Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently gained significant attention due to their remarkable capabilities in performing diverse tasks across various domains.
Socialiqa: Commonsense reasoning about social interactions
Maarten Sap, Hannah Rashkin, Derek Chen, Ronan LeBras, and Yejin Choi. 2019 · 1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
Boolq: Exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes/no questions
Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, Ming-Wei Chang, Tom Kwiatkowski, Michael Collins, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019 · 1905
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hellaswag: Can a machine really finish your sentence?
Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, and Yejin Choi. 2019 · 1905
Earlier work this paper cites.
Perplexity—a measure of the difficulty of speech recognition tasks
Fred Jelinek, Robert L Mercer, Lalit R Bahl, and James K Baker. 1977 · 1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
TyDi QA: A benchmark for information-seeking question answering in typologically diverse languages
Jonathan H Clark, Eunsol Choi, Michael Collins, Dan Garrette, Tom Kwiatkowski, Vitaly Nikolaev, and Jennimaria Palomaki. 2020 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries
Chin-Yew Lin. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom B Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Aligning ai with shared human values
Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andrew Critch, Jerry Li, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2020a · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measuring massive multitask language understanding
Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2020b · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mocha: A dataset for training and evaluating generative reading comprehension metrics
Anthony Chen, Gabriel Stanovsky, Sameer Singh, and Matt Gardner. 2020 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
A diagram is worth a dozen images
Aniruddha Kembhavi, Mike Salvato, Eric Kolve, Minjoon Seo, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, and Ali Farhadi. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Beam search strategies for neural machine translation
Markus Freitag and Yaser Al-Onaizan. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Triviaqa: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension
Mandar Joshi, Eunsol Choi, Daniel S Weld, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Race: Large-scale reading comprehension dataset from examinations
Guokun Lai, Qizhe Xie, Hanxiao Liu, Yiming Yang, and Eduard Hovy. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge
Peter Clark, Isaac Cowhey, Oren Etzioni, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal, Carissa Schoenick, and Oyvind Tafjord. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Can a suit of armor conduct electricity? a new dataset for open book question answering
Todor Mihaylov, Peter Clark, Tushar Khot, and Ashish Sabharwal. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Building language models for text with named entities
Md Rizwan Parvez, Saikat Chakraborty, Baishakhi Ray, and Kai-Wei Chang. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A corpus of drug usage guidelines annotated with type of advice
Sarah Masud Preum, Md Rizwan Parvez, Kai-Wei Chang, and John Stankovic. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Improving language understanding by generative pre-training
Alec Radford, Karthik Narasimhan, Tim Salimans, Ilya Sutskever, et al. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Know what you don’t know: Unanswerable questions for squad
Pranav Rajpurkar, Robin Jia, and Percy Liang. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
The web as a knowledge-base for answering complex questions
Alon Talmor and Jonathan Berant. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Samsum corpus: A human-annotated dialogue dataset for abstractive summarization
Bogdan Gliwa, Iwona Mochol, Maciej Biesek, and Aleksander Wawer. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research
Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Redfield, Michael Collins, Ankur Parikh, Chris Alberti, Danielle Epstein, Illia Polosukhin, Jacob Devlin, Kenton Lee, et al. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Robust text classifier on test-time budgets
Md Rizwan Parvez, Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang, and Venkatesh Saligrama. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert
Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Piqa: Reasoning about physical commonsense in natural language
Yonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Jianfeng Gao, Yejin Choi, et al. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Contextualized embeddings based transformer encoder for sentence similarity modeling in answer selection task
Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Xiangji Huang, and Enamul Hoque. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks
Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, et al. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Program synthesis with large language models
Jacob Austin, Augustus Odena, Maxwell Nye, Maarten Bosma, Henryk Michalewski, David Dohan, Ellen Jiang, Carrie Cai, Michael Terry, Quoc Le, et al. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evaluating large language models trained on code
Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measuring coding challenge competence with APPS
Dan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Saurav Kadavath, Mantas Mazeika, Akul Arora, Ethan Guo, Collin Burns, Samir Puranik, Horace He, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Human evaluation of automatically generated text: Current trends and best practice guidelines
Chris van der Lee, Albert Gatt, Emiel van Miltenburg, and Emiel Krahmer. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Truthfulqa: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods
Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, and Owain Evans. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Docvqa: A dataset for vqa on document images
Minesh Mathew, Dimosthenis Karatzas, and CV Jawahar. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Retrieval augmented code generation and summarization
Md Rizwan Parvez, Wasi Ahmad, Saikat Chakraborty, Baishakhi Ray, and Kai-Wei Chang. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evaluating the values of sources in transfer learning
Md Rizwan Parvez and Kai-Wei Chang. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
How good is your tokenizer? on the monolingual performance of multilingual language models
Phillip Rust, Jonas Pfeiffer, Ivan Vulić, Sebastian Ruder, and Iryna Gurevych. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Winogrande: An adversarial winograd schema challenge at scale
Keisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, and Yejin Choi. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bartscore: Evaluating generated text as text generation
Weizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, and Pengfei Liu. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tomayto, tomahto. beyond token-level answer equivalence for question answering evaluation
Jannis Bulian, Christian Buck, Wojciech Gajewski, Benjamin Boerschinger, and Tal Schuster. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scaling instruction-finetuned language models
Hyung Won Chung, Le Hou, Shayne Longpre, Barret Zoph, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Eric Li, Xuezhi Wang, Mostafa Dehghani, Siddhartha Brahma, et al. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Is gpt-3 a good data annotator?
