Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable zero-shot generalization abilities: state-of-the-art chatbots can provide plausible answers to many common questions that arise in daily life.
J. McCarthy, “Situations, actions, and causal laws,” Stanford University Technical Report, Tech. Rep., 1963
1963
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Weizenbaum, “Eliza—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine,” Communications of the ACM , vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 1966
1966
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. E. Fikes and N. J. Nilsson, “Strips: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving,” Artificial intelligence , vol. 2, no. 3-4, pp. 189–208, 1971
1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. J. Nilsson et al. , “Shakey the robot,” 1984
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Carbonell, O. Etzioni, Y. Gil, R. Joseph, C. Knoblock, S. Minton, and M. Veloso, “Prodigy: An integrated architecture for planning and learning,” ACM SIGART Bulletin , vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 51–55, 1991
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Bylander, “The computational complexity of propositional STRIPS planning,” Artificial Intelligence , vol. 69, no. 1-2, pp. 165–204, 1994
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. McDermott, M. Ghallab, A. Howe, C. Knoblock, A. Ram, M. Veloso, D. Weld, and D. Wilkins, “Pddl-the planning domain definition language,” 1998
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Lifschitz, “Answer set programming and plan generation,” Artificial Intelligence , vol. 138, no. 1-2, pp. 39–54, 2002
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. S. Nau, T.-C. Au, O. Ilghami, U. Kuter, J. W. Murdock, D. Wu, and F. Yaman, “Shop2: An htn planning system,” Journal of artificial intelligence research , 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Fox and D. Long, “Pddl2. 1: An extension to pddl for expressing temporal planning domains,” Journal of artificial intelligence research , vol. 20, pp. 61–124, 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Helmert, “The fast downward planning system,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , vol. 26, pp. 191–246, 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Brewka, T. Eiter, and M. Truszczyński, “Answer set programming at a glance,” Communications of the ACM , vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 92–103, 2011
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. P. Kaelbling and T. Lozano-Pérez, “Integrated task and motion planning in belief space,” The International Journal of Robotics Research , vol. 32, no. 9-10, pp. 1194–1227, 2013
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Zhang, F. Yang, P. Khandelwal, and P. Stone, “Mobile robot planning using action language bc with an abstraction hierarchy,” in International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning . Springer, 2015, pp. 502–516
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Lagriffoul, N. T. Dantam, C. Garrett, A. Akbari, S. Srivastava, and L. E. Kavraki, “Platform-independent benchmarks for task and motion planning,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3765–3772, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Haslum, N. Lipovetzky, D. Magazzeni, and C. Muise, “An introduction to the planning domain definition language,” Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–187, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y.-q. Jiang, S.-q. Zhang, P. Khandelwal, and P. Stone, “Task planning in robotics: an empirical comparison of pddl-and asp-based systems,” Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering , vol. 20, pp. 363–373, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Jiang, H. Yedidsion, S. Zhang, G. Sharon, and P. Stone, “Multi-robot planning with conflicts and synergies,” Autonomous Robots , vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 2011–2032, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, et al. , “Language models are few-shot learners,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Ding, X. Zhang, X. Zhan, and S. Zhang, “Task-motion planning for safe and efficient urban driving,” in 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Huang, P. Abbeel, D. Pathak, and I. Mordatch, “Language models as zero-shot planners: Extracting actionable knowledge for embodied agents,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2022, pp. 9118–9147
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Kant, A. Ramachandran, S. Yenamandra, I. Gilitschenski, D. Batra, A. Szot, and H. Agrawal, “Housekeep: Tidying virtual households using commonsense reasoning,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXXIX . Springer, 2022, pp. 355–373
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Silver, V. Hariprasad, R. S. Shuttleworth, N. Kumar, T. Lozano-Pérez, and L. P. Kaelbling, “PDDL planning with pretrained large language models,” in NeurIPS 2022 Foundation Models for Decision Making Workshop , 2022. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=1QMMUB4zfl
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
A. Madaan, N. Tandon, P. Clark, and Y. Yang, “Memory-assisted prompt editing to improve gpt-3 after deployment,” 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.