Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools have become increasingly prevalent in software development, offering assistance to various managerial and technical project activities.
T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert-Voss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. M. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B. Chess, J. Clark, C. Berner, S. McCandlish, A. Radford, I. Sutskever, D. Amodei, Language models are few-shot learners, in: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’20, Curran Associates Inc., pp. 1877–1901
1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1145/3510454.3522684
S. Imai, Is GitHub copilot a substitute for human pair-programming? an empirical study, in: 2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion), pp. 319–321, ISSN: 2574-1926 · 1926
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, J. Vlissides, D. Patterns, Elements of reusable object-oriented software, Design Patterns (1995)
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Bengio, R. Ducharme, P. Vincent, A neural probabilistic language model, Advances in neural information processing systems 13 (2000)
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Adiwardana, M. Luong, D. R. So, J. Hall, N. Fiedel, R. Thoppilan, Z. Yang, A. Kulshreshtha, G. Nemade, Y. Lu, Q. V. Le, Towards a human-like open-domain chatbot , CoRR abs/2001.09977 (2020) · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Kaplan, S. McCandlish, T. Henighan, T. B. Brown, B. Chess, R. Child, S. Gray, A. Radford, J. Wu, D. Amodei, Scaling laws for neural language models · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Feng, D. Guo, D. Tang, N. Duan, X. Feng, M. Gong, L. Shou, B. Qin, T. Liu, D. Jiang, M. Zhou, CodeBERT: A pre-trained model for programming and natural languages · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Planning, The economic impacts of inadequate infrastructure for software testing, National Institute of Standards and Technology 1 (2002)
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. P. Ammeter, J. M. Dukerich, Leadership, team building, and team member characteristics in high performance project teams, Engineering management journal 14 (4) (2002) 3–10
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. J. Smith, Engineering project management, Blackwell Science Ames, IA, 2002
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Levin, R. Cross, L. Abrams, Why should i trust you? predictors of interpersonal trust in a knowledge transfer context (09 2002)
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Henderson, J. Hu, J. Romoff, E. Brunskill, D. Jurafsky, J. Pineau, Towards the systematic reporting of the energy and carbon footprints of machine learning · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Kontio, L. Lehtola, J. Bragge, Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences, in: Proceedings. 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2004. ISESE ’04., pp. 271–280
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. S. Blanchard, System engineering management, John Wiley & Sons, 2004
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2006.07.007
N. Anquetil, K. M. de Oliveira, K. D. de Sousa, M. G. Batista Dias, Software maintenance seen as a knowledge management issue, Information and Software Technology 49 (5) (2007) 515–529 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1109/FOSE.2007.14
R. France, B. Rumpe, Model-driven development of complex software: A research roadmap · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Brants, A. C. Popat, P. Xu, F. J. Och, J. Dean, Large language models in machine translation (2007)
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Jarzabek, Effective software maintenance and evolution: A reuse-based approach, CRC Press, 2007
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Blank, The Four Steps to the Epiphany: Successful Strategies for Products that Win, Cafepress.com, 2007
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Eisner, Essentials of project and systems engineering management, John Wiley & Sons, 2008
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1109/ICSE-COMPANION.2009.5070978
S. Jansen, A. Finkelstein, S. Brinkkemper, A sense of community: A research agenda for software ecosystems, in: 2009 31st International Conference on Software Engineering - Companion Volume, pp. 187–190 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Guo, S. Ren, S. Lu, Z. Feng, D. Tang, S. Liu, L. Zhou, N. Duan, A. Svyatkovskiy, S. Fu, M. Tufano, S. K. Deng, C. Clement, D. Drain, N. Sundaresan, J. Yin, D. Jiang, M. Zhou, GraphCodeBERT: Pre-training code representations with data flow · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Khamooshi, D. F. Cioffi, Program risk contingency budget planning, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 56 (1) (2009) 171–179
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Mikolov, M. Karafiát, L. Burget, J. Cernockỳ, S. Khudanpur, Recurrent neural network based language model., in: Interspeech, Vol. 2, Makuhari, 2010, pp. 1045–1048
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Ramesh, L. Cao, R. Baskerville, Agile requirements engineering practices and challenges: an empirical study, Information Systems Journal 20 (5) (2010) 449–480
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Ries, The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses, The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses, Crown Business, 2011
