Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
While a vast collection of explainable AI (XAI) algorithms have been developed in recent years, they are often criticized for significant gaps with how humans produce and consume explanations.
XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding
Zhilin Yang, Zihang Dai, Yiming Yang, Jaime Carbonell, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Quoc V. Le. 2020a · 1906
Earlier work this paper cites.
Knowledge-based causal attribution: The abnormal conditions focus model
Denis J Hilton and Ben R Slugoski. 1986 · 1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
The problem of causal selection
Germund Hesslow. 1988 · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Contrastive explanation
Peter Lipton. 1990 · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques
Nancy J Cooke. 1994 · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
For you can’t always get what you want: When preconditions are better explanations than goals
John McClure and Denis Hilton. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting , Vol. 50. Sage publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 904–908
Sandra G Hart. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
How the mind explains behavior: Folk explanations, meaning, and social interaction
Bertram F Malle. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sensitive and insensitive causation
James Woodward. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
The course of events: counterfactuals, causal sequences, and explanation
Denis J Hilton and L McCLURE John. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Opinion mining and sentiment analysis
Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, et al · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Why and why not explanations improve the intelligibility of context-aware intelligent systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 2119–2128
Brian Y Lim, Anind K Dey, and Daniel Avrahami. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Interacting meaningfully with machine learning systems: Three experiments
Simone Stumpf, Vidya Rajaram, Lida Li, Weng-Keen Wong, Margaret Burnett, Thomas Dietterich, Erin Sullivan, and Jonathan Herlocker. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies . Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, Oregon, USA, 142–150
Andrew L. Maas, Raymond E. Daly, Peter T. Pham, Dan Huang, Andrew Y. Ng, and Christopher Potts. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python
F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) . Association for Computational Linguistics, Doha, Qatar, 1532–1543
Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
The role of explanations on trust and reliance in clinical decision support systems. In 2015 International Conference on Healthcare Informatics . IEEE, 160–169
Adrian Bussone, Simone Stumpf, and Dympna O’Sullivan. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err
Berkeley J Dietvorst, Joseph P Simmons, and Cade Massey. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Interpretable decision sets: A joint framework for description and prediction. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining . 1675–1684
Himabindu Lakkaraju, Stephen H Bach, and Jure Leskovec. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Why should i trust you?: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of KDD
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Human-Centric Justification of Machine Learning Predictions.. In IJCAI , Vol. 2017. 1461–1467
Or Biran and Kathleen R McKeown. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning
Finale Doshi-Velez and Been Kim. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Explainable artificial intelligence (xai)
David Gunning. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Social attribution and explanation
Denis Hilton. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR
Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, and Chris Russell. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Amina Adadi and Mohammed Berrada. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
’It’s Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage’ Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–14
Reuben Binns, Max Van Kleek, Michael Veale, Ulrik Lyngs, Jun Zhao, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them
Berkeley J Dietvorst, Joseph P Simmons, and Cade Massey. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Explaining explanations: An overview of interpretability of machine learning. In 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on data science and advanced analytics (DSAA) . IEEE, 80–89
Leilani H Gilpin, David Bau, Ben Z Yuan, Ayesha Bajwa, Michael Specter, and Lalana Kagal. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Interpretability beyond feature attribution: Quantitative testing with concept activation vectors (tcav). In International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2668–2677
Been Kim, Martin Wattenberg, Justin Gilmer, Carrie Cai, James Wexler, Fernanda Viegas, et al · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
The mythos of model interpretability
Zachary C Lipton. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Menaka Narayanan, Emily Chen, Jeffrey He, Been Kim, Sam Gershman, and Finale Doshi-Velez. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Manipulating and measuring model interpretability
Forough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G Goldstein, Jake M Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, and Hanna Wallach. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Anchors: High-precision model-agnostic explanations. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Human-centered tools for coping with imperfect algorithms during medical decision-making. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . ACM, 4
Carrie J Cai, Emily Reif, Narayan Hegde, Jason Hipp, Been Kim, Daniel Smilkov, Martin Wattenberg, Fernanda Viegas, Greg S Corrado, Martin C Stumpe, et al · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Machine learning interpretability: A survey on methods and metrics
Diogo V Carvalho, Eduardo M Pereira, and Jaime S Cardoso. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Explaining Decision-Making Algorithms through UI: Strategies to Help Non-Expert Stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . ACM, 559
Hao-Fei Cheng, Ruotong Wang, Zheng Zhang, Fiona O’Connell, Terrance Gray, F Maxwell Harper, and Haiyi Zhu. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
CheXplain: Enabling Physicians to Explore and Understand Data-Driven, AI-Enabled Medical Imaging Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13
Yao Xie, Melody Chen, David Kao, Ge Gao, and Xiang ‘Anthony’ Chen. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Re-examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 chi conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–13
Qian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, Carolyn Rosé, and John Zimmerman. 2020c · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Yunfeng Zhang, Q Vera Liao, and Rachel KE Bellamy. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
From human explanation to model interpretability: A framework based on weight of evidence. In AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (HCOMP)
David Alvarez-Melis, Harmanpreet Kaur, Hal Daumé III, Hanna Wallach, and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan. 2021 · 2021
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In Proceedings of NAACL
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Explaining models: an empirical study of how explanations impact fairness judgment. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 275–285
Jonathan Dodge, Q Vera Liao, Yunfeng Zhang, Rachel KE Bellamy, and Casey Dugan. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Automated rationale generation: a technique for explainable AI and its effects on human perceptions. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 263–274
