Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Large language models (LLMs) are a special class of pretrained language models obtained by scaling model size, pretraining corpus and computation.
S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long short-term memory,” Neural computation , vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W.-J. Zhu, “Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation,” in Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 2002, pp. 311–318
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
C.-Y. Lin, “Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries,” in Text summarization branches out , 2004, pp. 74–81
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin, “Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions,” IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering , vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 734–749, 2005
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Banerjee and A. Lavie, “Meteor: An automatic metric for mt evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments,” in Proceedings of the acl workshop on intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation measures for machine translation and/or summarization , 2005, pp. 65–72
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Blitzer, M. Dredze, and F. Pereira, “Biographies, bollywood, boom-boxes and blenders: Domain adaptation for sentiment classification,” in Proceedings of the 45th annual meeting of the association of computational linguistics , 2007, pp. 440–447
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. J. Pan and Q. Yang, “A survey on transfer learning,” IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering , vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1345–1359, 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei, “Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . Ieee, 2009, pp. 248–255
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Chali, S. A. Hasan, and S. R. Joty, “Improving graph-based random walks for complex question answering using syntactic, shallow semantic and extended string subsequence kernels,” Information Processing & Management , vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 843–855, 2011
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 25, 2012
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Pennington, R. Socher, and C. D. Manning, “Glove: Global vectors for word representation,” in Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) , 2014, pp. 1532–1543
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Kalchbrenner, E. Grefenstette, and P. Blunsom, “A convolutional neural network for modelling sentences,” in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2014, pp. 655–665
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Chung, C. Gulcehre, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio, “Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling,” in NIPS 2014 Workshop on Deep Learning, December 2014 , 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Sutskever, O. Vinyals, and Q. V. Le, “Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 27, 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Kim, “Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification,” in Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) . Association for Computational Linguistics, 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Cho, B. van Merrienboer, C. Gulcehre, D. Bahdanau, F. Bougares, H. Schwenk, and Y. Bengio, “Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder–decoder for statistical machine translation,” in Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) . Association for Computational Linguistics, 2014, p. 1724
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Goertzel, “Artificial general intelligence: concept, state of the art, and future prospects,” Journal of Artificial General Intelligence , vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Just, D. Jalali, and M. D. Ernst, “Defects4j: A database of existing faults to enable controlled testing studies for java programs,” in Proceedings of the 2014 international symposium on software testing and analysis , 2014, pp. 437–440
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Bahdanau, K. H. Cho, and Y. Bengio, “Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate,” in 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015 , 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
M.-T. Luong, H. Pham, and C. D. Manning, “Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation,” in Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , 2015, pp. 1412–1421
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,” in 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2015) . Computational and Biological Learning Society, 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V. Vanhoucke, and A. Rabinovich, “Going deeper with convolutions,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2015, pp. 1–9
