Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Drawing real world social inferences usually requires taking into account information from multiple modalities.
Dynamic programming and stochastic control processes
Richard Bellman. 1958 · 1958
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Intentional Stance
Daniel Clement Dennett. 1981 · 1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
PDDL | The Planning Domain Definition language
Constructions Aeronautiques, Adele Howe, Craig Knoblock, ISI Drew McDermott, Ashwin Ram, Manuela Veloso, Daniel Weld, David Wilkins SRI, Anthony Barrett, Dave Christianson, and 1 others. 1998 · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains
Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Michael L Littman, and Anthony R Cassandra. 1998 · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Action understanding as inverse planning
Chris L Baker, Rebecca Saxe, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bayesian theory of mind: Modeling joint belief-desire attribution
Chris Baker, Rebecca Saxe, and Joshua Tenenbaum. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tree Adaptive A*
Carlos Hernández, Xiaoxun Sun, Sven Koenig, and Pedro Meseguer. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Psychological reasoning in infancy
Renée Baillargeon, Rose M Scott, and Lin Bian. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
The naïve utility calculus: Computational principles underlying commonsense psychology
Julian Jara-Ettinger, Hyowon Gweon, Laura E Schulz, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rational quantitative attribution of beliefs, desires and percepts in human mentalizing
Chris L Baker, Julian Jara-Ettinger, Rebecca Saxe, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Theory of minds: Understanding behavior in groups through inverse planning
Michael Shum, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Michael L Littman, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
The naive utility calculus as a unified, quantitative framework for action understanding
Julian Jara-Ettinger, Laura E Schulz, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Online Bayesian goal inference for boundedly rational planning agents
Tan Zhi-Xuan, Jordyn Mann, Tom Silver, Josh Tenenbaum, and Vikash Mansinghka. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Modeling the mistakes of boundedly rational agents within a bayesian theory of mind
Arwa Alanqary, Gloria Z Lin, Joie Le, Tan Zhi-Xuan, Vikash K Mansinghka, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Too many cooks: Bayesian inference for coordinating multi-agent collaboration
Sarah A Wu, Rose E Wang, James A Evans, Joshua B Tenenbaum, and David C et al Parkes. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Neural theory-of-mind? on the limits of social intelligence in large lms
Maarten Sap, Ronan Le Bras, Daniel Fried, and Yejin Choi. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed H Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, and 1 others. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
PDDL. jl: An Extensible Interpreter and Compiler Interface for Fast and Flexible AI Planning
Tan Zhi-Xuan. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Solving the baby intuitions benchmark with a hierarchically bayesian theory of mind
Tan Zhi-Xuan, Nishad Gothoskar, Falk Pollok, Dan Gutfreund, Joshua B Tenenbaum, and Vikash K Mansinghka. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Bounded Rationality as a Strategy for Cognitive Science
Tyler Brooke-Wilson. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Theory of mind may have spontaneously emerged in large language models
Michal Kosinski. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Automated statistical model discovery with language models
Michael Y Li, Emily Fox, and Noah Goodman. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
OpenAI, Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, Red Avila, Igor Babuschkin, Suchir Balaji, Valerie Balcom, Paul Baltescu, Haiming Bao, Mohammad Bavarian, Jeff Belgum, and 262 others. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Worldcoder, a model-based llm agent: Building world models by writing code and interacting with the environment
Hao Tang, Darren Key, and Kevin Ellis. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Learning grounded action abstractions from language
Lionel Wong, Jiayuan Mao, Pratyusha Sharma, Zachary S Siegel, Jiahai Feng, Noa Korneev, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and Jacob Andreas. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Eliciting the priors of large language models using iterated in-context learning
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Bo Liu, Yuqian Jiang, Xiaohan Zhang, Qiang Liu, Shiqi Zhang, Joydeep Biswas, and Peter Stone. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Boosting theory-of-mind performance in large language models via prompting
Shima Rahimi Moghaddam and Christopher J Honey. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Generalized planning in pddl domains with pretrained large language models
Tom Silver, Soham Dan, Kavitha Srinivas, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, and Michael Katz. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Large language models fail on trivial alterations to theory-of-mind tasks
Tomer Ullman. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Lionel Wong, Gabriel Grand, Alexander K. Lew, Noah D. Goodman, Vikash K. Mansinghka, Jacob Andreas, and Joshua B. Tenenbaum. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Translating natural language to planning goals with large-language models
Yaqi Xie, Chen Yu, Tongyao Zhu, Jinbin Bai, Ze Gong, and Harold Soh. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Inferring the goals of communicating agents from actions and instructions
Lance Ying, Tan Zhi-Xuan, Vikash Mansinghka, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Jian-Qiao Zhu and Thomas L Griffiths. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Visual cognition in multimodal large language models
Luca Buschoff, Elif Akata, Matthias Bethge, and Eric Schulz. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Justin Domke. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Re-evaluating theory of mind evaluation in large language models
Jennifer Hu, Felix Sosa, and Tomer Ullman. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Hypothesis-driven theory-of-mind reasoning for large language models
Hyunwoo Kim, Melanie Sclar, Tan Zhi-Xuan, Lance Ying, Sydney Levine, Yang Liu, Joshua B Tenenbaum, and Yejin Choi. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Bayesian teaching enables probabilistic reasoning in large language models
Linlu Qiu, Fei Sha, Kelsey Allen, Yoon Kim, Tal Linzen, and Sjoerd van Steenkiste. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Visual cognition in multimodal large language models
Luca M Schulze Buschoff, Elif Akata, Matthias Bethge, and Eric Schulz. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Mumatom: Multi-modal multi-agent theory of mind
Haojun Shi, Suyu Ye, Xinyu Fang, Chuanyang Jin, Leyla Isik, Yen-Ling Kuo, and Tianmin Shu. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models
Gemini Team, Rohan Anil, Sebastian Borgeaud, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jiahui Yu, Radu Soricut, Johan Schalkwyk, Andrew M. Dai, Anja Hauth, Katie Millican, David Silver, Melvin Johnson, Ioannis Antonoglou, Julian Schrittwieser, Amelia Glaese, Jilin Chen, Emily Pitler, Timothy Lillicrap, Angeliki Lazaridou, and 1332 others. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Autotom: Automated bayesian inverse planning and model discovery for open-ended theory of mind
Zhining Zhang, Chuanyang Jin, Mung Yao Jia, and Tianmin Shu. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Pragmatic instruction following and goal assistance via cooperative language-guided inverse planning
Tan Zhi-Xuan, Lance Ying, Vikash Mansinghka, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. 2024b · 2094
Closest in time.