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Gu, Z. Li, C. Gao, C. Wang, H. Zhang, Z. Xu, M. R. Lyu, CRaDLe: Deep code retrieval based on semantic dependency learning 141 385–394 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Penzenstadler, V. Bauer, C. Calero, X. Franch, Sustainability in software engineering: a systematic literature review 32–41 doi:10.1049/ic.2012.0004
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Heafield, I. Pouzyrevsky, J. H. Clark, P. Koehn, Scalable modified kneser-ney language model estimation, in: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), 2013, pp. 690–696
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1109/RCIS.2013.6577679
A. Martakis, M. Daneva, Handling requirements dependencies in agile projects: A focus group with agile software development practitioners, in: IEEE 7th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp. 1–11, ISSN: 2151-1357 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.018
M. Cukusic, Z. Garaca, M. Jadric, Online self-assessment and students’ success in higher education institutions 72 100–109 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.046
I. Inayat, S. S. Salim, S. Marczak, M. Daneva, S. Shamshirband, A systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges, Computers in Human Behavior 51 (2015) 915–929 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Issaoui, N. Bouassida, H. Ben-Abdallah, A new approach for interactive design pattern recommendation, Lecture Notes on Software Engineering 3 (3) (2015) 173
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Nahar, T. S. U. Mahmud, K. Sakib, An improved behavioral matching for anti-pattern based abstract factory recommendation, in: 2016 5th International Conference on Informatics, Electronics and Vision (ICIEV), IEEE, 2016, pp. 35–40
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Garousi, M. V. Mäntylä, A systematic literature review of literature reviews in software testing, Information and Software Technology 80 (2016) 195–216
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1109/SEAA.2016.21
A. Nguyen-Duc, S. M. A. Shah, P. Ambrahamsson, Towards an early stage software startups evolution model, in: 2016 42th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), pp. 120–127 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, C. Guestrin, "why should i trust you?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier (2016) · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, I. Polosukhin, Attention is all you need, Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Fitzgerald, K.-J. Stol, Continuous software engineering: A roadmap and agenda, Journal of Systems and Software 123 (2017) 176–189
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Zhao, T. Wang, M. Yatskar, V. Ordonez, K.-W. Chang, Men also like shopping: Reducing gender bias amplification using corpus-level constraints (2017) · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.5220/0006681900540064
A. Przybyłek, M. Zakrzewski, Adopting collaborative games into agile requirements engineering, in: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, ENASE 2018, SCITEPRESS, 2018, p. 54–64 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Bou, N. Laosen, E. Nantajeewarawat, Design pattern ranking based on the design pattern intent ontology, in: Intelligent Information and Database Systems: 10th Asian Conference, ACIIDS 2018, Dong Hoi City, Vietnam, March 19-21, 2018, Proceedings, Part I 10, Springer, 2018, pp. 25–35
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1109/FIE.2018.8659282
M. Verleger, J. Pembridge, A Pilot Study Integrating an AI-driven Chatbot in an Introductory Programming Course , IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–4 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.03.001
M. Ewens, R. Nanda, M. Rhodes-Kropf, Cost of experimentation and the evolution of venture capital, Journal of Financial Economics 128 (3) (2018) 422–442 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, I. Sutskever, et al., Language models are unsupervised multitask learners, OpenAI blog 1 (8) (2019) 9
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, K. Toutanova, Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding (2019) · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Tambe, P. Cappelli, V. Yakubovich, Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward, California Management Review 61 (4) (2019) 15–42
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. K. Dam, T. Tran, J. Grundy, A. Ghose, Y. Kamei, Towards effective ai-powered agile project management, in: 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st international conference on software engineering: new ideas and emerging results (ICSE-NIER), IEEE, 2019, pp. 41–44
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1109/ICE.2019.8792673
S. Hyrynsalmi, E. Sutinen, The role of women software communities in attracting more women to the software industry, in: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 2019, pp. 1–7 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1109/IMITEC45504.2019.9015857
M. Ismail, A. Ade-Ibijola, Lecturer’s apprentice: A chatbot for assisting novice programmers , IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–8 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Amershi, A. Begel, C. Bird, R. DeLine, H. Gall, E. Kamar, N. Nagappan, B. Nushi, T. Zimmermann, Software engineering for machine learning: A case study, in: 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP), IEEE, 2019, pp. 291–300