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. M. Dai and Q. V. Le, “Semi-supervised sequence learning,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 28, 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Y. Wang and D. Yang, “That’s so annoying!!!: A lexical and frame-semantic embedding based data augmentation approach to automatic categorization of annoying behaviors using# petpeeve tweets,” in Proceedings of the 2015 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing , 2015, pp. 2557–2563
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Zhang, J. Zhao, and Y. LeCun, “Character-level convolutional networks for text classification,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 28, 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Sennrich, B. Haddow, and A. Birch, “Improving neural machine translation models with monolingual data,” in Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2016, pp. 86–96
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Bojanowski, E. Grave, A. Joulin, and T. Mikolov, “Enriching word vectors with subword information,” Transactions of the association for computational linguistics , vol. 5, pp. 135–146, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 30, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Lin, J. Koppel, A. Chen, and A. Solar-Lezama, “Quixbugs: A multi-lingual program repair benchmark set based on the quixey challenge,” in Proceedings Companion of the 2017 ACM SIGPLAN international conference on systems, programming, languages, and applications: software for humanity , 2017, pp. 55–56
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 30, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Young, D. Hazarika, S. Poria, and E. Cambria, “Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing,” ieee Computational intelligenCe magazine , vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 55–75, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Pagliardini, P. Gupta, and M. Jaggi, “Unsupervised learning of sentence embeddings using compositional n-gram features,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) , 2018, pp. 528–540
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. E. Peters, M. Neumann, M. Iyyer, M. Gardner, C. Clark, K. Lee, and L. Zettlemoyer, “Deep contextualized word representations,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) . New Orleans, Louisiana: Association for Computational Linguistics, Jun. 2018, pp. 2227–2237. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/N18-1202
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Howard and S. Ruder, “Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification,” in Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2018, pp. 328–339
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. V. Serban, R. Lowe, P. Henderson, L. Charlin, and J. Pineau, “A survey of available corpora for building data-driven dialogue systems: The journal version,” Dialogue & Discourse , vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–49, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Belinkov and Y. Bisk, “Synthetic and natural noise both break neural machine translation,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Wang, A. Singh, J. Michael, F. Hill, O. Levy, and S. R. Bowman, “Glue: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Narayan, S. B. Cohen, and M. Lapata, “Don’t give me the details, just the summary! topic-aware convolutional neural networks for extreme summarization,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , 2018, pp. 1797–1807
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Yang, Z. Dai, Y. Yang, J. Carbonell, R. R. Salakhutdinov, and Q. V. Le, “Xlnet: Generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 32, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Clark, M.-T. Luong, Q. V. Le, and C. D. Manning, “Electra: Pre-training text encoders as discriminators rather than generators,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Lan, M. Chen, S. Goodman, K. Gimpel, P. Sharma, and R. Soricut, “Albert: A lite bert for self-supervised learning of language representations,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, I. Sutskever et al. , “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” OpenAI blog , vol. 1, no. 8, p. 9, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Conneau and G. Lample, “Cross-lingual language model pretraining,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 32, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Wu and Y. He, “Enriching pre-trained language model with entity information for relation classification,” in Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management , 2019, pp. 2361–2364
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Hutter, L. Kotthoff, and J. Vanschoren, Automated machine learning: methods, systems, challenges . Springer Nature, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. S. Murthy, G. Siddesh, and K. Srinivasa, “Twitsenti: a real-time twitter sentiment analysis and visualization framework,” Journal of Information & Knowledge Management , vol. 18, no. 02, p. 1950013, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Shorten and T. M. Khoshgoftaar, “A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning,” Journal of big data , vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–48, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Wei and K. Zou, “Eda: Easy data augmentation techniques for boosting performance on text classification tasks,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) , 2019, pp. 6382–6388