Bosheng Ding, Chengwei Qin, Linlin Liu, Lidong Bing, Shafiq Joty, and Boyang Li. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Competition-level code generation with alphacode
Yujia Li, David Choi, Junyoung Chung, Nate Kushman, Julian Schrittwieser, Rémi Leblond, Tom Eccles, James Keeling, Felix Gimeno, Agustin Dal Lago, Thomas Hubert, Peter Choy, Cyprien de Masson d’Autume, Igor Babuschkin, Xinyun Chen, Po-Sen Huang, Johannes Welbl, Sven Gowal, Alexey Cherepanov, James Molloy, Daniel J. Mankowitz, Esme Sutherland Robson, Pushmeet Kohli, Nando de Freitas, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Oriol Vinyals. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Holistic evaluation of language models
Percy Liang, Rishi Bommasani, Tony Lee, Dimitris Tsipras, Dilara Soylu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Yian Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Yuhuai Wu, Ananya Kumar, et al. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learn to explain: Multimodal reasoning via thought chains for science question answering
Pan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tanglin Xia, Liang Qiu, Kai-Wei Chang, Song-Chun Zhu, Oyvind Tafjord, Peter Clark, and Ashwin Kalyan. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Chartqa: A benchmark for question answering about charts with visual and logical reasoning
Ahmed Masry, Do Xuan Long, Jia Qing Tan, Shafiq Joty, and Enamul Hoque. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Red teaming language models with language models
Ethan Perez, Saffron Huang, Francis Song, Trevor Cai, Roman Ring, John Aslanides, Amelia Glaese, Nat McAleese, and Geoffrey Irving. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
A survey on clinical natural language processing in the united kingdom from 2007 to 2022
Honghan Wu, Minhong Wang, Jinge Wu, Farah Francis, Yun-Hsuan Chang, Alex Shavick, Hang Dong, Michael TC Poon, Natalie Fitzpatrick, Adam P Levine, et al. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Linyi Yang, Shuibai Zhang, Libo Qin, Yafu Li, Yidong Wang, Hanmeng Liu, Jindong Wang, Xing Xie, and Yue Zhang. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mega: Multilingual evaluation of generative ai
Kabir Ahuja, Harshita Diddee, Rishav Hada, Millicent Ochieng, Krithika Ramesh, Prachi Jain, Akshay Nambi, Tanuja Ganu, Sameer Segal, Maxamed Axmed, et al. 2023 · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
The falcon series of open language models
Ebtesam Almazrouei, Hamza Alobeidli, Abdulaziz Alshamsi, Alessandro Cappelli, Ruxandra Cojocaru, Mérouane Debbah, Étienne Goffinet, Daniel Hesslow, Julien Launay, Quentin Malartic, et al. 2023 · 2023
Earlier work this paper cites.