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Barenkamp, J. Rebstadt, O. Thomas, Applications of ai in classical software engineering, AI Perspectives 2 (1) (2020) 1
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
doi:10.1109/RE48521.2020.00028
T. Hey, J. Keim, A. Koziolek, W. F. Tichy, Norbert: Transfer learning for requirements classification, in: 2020 IEEE 28th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 2020, pp. 169–179 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
J. E. Van Engelen, H. H. Hoos, A survey on semi-supervised learning, Machine learning 109 (2) (2020) 373–440
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
H. H. Elmousalami, Comparison of artificial intelligence techniques for project conceptual cost prediction: a case study and comparative analysis, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 68 (1) (2020) 183–196
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
doi:10.1109/UYMS50627.2020.9247027
E. Sarikaya, S. Bagriyanik, M. Gökalp, Teaching agile software development using agile methods: A case study, in: 2020 Turkish National Software Engineering Symposium (UYMS), 2020, pp. 1–6 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1871399
R. S. Dubey, J. Paul, V. Tewari, The soft skills gap: a bottleneck in the talent supply in emerging economies , The International Journal of Human Resource Management 33 (13) (2022) 2630–2661 · 2020
D. Hidellaarachchi, J. Grundy, R. Hoda, I. Mueller, The influence of human aspects on requirements engineering-related activities: Software practitioners’ perspective, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 32 (5) (2023) 1–37
2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1145/3593434.3593468
A. Ahmad, M. Waseem, P. Liang, M. Fahmideh, M. S. Aktar, T. Mikkonen, Towards human-bot collaborative software architecting with chatgpt , in: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE ’23, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2023, p. 279–285 · 2023
Closest in time.
J. J. Maranhão Junior, F. F. Correia, E. Guerra, Can chatgpt suggest patterns? an exploratory study about answers given by ai-assisted tools to design problems, in: AI-Assisted Agile Software Development Workshop at XP2023 conference, Springer, 2023
2023
Closest in time.
L. Viviani, E. Guerra, J. Melegati, X. Wang, An empirical study about the instability and uncertainty of non-functional requirements, in: International Conference on Agile Software Development, Springer Nature Switzerland Cham, 2023, pp. 77–93
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
doi:10.1109/MS.2020.2985621
V. Vakkuri, K.-K. Kemell, J. Kultanen, P. Abrahamsson, The Current State of Industrial Practice in Artificial Intelligence Ethics, IEEE Software 37 (4) (2020) 50–57 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Paik, J.-W. Wang, Improving text-to-code generation with features of code graph on gpt-2, Electronics 10 (21) (2021) 2706
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Sosnowski, M. Bereza, Y. Y. Ng, Business-oriented approach to requirements elicitation in a scrum project, in: A. Przybyłek, J. Miler, A. Poth, A. Riel (Eds.), Lean and Agile Software Development, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021, pp. 185–191
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
doi:10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00041
A. Mastropaolo, S. Scalabrino, N. Cooper, D. Nader Palacio, D. Poshyvanyk, R. Oliveto, G. Bavota, Studying the usage of text-to-text transfer transformer to support code-related tasks, in: 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), 2021, pp. 336–347 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
E. J. Hu, Y. Shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y. Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, W. Chen, Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models (2021) · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.353
X. L. Li, P. Liang, Prefix-tuning: Optimizing continuous prompts for generation , in: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 2021, pp. 4582–4597 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
X. Liu, Y. Zheng, Z. Du, M. Ding, Y. Qian, Z. Yang, J. Tang, Gpt understands, too (2021) · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Closest in time.
H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozière, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azhar, A. Rodriguez, A. Joulin, E. Grave, G. Lample, Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models (2023) · 2023
Closest in time.
Andersen v. stability ai ltd. on courtlistener , accessed on 2023-10-05. URL https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66732129/parties/andersen-v-stability-ai-ltd/
2023
Closest in time.
Doe v. github inc. on courtlistener, accessed on 2023-10-05
2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1016/j.jss.2023.111734
A. Moradi Dakhel, V. Majdinasab, A. Nikanjam, F. Khomh, M. C. Desmarais, Z. M. J. Jiang, GitHub copilot AI pair programmer: Asset or liability? 203 111734 · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1109/NLBSE59153.2023.00018
M. L. Siddiq, A. Samee, S. R. Azgor, M. A. Haider, S. I. Sawraz, J. C. S. Santos, Zero-shot prompting for code complexity prediction using GitHub copilot, in: 2023 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Natural Language-Based Software Engineering (NLBSE), pp. 56–59 · 2023
Closest in time.
