Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT models, are increasingly used in software engineering for various tasks, such as code generation, requirements management, and debugging.
D. Binkley, M. Davis, D. Lawrie, and C. Morrell, “To camelcase or under_score,” in 2009 IEEE 17th International Conference on Program Comprehension , 2009, pp. 158–167
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Cohen, Y. Huang, J. Chen, J. Benesty, J. Benesty, J. Chen, Y. Huang, and I. Cohen, “Pearson correlation coefficient,” Noise reduction in speech processing , pp. 1–4, 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Breiman, Classification and regression trees . Routledge, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Feurer and F. Hutter, “Hyperparameter optimization,” Automated machine learning: Methods, systems, challenges , pp. 3–33, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Chen, J. Tworek, H. Jun, Q. Yuan, H. P. de Oliveira Pinto, J. Kaplan, H. Edwards, Y. Burda, N. Joseph, G. Brockman, A. Ray, R. Puri, G. Krueger, M. Petrov, H. Khlaaf, G. Sastry, P. Mishkin, B. Chan, S. Gray, N. Ryder, M. Pavlov, A. Power, L. Kaiser, M. Bavarian, C. Winter, P. Tillet, F. P. Such, D. Cummings, M. Plappert, F. Chantzis, E. Barnes, A. Herbert-Voss, W. H. Guss, A. Nichol, A. Paino, N. Tezak, J. Tang, I. Babuschkin, S. Balaji, S. Jain, W. Saunders, C. Hesse, A. N. Carr, J. Leike, J. Achiam, V. Misra, E. Morikawa, A. Radford, M. Knight, M. Brundage, M. Murati, K. Mayer, P. Welinder, B. McGrew, D. Amodei, S. McCandlish, I. Sutskever, and W. Zaremba, “Evaluating large language models trained on code,” 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Alexandr, O. Irina, K. Tatyana, K. Inessa, and P. Arina, “Fine-tuning gpt-3 for russian text summarization,” in Data Science and Intelligent Systems: Proceedings of 5th Computational Methods in Systems and Software 2021, Vol. 2 . Springer, 2021, pp. 748–757
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Bhavya, J. Xiong, and C. Zhai, “Analogy generation by prompting large language models: A case study of instructgpt,” 2022
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Poesia, A. Polozov, V. Le, A. Tiwari, G. Soares, C. Meek, and S. Gulwani, “Synchromesh: Reliable code generation from pre-trained language models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=KmtVD97J43e
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Jiang, Y. Dong, L. Wang, Z. Fang, Q. Shang, G. Li, Z. Jin, and W. Jiao, “Self-planning code generation with large language models,” 2023
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
X.-Y. Li, J.-T. Xue, Z. Xie, and M. Li, “Think outside the code: Brainstorming boosts large language models in code generation,” 2023
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Buscemi, “A comparative study of code generation using chatgpt 3.5 across 10 programming languages,” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Feng, S. Vanam, M. Cherukupally, W. Zheng, M. Qiu, and H. Chen, “Investigating code generation performance of chatgpt with crowdsourcing social data,” in 2023 IEEE 47th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) , 2023, pp. 876–885
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
I. G. Ndukwe, S. A. Licorish, A. Tahir, and S. G. MacDonell, “How have views on software quality differed over time? research and practice viewpoints,” Journal of Systems and Software , vol. 195, p. 111524, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016412122200200X
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Ouyang, J. M. Zhang, M. Harman, and M. Wang, “Llm is like a box of chocolates: the non-determinism of chatgpt in code generation,” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
X. Du, M. Liu, J. Li, H. Wang, X. Peng, and Y. Lou, “Resolving crash bugs via large language models: An empirical study,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
X. Chen, M. Lin, N. Schärli, and D. Zhou, “Teaching large language models to self-debug,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. Pan, A. Sadé, J. Kim, E. Soriano, G. Sole, and S. Flamant, “Stelocoder: a decoder-only llm for multi-language to python code translation,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
C. Arora, J. Grundy, and M. Abdelrazek, “Advancing requirements engineering through generative ai: Assessing the role of llms,” in Generative AI for Effective Software Development . Springer, 2024, pp. 129–148
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
J.-B. Döderlein, M. Acher, D. E. Khelladi, and B. Combemale, “Piloting copilot and codex: Hot temperature, cold prompts, or black magic?” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Lu, L. Yu, X. Li, L. Yang, and C. Zuo, “Llama-reviewer: Advancing code review automation with large language models through parameter-efficient fine-tuning,” in 2023 IEEE 34th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE) , 2023, pp. 647–658
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Yan, Z. Gao, and Z. Liu, “A closer look at different difficulty levels code generation abilities of chatgpt,” in 2023 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) , 2023, pp. 1887–1898
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
F. A. Sakib, S. H. Khan, and A. H. M. R. Karim, “Extending the frontier of chatgpt: Code generation and debugging,” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Sun, C. Fang, Y. You, Y. Miao, Y. Liu, Y. Li, G. Deng, S. Huang, Y. Chen, Q. Zhang, H. Qian, Y. Liu, and Z. Chen, “Automatic code summarization via chatgpt: How far are we?” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Zhang, Z. Chen, Y. Shen, M. Ding, J. B. Tenenbaum, and C. Gan, “Planning with large language models for code generation,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , 2023. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=Lr8cOOtYbfL
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Mu, L. Shi, S. Wang, Z. Yu, B. Zhang, C. Wang, S. Liu, and Q. Wang, “Clarifygpt: Empowering llm-based code generation with intention clarification,” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2024
Closest in time.
H. Al Naqbi, Z. Bahroun, and V. Ahmed, “Enhancing work productivity through generative artificial intelligence: A comprehensive literature review,” Sustainability , vol. 16, no. 3, p. 1166, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
K. Yang, J. Liu, J. Wu, C. Yang, Y. Fung, S. Li, Z. Huang, X. Cao, X. Wang, H. Ji, and C. Zhai, “If LLM is the wizard, then code is the wand: A survey on how code empowers large language models to serve as intelligent agents,” in ICLR 2024 Workshop on Large Language Model (LLM) Agents , 2024. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=8dmNOD9hbq
2024
Closest in time.
D. Nam, A. Macvean, V. Hellendoorn, B. Vasilescu, and B. Myers, “Using an llm to help with code understanding,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’24. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3597503.3639187
2024
Closest in time.
Y. Zhang, “Detecting code comment inconsistencies using llm and program analysis,” in Companion Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on the Foundations of Software Engineering , ser. FSE 2024. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024, p. 683–685. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3663529.3664458
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
——, “Lost in translation: A study of bugs introduced by large language models while translating code,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’24. ACM, Apr. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3597503.3639226
2024
Closest in time.