Skill-based few-shot selection for in-context learning
Shengnan An, Bo Zhou, Zeqi Lin, Qiang Fu, Bei Chen, Nanning Zheng, Weizhu Chen, and Jian-Guang Lou. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Rohan Anil, Andrew M Dai, Orhan Firat, Melvin Johnson, Dmitry Lepikhin, Alexandre Passos, Siamak Shakeri, Emanuel Taropa, Paige Bailey, Zhifeng Chen, et al. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Qwen-vl: A frontier large vision-language model with versatile abilities
Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Shusheng Yang, Shijie Wang, Sinan Tan, Peng Wang, Junyang Lin, Chang Zhou, and Jingren Zhou. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Yejin Bang, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Nayeon Lee, Wenliang Dai, Dan Su, Bryan Wilie, Holy Lovenia, Ziwei Ji, Tiezheng Yu, Willy Chung, et al. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Medexpqa: Multilingual benchmarking of large language models for medical question answering
Iñigo Alonso, Maite Oronoz, and Rodrigo Agerri. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
When benchmarks are targets: Revealing the sensitivity of large language model leaderboards
Norah Alzahrani, Hisham Abdullah Alyahya, Yazeed Alnumay, Sultan Alrashed, Shaykhah Alsubaie, Yusef Almushaykeh, Faisal Mirza, Nouf Alotaibi, Nora Altwairesh, Areeb Alowisheq, M Saiful Bari, and Haidar Khan. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
The claude 3 model family: Opus, sonnet, haiku
Anthropic. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Benchmarking foundation models with language-model-as-an-examiner
Yushi Bai, Jiahao Ying, Yixin Cao, Xin Lv, Yuze He, Xiaozhi Wang, Jifan Yu, Kaisheng Zeng, Yijia Xiao, Haozhe Lyu, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Leak, cheat, repeat: Data contamination and evaluation malpractices in closed-source llms
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Elo uncovered: Robustness and best practices in language model evaluation
Meriem Boubdir, Edward Kim, Beyza Ermis, Sara Hooker, and Marzieh Fadaee. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Can large language models be an alternative to human evaluations?
Cheng-Han Chiang and Hung-yi Lee. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
A study on the evaluation of tokenizer performance in natural language processing
Sanghyun Choo and Wonjoon Kim. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Llmebench: A flexible framework for accelerating llms benchmarking
Fahim Dalvi, Maram Hasanain, Sabri Boughorbel, Basel Mousi, Samir Abdaljalil, Nizi Nazar, Ahmed Abdelali, Shammur Absar Chowdhury, Hamdy Mubarak, Ahmed Ali, et al. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Time travel in llms: Tracing data contamination in large language models
Shahriar Golchin and Mihai Surdeanu. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Tianrui Guan, Fuxiao Liu, Xiyang Wu, Ruiqi Xian, Zongxia Li, Xiaoyu Liu, Xijun Wang, Lichang Chen, Furong Huang, Yaser Yacoob, et al. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Are large language model-based evaluators the solution to scaling up multilingual evaluation?
Rishav Hada, Varun Gumma, Adrian de Wynter, Harshita Diddee, Mohamed Ahmed, Monojit Choudhury, Kalika Bali, and Sunayana Sitaram. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Evaluation of ChatGPT on biomedical tasks: A zero-shot comparison with fine-tuned generative transformers
Israt Jahan, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Chun Peng, and Jimmy Huang. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Simone Balloccu, Patrícia Schmidtová, Mateusz Lango, and Ondřej Dušek. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Lessons from the trenches on reproducible evaluation of language models
Stella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Lintang Sutawika, Leo Gao, Jonathan Tow, Baber Abbasi, Alham Fikri Aji, Pawan Sasanka Ammanamanchi, Sidney Black, Jordan Clive, Anthony DiPofi, Julen Etxaniz, Benjamin Fattori, Jessica Zosa Forde, Charles Foster, Mimansa Jaiswal, Wilson Y. Lee, Haonan Li, Charles Lovering, Niklas Muennighoff, Ellie Pavlick, Jason Phang, Aviya Skowron, Samson Tan, Xiangru Tang, Kevin A. Wang, Genta Indra Winata, François Yvon, and Andy Zou. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Sabri Boughorbel, MD Parvez, and Majd Hawasly. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
A survey on mixture of experts
Weilin Cai, Juyong Jiang, Fan Wang, Jing Tang, Sunghun Kim, and Jiayi Huang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
A survey on evaluation of large language models
Yupeng Chang, Xu Wang, Jindong Wang, Yuan Wu, Linyi Yang, Kaijie Zhu, Hao Chen, Xiaoyuan Yi, Cunxiang Wang, Yidong Wang, Wei Ye, Yue Zhang, Yi Chang, Philip S. Yu, Qiang Yang, and Xing Xie. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Jailbreakbench: An open robustness benchmark for jailbreaking large language models
Patrick Chao, Edoardo Debenedetti, Alexander Robey, Maksym Andriushchenko, Francesco Croce, Vikash Sehwag, Edgar Dobriban, Nicolas Flammarion, George J Pappas, Florian Tramer, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Steffi Chern, Ethan Chern, Graham Neubig, and Pengfei Liu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Instructblip: Towards general-purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning
Wenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong, Junqi Zhao, Weisheng Wang, Boyang Li, Pascale N Fung, and Steven Hoi. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Aryo Pradipta Gema, Joshua Ong Jun Leang, Giwon Hong, Alessio Devoto, Alberto Carlo Maria Mancino, Rohit Saxena, Xuanli He, Yu Zhao, Xiaotang Du, Mohammad Reza Ghasemi Madani, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Better & faster large language models via multi-token prediction
Fabian Gloeckle, Badr Youbi Idrissi, Baptiste Rozière, David Lopez-Paz, and Gabriel Synnaeve. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Can perplexity reflect large language model’s ability in long text understanding?
