Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Screening prioritisation in medical systematic reviews aims to rank the set of documents retrieved by complex Boolean queries.
Combination of multiple searches
Edward Fox and Joseph Shaw. 1994 · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Some simple effective approximations to the 2-poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval. In SIGIR’94: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, organised by Dublin City University . Springer, 232–241
Stephen E Robertson and Steve Walker. 1994 · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
A Language Modeling Approach to Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Melbourne, Australia) (SIGIR ’98) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 275–281
Jay M. Ponte and W. Bruce Croft. 1998 · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review
David Tranfield, David Denyer, and Palminder Smart. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Procedures for performing systematic reviews
Barbara Kitchenham. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
A review and critique of modelling in prioritising and designing screening programmes
Jon Karnon, Elizabeth Goyder, Paul Tappenden, Seonaid McPhie, Isabel Towers, John Brazier, and Jason Madan. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Boolean versus ranked querying for biomedical systematic reviews
Sarvnaz Karimi, Stefan Pohl, Falk Scholer, Lawrence Cavedon, and Justin Zobel. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Information fusion for combining visual and textual image retrieval. In 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition . IEEE, 1590–1593
Xin Zhou, Adrien Depeursinge, and Henning Muller. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gensim—statistical semantics in python
Radim Rehurek, Petr Sojka, et al · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Grey literature searching for health sciences systematic reviews: a prospective study of time spent and resources utilized
Ahlam A Saleh, Melissa A Ratajeski, and Marnie Bertolet. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pooled evaluation over query variations: Users are as diverse as systems. In proceedings of the 24th ACM international on conference on information and knowledge management . 1759–1762
Alistair Moffat, Falk Scholer, Paul Thomas, and Peter Bailey. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using Text Mining for Study Identification in Systematic Reviews: A Systematic Review of Current Approaches
Alison O’Mara-Eves, James Thomas, John McNaught, Makoto Miwa, and Sophia Ananiadou. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A scoping review of rapid review methods
Andrea C Tricco, Jesmin Antony, Wasifa Zarin, Lisa Strifler, Marco Ghassemi, John Ivory, Laure Perrier, Brian Hutton, David Moher, and Sharon E Straus. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Assessors agreement: A case study across assessor type, payment levels, query variations and relevance dimensions. In Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction: 7th International Conference of the CLEF Association, CLEF 2016, Évora, Portugal, September 5-8, 2016, Proceedings 7 . Springer, 40–53
Joao Palotti, Guido Zuccon, Johannes Bernhardt, Allan Hanbury, and Lorraine Goeuriot. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Guido Zuccon, Joao Palotti, and Allan Hanbury. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ranking Abstracts to Identify Relevant Evidence for Systematic Reviews: The University of Sheffield’s Approach to CLEF eHealth 2017 Task 2.. In CLEF (Working Notes)
Amal Alharbi and Mark Stevenson. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Combining Inter-Review Learning-to-Rank and Intra-Review Incremental Training for Title and Abstract Screening in Systematic Reviews.. In CLEF (Working Notes)
Antonios Anagnostou, Athanasios Lagopoulos, Grigorios Tsoumakas, and Ioannis P Vlahavas. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
ECNU at 2017 eHealth Task 2: Technologically Assisted Reviews in Empirical Medicine.. In CLEF (Working Notes)
Jiayi Chen, Su Chen, Yang Song, Hongyu Liu, Yueyao Wang, Qinmin Hu, Liang He, and Yan Yang. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
An Interactive Two-Dimensional Approach to Query Aspects Rewriting in Systematic Reviews. IMS Unipd At CLEF eHealth Task 2.. In CLEF (Working Notes)
Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio, Federica Beghini, Federica Vezzani, and Geneviève Henrot. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ranking and Feedback-based Stopping for Recall-Centric Document Retrieval.. In CLEF (Working Notes)
Noah Hollmann and Carsten Eickhoff. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
CLEF 2017 Technologically Assisted Reviews in Empirical Medicine Overview. In CLEF’17
Evangelos Kanoulas, Dan Li, Leif Azzopardi, and Rene Spijker. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A study of convolutional neural networks for clinical document classification in systematic reviews: sysreview at CLEF eHealth 2017
Grace Eunkyung Lee. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Limsi@ clef ehealth 2017 task 2: Logistic regression for automatic article ranking
Christopher Norman12, Mariska Leeflang, and Aurélie Névéol. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
QUT ielab at CLEF eHealth 2017 technology assisted reviews track: Initial experiments with learning to rank. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings: Working Notes of CLEF 2017: Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum , Vol. 1866. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Paper–98
Harrisen Scells, Guido Zuccon, Anthony Deacon, and Bevan Koopman. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
IIIT-H at CLEF eHealth 2017 Task 2: Technologically Assisted Reviews in Empirical Medicine.. In CLEF (Working Notes)
Jaspreet Singh and Lini Thomas. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Data Balancing for Technologically Assisted Reviews: Undersampling or Reweighting.. In CLEF (Working Notes)