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Sugiyama and N. Yoshinaga, “Data augmentation using back-translation for context-aware neural machine translation,” in Proceedings of the fourth workshop on discourse in machine translation (DiscoMT 2019) , 2019, pp. 35–44
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Zhang, V. Kishore, F. Wu, K. Q. Weinberger, and Y. Artzi, “Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Zhao, M. Peyrard, F. Liu, Y. Gao, C. M. Meyer, and S. Eger, “Moverscore: Text generation evaluating with contextualized embeddings and earth mover distance,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) , 2019, pp. 563–578
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell et al. , “Language models are few-shot learners,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. He, X. Liu, J. Gao, and W. Chen, “Deberta: Decoding-enhanced bert with disentangled attention,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Raffel, N. Shazeer, A. Roberts, K. Lee, S. Narang, M. Matena, Y. Zhou, W. Li, and P. J. Liu, “Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer,” The Journal of Machine Learning Research , vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 5485–5551, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Lewis, Y. Liu, N. Goyal, M. Ghazvininejad, A. Mohamed, O. Levy, V. Stoyanov, and L. Zettlemoyer, “Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension,” in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 2020, pp. 7871–7880
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Zhuang, Z. Qi, K. Duan, D. Xi, Y. Zhu, H. Zhu, H. Xiong, and Q. He, “A comprehensive survey on transfer learning,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 43–76, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. W. Otter, J. R. Medina, and J. K. Kalita, “A survey of the usages of deep learning for natural language processing,” IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems , vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 604–624, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. E. Van Engelen and H. H. Hoos, “A survey on semi-supervised learning,” Machine learning , vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 373–440, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Qiu, T. Sun, Y. Xu, Y. Shao, N. Dai, and X. Huang, “Pre-trained models for natural language processing: A survey,” Science China Technological Sciences , vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 1872–1897, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Zhang, Y. Zhao, M. Saleh, and P. Liu, “Pegasus: Pre-training with extracted gap-sentences for abstractive summarization,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2020, pp. 11 328–11 339
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Liu, J. Gu, N. Goyal, X. Li, S. Edunov, M. Ghazvininejad, M. Lewis, and L. Zettlemoyer, “Multilingual denoising pre-training for neural machine translation,” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , vol. 8, pp. 726–742, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Kakwani, A. Kunchukuttan, S. Golla, N. Gokul, A. Bhattacharyya, M. M. Khapra, and P. Kumar, “Indicnlpsuite: Monolingual corpora, evaluation benchmarks and pre-trained multilingual language models for indian languages,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 , 2020, pp. 4948–4961
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Conneau, K. Khandelwal, N. Goyal, V. Chaudhary, G. Wenzek, F. Guzmán, É. Grave, M. Ott, L. Zettlemoyer, and V. Stoyanov, “Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale,” in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 2020, pp. 8440–8451
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Q. Nguyen, T. Vu, and A. T. Nguyen, “Bertweet: A pre-trained language model for english tweets,” in Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations , 2020, pp. 9–14
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Barbieri, J. Camacho-Collados, L. E. Anke, and L. Neves, “Tweeteval: Unified benchmark and comparative evaluation for tweet classification,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 , 2020, pp. 1644–1650
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Chalkidis, M. Fergadiotis, P. Malakasiotis, N. Aletras, and I. Androutsopoulos, “Legal-bert: The muppets straight out of law school,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 , 2020, pp. 2898–2904
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Feng, D. Guo, D. Tang, N. Duan, X. Feng, M. Gong, L. Shou, B. Qin, T. Liu, D. Jiang et al. , “Codebert: A pre-trained model for programming and natural languages,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 , 2020, pp. 1536–1547