Yutong Hu, Quzhe Huang, Mingxu Tao, Chen Zhang, and Yansong Feng. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
A comprehensive evaluation of large language models on benchmark biomedical text processing tasks
Israt Jahan, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Chun Peng, and Jimmy Xiangji Huang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
On scalable oversight with weak llms judging strong llms
Zachary Kenton, Noah Y Siegel, János Kramár, Jonah Brown-Cohen, Samuel Albanie, Jannis Bulian, Rishabh Agarwal, David Lindner, Yunhao Tang, Noah D Goodman, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Large language models are state-of-the-art evaluator for grammatical error correction
Masamune Kobayashi, Masato Mita, and Mamoru Komachi. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Risk or chance? large language models and reproducibility in human-computer interaction research
Thomas Kosch and Sebastian Feger. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Rewardbench: Evaluating reward models for language modeling
Nathan Lambert, Valentina Pyatkin, Jacob Morrison, LJ Miranda, Bill Yuchen Lin, Khyathi Chandu, Nouha Dziri, Sachin Kumar, Tom Zick, Yejin Choi, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Zongxia Li, Ishani Mondal, Yijun Liang, Huy Nghiem, and Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Llmscore: Unveiling the power of large language models in text-to-image synthesis evaluation
Yujie Lu, Xianjun Yang, Xiujun Li, Xin Eric Wang, and William Yang Wang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Cheap and quick: Efficient vision-language instruction tuning for large language models
Gen Luo, Yiyi Zhou, Tianhe Ren, Shengxin Chen, Xiaoshuai Sun, and Rongrong Ji. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Yuanjie Lyu, Zhiyu Li, Simin Niu, Feiyu Xiong, Bo Tang, Wenjin Wang, Hao Wu, Huanyong Liu, Tong Xu, and Enhong Chen. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Improving automatic vqa evaluation using large language models
Oscar Mañas, Benno Krojer, and Aishwarya Agrawal. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Chartinstruct: Instruction tuning for chart comprehension and reasoning
Ahmed Masry, Mehrad Shahmohammadi, Md Rizwan Parvez, Enamul Hoque, and Shafiq Joty. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
On leakage of code generation evaluation datasets
Alexandre Matton, Tom Sherborne, Dennis Aumiller, Elena Tommasone, Milad Alizadeh, Jingyi He, Raymond Ma, Maxime Voisin, Ellen Gilsenan-McMahon, and Matthias Gallé. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Inadequacies of large language model benchmarks in the era of generative artificial intelligence
Timothy R McIntosh, Teo Susnjak, Tong Liu, Paul Watters, and Malka N Halgamuge. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Large language models: A survey
Shervin Minaee, Tomas Mikolov, Narjes Nikzad, Meysam Chenaghlu, Richard Socher, Xavier Amatriain, and Jianfeng Gao. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Fine-grained hallucination detection and editing for language models
Abhika Mishra, Akari Asai, Vidhisha Balachandran, Yizhong Wang, Graham Neubig, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Mixeval: Deriving wisdom of the crowd from llm benchmark mixtures
Jinjie Ni, Fuzhao Xue, Xiang Yue, Yuntian Deng, Mahir Shah, Kabir Jain, Graham Neubig, and Yang You. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Md Rizwan Parvez. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Valor-eval: Holistic coverage and faithfulness evaluation of large vision-language models
Haoyi Qiu, Wenbo Hu, Zi-Yi Dou, and Nanyun Peng. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Hello qwen2
Qwen2. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
How much are llms contaminated? a comprehensive survey and the llmsanitize library
Mathieu Ravaut, Bosheng Ding, Fangkai Jiao, Hailin Chen, Xingxuan Li, Ruochen Zhao, Chengwei Qin, Caiming Xiong, and Shafiq Joty. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Samba-coe v0.3: The power of routing ml models at scale
SambaNova. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
The prompt report: A systematic survey of prompting techniques