Y. Dong, X. Jiang, Z. Jin, G. Li, Self-collaboration code generation via chatgpt (2023) · 2023
Closest in time.
H. Li, Y. Hao, Y. Zhai, Z. Qian, The hitchhiker’s guide to program analysis: A journey with large language models (2023) · 2023
Closest in time.
Z. Wang, R. Panda, L. Karlinsky, R. Feris, H. Sun, Y. Kim, Multitask prompt tuning enables parameter-efficient transfer learning (2023) · 2023
Closest in time.
R. Li, L. B. Allal, Y. Zi, N. Muennighoff, D. Kocetkov, C. Mou, M. Marone, C. Akiki, J. Li, J. Chim, Q. Liu, E. Zheltonozhskii, T. Y. Zhuo, T. Wang, O. Dehaene, M. Davaadorj, J. Lamy-Poirier, J. Monteiro, O. Shliazhko, N. Gontier, N. Meade, A. Zebaze, M.-H. Yee, L. K. Umapathi, J. Zhu, B. Lipkin, M. Oblokulov, Z. Wang, R. Murthy, J. Stillerman, S. S. Patel, D. Abulkhanov, M. Zocca, M. Dey, Z. Zhang, N. Fahmy, U. Bhattacharyya, W. Yu, S. Singh, S. Luccioni, P. Villegas, M. Kunakov, F. Zhdanov, M. Romero, T. Lee, N. Timor, J. Ding, C. Schlesinger, H. Schoelkopf, J. Ebert, T. Dao, M. Mishra, A. Gu, J. Robinson, C. J. Anderson, B. Dolan-Gavitt, D. Contractor, S. Reddy, D. Fried, D. Bahdanau, Y. Jernite, C. M. Ferrandis, S. Hughes, T. Wolf, A. Guha, L. von Werra, H. de Vries, Starcoder: may the source be with you! (2023) · 2023
Closest in time.
TestRail, The 2023 software testing and quality report (2023)
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
Z. Kotti, R. Galanopoulou, D. Spinellis, Machine learning for software engineering: A tertiary study, ACM Computing Surveys 55 (12) (2023) 1–39
2023
Closest in time.
S. Jalil, S. Rafi, T. D. LaToza, K. Moran, W. Lam, Chatgpt and software testing education: Promises & perils, in: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW), IEEE, 2023, pp. 4130–4137
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
Z. Zheng, K. Ning, J. Chen, Y. Wang, W. Chen, L. Guo, W. Wang, Towards an understanding of large language models in software engineering tasks (2023) · 2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1145/3551349.3559555
T. Ahmed, P. Devanbu, Few-shot training llms for project-specific code-summarization , in: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE ’22, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
A. Madaan, A. Shypula, U. Alon, M. Hashemi, P. Ranganathan, Y. Yang, G. Neubig, A. Yazdanbakhsh, Learning performance-improving code edits (2023) · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179324
H. Pearce, B. Tan, B. Ahmad, R. Karri, B. Dolan-Gavitt, Examining zero-shot vulnerability repair with large language models, in: 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), 2023, pp. 2339–2356 · 2023
Closest in time.
O. Asare, M. Nagappan, N. Asokan, Is github’s copilot as bad as humans at introducing vulnerabilities in code? (2023) · 2023
Closest in time.