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Lee, W. Yoon, S. Kim, D. Kim, S. Kim, C. H. So, and J. Kang, “Biobert: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining,” Bioinformatics , vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1234–1240, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Jiao, Y. Yin, L. Shang, X. Jiang, X. Chen, L. Li, F. Wang, and Q. Liu, “Tinybert: Distilling bert for natural language understanding,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 , 2020, pp. 4163–4174
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Sun, H. Yu, X. Song, R. Liu, Y. Yang, and D. Zhou, “Mobilebert: a compact task-agnostic bert for resource-limited devices,” in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 2020, pp. 2158–2170
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Zaheer, G. Guruganesh, K. A. Dubey, J. Ainslie, C. Alberti, S. Ontanon, P. Pham, A. Ravula, Q. Wang, L. Yang et al. , “Big bird: Transformers for longer sequences.” in NeurIPS , 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Du and C. Cardie, “Event extraction by answering (almost) natural questions,” in Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , 2020, pp. 671–683
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Stahlberg, “Neural machine translation: A review,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , vol. 69, pp. 343–418, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Tan, S. Wang, Z. Yang, G. Chen, X. Huang, M. Sun, and Y. Liu, “Neural machine translation: A review of methods, resources, and tools,” AI Open , vol. 1, pp. 5–21, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Yuan, T. Wang, R. Meng, K. Thaker, P. Brusilovsky, D. He, and A. Trischler, “One size does not fit all: Generating and evaluating variable number of keyphrases,” in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 2020, pp. 7961–7975
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Nogueira, Z. Jiang, R. Pradeep, and J. Lin, “Document ranking with a pretrained sequence-to-sequence model,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 , 2020, pp. 708–718
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Dong, X. Zeng, L. Koehl, and J. Zhang, “An interactive knowledge-based recommender system for fashion product design in the big data environment,” Information Sciences , vol. 540, pp. 469–488, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Guo, S. Ren, S. Lu, Z. Feng, D. Tang, L. Shujie, L. Zhou, N. Duan, A. Svyatkovskiy, S. Fu et al. , “Graphcodebert: Pre-training code representations with data flow,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. S. Kalyan and S. Sangeetha, “Medical concept normalization in user-generated texts by learning target concept embeddings,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Health Text Mining and Information Analysis , 2020, pp. 18–23
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
——, “Target concept guided medical concept normalization in noisy user-generated texts,” in Proceedings of Deep Learning Inside Out (DeeLIO): The First Workshop on Knowledge Extraction and Integration for Deep Learning Architectures , 2020, pp. 64–73
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Chmielewski and S. C. Kucker, “An mturk crisis? shifts in data quality and the impact on study results,” Social Psychological and Personality Science , vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 464–473, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Liu, X. Wang, C. Xiang, and W. Meng, “A survey of text data augmentation,” in 2020 International Conference on Computer Communication and Network Security (CCNS) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 191–195
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Ippolito, D. Duckworth, C. Callison-Burch, and D. Eck, “Automatic detection of generated text is easiest when humans are fooled,” in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 2020, pp. 1808–1822
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Liu, F. Zhang, Z. Hou, L. Mian, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, and J. Tang, “Self-supervised learning: Generative or contrastive,” IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering , vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 857–876, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Han, Z. Zhang, N. Ding, Y. Gu, X. Liu, Y. Huo, J. Qiu, Y. Yao, A. Zhang, L. Zhang et al. , “Pre-trained models: Past, present and future,” AI Open , vol. 2, pp. 225–250, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Zhang and Q. Yang, “A survey on multi-task learning,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 5586–5609, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Xue, N. Constant, A. Roberts, M. Kale, R. Al-Rfou, A. Siddhant, A. Barua, and C. Raffel, “mt5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformer,” in Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies , 2021, pp. 483–498