Zhe Yu and Tim Menzies. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Retrieving and ranking studies for systematic reviews: University of Sheffield’s approach to CLEF eHealth 2018 Task 2. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings , Vol. 2125. CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Amal Alharbi, William Briggs, and Mark Stevenson. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Rethink training of BERT rerankers in multi-stage retrieval pipeline. In European Conference on Information Retrieval . Springer, 280–286
Luyu Gao, Zhuyun Dai, and Jamie Callan. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Investigating Memorization of Conspiracy Theories in Text Generation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021 . Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 4718–4729
Sharon Levy, Michael Saxon, and William Yang Wang. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
A comparison of automatic Boolean query formulation for systematic reviews
Harrisen Scells, Guido Zuccon, and Bevan Koopman. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Bert-based dense retrievers require interpolation with bm25 for effective passage retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval . 317–324
Shuai Wang, Shengyao Zhuang, and Guido Zuccon. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches
Wichor M Bramer, Gerdien B De Jonge, Melissa L Rethlefsen, Frans Mast, and Jos Kleijnen. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Interactive Sampling for Systematic Reviews. IMS Unipd At CLEF 2018 eHealth Task 2.. In CLEF (Working Notes)
Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio, Giacomo Ciuffreda, and Federica Vezzani. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
An introduction to writing narrative and systematic reviews—Tasks, tips and traps for aspiring authors
Ann T Gregory and A Robert Denniss. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
CLEF 2018 Technology Assisted Reviews in Empirical Medicine Overview. In CLEF 2018 Evaluation Labs and Workshop: Online Working Notes, CEUR-WS
Evangelos Kanoulas, Rene Spijker, Dan Li, and Leif Azzopardi. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Seed-driven Document Ranking for Systematic Reviews in Evidence-Based Medicine. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (SIGIR ’18) . ACM, New York, NY, USA, 455–464
Grace E. Lee and Aixin Sun. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Aristotle University’s Approach to the Technologically Assisted Reviews in Empirical Medicine Task of the 2018 CLEF eHealth Lab.. In CLEF (Working Notes)
Adamantios Minas, Athanasios Lagopoulos, and Grigorios Tsoumakas. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
LIMSI@ CLEF eHealth 2018 Task 2: Technology Assisted Reviews by Stacking Active and Static Learning.. In CLEF (Working Notes)
Christopher Norman, Mariska Leeflang, and Aurélie Névéol. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Jonathan J Deeks, Patrick M Bossuyt, Mariska M Leeflang, and Yemisi Takwoingi. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Precise zero-shot dense retrieval without relevance labels
Luyu Gao, Xueguang Ma, Jimmy Lin, and Jamie Callan. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
BioGPT: Generative Pre-Trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation and Mining
Renqian Luo, Liai Sun, Yingce Xia, Tao Qin, Sheng Zhang, Hoifung Poon, and Tie-Yan Liu. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Automated MeSH Term Suggestion for Effective Query Formulation in Systematic Reviews Literature Search
Shuai Wang, Harrisen Scells, Bevan Koopman, and Guido Zuccon. 2022c · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Self-instruct: Aligning language model with self generated instructions
Yizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu, Noah A Smith, Daniel Khashabi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2022a · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Goldilocks: Just-right tuning of bert for technology-assisted review. In European Conference on Information Retrieval . Springer, 502–517
Eugene Yang, Sean MacAvaney, David D Lewis, and Ophir Frieder. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI models
Roberto Gozalo-Brizuela and Eduardo C Garrido-Merchan. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
How close is chatgpt to human experts? comparison corpus, evaluation, and detection
Biyang Guo, Xin Zhang, Ziyuan Wang, Minqi Jiang, Jinran Nie, Yuxuan Ding, Jianwei Yue, and Yupeng Wu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Yunjie Ji, Yan Gong, Yiping Peng, Chao Ni, Peiyan Sun, Dongyu Pan, Baochang Ma, and Xiangang Li. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Active retrieval augmented generation
Zhengbao Jiang, Frank F Xu, Luyu Gao, Zhiqing Sun, Qian Liu, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Yiming Yang, Jamie Callan, and Graham Neubig. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Reham Omar, Omij Mangukiya, Panos Kalnis, and Essam Mansour. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In Healthcare , Vol. 11. MDPI, 887
Malik Sallam. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agent
Weiwei Sun, Lingyong Yan, Xinyu Ma, Pengjie Ren, Dawei Yin, and Zhaochun Ren. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Evaluation of ChatGPT as a question answering system for answering complex questions
Yiming Tan, Dehai Min, Yu Li, Wenbo Li, Nan Hu, Yongrui Chen, and Guilin Qi. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Stanford Alpaca: An Instruction-following LLaMA model
Rohan Taori, Ishaan Gulrajani, Tianyi Zhang, Yann Dubois, Xuechen Li, Carlos Guestrin, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori B. Hashimoto. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models
Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Query2doc: Query Expansion with Large Language Models
Liang Wang, Nan Yang, and Furu Wei. 2023c · 2023
Closest in time.
Can ChatGPT write a good boolean query for systematic review literature search?
Shuai Wang, Harrisen Scells, Bevan Koopman, and Guido Zuccon. 2023a · 2023
Closest in time.
Retrieval-augmented multimodal language modeling
Michihiro Yasunaga, Armen Aghajanyan, Weijia Shi, Richard James, Jure Leskovec, Percy Liang, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Wen-tau Yih. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.