Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Over the past decade, predictive language modeling for code has proven to be a valuable tool for enabling new forms of automation for developers.
M. White, C. Vendome, M. Linares-Vásquez, and D. Poshyvanyk, “Toward Deep Learning Software Repositories,” in MSR
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Hindle, E. T. Barr, M. Gabel, Z. Su, and P. Devanbu, “On the Naturalness of Software,” CACM
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cambridge University Press, 2016
P. Ammann and J. Offutt, Introduction to Software Testing · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is All You Need,” NeurIPS
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding,” arXiv
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Allamanis, M. Brockschmidt, and M. Khademi, “Learning to Represent Programs with Graphs,” in ICLR
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, and A. Askell, “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners,” NeurIPS
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Feng, D. Guo, D. Tang, N. Duan, X. Feng, M. Gong, L. Shou, B. Qin, T. Liu, and D. Jiang, “CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languages,” arXiv
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Chen, J. Tworek, H. Jun, Q. Yuan, H. P. d. O. Pinto, J. Kaplan, H. Edwards, Y. Burda, N. Joseph, and G. Brockman, “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code,” arXiv
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Chen, J. Tworek, H. Jun, Q. Yuan, H. P. d. O. Pinto, J. Kaplan, H. Edwards, Y. Burda, N. Joseph, and G. Brockman, “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code,” arXiv
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Lertbanjongngam, B. Chinthanet, T. Ishio, R. G. Kula, P. Leelaprute, B. Manaskasemsak, A. Rungsawang, and K. Matsumoto, “An Empirical Evaluation of Competitive Programming AI: A Case Study of AlphaCode,” in IWSC
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
L. Ouyang, J. Wu, X. Jiang, D. Almeida, C. L. Wainwright, P. Mishkin, C. Zhang, S. Agarwal, K. Slama, and A. Ray, “Training Language Models to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback,” arXiv
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Li, D. Choi, J. Chung, N. Kushman, J. Schrittwieser, R. Leblond, T. Eccles, J. Keeling, F. Gimeno, and A. Dal Lago, “Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode,” Science
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
T. H. Kung, M. Cheatham, A. Medinilla, ChatGPT, C. Sillos, L. De Leon, C. Elepano, M. Madriaga, R. Aggabao, and G. Diaz-Candido, “Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-Assisted Medical Education Using Large Language Models,” medRxiv
2022
Later among the works it cites.
OpenAI, “ChatGPT.” https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
“ChatGPT Software Testing Study: GitHub Repository.” https://github.com/sajedjalil/ChatGPT-Software-Testing-Study , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
“ChatGPT Software Testing Study: Zenodo Record.” https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7700501 , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
P. Ammann and J. Offutt, “Introduction to Software Testing Book Solution.” https://cs.gmu.edu/~offutt/softwaretest/exer-student.pdf , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
J. Finnie-Ansley, P. Denny, B. A. Becker, A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Prather, “The Robots are Coming: Exploring the Implications of OpenAI Codex on Introductory Programming,” in ACE
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Puryear and G. Sprint, “Github CoPilot in the Classroom: Learning to Code with AI Assistance,” CCSC
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
F. F. Xu, B. Vasilescu, and G. Neubig, “In-IDE Code Generation from Natural Language: Promise and Challenges,” TOSEM
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Vaithilingam, T. Zhang, and E. L. Glassman, “Expectation vs. Experience: Evaluating the Usability of Code Generation Tools Powered by Large Language Models,” in CHI
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Vasconcelos, M. Jörke, M. Grunde-McLaughlin, T. Gerstenberg, M. Bernstein, and R. Krishna, “Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making,” arXiv
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
“OpenAI.” https://openai.com , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
H. Pearce, B. Tan, B. Ahmad, R. Karri, and B. Dolan-Gavitt, “Examining Zero-Shot Vulnerability Repair with Large Language Models,” in S&P
2023
Closest in time.
J. Finnie-Ansley, P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, E. A. Santos, J. Prather, and B. A. Becker, “My AI Wants to Know if This Will Be on the Exam: Testing OpenAI’s Codex on CS2 Programming Exercises,” in ACE
2023
Closest in time.
J. H. Choi, K. E. Hickman, A. Monahan, and D. B. Schwarcz, “ChatGPT Goes to Law School,” SSRN
2023
Closest in time.