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Liu, D. Huang, K. Huang, Z. Li, and J. Zhao, “Finbert: A pre-trained financial language representation model for financial text mining,” in Proceedings of the twenty-ninth international conference on international joint conferences on artificial intelligence , 2021, pp. 4513–4519
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Wang, W. Wang, S. Joty, and S. C. Hoi, “Codet5: Identifier-aware unified pre-trained encoder-decoder models for code understanding and generation,” in Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , 2021, pp. 8696–8708
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. raj Kanakarajan, B. Kundumani, and M. Sankarasubbu, “Bioelectra: pretrained biomedical text encoder using discriminators,” in Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Biomedical Language Processing , 2021, pp. 143–154
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Liu, E. Shareghi, Z. Meng, M. Basaldella, and N. Collier, “Self-alignment pretraining for biomedical entity representations,” in Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies , 2021, pp. 4228–4238
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. Lieber, O. Sharir, B. Lenz, and Y. Shoham, “Jurassic-1: Technical details and evaluation,” White Paper. AI21 Labs , vol. 1, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Zhao, E. Wallace, S. Feng, D. Klein, and S. Singh, “Calibrate before use: Improving few-shot performance of language models,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2021, pp. 12 697–12 706
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Chintagunta, N. Katariya, X. Amatriain, and A. Kannan, “Medically aware gpt-3 as a data generator for medical dialogue summarization,” in Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference . PMLR, 2021, pp. 354–372
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Meng, X. Yuan, T. Wang, S. Zhao, A. Trischler, and D. He, “An empirical study on neural keyphrase generation,” in Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies , 2021, pp. 4985–5007
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Thakur, N. Reimers, A. Rücklé, A. Srivastava, and I. Gurevych, “Beir: A heterogeneous benchmark for zero-shot evaluation of information retrieval models,” in Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2) , 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Rezaimehr and C. Dadkhah, “A survey of attack detection approaches in collaborative filtering recommender systems,” Artificial Intelligence Review , vol. 54, pp. 2011–2066, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Lu, D. Guo, S. Ren, J. Huang, A. Svyatkovskiy, A. Blanco, C. Clement, D. Drain, D. Jiang, D. Tang et al. , “Codexglue: A machine learning benchmark dataset for code understanding and generation,” in Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 1) , 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Phan, H. Tran, D. Le, H. Nguyen, J. Annibal, A. Peltekian, and Y. Ye, “Cotext: Multi-task learning with code-text transformer,” in Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Programming (NLP4Prog 2021) , 2021, pp. 40–47
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Ahmad, S. Chakraborty, B. Ray, and K.-W. Chang, “Unified pre-training for program understanding and generation,” in Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies , 2021, pp. 2655–2668
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Cai, S. Liu, J. Han, L. Yang, Z. Liu, and T. Liu, “Chestxraybert: A pretrained language model for chest radiology report summarization,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia , 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Chen, W. Chen, C. Smiley, S. Shah, I. Borova, D. Langdon, R. Moussa, M. Beane, T.-H. Huang, B. R. Routledge et al. , “Finqa: A dataset of numerical reasoning over financial data,” in Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , 2021, pp. 3697–3711
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Wang, Y. Liu, Y. Xu, C. Zhu, and M. Zeng, “Want to reduce labeling cost? gpt-3 can help,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 , 2021, pp. 4195–4205
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Van Atteveldt, M. A. Van der Velden, and M. Boukes, “The validity of sentiment analysis: Comparing manual annotation, crowd-coding, dictionary approaches, and machine learning algorithms,” Communication Methods and Measures , vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 121–140, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Y. Feng, V. Gangal, J. Wei, S. Chandar, S. Vosoughi, T. Mitamura, and E. Hovy, “A survey of data augmentation approaches for nlp,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021 , 2021, pp. 968–988
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Clark, T. August, S. Serrano, N. Haduong, S. Gururangan, and N. A. Smith, “All that’s ‘human’is not gold: Evaluating human evaluation of generated text,” in Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2021, pp. 7282–7296
