Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The release of ChatGPT has uncovered a range of possibilities whereby large language models (LLMs) can substitute human intelligence.
When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification
Maria D Sera, Chryle Elieff, James Forbes, Melissa Clark Burch, Wanda Rodríguez, and Diane Poulin Dubois. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Utility data annotation with Amazon Mechanical Turk. In 2008 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops . 1–8
Alexander Sorokin and David Forsyth. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Amazon mechanical turk for subjectivity word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 workshop on creating speech and language data with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk . 195–203
Cem Akkaya, Alexander Conrad, Janyce Wiebe, and Rada Mihalcea. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Like it or not: A survey of twitter sentiment analysis methods
Anastasia Giachanou and Fabio Crestani. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Semeval-2016 task 6: Detecting stance in tweets. In Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on semantic evaluation (SemEval-2016) . 31–41
Saif Mohammad, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Parinaz Sobhani, Xiaodan Zhu, and Colin Cherry. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Governing hate speech by means of counterspeech on Facebook. In 66th ica annual conference, at fukuoka, japan . 1–23
Carla Schieb and Mike Preuss. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bot conversations are different: leveraging network metrics for bot detection in twitter. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) . IEEE, 825–832
David M Beskow and Kathleen M Carley. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A survey on automatic detection of hate speech in text
Paula Fortuna and Sérgio Nunes. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A challenging dataset for bias detection: the case of the crisis in the ukraine. In Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling: 12th International Conference, SBP-BRiMS 2019, Washington, DC, USA, July 9–12, 2019, Proceedings 12 . Springer, 173–183
Andres Cremisini, Daniela Aguilar, and Mark A Finlayson. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Thou shalt not hate: Countering online hate speech. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media , Vol. 13. 369–380
Binny Mathew, Punyajoy Saha, Hardik Tharad, Subham Rajgaria, Prajwal Singhania, Suman Kalyan Maity, Pawan Goyal, and Animesh Mukherjee. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
SemEval-2017 task 4: Sentiment analysis in Twitter
Sara Rosenthal, Noura Farra, and Preslav Nakov. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Detecting social bots on facebook in an information veracity context. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media , Vol. 13. 463–472
Giovanni C Santia, Munif Ishad Mujib, and Jake Ryland Williams. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Unsupervised machine learning for networking: Techniques, applications and research challenges
Muhammad Usama, Junaid Qadir, Aunn Raza, Hunain Arif, Kok-Lim Alvin Yau, Yehia Elkhatib, Amir Hussain, and Ala Al-Fuqaha. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
The emergence of deepfake technology: A review
Mika Westerlund. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Stance detection: A survey
Dilek Küçük and Fazli Can. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A survey on large-scale machine learning
Meng Wang, Weijie Fu, Xiangnan He, Shijie Hao, and Xindong Wu. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Social media identity deception detection: a survey
Ahmed Alharbi, Hai Dong, Xun Yi, Zahir Tari, and Ibrahim Khalil. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Latent hatred: A benchmark for understanding implicit hate speech
Mai ElSherief, Caleb Ziems, David Muchlinski, Vaishnavi Anupindi, Jordyn Seybolt, Munmun De Choudhury, and Diyi Yang. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
TweepFake: About detecting deepfake tweets
Tiziano Fagni, Fabrizio Falchi, Margherita Gambini, Antonio Martella, and Maurizio Tesconi. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Stance detection in COVID-19 tweets. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Long Papers) , Vol. 1
Kyle Glandt, Sarthak Khanal, Yingjie Li, Doina Caragea, and Cornelia Caragea. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Racism is a virus: Anti-Asian hate and counterspeech in social media during the COVID-19 crisis. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining . 90–94
ChatGPT and the future of medical writing
Som Biswas. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
ChatGPT goes to law school
Jonathan H Choi, Kristin E Hickman, Amy Monahan, and Daniel Schwarcz. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks
Fabrizio Gilardi, Meysam Alizadeh, and Maël Kubli. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection
Biyang Guo, Xin Zhang, Ziyuan Wang, Minqi Jiang, Jinran Nie, Yuxuan Ding, Jianwei Yue, and Yupeng Wu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Seeing ChatGPT Through Students’ Eyes: An Analysis of TikTok Data
Anna-Carolina Haensch, Sarah Ball, Markus Herklotz, and Frauke Kreuter. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Bing He, Caleb Ziems, Sandeep Soni, Naren Ramakrishnan, Diyi Yang, and Srijan Kumar. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
P-stance: A large dataset for stance detection in political domain. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021 . 2355–2365
Yingjie Li, Tiberiu Sosea, Aditya Sawant, Ajith Jayaraman Nair, Diana Inkpen, and Cornelia Caragea. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Want to reduce labeling cost? GPT-3 can help
Shuohang Wang, Yang Liu, Yichong Xu, Chenguang Zhu, and Michael Zeng. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
OpenAI ChatGPT generated literature review: Digital twin in healthcare
Ömer Aydın and Enis Karaarslan. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Are ChatGPT and AlphaCode going to replace programmers?
Davide Castelvecchi. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
It’s All Relative! A Method to Counter Human Bias in Crowdsourced Stance Detection of News Articles
Ehsan-Ul Haq, Yang K. Lu, and Pan Hui. 2022a · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Twitter dataset for 2022 russo-ukrainian crisis
Ehsan-Ul Haq, Gareth Tyson, Lik-Hang Lee, Tristan Braud, and Pan Hui. 2022b · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education
Xiaoming Zhai. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Using ChatGPT to Fight Misinformation: ChatGPT Nails 72% of 12,000 Verified Claims
Emma Hoes, Sacha Altay, and Juan Bermeo. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Fan Huang, Haewoon Kwak, and Jisun An. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models
Tiffany H Kung, Morgan Cheatham, Arielle Medenilla, Czarina Sillos, Lorie De Leon, Camille Elepaño, Maria Madriaga, Rimel Aggabao, Giezel Diaz-Candido, James Maningo, et al · 2023
Closest in time.
ChatGPT: Beginning of an End of Manual Linguistic Data Annotation? Use Case of Automatic Genre Identification
Taja Kuzman, Igor Mozetic, and Nikola Ljubešic. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education
John V Pavlik. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
ChatGPT Output Regarding Compulsory Vaccination and COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy: A Descriptive Study at the Outset of a Paradigm Shift in Online Search for Information
Malik Sallam, Nesreen A Salim, B Ala’a, Muna Barakat, Diaa Fayyad, Souheil Hallit, Harapan Harapan, Rabih Hallit, Azmi Mahafzah, and B Ala’a. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
An analysis of the automatic bug fixing performance of chatgpt
Dominik Sobania, Martin Briesch, Carol Hanna, and Justyna Petke. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
“What Can ChatGPT Do?” Analyzing Early Reactions to the Innovative AI Chatbot on Twitter
Viriya Taecharungroj. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Is chatgpt a good nlg evaluator? a preliminary study
Jiaan Wang, Yunlong Liang, Fandong Meng, Haoxiang Shi, Zhixu Li, Jinan Xu, Jianfeng Qu, and Jie Zhou. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
A Complete Survey on Generative AI (AIGC): Is ChatGPT from GPT-4 to GPT-5 All You Need?
Chaoning Zhang, Chenshuang Zhang, Sheng Zheng, Yu Qiao, Chenghao Li, Mengchun Zhang, Sumit Kumar Dam, Chu Myaet Thwal, Ye Lin Tun, Le Luang Huy, et al · 2023
Closest in time.