacts of coding practices on readability
R. M. dos Santos and M. A. Gerosa · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Automated clustering and program repair for introductory programming assignments
S. Gulwani, I. Radiček, and F. Zuleger · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Improving source code readability: Theory and practice
S. Fakhoury, D. Roy, A. Hassan, and V. Arnaoudova · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Re-factoring based program repair applied to programming assignments
Y. Hu, U. Z. Ahmed, S. Mechtaev, B. Leong, and A. Roychoudhury · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Machine translation from natural language to code using long-short term memory
K. Rahit, R. H. Nabil, and M. H. Huq · 2019
Solving linear algebra by program synthesis
I. Drori and N. Verma · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
The space of developer productivity: There’s more to it than you think
N. Forsgren, M.-A. Storey, C. Maddila, T. Zimmermann, B. Houck, and J. Butler · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Assessing developer expertise from the statistical distribution of programming syntax patterns
A. Moradi Dakhel, M. C. Desmarais, and F. Khomh · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Solving probability and statistics problems by program synthesis
L. Tang, E. Ke, N. Singh, N. Verma, and I. Drori · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Is github’s copilot as bad as humans at introducing vulnerabilities in code?
O. Asare, M. Nagappan, and N. Asokan · 2022
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatically assessing code understandability
S. Scalabrino, G. Bavota, C. Vendome, M. Linares-Vasquez, D. Poshyvanyk, and R. Oliveto · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Does bleu score work for code migration?
N. Tran, H. Tran, S. Nguyen, H. Nguyen, and T. Nguyen · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Characterizing the pedagogical benefits of adaptive feedback for compilation errors by novice programmers
U. Z. Ahmed, N. Srivastava, R. Sindhgatta, and A. Karkare · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Fundamental limits to computing
R. K. Bera and R. K. Bera · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Language models are few-shot learners
T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, et al · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Pymt5: multi-mode translation of natural language and python code with transformers
C. B. Clement, D. Drain, J. Timcheck, A. Svyatkovskiy, and N. Sundaresan · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Closest in time.
Quantifying memorization across neural language models
N. Carlini, D. Ippolito, M. Jagielski, K. Lee, F. Tramer, and C. Zhang · 2022
Closest in time.
Replication package
M. et al · 2022
Closest in time.
The robots are coming: Exploring the implications of openai codex on introductory programming
J. Finnie-Ansley, P. Denny, B. A. Becker, A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Prather · 2022
Closest in time.
Geeksforgeeks
Geeksforgeeks Team · 2022
Closest in time.
Is github copilot a substitute for human pair-programming? an empirical study
S. Imai · 2022
Closest in time.
Competition-level code generation with alphacode
Y. Li, D. Choi, J. Chung, N. Kushman, J. Schrittwieser, R. Leblond, T. Eccles, J. Keeling, F. Gimeno, A. D. Lago, et al · 2022
Closest in time.
The potential of artificial intelligence as a method of software developer’s productivity improvement
E. A. Moroz, V. O. Grizkevich, and I. M. Novozhilov · 2022
Closest in time.
An empirical evaluation of GitHub Copilot’s code suggestions
N. Nguyen and S. Nadi · 2022
Closest in time.
Asleep at the keyboard? assessing the security of github copilot’s code contributions
H. Pearce, B. Ahmad, B. Tan, B. Dolan-Gavitt, and R. Karri · 2022
Closest in time.
Expectation vs. experience: Evaluating the usability of code generation tools powered by large language models
P. Vaithilingam, T. Zhang, and E. L. Glassman · 2022
Closest in time.
W3schools
W3schools Team · 2022
Closest in time.
Productivity assessment of neural code completion
A. Ziegler, E. Kalliamvakou, S. Simister, G. Sittampalam, A. Li, A. Rice, D. Rifkin, and E. Aftandilian · 2022
Closest in time.