Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring
Benjamin S Bloom. 1984 · 1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
Some difficulties of learning to program
Benedict Du Boulay. 1986 · 1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
Superposter behavior in MOOC forums. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference . 117–126
Jonathan Huang, Anirban Dasgupta, Arpita Ghosh, Jane Manning, and Marc Sanders. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A systematic review of approaches for teaching introductory programming and their influence on success. In Proc. of the tenth annual conf. on Int. computing education research . 19–26
Arto Vihavainen, Jonne Airaksinen, and Christopher Watson. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Failure rates in introductory programming revisited. In Proc. of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education . 39–44
Christopher Watson and Frederick WB Li. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fact sheet: President obama announces computer science for all initiative
White House. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses
René F Kizilcec, Mar Pérez-Sanagustín, and Jorge J Maldonado. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLG. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , Martha Palmer, Rebecca Hwa, and Sebastian Riedel (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2241–2252
Jekaterina Novikova, Ondřej Dušek, Amanda Cercas Curry, and Verena Rieser. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A systematic literature review of automated feedback generation for programming exercises
Hieke Keuning, Johan Jeuring, and Bastiaan Heeren. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Introductory programming: a systematic literature review. In Proc. Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education . 55–106
Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Ibrahim Albluwi, Brett A Becker, Michail Giannakos, Amruth N Kumar, Linda Ott, James Paterson, Michael James Scott, Judy Sheard, and Claudia Szabo. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Social help-seeking strategies in a programming MOOC. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education . 116–121
Matti Nelimarkka and Arto Hellas. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Undergraduate teaching assistants in computer science: a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research . 31–40
Diba Mirza, Phillip T Conrad, Christian Lloyd, Ziad Matni, and Arthur Gatin. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Non-restricted Access to Model Solutions: A Good Idea?. In Proc. of the 2019 ACM Conf. on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education . 44–50
Henrik Nygren, Juho Leinonen, and Arto Hellas. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evaluation of text generation: A survey
Asli Celikyilmaz, Elizabeth Clark, and Jianfeng Gao. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Human evaluation of automatically generated text: Current trends and best practice guidelines
Chris van der Lee, Albert Gatt, Emiel van Miltenburg, and Emiel Krahmer. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
The Robots Are Coming: Exploring the Implications of OpenAI Codex on Introductory Programming. In Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (ACE ’22) . ACM, NY, NY, USA, 10–19
James Finnie-Ansley, Paul Denny, Brett A. Becker, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, and James Prather. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Automated assessment in computer science education: A state-of-the-art review
José Carlos Paiva, José Paulo Leal, and Álvaro Figueira. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Github copilot in the classroom: learning to code with AI assistance
QuickTA: Exploring the Design Space of Using Large Language Models to Provide Support to Students. Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference 2023 (LAK’23)
Harsh Kumar, Ilya Musabirov, Joseph Jay Williams, and Michael Liut. 2023b · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Using Large Language Models to Enhance Programming Error Messages. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Toronto ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023) . ACM, NY, NY, USA, 563–569
Juho Leinonen, Arto Hellas, Sami Sarsa, Brent Reeves, Paul Denny, James Prather, and Brett A. Becker. 2023b · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
CodeHelp: Using Large Language Models with Guardrails for Scalable Support in Programming Classes
Mark Liffiton, Brad Sheese, Jaromir Savelka, and Paul Denny. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Experiences from Using Code Explanations Generated by Large Language Models in a Web Software Development E-Book. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Toronto ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023) . ACM, NY, NY, USA, 931–937
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Ben Puryear and Gina Sprint. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations Using Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 (Lugano and Virtual Event, Switzerland) (ICER ’22) . ACM, NY, NY, USA, 27–43
Sami Sarsa, Paul Denny, Arto Hellas, and Juho Leinonen. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Expectation vs. Experience: Evaluating the Usability of Code Generation Tools Powered by Large Language Models. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts . Association for Computing Machinery, NY NY, USA, 1–7
Priyan Vaithilingam, Tianyi Zhang, and Elena L. Glassman. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Generative AI in Introductory Programming Education
Brett A. Becker, Michelle Craig, Paul Denny, Hieke Keuning, Natalie Kiesler, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Lauri Malmi, James Prather, and Keith Quille. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Significant Trends in CS Educational Material: Current and Future. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (Toronto ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023) . ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1253
Peter Brusilovsky, Barbara J. Ericson, Cay S. Horstmann, Christian Servin, Frank Vahid, and Craig . 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Top French university bans use of ChatGPT to prevent plagiarism
Geert De Clercq and Josie Kao. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Exploring the Responses of Large Language Models to Beginner Programmers’ Help Requests. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 (Chicago, IL, USA) (ICER ’23) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93–105
Arto Hellas, Juho Leinonen, Sami Sarsa, Charles Koutcheme, Lilja Kujanpää, and Juha Sorva. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Studying the Effect of AI Code Generators on Supporting Novice Learners in Introductory Programming. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23) . ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 455, 23 pages
Majeed Kazemitabaar, Justin Chow, Carl Ka To Ma, Barbara J. Ericson, David Weintrop, and Tovi Grossman. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Stephen MacNeil, Andrew Tran, Arto Hellas, Joanne Kim, Sami Sarsa, Paul Denny, Seth Bernstein, and Juho Leinonen. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Banning ChatGPT will do more harm than good
Rohan Mehta. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Do users write more insecure code with AI assistants?. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security . 2785–2799
Neil Perry, Megha Srivastava, Deepak Kumar, and Dan Boneh. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Generating Programs Trivially: Student Use of Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education Vol 1 . 126–132
Siddhartha Prasad, Ben Greenman, Tim Nelson, and Shriram Krishnamurthi. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
The robots are here: Navigating the generative ai revolution in computing education
James Prather, Paul Denny, Juho Leinonen, Brett A Becker, Ibrahim Albluwi, Michelle Craig, Hieke Keuning, Natalie Kiesler, Tobias Kohn, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“It’s Weird That It Knows What I Want”: Usability and Interactions with Copilot for Novice Programmers
James Prather, Brent N. Reeves, Paul Denny, Brett A. Becker, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Garrett Powell, James Finnie-Ansley, and Eddie Antonio Santos. 2023b · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Always Provide Context: The Effects of Code Context on Programming Error Message Enhancement. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education Vol 1 . 147–153
Eddie Antonio Santos, Prajish Prasad, and Brett A Becker. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Using Large Language Models to Automatically Identify Programming Concepts in Code Snippets. In Proc. of the 2023 ACM Conf. on Int. Computing Education Research - Volume 2 , Vol. 1. ACM, 563–569
Andrew Tran, Linxuan Li, Egi Rama, Kenneth Angelikas, and Stephen MacNeil. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Computing Education in the Era of Generative AI
Paul Denny, James Prather, Brett A. Becker, James Finnie-Ansley, Arto Hellas, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Brent N. Reeves, Eddie Antonio Santos, and Sami Sarsa. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Blurps and useful stats
Hour of Code. [n. d.] · 2024
Closest in time.