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Wang, Q. Liu, T. Gui, Q. Zhang, Y. Zou, X. Zhou, J. Ye, Y. Zhang, R. Zheng, Z. Pang et al. , “Textflint: Unified multilingual robustness evaluation toolkit for natural language processing,” in Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations , 2021, pp. 347–355
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Kocmi, C. Federmann, R. Grundkiewicz, M. Junczys-Dowmunt, H. Matsushita, and A. Menezes, “To ship or not to ship: An extensive evaluation of automatic metrics for machine translation,” in Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Machine Translation , 2021, pp. 478–494
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Yuan, G. Neubig, and P. Liu, “Bartscore: Evaluating generated text as text generation,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 27 263–27 277, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Ouyang, J. Wu, X. Jiang, D. Almeida, C. Wainwright, P. Mishkin, C. Zhang, S. Agarwal, K. Slama, A. Ray et al. , “Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, pp. 27 730–27 744, 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. S. Kalyan, A. Rajasekharan, and S. Sangeetha, “Ammu: a survey of transformer-based biomedical pretrained language models,” Journal of biomedical informatics , vol. 126, p. 103982, 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. He, J. Gao, and W. Chen, “Debertav3: Improving deberta using electra-style pre-training with gradient-disentangled embedding sharing,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Du, Y. Huang, A. M. Dai, S. Tong, D. Lepikhin, Y. Xu, M. Krikun, Y. Zhou, A. W. Yu, O. Firat et al. , “Glam: Efficient scaling of language models with mixture-of-experts,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2022, pp. 5547–5569
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Lin, Y. Wang, X. Liu, and X. Qiu, “A survey of transformers,” AI Open , 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Wei, Y. Tay, R. Bommasani, C. Raffel, B. Zoph, S. Borgeaud, D. Yogatama, M. Bosma, D. Zhou, D. Metzler et al. , “Emergent abilities of large language models,” Transactions on Machine Learning Research , 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Li, D. Choi, J. Chung, N. Kushman, J. Schrittwieser, R. Leblond, T. Eccles, J. Keeling, F. Gimeno, A. Dal Lago et al. , “Competition-level code generation with alphacode,” Science , vol. 378, no. 6624, pp. 1092–1097, 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Zeng, X. Liu, Z. Du, Z. Wang, H. Lai, M. Ding, Z. Yang, Y. Xu, W. Zheng, X. Xia et al. , “Glm-130b: An open bilingual pre-trained model,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Nijkamp, B. Pang, H. Hayashi, L. Tu, H. Wang, Y. Zhou, S. Savarese, and C. Xiong, “Codegen: An open large language model for code with multi-turn program synthesis,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Q. Li, H. Peng, J. Li, C. Xia, R. Yang, L. Sun, P. S. Yu, and L. He, “A survey on text classification: From traditional to deep learning,” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–41, 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. J. Gutiérrez, N. McNeal, C. Washington, Y. Chen, L. Li, H. Sun, and Y. Su, “Thinking about gpt-3 in-context learning for biomedical ie? think again,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022 , 2022, pp. 4497–4512
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Stammbach, M. Antoniak, and E. Ash, “Heroes, villains, and victims, and gpt-3: Automated extraction of character roles without training data,” in Proceedings of the 4th Workshop of Narrative Understanding (WNU2022) , 2022, pp. 47–56
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Lu, Q. Liu, D. Dai, X. Xiao, H. Lin, X. Han, L. Sun, and H. Wu, “Unified structure generation for universal information extraction,” in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2022, pp. 5755–5772
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. S. S. Das, A. Katiyar, R. J. Passonneau, and R. Zhang, “Container: Few-shot named entity recognition via contrastive learning,” in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2022, pp. 6338–6353
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Ye, Y. Lin, P. Li, and M. Sun, “Packed levitated marker for entity and relation extraction,” in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2022, pp. 4904–4917
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Zhao, X. Jin, L. Bai, J. Guo, and X. Cheng, “Knowledge-enhanced self-supervised prototypical network for few-shot event detection,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022 , 2022, pp. 6266–6275
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Ma, Z. Wang, Y. Cao, M. Li, M. Chen, K. Wang, and J. Shao, “Prompt for extraction? paie: Prompting argument interaction for event argument extraction,” in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2022, pp. 6759–6774
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Wang, S. Mishra, P. Alipoormolabashi, Y. Kordi, A. Mirzaei, A. Naik, A. Ashok, A. S. Dhanasekaran, A. Arunkumar, D. Stap et al. , “Super-naturalinstructions: Generalization via declarative instructions on 1600+ nlp tasks,” in Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , 2022, pp. 5085–5109