Sander Schulhoff, Michael Ilie, Nishant Balepur, Konstantine Kahadze, Amanda Liu, Chenglei Si, Yinheng Li, Aayush Gupta, HyoJung Han, Sevien Schulhoff, Pranav Sandeep Dulepet, Saurav Vidyadhara, Dayeon Ki, Sweta Agrawal, Chau Pham, Gerson C. Kroiz, Feileen Li, Hudson Tao, Ashay Srivastava, Hevander Da Costa, Saloni Gupta, Megan L. Rogers, Inna Goncearenco, Giuseppe Sarli, Igor Galynker, Denis Peskoff, Marine Carpuat, Jules White, Shyamal Anadkat, Alexander Miserlis Hoyle, and Philip Resnik. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Who validates the validators? aligning llm-assisted evaluation of llm outputs with human preferences
Shreya Shankar, JD Zamfirescu-Pereira, Björn Hartmann, Aditya G Parameswaran, and Ian Arawjo. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
A thorough examination of decoding methods in the era of llms
Chufan Shi, Haoran Yang, Deng Cai, Zhisong Zhang, Yifan Wang, Yujiu Yang, and Wai Lam. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Large language models are inconsistent and biased evaluators
Rickard Stureborg, Dimitris Alikaniotis, and Yoshi Suhara. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Trustllm: Trustworthiness in large language models
Lichao Sun, Yue Huang, Haoran Wang, Siyuan Wu, Qihui Zhang, Chujie Gao, Yixin Huang, Wenhan Lyu, Yixuan Zhang, Xiner Li, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Multihop-rag: Benchmarking retrieval-augmented generation for multi-hop queries
Yixuan Tang and Yi Yang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Gemma: Open models based on gemini research and technology
Gemma Team, Thomas Mesnard, Cassidy Hardin, Robert Dadashi, Surya Bhupatiraju, Shreya Pathak, Laurent Sifre, Morgane Rivière, Mihir Sanjay Kale, Juliette Love, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Alert: A comprehensive benchmark for assessing large language models’ safety through red teaming
Simone Tedeschi, Felix Friedrich, Patrick Schramowski, Kristian Kersting, Roberto Navigli, Huu Nguyen, and Bo Li. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Replacing judges with juries: Evaluating llm generations with a panel of diverse models
Pat Verga, Sebastian Hofstatter, Sophia Althammer, Yixuan Su, Aleksandra Piktus, Arkady Arkhangorodsky, Minjie Xu, Naomi White, and Patrick Lewis. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Unveiling selection biases: Exploring order and token sensitivity in large language models
Sheng-Lun Wei, Cheng-Kuang Wu, Hen-Hsen Huang, and Hsin-Hsi Chen. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Fofo: A benchmark to evaluate llms’ format-following capability
Congying Xia, Chen Xing, Jiangshu Du, Xinyi Yang, Yihao Feng, Ran Xu, Wenpeng Yin, and Caiming Xiong. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Benchmarking retrieval-augmented generation for medicine
Guangzhi Xiong, Qiao Jin, Zhiyong Lu, and Aidong Zhang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Benchmarking benchmark leakage in large language models
Ruijie Xu, Zengzhi Wang, Run-Ze Fan, and Pengfei Liu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
An Yang, Baosong Yang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Zhou, Chengpeng Li, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Guanting Dong, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jialong Tang, Jialin Wang, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Ma, Jin Xu, Jingren Zhou, Jinze Bai, Jinzheng He, Junyang Lin, Kai Dang, Keming Lu, Keqin Chen, Kexin Yang, Mei Li, Mingfeng Xue, Na Ni, Pei Zhang, Peng Wang, Ru Peng, Rui Men, Ruize Gao, Runji Lin, Shijie Wang, Shuai Bai, Sinan Tan, Tianhang Zhu, Tianhao Li, Tianyu Liu, Wenbin Ge, Xiaodong Deng, Xiaohuan Zhou, Xingzhang Ren, Xinyu Zhang, Xipin Wei, Xuancheng Ren, Yang Fan, Yang Yao, Yichang Zhang, Yu Wan, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Zhenru Zhang, and Zhihao Fan. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena
Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zi Lin, Zhuohan Li, Dacheng Li, Eric Xing, et al. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Dyval 2: Dynamic evaluation of large language models by meta probing agents
Kaijie Zhu, Jindong Wang, Qinlin Zhao, Ruochen Xu, and Xing Xie. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Can large language models transform computational social science?
Caleb Ziems, William Held, Omar Shaikh, Jiaao Chen, Zhehao Zhang, and Diyi Yang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.