Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
There is a growing concern that generative AI models will generate outputs closely resembling the copyrighted materials for which they are trained.
Nichols v. Universal Pictures Corporation, 45 F.2d 119, (2st Cir., 1930)
N. vs. U · 1930
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mazer v. Stein, 347 U.S 201, 219]
Mvs.S · 1954
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sid & Marty Krofft TV Prod., Inc. v. McDonald’s Corp., 562 F.2d 1157, 1164 (9th Cir. 1977)
Svs.M · 1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
Universal City Studios v. Kamar Industries, Inc., 217 USPQ. (BNA) 1165 (S.D Tex 1982)
Uvs.K · 1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S 539
Hvs.R · 1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
The myth of the idea/expression dichotomy in copyright law
R. H. Jones · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
The public domain
J. Litman · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Nash v. CBS, Inc., 899 F.2d 1537 (7th, cir., 1990)
N.vs.C · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 US 340, 345
Fvs.R · 1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1472 (9th Cir. 1992))
Bvs.S · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rules versus standards: An economic analysis
L. Kaplow · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S 569, 578
Cvs.A · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cyberlaw and social change: A democratic approach to copyright law in cyberspace
N. Elkin-Koren · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int’l, Inc., 49 F.3d 807, 815 (1st Cir. 1995); Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int’l, Inc., 516 U.S 233 (1996)
L.vs.B · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
The copyright grab
P. Samuelson · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Free as the air to common use: First amendment constraints on enclosure of the public domain
Y. Benkler · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Copyrights and copywrongs
S. Vaidhyanathan · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis
C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. Smith · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Risk aversion and rights accretion in intellectual property law
J. Gibson · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
17 U.S.C. § 102(b)
U.S.C · 2006
Cited alongside, same era.
Billowing white goo
J. Litman · 2007
Cited alongside, same era.
Copyright’s paradox
N. W. Netanel · 2008
Cited alongside, same era.
Releasing search queries and clicks privately
A. Korolova, K. Kenthapadi, N. Mishra, and A. Ntoulas · 2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Our bizarre system for proving copyright infringement
M. A. Lemley · 2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Originality
G. Parchomovsky and A. Stein · 2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Making sense of fair use
N. W. Netanel · 2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Independent creation in a world of ai
C. D. Asay · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Synthetic data generators–sequential and private
O. Bousquet, R. Livni, and S. Moran · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Fair learning
M. A. Lemley and B. Casey · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Advances and open problems in federated learning
P. Kairouz, H. B. McMahan, B. Avent, A. Bellet, M. Bennis, A. N. Bhagoji, K. Bonawitz, Z. Charles, G. Cormode, R. Cummings, et al · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Works Not Protected by Copyright
U. C. Office · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
DOE 1 et al v. GitHub, Inc. et al class action
Dvs.G · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Deepcreativity: measuring creativity with deep learning techniques
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Configuring the networked self: Law, code, and the play of everyday practice
J. E. Cohen · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Fairness through awareness
C. Dwork, M. Hardt, T. Pitassi, O. Reingold, and R. Zemel · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Notice failure and notice externalities
P. S. Menell and M. J. Meurer · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
SAS Institute Inc. v. World Programming Ltd., 64 F. Supp. 3d 755, 762
Svs.W · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Copyright in a digital ecosystem: a user-rights approach
N. Elkin-Koren · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Franceschelli and M. Musolesi · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Reconstructing training data from trained neural networks
N. Haim, G. Vardi, G. Yehudai, O. Shamir, and M. Irani · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
OPINION: USES OF COPYRIGHTED MATERIALS FOR MACHINE LEARNING
Legislation and L. C. C. Law) · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Formalizing human ingenuity: A quantitative framework for coyright law’s substantial similarity
S. Scheffler, E. Tromer, and M. Varia · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Selective differential privacy for language modeling
W. Shi, A. Cui, E. Li, R. Jia, and Z. Yu · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Andersen et al v. Stability AI Ltd. et al, Docket No. 3:23-cv-00201 (N.D. Cal. Jan 13, 2023)
AVs.S · 2023
Closest in time.
Extracting training data from diffusion models
N. Carlini, J. Hayes, M. Nasr, M. Jagielski, V. Sehwag, F. Tramer, B. Balle, D. Ippolito, and E. Wallace · 2023
Closest in time.
Sok: Memorization in general-purpose large language models
V. Hartmann, A. Suri, V. Bindschaedler, D. Evans, S. Tople, and R. West · 2023
Closest in time.
Foundation models and fair use
P. Henderson, X. Li, D. Jurafsky, T. Hashimoto, M. A. Lemley, and P. Liang · 2023
Closest in time.
Talkin”bout ai generation: Copyright and the generative-ai supply chain
K. Lee, A. F. Cooper, and J. Grimmelmann · 2023
Closest in time.
Generative ai meets copyright
P. Samuelson · 2023
Closest in time.
Provable copyright protection for generative models
N. Vyas, S. Kakade, and B. Barak · 2023
Closest in time.
Copyright regenerated: Harnessing genai to measure originality and copyright scope
U. Y. Hacohen and N. Elkin-Koren · 2024
Closest in time.