Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Behavior study experiments are an important part of society modeling and understanding human interactions.
Fairness and the assumptions of economics
Daniel Kahneman, Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard H. Thaler · 1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
Communication in the battle of the sexes game: Some experimental results
Russell Cooper, Douglas V. DeJong, Robert Forsythe, and Thomas W. Ross · 1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners
Colin F. Camerer and Richard H. Thaler · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
On expectations and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games
Elizabeth Hoffman, Kevin McCabe, and Vernon Smith · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Basic emotions
Paul Ekman et al · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis
Hessel Oosterbeek, Randolph Sloof, and Gijs van de Kuilen · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using Turn Taking to Mitigate Conflict and Coordination Problems in the Repeated Battle of the Sexes Game
Sau-Him Paul lau and Vai-Lam Mui · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Behavioral economics
Erik Angner and George Loewenstein · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the ultimatum game
Katia M Harlé and Alan G Sanfey · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Being emotional during decision making—good or bad? an empirical investigation
Myeong-Gu Seo and Lisa Feldman Barrett · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
The enduring impact of transient emotions on decision making
Eduardo B. Andrade and Dan Ariely · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions
Laura Moretti and Giuseppe Di Pellegrino · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
When happiness makes us selfish, but sadness makes us fair: Affective influences on interpersonal strategies in the dictator game
Hui Bing Tan and Joseph P. Forgas · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pecunia olet: The role of incidental disgust in the ultimatum game
Nicolao Bonini, Constantinos Hadjichristidis, Ketti Mazzocco, M. Luisa Demattè, Massimiliano Zampini, Andrea Sbarbati, and Stefano Magon · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dictator games: A meta study
Christoph Engel · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fear and guilt in proposers: Using emotions to explain offers in ultimatum bargaining
Rob M. A. Nelissen, Marijke C. Leliveld, Eric van Dijk, and Marcel Zeelenberg · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Behavioral economics: Old wine in irrelevant new bottles?
Fred S. McChesney · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
The effect of partner-directed emotion in social exchange decision-making
Iveta Eimontaite, Antoinette Nicolle, Igor C. Schindler, and Vinod Goel · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
To give or to keep? affective influences on selfishness and fairness in computer-mediated interactions in the dictator game and the ultimatum game
Joseph P. Forgas and Hui Bing Tan · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Do people have accurate beliefs about the behavioral consequences of incidental emotions? evidence from trust games
Edgar E. Kausel and Terry Connolly · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Emotion and decision making
Jennifer S Lerner, Ye Li, Piercarlo Valdesolo, and Karim S Kassam · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future
Richard H. Thaler · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Influences of state and trait affect on behavior, feedback-related negativity, and p3b in the ultimatum game
Korbinian Riepl, Patrick Mussel, Roman Osinsky, and Johannes Hewig · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Individual characteristics vs. experience: An experimental study on cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma
Iván Barreda-Tarrazona, Ainhoa Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, Marina Pavan, and Gerardo Sabater-Grande · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Risk and temptation: A meta-study on prisoner’s dilemma games
Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior
Joon Sung Park, Joseph O’Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S Bernstein · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Using large language models to simulate multiple humans and replicate human subject studies, 2023
Gati Aher, Rosa I. Arriaga, and Adam Tauman Kalai · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Out of one, many: Using language models to simulate human samples
Lisa P. Argyle, Ethan C. Busby, Nancy Fulda, Joshua R. Gubler, Christopher Rytting, and David Wingate · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Playing repeated games with large language models, 2023
Elif Akata, Lion Schulz, Julian Coda-Forno, Seong Joon Oh, Matthias Bethge, and Eric Schulz · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Large language models as simulated economic agents: What can we learn from homo silicus?, 2023
John J. Horton · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Friederike Mengel · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Induced negative mood increases dictator game giving
Carolina Pérez-Dueñas, M. Fernanda Rivas, Olusegun A. Oyediran, and Francisco García-Torres · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning to alternate
Jasmina Arifovic and John Ledyard · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Criticism of behavioural economics: Attacks towards ideology, evidence and practical application
Līga Pūce · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Happiness, cooperation and language
Eugenio Proto, Daniel Sgroi, and Mahnaz Nazneen · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Stake size effects in ultimatum game and dictator game offers: A meta-analysis
Andrea Larney, Amanda Rotella, and Pat Barclay · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Coherence between subjective experience and physiology in emotion: Individual differences and implications for well-being
Casey L Brown, Natalia Van Doren, Brett Q Ford, Iris B Mauss, Jocelyn W Sze, and Robert W Levenson · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Cheng Li, Jindong Wang, Yixuan Zhang, Kaijie Zhu, Wenxin Hou, Jianxun Lian, Fang Luo, Qiang Yang, and Xing Xie · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Playing games with gpt: What can we learn about a large language model from canonical strategic games?, 2023
Philip Brookins and Jason Matthew DeBacker · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Emergent cooperation and strategy adaptation in multi-agent systems: An extended coevolutionary theory with llms
I de Zarzà, J de Curtò, Gemma Roig, Pietro Manzoni, and Carlos T Calafate · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Language-specific representation of emotion-concept knowledge causally supports emotion inference, 2023
Ming Li, Yusheng Su, Hsiu-Yuan Huang, Jiali Cheng, Xin Hu, Xinmiao Zhang, Huadong Wang, Yujia Qin, Xiaozhi Wang, Zhiyuan Liu, and Dan Zhang · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Instructerc: Reforming emotion recognition in conversation with a retrieval multi-task llms framework, 2023
Shanglin Lei, Guanting Dong, Xiaoping Wang, Keheng Wang, and Sirui Wang · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
An appraisal-based chain-of-emotion architecture for affective language model game agents, 2023
Maximilian Croissant, Madeleine Frister, Guy Schofield, and Cade McCall · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Emotional intelligence of gpt-4 large language model
Gleb Vzorin, Alexey Bukinich, Anna Sedykh, Irina Vetrova, and Elena Sergienko · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
The good, the bad, and why: Unveiling emotions in generative ai, 2023
Cheng Li, Jindong Wang, Yixuan Zhang, Kaijie Zhu, Xinyi Wang, Wenxin Hou, Jianxun Lian, Fang Luo, Qiang Yang, and Xing Xie · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Do llm agents exhibit social behavior?
Yan Leng and Yuan Yuan · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Strategic behavior of large language models: Game structure vs. contextual framing, 2023
Nunzio Lorè and Babak Heydari · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Alexander Pan, Jun Shern Chan, Andy Zou, Nathaniel Li, Steven Basart, Thomas Woodside, Hanlin Zhang, Scott Emmons, and Dan Hendrycks · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Emotionally numb or empathetic? evaluating how llms feel using emotionbench, 2024
Jen tse Huang, Man Ho Lam, Eric John Li, Shujie Ren, Wenxuan Wang, Wenxiang Jiao, Zhaopeng Tu, and Michael R. Lyu · 2024
Closest in time.
Can large language model agents simulate human trust behaviors?
Chengxing Xie, Canyu Chen, Feiran Jia, Ziyu Ye, Kai Shu, Adel Bibi, Ziniu Hu, Philip Torr, Bernard Ghanem, and Guohao Li · 2024
Closest in time.