Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
As LLMs increasingly take on roles in human-AI interactions and autonomous AI systems, understanding their social behavior becomes important for informed use and continuous improvement.
Bratman M (1987) Intention, plans, and practical reason
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The economic journal 100(401):464–477
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Georgeff M, Pell B, Pollack M, Tambe M, Wooldridge M (1999) The belief-desire-intention model of agency. Intelligent Agents V: Agents Theories, Architectures, and Languages: 5th International Workshop, ATAL’98 Paris, France, July 4–7, 1998 Proceedings 5 , 1–10 (Springer)
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The quarterly journal of economics 114(3):817–868
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) Erc: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American economic review 91(1):166–193
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of economic perspectives 14(3):159–182
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3):817–869
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Raghu T, Jayaraman B, Rao HR (2004) Toward an integration of agent-and activity-centric approaches in organizational process modeling: Incorporating incentive mechanisms. Information systems research 15(4):316–335
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Brown TB (2020) Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Nowak MA, Sigmund K (2005) Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature 437(7063):1291–1298
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. American economic review 96(5):1652–1678
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Falk A, Fischbacher U (2006) A theory of reciprocity. Games and economic behavior 54(2):293–315
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Chen Y, Li SX (2009) Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review 99(1):431–457
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining , 785–794
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tong Y, Tan CH, Teo HH (2017) Direct and indirect information system use: A multimethod exploration of social power antecedents in healthcare. Information Systems Research 28(4):690–710
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Linneberg MS, Korsgaard S (2019) Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative research journal 19(3):259–270
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rahwan I, Cebrian M, Obradovich N, Bongard J, Bonnefon JF, Breazeal C, Crandall JW, Christakis NA, Couzin ID, Jackson MO, et al. (2019) Machine behaviour. Nature 568(7753):477–486
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Russell S (2019) Human compatible: AI and the problem of control (Penguin Uk)
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Floridi L, Chiriatti M (2020) Gpt-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines 30:681–694
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Baird A, Maruping LM (2021) The next generation of research on is use: A theoretical framework of delegation to and from agentic is artifacts. MIS quarterly 45(1)
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Berente N, Gu B, Recker J, Santhanam R (2021) Managing artificial intelligence. MIS quarterly 45(3)
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Blut M, Wang C, Wünderlich NV, Brock C (2021) Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: a meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other ai. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 49:632–658
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Jussupow E, Spohrer K, Heinzl A, Gawlitza J (2021) Augmenting medical diagnosis decisions? an investigation into physicians’ decision-making process with artificial intelligence. Information Systems Research 32(3):713–735
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Schanke S, Burtch G, Ray G (2021) Estimating the impact of “humanizing” customer service chatbots. Information Systems Research 32(3):736–751
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Andreas J (2022) Language models as agent models. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022 , 5769–5779
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W (2022) Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Information Systems Research 33(2):678–696
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Wei J, Wang X, Schuurmans D, Bosma M, Xia F, Chi E, Le QV, Zhou D, et al. (2022) Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35:24824–24837
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Abdel-Karim BM, Pfeuffer N, Carl KV, Hinz O (2023) How ai-based systems can induce reflections: The case of ai-augmented diagnostic work. MIS Quarterly (4)
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Pellert M, Lechner CM, Wagner C, Rammstedt B, Strohmaier M (2023) Ai psychometrics: Using psychometric inventories to obtain psychological profiles of large language models
2023
Closest in time.
Pinski M, Adam M, Benlian A (2023) Ai knowledge: Improving ai delegation through human enablement. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems , 1–17
2023
Closest in time.
Qiu L, Singh PV, Srinivasan K (2023) How much should we trust llm results for marketing research? Available at SSRN 4526072
2023
Closest in time.
Shiffrin R, Mitchell M (2023) Probing the psychology of ai models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(10):e2300963120
2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Adam M, Roethke K, Benlian A (2023) Human vs. automated sales agents: How and why customer responses shift across sales stages. Information Systems Research 34(3):1148–1168
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Aher GV, Arriaga RI, Kalai AT (2023) Using large language models to simulate multiple humans and replicate human subject studies. International Conference on Machine Learning , 337–371 (PMLR)
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Binz M, Schulz E (2023) Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(6):e2218523120
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Brand J, Israeli A, Ngwe D (2023) Using GPT for market research. Available at SSRN 4395751
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Brookins P, DeBacker JM (2023) Playing games with GPT: What can we learn about a large language model from canonical strategic games? Available at SSRN 4493398
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Chalmers DJ (2023) Could a large language model be conscious? arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07103
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Chan A, Salganik R, Markelius A, Pang C, Rajkumar N, Krasheninnikov D, Langosco L, He Z, Duan Y, Carroll M, et al. (2023) Harms from increasingly agentic algorithmic systems. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 651–666
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Closest in time.
Wang W, Gao G, Agarwal R (2023) Friend or foe? teaming between artificial intelligence and workers with variation in experience. Management Science
2023
Closest in time.
Webb T, Holyoak KJ, Lu H (2023) Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models. Nature Human Behaviour 7(9):1526–1541
2023
Closest in time.
Adam M, Diebel C, Goutier M, Benlian A (2024) Navigating autonomy and control in human-ai delegation: User responses to technology-versus user-invoked task allocation. Decision Support Systems 180:114193
2024
Closest in time.
Bail CA (2024) Can generative ai improve social science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121(21):e2314021121
2024
Closest in time.
Dlugosz J, Gam YK, Gopalan R, Skrastins J (2024) Decision-making delegation in banks. Management Science 70(5):3281–3301
2024
Closest in time.
Goli A, Singh A (2024) Can llms capture human preferences? Marketing Science
2024
Closest in time.
Leng Y (2024) Can llms mimic human-like mental accounting and behavioral biases? Available at SSRN 4705130
2024
Closest in time.
Li P, Castelo N, Katona Z, Sarvary M (2024) Language models for automated market research: A new way to generate perceptual maps. Marketing Science
2024
Closest in time.
Mei Q, Xie Y, Yuan W, Jackson MO (2024) A turing test of whether ai chatbots are behaviorally similar to humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121(9):e2313925121
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Nistor C, Selove M (2024) Influencers: The power of comments. Marketing Science
2024
Closest in time.
Schneider J (2024) Explainable generative ai (genxai): a survey, conceptualization, and research agenda. Artificial Intelligence Review 57(11):289
2024
Closest in time.
Seymour M, Yuan L, Riemer K, Dennis AR (2024) Less artificial, more intelligent: Understanding affinity, trustworthiness, and preference for digital humans. Information Systems Research
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Strachan JW, Albergo D, Borghini G, Pansardi O, Scaliti E, Gupta S, Saxena K, Rufo A, Panzeri S, Manzi G, et al. (2024) Testing theory of mind in large language models and humans. Nature Human Behaviour 1–11
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Tai RH, Bentley LR, Xia X, Sitt JM, Fankhauser SC, Chicas-Mosier AM, Monteith BG (2024) An examination of the use of large language models to aid analysis of textual data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 23:16094069241231168
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.