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Zaib, W. E. Zhang, Q. Z. Sheng, A. Mahmood, and Y. Zhang, “Conversational question answering: A survey,” Knowledge and Information Systems , vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 3151–3195, 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Yang, Z. Gan, J. Wang, X. Hu, Y. Lu, Z. Liu, and L. Wang, “An empirical study of gpt-3 for few-shot knowledge-based vqa,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 36, no. 3, 2022, pp. 3081–3089
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Bommarito II and D. M. Katz, “Gpt takes the bar exam,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.14402 , 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Robinson and D. Wingate, “Leveraging large language models for multiple choice question answering,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Lin, J. Hilton, and O. Evans, “Truthfulqa: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods,” in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2022, pp. 3214–3252
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Shao, Z. Yu, M. Wang, and J. Yu, “Prompting large language models with answer heuristics for knowledge-based visual question answering,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2023, pp. 14 974–14 983
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
G. P. Prodan and E. Pelican, “Prompt scoring system for dialogue summarization using gpt-3,” ACM Transaction on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , pp. 1–9, 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Kulkarni, D. Mahata, R. Arora, and R. Bhowmik, “Learning rich representation of keyphrases from text,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022 . Seattle, United States: Association for Computational Linguistics, Jul. 2022, pp. 891–906. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2022.findings-naacl.67
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Y. Khan and G. Uddin, “Automatic code documentation generation using gpt-3,” in Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering , 2022, pp. 1–6
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
J. Giorgi, A. Toma, R. Xie, S. Chen, K. An, G. Zheng, and B. Wang, “Wanglab at mediqa-chat 2023: Clinical note generation from doctor-patient conversations using large language models,” in Proceedings of the 5th Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop , 2023, pp. 323–334
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
Y. Tanaka, T. Nakata, K. Aiga, T. Etani, R. Muramatsu, S. Katagiri, H. Kawai, F. Higashino, M. Enomoto, M. Noda, M. Kometani, M. Takamura, T. Yoneda, H. Kakizaki, and A. Nomura, “Performance of generative pretrained transformer on the national medical licensing examination in japan,” in medRxiv , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
Z. Yang, S. Cherian, and S. Vucetic, “Data augmentation for radiology report simplification,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2023 , 2023, pp. 1877–1887
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
X. Wang, Z. Gong, G. Wang, J. Jia, Y. Xu, J. Zhao, Q. Fan, S. Wu, W. Hu, and X. Li, “Chatgpt performs on the chinese national medical licensing examination,” 2023
2023
Closest in time.
K. A. Carpenter and R. B. Altman, “Using gpt-3 to build a lexicon of drugs of abuse synonyms for social media pharmacovigilance,” Biomolecules , vol. 13, no. 2, p. 387, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
E. Hernandez, D. Mahajan, J. Wulff, M. J. Smith, Z. Ziegler, D. Nadler, P. Szolovits, A. Johnson, E. Alsentzer et al. , “Do we still need clinical language models?” in Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning . PMLR, 2023, pp. 578–597
2023
Closest in time.
A. S. Rao, M. Pang, J. Kim, M. Kamineni, W. Lie, A. K. Prasad, A. Landman, K. Dryer, and M. D. Succi, “Assessing the utility of chatgpt throughout the entire clinical workflow,” medRxiv , pp. 2023–02, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
T. H. Kung, M. Cheatham, A. Medenilla, C. Sillos, L. De Leon, C. Elepaño, M. Madriaga, R. Aggabao, G. Diaz-Candido, J. Maningo et al. , “Performance of chatgpt on usmle: Potential for ai-assisted medical education using large language models,” PLoS digital health , vol. 2, no. 2, p. e0000198, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
A. Hulman, O. L. Dollerup, J. F. Mortensen, M. Fenech, K. Norman, H. Stoevring, and T. K. Hansen, “Chatgpt-versus human-generated answers to frequently asked questions about diabetes: a turing test-inspired survey among employees of a danish diabetes center,” medRxiv , pp. 2023–02, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
T. Hirosawa, Y. Harada, M. Yokose, T. Sakamoto, R. Kawamura, and T. Shimizu, “Diagnostic accuracy of differential-diagnosis lists generated by generative pretrained transformer 3 chatbot for clinical vignettes with common chief complaints: A pilot study,” International journal of environmental research and public health , vol. 20, no. 4, p. 3378, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
