Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Large language models are increasingly used in strategic decision-making settings, yet evidence shows that, like humans, they often deviate from full rationality.
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. 1974 · 1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. 1979 · 1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics
Matthew Rabin. 1993 · 1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Unraveling in guessing games: An experimental study
Rosemarie Nagel. 1995 · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
On players’ models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence
Dale O. Stahl and Paul W. Wilson. 1995 · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Progress in behavioral game theory
Colin F. Camerer. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation
Ernst Fehr and Klaus M. Schmidt. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments
Ernst Fehr and Simon Gächter. 2000 · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cooperation in pd games: Fear, greed, and history of play
T. K. Ahn, Elinor Ostrom, David Schmidt, Robert Shupp, and James Walker. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Understanding social preferences with simple tests
Gary Charness and Matthew Rabin. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cooperation under the shadow of the future: Experimental evidence from infinitely repeated games
Pedro Dal Bó. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Spontaneous giving and calculated greed
David G. Rand, Joshua D. Greene, and Martin A. Nowak. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Social cycling and conditional responses in the rock-paper-scissors game
Zhijian Wang, Bin Xu, and Hai-Jun Zhou. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
An experimental investigation of evolutionary dynamics in the Rock-Paper-Scissors game
Moshe Hoffman, Sigrid Suetens, Uri Gneezy, and Martin A. Nowak. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Negative outcomes evoke cyclic irrational decisions in rock, paper, scissors
Benjamin J. Dyson, Jonathan M. P. Wilbiks, Raj Sandhu, Georgios Papanicolaou, and Jaimie Lintag. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rock-paper-scissors play: Beyond the win-stay/lose-change strategy
Hanshu Zhang, Frederic Moisan, and Cleotilde Gonzalez. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Human-level play in the game of diplomacy by combining language models with strategic reasoning
Meta Fundamental AI Research Diplomacy Team (FAIR)†, Anton Bakhtin, Noam Brown, Emily Dinan, Gabriele Farina, Colin Flaherty, Daniel Fried, Andrew Goff, Jonathan Gray, Hengyuan Hu, Athul Paul Jacob, Mojtaba Komeili, Karthik Konath, Minae Kwon, Adam Lerer, Mike Lewis, Alexander H. Miller, Sasha Mitts, Adithya Renduchintala, Stephen Roller, Dirk Rowe, Weiyan Shi, Joe Spisak, Alexander Wei, David Wu, Hugh Zhang, and Markus Zijlstra. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Inferring strategies from observations in long iterated prisoner’s dilemma experiments
Eladio Montero-Porras, Jelena Grujić, Elias Fernández-Domingos, and Tom Lenaerts. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Motives for cooperation in the one-shot prisoner’s dilemma
Mark Schneider and Timothy Shields. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Playing games with gpt: What can we learn about a large language model from canonical strategic games?
Daniel Brookins and Richard DeBacker. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
(ir)rationality and cognitive biases in large language models
Olivia Macmillan-Scott and Mirco Musolesi. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
A turing test of whether ai chatbots are behaviorally similar to humans
Qiaozhu Mei, Yutong Xie, Walter Yuan, and Matthew O. Jackson. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
EAI: Emotional decision-making of LLMs in strategic games and ethical dilemmas
Mikhail Mozikov, Nikita Severin, Valeria Bodishtianu, Maria Glushanina, Ivan Nasonov, Daniil Orekhov, Vladislav Pekhotin, Ivan Makovetskiy, Mikhail Baklashkin, Vasily Lavrentyev, Akim Tsvigun, Denis Turdakov, Tatiana Shavrina, Andrey Savchenko, and Ilya Makarov. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Large language models playing mixed strategy nash equilibrium games
Alonso Silva. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Measuring bargaining abilities of llms: A benchmark and a buyer-enhancement method
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Kanishk Gandhi, Dorsa Sadigh, and Noah D. Goodman. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Human-like intuitive behavior and reasoning biases emerged in large language models but disappeared in chatgpt
Tim Hagendorff, Stephanie Fabi, and Michal Kosinski. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Introducing claude 3.5 sonnet
Anthropic. 2024 · 2024
Cited alongside, same era.
How well can llms negotiate? negotiationarena platform and analysis
Federico Bianchi, Patrick John Chia, Mert Yuksekgonul, Jacopo Tagliabue, Dan Jurafsky, and James Zou. 2024 · 2024
Cited alongside, same era.
LLMs at the bargaining table
Yuan Deng, Vahab Mirrokni, Renato Paes Leme, Hanrui Zhang, and Song Zuo. 2024 · 2024
Cited alongside, same era.
Nicer than humans: How do large language models behave in the prisoner’s dilemma?
Nicoló Fontana, Francesco Pierri, and Luca Maria Aiello. 2024 · 2024
Cited alongside, same era.
Bias in large language models: Origin, evaluation, and mitigation
Yufei Guo, Muzhe Guo, Juntao Su, Zhou Yang, Mengqiu Zhu, Hongfei Li, Mengyang Qiu, and Shuo Shuo Liu. 2024 · 2024
Cited alongside, same era.
Negotiating with llms: Prompt hacks, skill gaps, and reasoning deficits
Johannes Schneider, Steffi Haag and Leona Chandra Kruse. 2024 · 2024
Cited alongside, same era.
Tian Xia, Zhiwei He, Tong Ren, Yibo Miao, Zhuosheng Zhang, Yang Yang, and Rui Wang. 2024 · 2024
Later among the works it cites.
Playing repeated games with large language models
Elif Akata, Lion Schulz, Jacopo Coda-Forno, Seong J. Oh, Matthias Bethge, and Eric Schulz. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Claude 3.7 sonnet and claude code
Anthropic. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Large Language Models Amplify Human Biases in Moral Decision-Making
Vincent Cheung, Michael Maier, and Falk Lieder. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Econevals: Benchmarks and litmus tests for llm agents in unknown environments
Sara Fish, Julia Shephard, Minkai Li, Ran I. Shorrer, and Yannai A. Gonczarowski. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Distributive fairness in large language models: Evaluating alignment with human values
Hadi Hosseini and Samarth Khanna. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Large language model strategic reasoning evaluation through behavioral game theory
Jingru Jia, Zehua Yuan, Junhao Pan, Paul E. McNamara, and Deming Chen. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Cognitive debiasing large language models for decision-making
Yougang Lyu, Shijie Ren, Yue Feng, Zihan Wang, Zhumin Chen, Zhaochun Ren, and Maarten de Rijke. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Moral alignment for llm agents
Elizaveta Tennant, Stephen Hailes, and Mirco Musolesi. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Game theory
Wikipedia contributors. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Multi-agent kto: Reinforcing strategic interactions of large language model in language game
Rong Ye, Yongxin Zhang, Yikai Zhang, Haoyu Kuang, Zhongyu Wei, and Peng Sun. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.
Socialeval: Evaluating social intelligence of large language models
Jinfeng Zhou, Yuxuan Chen, Yihan Shi, Xuanming Zhang, Leqi Lei, Yi Feng, Zexuan Xiong, Miao Yan, Xunzhi Wang, Yaru Cao, Jianing Yin, Shuai Wang, Quanyu Dai, Zhenhua Dong, Hongning Wang, and Minlie Huang. 2025 · 2025
Closest in time.