Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
A major threat to the peer-review systems of computer science conferences is the existence of "collusion rings" between reviewers.
Finding a maximum density subgraph
Goldberg, A. V. (1984) · 1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
Greedy approximation algorithms for finding dense components in a graph
Charikar, M. (2000) · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
NetProbe: A fast and scalable system for fraud detection in online auction networks
Pandit, S., Chau, D. H., Wang, S., and Faloutsos, C. (2007) · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
EigenSpokes: Surprising patterns and scalable community chipping in large graphs
Prakash, B. A., Sridharan, A., Seshadri, M., Machiraju, S., and Faloutsos, C. (2010) · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sum of us: Strategyproof selection from the selectors
Alon, N., Fischer, F., Procaccia, A., and Tennenholtz, M. (2011) · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Opinion fraud detection in online reviews by network effects
Akoglu, L., Chandy, R., and Faloutsos, C. (2013) · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Toronto Paper Matching System: An automated paper-reviewer assignment system
Charlin, L. and Zemel, R. S. (2013) · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
PrefLib: A library for preferences http://www. preflib. org
Mattei, N. and Walsh, T. (2013) · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Denser than the densest subgraph: Extracting optimal quasi-cliques with quality guarantees
Tsourakakis, C., Bonchi, F., Gionis, A., Gullo, F., and Tsiarli, M. (2013) · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Graph based anomaly detection and description: A survey
Akoglu, L., Tong, H., and Koutra, D. (2015) · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Peer review and competition in the art exhibition game
Balietti, S., Goldstone, R. L., and Helbing, D. (2016) · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fraudar: Bounding graph fraud in the face of camouflage
Hooi, B., Song, H. A., Beutel, A., Shah, N., Shin, K., and Faloutsos, C. (2016) · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Design and analysis of the NIPS 2016 review process
Shah, N., Tabibian, B., Muandet, K., Guyon, I., and Von Luxburg, U. (2018) · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
ZooBP: Belief propagation for heterogeneous networks
Eswaran, D., Günnemann, S., Faloutsos, C., Makhija, D., and Kumar, M. (2017) · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Mirage: Content masking attack against information-based online services
Markwood, I., Shen, D., Liu, Y., and Lu, Z. (2017) · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Construction of the literature graph in Semantic Scholar
Ammar, W., Groeneveld, D., Bhagavatula, C., Beltagy, I., Crawford, M., Downey, D., Dunkelberger, J., Elgohary, A., Feldman, S., Ha, V., et al. (2018) · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
K-loop free assignment in conference review systems
Guo, L., Wu, J., Chang, W., Wu, J., and Li, J. (2018) · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Catch me if I can: Detecting strategic behaviour in peer assessment
Stelmakh, I., Shah, N. B., and Singh, A. (2021) · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Making paper reviewing robust to bid manipulation attacks
Wu, R., Guo, C., Wu, F., Kidambi, R., Van Der Maaten, L., and Weinberger, K. (2021) · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Combating collusion rings is hard but possible
Boehmer, N., Bredereck, R., and Nichterlein, A. (2022) · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
The price of strategyproofing peer assessment
Dhull, K., Jecmen, S., Kothari, P., and Shah, N. B. (2022) · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Tradeoffs in preventing manipulation in paper bidding for reviewer assignment
Jecmen, S., Shah, N. B., Fang, F., and Conitzer, V. (2022) · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Kumar, S., Hooi, B., Makhija, D., Kumar, M., Faloutsos, C., and Subrahmanian, V. S. (2018) · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
PDFPhantom: Exploiting PDF attacks against academic conferences’ paper submission process with counterattack
Tran, D. and Jaiswal, C. (2019) · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
On strategyproof conference peer review
Xu, Y., Zhao, H., Shi, X., and Shah, N. B. (2019) · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
TellTail: Fast scoring and detection of dense subgraphs
Hooi, B., Shin, K., Lamba, H., and Faloutsos, C. (2020) · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Mitigating manipulation in peer review via randomized reviewer assignments
Jecmen, S., Zhang, H., Liu, R., Shah, N., Conitzer, V., and Fang, F. (2020) · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Academic fraud: Solving the crisis in modern academia
Wilson, P. (2020) · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer science research
Littman, M. L. (2021) · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Leyton-Brown, K., Mausam, Nandwani, Y., Zarkoob, H., Cameron, C., Newman, N., and Raghu, D. (2022) · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Challenges, experiments, and computational solutions in peer review
Shah, N. B. (2022) · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
No more reviewer #2: Subverting automatic paper-reviewer assignment using adversarial learning
Eisenhofer, T., Quiring, E., Möller, J., Riepel, D., Holz, T., and Rieck, K. (2023) · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A dataset on malicious paper bidding in peer review
Jecmen, S., Yoon, M., Conitzer, V., Shah, N. B., and Fang, F. (2023) · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A gold standard dataset for the reviewer assignment problem
Stelmakh, I., Wieting, J., Neubig, G., and Shah, N. B. (2023) · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Potential organized fraud in ACM/IEEE computer architecture conferences
Vijaykumar, T. N. (2020) · 2024
Closest in time.