X. Hou, Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, Z. Yang, K. Wang, L. Li, X. Luo, D. Lo, J. Grundy, H. Wang, Large language models for software engineering: A systematic literature review (2023) · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1109/COMPSAC57700.2023.00117
Y. Feng, S. Vanam, M. Cherukupally, W. Zheng, M. Qiu, H. Chen, Investigating code generation performance of ChatGPT with crowdsourcing social data, in: 2023 IEEE 47th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), pp. 876–885, ISSN: 0730-3157 · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1109/IcETRAN59631.2023.10192161
N. Petrovic, Machine learning-based run-time DevSecOps: ChatGPT against traditional approach, in: 2023 10th International Conference on Electrical, Electronic and Computing Engineering (IcETRAN), pp. 1–5 · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3282111
Y. Ye, H. You, J. Du, Improved trust in human-robot collaboration with ChatGPT 11 55748–55754, conference Name: IEEE Access · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3297447
M.-N. Chu, Assessing the benefits of ChatGPT for business: An empirical study on organizational performance 11 76427–76436, conference Name: IEEE Access · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1109/MS.2023.3265877
C. Ebert, P. Louridas, Generative AI for software practitioners 40 (4) 30–38, conference Name: IEEE Software · 2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
L. Song, L. L. Minku, Artificial intelligence in software project management, in: Optimising the Software Development Process with Artificial Intelligence, Springer, 2023, pp. 19–65
2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1109/INCET57972.2023.10170591
S. Tennakoon, R. Islam, D. Wijerathna, R. Deen, P. Sumathipala, L. Abeywardhana, An interactive application for university students to reduce the industry-academia skill gap in the software engineering field, in: 2023 4th International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), 2023, pp. 1–6 · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1080/23311886.2023.2176363
L. Jiagui, W. Wanli, J. F. I. Lam, L. Ke, SWOT analysis and public policy of macao’s digital trade in services 9 (1) 2176363 · 2023
Closest in time.
OpenAI, Gpt-4 technical report (2023) · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121
J. Qadir, Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education , in: 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1–9 · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1145/3587102.3588815
M. Daun, J. Brings, How ChatGPT will change software engineering education , in: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1, ITiCSE 2023, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 110–116 · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1109/MS.2023.3300574
C. Bull, A. Kharrufa, Generative AI assistants in software development education: A vision for integrating generative AI into educational practice, not instinctively defending against it. 1–9Conference Name: IEEE Software · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1109/CSEET58097.2023.00031
J. Berrezueta-Guzman, S. Krusche, Recommendations to create programming exercises to overcome ChatGPT, in: 2023 IEEE 35th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), pp. 147–151, ISSN: 2377-570X · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.23919/MIPRO57284.2023.10159727
B. Banić, M. Konecki, M. Konecki, Pair programming education aided by ChatGPT, in: 2023 46th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO), pp. 911–915, ISSN: 2623-8764 · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1109/ICSTW58534.2023.00078
S. Jalil, S. Rafi, T. D. LaToza, K. Moran, W. Lam, ChatGPT and software testing education: Promises & perils, in: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW), pp. 4130–4137 · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1049/icp.2023.1537
A. Ashraf, A. Imam, ChatGPT’s use case for software engineers, in: 8th International Conference on Computing in Engineering and Technology (ICCET 2023), Vol. 2023, pp. 487–492 · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147
R. Yilmaz, F. G. Karaoglan Yilmaz, The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation 4 100147 · 2023
Closest in time.
D. K. Kanbach, L. Heiduk, G. Blueher, M. Schreiter, A. Lahmann, The GenAI is out of the bottle: generative artificial intelligence from a business model innovation perspective, Review of Managerial Science (0123456789) (sep 2023)
2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00873-0
B. Meskó, E. J. Topol, The imperative for regulatory oversight of large language models (or generative AI) in healthcare, npj Digital Medicine 6 (1) (2023) 120 · 2023
Closest in time.
L. Chen, M. Zaharia, J. Zou, How is chatgpt’s behavior changing over time? (2023) · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
E. Kasneci, K. Sessler, S. Kuchemann, M. Bannert, D. Dementieva, F. Fischer, U. Gasser, G. Groh, S. Gunnemann, E. Hullermeier, S. Krusche, G. Kutyniok, T. Michaeli, C. Nerdel, J. Pfeffer, O. Poquet, M. Sailer, A. Schmidt, T. Seidel, M. Stadler, J. Weller, J. Kuhn, G. Kasneci, ChatGPT for good? on opportunities and challenges of large language models for education 103 102274 · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1145/3597512.3599715
B. Cabrero-Daniel, A. Sanagustín Cabrero, Perceived trustworthiness of natural language generators , in: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems, TAS ’23, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
doi:10.1145/3604930.3605705
A. A. Chien, L. Lin, H. Nguyen, V. Rao, T. Sharma, R. Wijayawardana, Reducing the carbon impact of generative AI inference (today and in 2035) , in: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Sustainable Computer Systems, HotCarbon ’23, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1–7 · 2035
Closest in time.
A. Przybyłek, An empirical study on the impact of aspectj on software evolvability, Empirical Software Engineering 23 (4) (2018) 2018–2050
2050
Closest in time.