Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Peer-reviewed conferences, the main publication venues in CS, rely critically on matching highly qualified reviewers for each paper.
Latent dirichlet allocation
David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Expertise modeling for matching papers with reviewers
David M. Mimno and Andrew McCallum · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the optimal assignment of conference papers to reviewers
Camillo J Taylor · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Recommender systems for the conference paper assignment problem
Don Conry, Yehuda Koren, and Naren Ramakrishnan · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
ICML 2009’s call for paper
Leon Bottou and Michael Littman · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Novel tools to streamline the conference review process: Experiences from SIGKDD’09
Peter A Flach, Sebastian Spiegler, Bruno Golénia, Simon Price, John Guiver, Ralf Herbrich, Thore Graepel, and Mohammed J Zaki · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Assigning papers to referees
Naveen Garg, Telikepalli Kavitha, Amit Kumar, Kurt Mehlhorn, and Julián Mestre · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Expertise matching via constraint-based optimization
Wenbin Tang, Jie Tang, and Chenhao Tan · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
ASPLOS XV: Proceedings of the fifteenth international conference on architectural support for programming languages and operating systems
Vikram S. Adve and James C. Hoe · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
A framework for optimizing paper matching
Laurent Charlin, Richard Zemel, and Craig Boutilier · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wilcoxon-Signed-Rank Test , pages 1658–1659
Denise Rey and Markus Neuhäuser · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for neural text processing
Taku Kudo and John Richardson · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Toronto Paper Matching System : An automated paper-reviewer assignment system
Laurent Charlin and Richard S Zemel · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
On good and fair paper-reviewer assignment
Cheng Long, Raymond Chi-Wing Wong, Yu Peng, and Liangliang Ye · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
The NIPS experiment
Neil Lawrence and Corinna Cortes · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
The oopsla two-phase review process
Cristina V. Lopes · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Paper allocation for NIPS, Jun 2014
Neil Lawrence · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
The conference paper assignment problem: Using order weighted averages to assign indivisible goods
Jing Wu Lian, Nicholas Mattei, Renee Noble, and Toby Walsh · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
[IJCAI-PRICAI 2020] discussions about summary reject
Christian Bessiere · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Poorly-explained NeurIPS 2020 desk-rejects peeve ML researchers
Yuan Yuan · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer science research
Michael L Littman · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Loss functions, axioms, and peer review
Ritesh Noothigattu, Nihar B Shah, and Ariel Procaccia · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Making paper reviewing robust to bid manipulation attacks
Ruihan Wu, Chuan Guo, Felix Wu, Rahul Kidambi, Laurens Van Der Maaten, and Kilian Weinberger · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Using extended abstracts to improve peer review
Christos Kozyrakis and Emery Berger · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Paper matching with local fairness constraints
Ari Kobren, Barna Saha, and Andrew McCallum · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
PaRe: A paper-reviewer matching approach using a common topic space
Omer Anjum, Hongyu Gong, Suma Bhat, Wen-Mei Hwu, and Jinjun Xiong · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Simple and effective paraphrastic similarity from parallel translations
John Wieting, Kevin Gimpel, Graham Neubig, and Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
PeerReview4All: Fair and accurate reviewer assignment in peer review
Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar B Shah, and Aarti Singh · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
ACL reviewer matching code
Graham Neubig, John Wieting, Arya McCarthy, Amanda Stent, Natalie Schluter, and Trevor Cohn · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Mitigating manipulation in peer review via randomized reviewer assignments
Steven Jecmen, Hanrui Zhang, Ryan Liu, Nihar B Shah, Vincent Conitzer, and Fei Fang · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Practices of PLDI
Hans Boehm, Jack Davidson, Kathleen Fisher, Cormac Flanagan, Jeffrey S. Foster, Jeremy Gibbons, Mary Hall, Graham Hutton, David Padua, Frank Tip, Jan Vitek, Philip Wadler, Keshav Pingali, Michael O’Boyle, Steve Blackburn, and Emery Berger · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Near-optimal reviewer splitting in two-phase paper reviewing and conference experiment design, 2021
Steven Jecmen, Hanrui Zhang, Ryan Liu, Fei Fang, Vincent Conitzer, and Nihar B Shah · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
[Twitter 2021] tweet about two-phase
Subbarao Kambhampati · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
AAAI acceptance rate
OpenResearch · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
[Twitter 2022] tweet about two-phase
Toby Walsh · 2022
Closest in time.