S. Liu, A. P. Wright, B. L. Patterson, J. P. Wanderer, R. W. Turer, S. D. Nelson, A. B. McCoy, D. F. Sittig, and A. Wright, “Assessing the value of chatgpt for clinical decision support optimization,” MedRxiv , pp. 2023–02, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
A. Gilson, C. W. Safranek, T. Huang, V. Socrates, L. Chi, R. A. Taylor, D. Chartash et al. , “How does chatgpt perform on the united states medical licensing examination? the implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment,” JMIR Medical Education , vol. 9, no. 1, p. e45312, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
F. Antaki, S. Touma, D. Milad, J. El-Khoury, and R. Duval, “Evaluating the performance of chatgpt in ophthalmology: An analysis of its successes and shortcomings,” Ophthalmology Science , p. 100324, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
Q. Lyu, J. Tan, M. E. Zapadka, J. Ponnatapura, C. Niu, K. J. Myers, G. Wang, and C. T. Whitlow, “Translating radiology reports into plain language using chatgpt and gpt-4 with prompt learning: results, limitations, and potential,” Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art , vol. 6, no. 1, p. 9, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
J. H. Choi, K. E. Hickman, A. Monahan, and D. Schwarcz, “Chatgpt goes to law school,” Available at SSRN , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
A. B. Abacha, W.-w. Yim, G. Adams, N. Snider, and M. Yetisgen-Yildiz, “Overview of the mediqa-chat 2023 shared tasks on the summarization & generation of doctor-patient conversations,” in Proceedings of the 5th Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop , 2023, pp. 503–513
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
M. Leippold, “Sentiment spin: Attacking financial sentiment with gpt-3,” Finance Research Letters , p. 103957, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
R. Bommasani, P. Liang, and T. Lee, “Holistic evaluation of language models,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
A. Srivastava, A. Rastogi, A. Rao, A. A. M. Shoeb, A. Abid, A. Fisch, A. R. Brown, A. Santoro, A. Gupta, A. Garriga-Alonso et al. , “Beyond the imitation game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models,” Transactions on Machine Learning Research , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
S. Meoni, E. De la Clergerie, and T. Ryffel, “Large language models as instructors: A study on multilingual clinical entity extraction,” in The 22nd Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing and BioNLP Shared Tasks , 2023, pp. 178–190
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
S. Thapa, U. Naseem, and M. Nasim, “From humans to machines: can chatgpt-like llms effectively replace human annotators in nlp tasks,” in Workshop Proceedings of the 17th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
T. Markov, C. Zhang, S. Agarwal, F. E. Nekoul, T. Lee, S. Adler, A. Jiang, and L. Weng, “A holistic approach to undesired content detection in the real world,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 37, no. 12, 2023, pp. 15 009–15 018
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
P. Hacker, A. Engel, and M. Mauer, “Regulating chatgpt and other large generative ai models,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2023, pp. 1112–1123
2023
Closest in time.
L. De Angelis, F. Baglivo, G. Arzilli, G. P. Privitera, P. Ferragina, A. E. Tozzi, and C. Rizzo, “Chatgpt and the rise of large language models: the new ai-driven infodemic threat in public health,” Frontiers in Public Health , vol. 11, p. 1166120, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
C. A. Gao, F. M. Howard, N. S. Markov, E. C. Dyer, S. Ramesh, Y. Luo, and A. T. Pearson, “Comparing scientific abstracts generated by chatgpt to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers,” NPJ Digital Medicine , vol. 6, no. 1, p. 75, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
D. R. Cotton, P. A. Cotton, and J. R. Shipway, “Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of chatgpt,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International , pp. 1–12, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
Z. Luo, Q. Xie, and S. Ananiadou, “Chatgpt as a factual inconsistency evaluator for text summarization,” 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
S. Dhuliawala, M. Komeili, J. Xu, R. Raileanu, X. Li, A. Celikyilmaz, and J. Weston, “Chain-of-verification reduces hallucination in large language models,” 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
J. Li, X. Cheng, W. X. Zhao, J.-Y. Nie, and J.-R. Wen, “Halueval: A large-scale hallucination evaluation benchmark for large language models,” arXiv e-prints , pp. arXiv–2305, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
Y. Chen, J. Cheng, H. Jiang, L. Liu, H. Zhang, S. Shi, and R. Xu, “Learning from sibling mentions with scalable graph inference in fine-grained entity typing,” in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , 2022, pp. 2076–2087
2087
Closest in time.