Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Despite the many use cases for large language models (LLMs) in creating personalized chatbots, there has been limited research on evaluating the extent to which the behaviors of personalized LLMs accurately and consistently reflect specific personality traits.
Personality and motivation structure and measurement
Raymond B Cattell. 1957 · 1957
Earlier work this paper cites.
The myers-briggs type indicator: Manual (1962)
Isabel Briggs Myers. 1962 · 1962
Earlier work this paper cites.
A study of the validity of the sixteen personality factor questionnaire in predicting high school academic achievement
Jerry B Ayers, W Louis Bashaw, and James A Wash. 1969 · 1969
Earlier work this paper cites.
Analysis of factors effecting interpersonal attraction in the dating situation
James Patrick Curran Jr. 1970 · 1970
Earlier work this paper cites.
A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual
Isabel Briggs Myers. 1985 · 1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
Assessing the five-factor model of personality description
Stephen R Briggs. 1992 · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Career assessment and the sixteen personality factor questionnaire
JM Schuerger. 1995 · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
The big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives
Oliver P John, Sanjay Srivastava, et al. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference
James W Pennebaker and Laura A King. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
The big five personality factors: the psycholexical approach to personality
Boele De Raad. 2000 · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Linguistic inquiry and word count: Liwc 2001
James W Pennebaker, Martha E Francis, and Roger J Booth. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Patterns of natural language use: Disclosure, personality, and social integration
James W Pennebaker and Anna Graybeal. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using the myers-briggs type indicator® in career counseling
R Bryan Kennedy and D Ashley Kennedy. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
An investigation of big five personality traits and career decidedness among early and middle adolescents
John W Lounsbury, Teresa Hutchens, and James M Loveland. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Whose thumb is it anyway? classifying author personality from weblog text
Jon Oberlander and Scott Nowson. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
The relations between personality and language use
Chang H Lee, Kyungil Kim, Young Seok Seo, and Cindy K Chung. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Personage: Personality generation for dialogue
François Mairesse and Marilyn Walker. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text
François Mairesse, Marilyn A Walker, Matthias R Mehl, and Roger K Moore. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Big five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance
Melissa C O’Connor and Sampo V Paunonen. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
The sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16pf)
Heather EP Cattell and Alan D Mead. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
The revised neo personality inventory (neo-pi-r)
Paul T Costa and Robert R McCrae. 2008 · 2008
Cited alongside, same era.
Personality and intimate partner aggression in dating relationships: the role of the “big five”
Denise A Hines and Kimberly J Saudino. 2008 · 2008
Cited alongside, same era.
Personality and language use in self-narratives
Jacob B Hirsh and Jordan B Peterson. 2009 · 2009
Cited alongside, same era.
The relationship between mbti® and academic performance: A study across academic disciplines
Cassandra DiRienzo, Jayoti Das, Wonhi Synn, Jeremy Kitts, and Kyle McGrath. 2010 · 2010
Cited alongside, same era.
Controlling user perceptions of linguistic style: Trainable generation of personality traits
François Mairesse and Marilyn A Walker. 2011 · 2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Recognising personality traits using facebook status updates
Estimating the personality of white-box language models
Saketh Reddy Karra, Son The Nguyen, and Theja Tulabandhula. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Is gpt-3 a psychopath? evaluating large language models from a psychological perspective
Xingxuan Li, Yutong Li, Linlin Liu, Lidong Bing, and Shafiq Joty. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Using large language models to simulate multiple humans and replicate human subject studies
Gati V Aher, Rosa I Arriaga, and Adam Tauman Kalai. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Using cognitive psychology to understand gpt-3
Marcel Binz and Eric Schulz. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Chatgpt can accurately predict public figures’ perceived personalities without any training
Xubo Cao and Michal Kosinski. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Golnoosh Farnadi, Susana Zoghbi, Marie-Francine Moens, and Martine De Cock. 2013 · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure
Lewis R Goldberg. 2013 · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Stylistic transfer in natural language generation systems using recurrent neural networks
Jad Kabbara and Jackie Chi Kit Cheung. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Fusing social media cues: personality prediction from twitter and instagram
Marcin Skowron, Marko Tkalčič, Bruce Ferwerda, and Markus Schedl. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Assigning personality/profile to a chatting machine for coherent conversation generation
Qiao Qian, Minlie Huang, Haizhou Zhao, Jingfang Xu, and Xiaoyan Zhu. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Personality predictions based on user behavior on the facebook social media platform
Michael M Tadesse, Hongfei Lin, Bo Xu, and Liang Yang. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Personalizing dialogue agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?
Saizheng Zhang, Emily Dinan, Jack Urbanek, Arthur Szlam, Douwe Kiela, and Jason Weston. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Adithya V Ganesan, Yash Kumar Lal, August Håkan Nilsson, and H Andrew Schwartz. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Large language models as simulated economic agents: What can we learn from homo silicus?
John J Horton. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Exploring the role of personality traits and attachment styles in shaping dating app user experience
Trina Ana Kajzer. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Tailoring personality traits in large language models via unsupervisedly-built personalized lexicons
Tianlong Li, Xiaoqing Zheng, and Xuanjing Huang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
G-eval: Nlg evaluation using gpt-4 with better human alignment. arxiv abs/2303.16634 (2023)
Yang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuo Wang, Ruochen Xu, et al. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Shengyu Mao, Ningyu Zhang, Xiaohan Wang, Mengru Wang, Yunzhi Yao, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, and Huajun Chen. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Do llms possess a personality? making the mbti test an amazing evaluation for large language models
Keyu Pan and Yawen Zeng. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior
Joon Sung Park, Joseph C O’Brien, Carrie J Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S Bernstein. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Can chatgpt assess human personalities? a general evaluation framework
Haocong Rao, Cyril Leung, and Chunyan Miao. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Personality traits in large language models
Mustafa Safdari, Greg Serapio-García, Clément Crepy, Stephen Fitz, Peter Romero, Luning Sun, Marwa Abdulhai, Aleksandra Faust, and Maja Matarić. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Character-llm: A trainable agent for role-playing
Yunfan Shao, Linyang Li, Junqi Dai, and Xipeng Qiu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models
Taylor Webb, Keith J Holyoak, and Hongjing Lu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Lionel Wong, Gabriel Grand, Alexander K Lew, Noah D Goodman, Vikash K Mansinghka, Jacob Andreas, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Psycot: Psychological questionnaire as powerful chain-of-thought for personality detection
Tao Yang, Tianyuan Shi, Fanqi Wan, Xiaojun Quan, Qifan Wang, Bingzhe Wu, and Jiaxiang Wu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Can large language models transform computational social science?
Caleb Ziems, William Held, Omar Shaikh, Jiaao Chen, Zhehao Zhang, and Diyi Yang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.