Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, have showcased remarkable zero-shot performance across various NLP tasks.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020 · 1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach
Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019 · 1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model
John M Digman. 1990 · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
An alternative" description of personality": the big-five factor structure
Lewis R Goldberg. 1990 · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Big five inventory
Oliver P John, Eileen M Donahue, and Robert L Kentle. 1991 · 1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
Introduction to type: A description of the theory and applications of the myers-briggs indicator
Isabel Myers-Briggs. 1991 · 1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
Long short-term memory
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference
James W Pennebaker and Laura A King. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Linguistic inquiry and word count: Liwc 2001
James W Pennebaker, Martha E Francis, and Roger J Booth. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains
Samuel D Gosling, Peter J Rentfrow, and William B Swann Jr. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Personality and comorbidity of common psychiatric disorders
Amir A Khan, Kristen C Jacobson, Charles O Gardner, Carol A Prescott, and Kenneth S Kendler. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
The mini-ipip scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality
M Brent Donnellan, Frederick L Oswald, Brendan M Baird, and Richard E Lucas. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues
Oliver P John, Laura P Naumann, and Christopher J Soto. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology
Philip J Corr and Gerald Ed Matthews. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Glove: Global vectors for word representation
Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D Manning. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
Philip Sedgwick. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Look like me: matching robot personality via gaze to increase motivation
Sean Andrist, Bilge Mutlu, and Adriana Tapus. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Convolutional neural network for sentence classification
Yahui Chen. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatic personality assessment through social media language
Gregory Park, H Andrew Schwartz, Johannes C Eichstaedt, Margaret L Kern, Michal Kosinski, David J Stillwell, Lyle H Ungar, and Martin EP Seligman. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
The role of the five-factor model in personality assessment and treatment planning
R Michael Bagby, Tara M Gralnick, Nadia Al-Dajani, and Amanda A Uliaszek. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Personality trait classification of essays with the application of feature reduction
Edward P Tighe, Jennifer C Ureta, Bernard Andrei L Pollo, Charibeth K Cheng, and Remedios de Dios Bulos. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning to answer psychological questionnaire for personality detection
Feifan Yang, Tao Yang, Xiaojun Quan, and Qinliang Su. 2021b · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways
Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, et al. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Automated video interview personality assessments: Reliability, validity, and generalizability investigations
Louis Hickman, Nigel Bosch, Vincent Ng, Rachel Saef, Louis Tay, and Sang Eun Woo. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Large language models are zero-shot reasoners
Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. 2022 · 2022
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Survey analysis of machine learning methods for natural language processing for mbti personality type prediction
Brandon Cui and Calvin Qi. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion
Sandra C Matz, Michal Kosinski, Gideon Nave, and David J Stillwell. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Who am i? personality detection based on deep learning for texts
Xiangguo Sun, Bo Liu, Jiuxin Cao, Junzhou Luo, and Xiaojun Shen. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Recent trends in deep learning based personality detection
Yash Mehta, Navonil Majumder, Alexander Gelbukh, and Erik Cambria. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Personality detection from text using convolutional neural network
Md Abdur Rahman, Asif Al Faisal, Tayeba Khanam, Mahfida Amjad, and Md Saeed Siddik. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Machine learning approach to personality type prediction based on the myers–briggs type indicator®
Mohammad Hossein Amirhosseini and Hassan Kazemian. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
Multitask prompted training enables zero-shot task generalization
Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Teven Le Scao, Arun Raja, et al. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Large language models are human-level prompt engineers
Yongchao Zhou, Andrei Ioan Muresanu, Ziwen Han, Keiran Paster, Silviu Pitis, Harris Chan, and Jimmy Ba. 2022b · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Contrastive graph transformer network for personality detection
Yangfu Zhu, Linmei Hu, Xinkai Ge, Wanrong Peng, and Bin Wu. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Systematic evaluation of gpt-3 for zero-shot personality estimation
Adithya V Ganesan, Yash Kumar Lal, August Håkan Nilsson, and H Andrew Schwartz. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
How good are gpt models at machine translation? a comprehensive evaluation
Amr Hendy, Mohamed Abdelrehim, Amr Sharaf, Vikas Raunak, Mohamed Gabr, Hitokazu Matsushita, Young Jin Kim, Mohamed Afify, and Hany Hassan Awadalla. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Synthetic prompting: Generating chain-of-thought demonstrations for large language models
Zhihong Shao, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen, Minlie Huang, Nan Duan, and Weizhu Chen. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models
Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
On the robustness of chatgpt: An adversarial and out-of-distribution perspective
Jindong Wang, HU Xixu, Wenxin Hou, Hao Chen, Runkai Zheng, Yidong Wang, Linyi Yang, Wei Ye, Haojun Huang, Xiubo Geng, et al. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Orders are unwanted: Dynamic deep graph convolutional network for personality detection
Tao Yang, Jinghao Deng, Xiaojun Quan, and Qifan Wang. 2022 · 2023
Closest in time.
Are nlp models really able to solve simple math word problems?
Arkil Patel, Satwik Bhattamishra, and Navin Goyal. 2021 · 2094
Closest in time.