Upol Ehsan, Pradyumna Tambwekar, Larry Chan, Brent Harrison, and Mark O Riedl. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Assessing the local interpretability of machine learning models
Sorelle A Friedler, Chitradeep Dutta Roy, Carlos Scheidegger, and Dylan Slack. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
The principles and limits of algorithm-in-the-loop decision making
Ben Green and Yiling Chen. 2019b · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A survey of methods for explaining black box models
Riccardo Guidotti, Anna Monreale, Salvatore Ruggieri, Franco Turini, Fosca Giannotti, and Dino Pedreschi. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Gamut: A design probe to understand how data scientists understand machine learning models. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13
Fred Hohman, Andrew Head, Rich Caruana, Robert DeLine, and Steven M Drucker. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Will You Accept an Imperfect AI?: Exploring Designs for Adjusting End-user Expectations of AI Systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . ACM, 411
Rafal Kocielnik, Saleema Amershi, and Paul N Bennett. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
Data-Centric Explanations: Explaining Training Data of Machine Learning Systems to Promote Transparency. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13
Ariful Islam Anik and Andrea Bunt. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Does the whole exceed its parts? the effect of ai explanations on complementary team performance. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–16
Gagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, and Daniel Weld. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
To trust or to think: cognitive forcing functions can reduce overreliance on AI in AI-assisted decision-making
Zana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
The who in explainable ai: How ai background shapes perceptions of ai explanations
Upol Ehsan, Samir Passi, Q Vera Liao, Larry Chan, I Lee, Michael Muller, Mark O Riedl, et al · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Explainability pitfalls: Beyond dark patterns in explainable AI
Upol Ehsan and Mark O Riedl. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Operationalizing human-centered perspectives in explainable AI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–6
Upol Ehsan, Philipp Wintersberger, Q Vera Liao, Martina Mara, Marc Streit, Sandra Wachter, Andreas Riener, and Mark O Riedl. 2021b · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Designing AI for trust and collaboration in time-constrained medical decisions: a sociotechnical lens. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–14
Maia Jacobs, Jeffrey He, Melanie F. Pradier, Barbara Lam, Andrew C Ahn, Thomas H McCoy, Roy H Perlis, Finale Doshi-Velez, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Algorithmic recourse: from counterfactual explanations to interventions. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency . 353–362
Amir-Hossein Karimi, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Isabel Valera. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Towards a science of human-ai decision making: a survey of empirical studies
Vivian Lai, Chacha Chen, Q Vera Liao, Alison Smith-Renner, and Chenhao Tan. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Assessing the Impact of Automated Suggestions on Decision Making: Domain Experts Mediate Model Errors but Take Less Initiative. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13
Ariel Levy, Monica Agrawal, Arvind Satyanarayan, and David Sontag. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiences
Q Vera Liao and Kush R Varshney. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Understanding the effect of out-of-distribution examples and interactive explanations on human-ai decision making
Han Liu, Vivian Lai, and Chenhao Tan. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Model LineUpper: Supporting Interactive Model Comparison at Multiple Levels for AutoML. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 170–174
Shweta Narkar, Yunfeng Zhang, Q Vera Liao, Dakuo Wang, and Justin D Weisz. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Manipulating and measuring model interpretability. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–52
Forough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G Goldstein, Jake M Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Wortman Vaughan, and Hanna Wallach. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Wait, but why?: assessing behavior explanation strategies for real-time strategy games. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 32–42
Justus Robertson, Athanasios Vasileios Kokkinakis, Jonathan Hook, Ben Kirman, Florian Block, Marian F Ursu, Sagarika Patra, Simon Demediuk, Anders Drachen, and Oluseyi Olarewaju. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Beyond expertise and roles: A framework to characterize the stakeholders of interpretable machine learning and their needs. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–16
Harini Suresh, Steven R Gomez, Kevin K Nam, and Arvind Satyanarayan. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Exploring and Promoting Diagnostic Transparency and Explainability in Online Symptom Checkers. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–17
Chun-Hua Tsai, Yue You, Xinning Gui, Yubo Kou, and John M Carroll. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Are Explanations Helpful? A Comparative Study of the Effects of Explanations in AI-Assisted Decision-Making. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 318–328
Xinru Wang and Ming Yin. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
A Human-Centered Agenda for Intelligible Machine Learning
Jennifer Wortman Vaughan and Hanna Wallach. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Shared Interest: Measuring Human-AI Alignment to Identify Recurring Patterns in Model Behavior. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–17
Angie Boggust, Benjamin Hoover, Arvind Satyanarayan, and Hendrik Strobelt. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
What to Learn, and How: Toward Effective Learning from Rationales. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022 . Association for Computational Linguistics, Dublin, Ireland, 1075–1088
Samuel Carton, Surya Kanoria, and Chenhao Tan. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Machine Explanations and Human Understanding
Chacha Chen, Shi Feng, Amit Sharma, and Chenhao Tan. 2022a · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Interpretable machine learning: Moving from mythos to diagnostics
Valerie Chen, Jeffrey Li, Joon Sik Kim, Gregory Plumb, and Ameet Talwalkar. 2022b · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Do People Engage Cognitively with AI? Impact of AI Assistance on Incidental Learning. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 794–806
Krzysztof Z Gajos and Lena Mamykina. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspective
Q Vera Liao and S Shyam Sundar. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AI. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing , Vol. 10. 147–159
Q Vera Liao, Yunfeng Zhang, Ronny Luss, Finale Doshi-Velez, and Amit Dhurandhar. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Understanding the impact of explanations on advice-taking: a user study for AI-based clinical Decision Support Systems. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–9
Cecilia Panigutti, Andrea Beretta, Fosca Giannotti, and Dino Pedreschi. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Talktomodel: Understanding machine learning models with open ended dialogues
Dylan Slack, Satyapriya Krishna, Himabindu Lakkaraju, and Sameer Singh. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making
Helena Vasconcelos, Matthew Jörke, Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Tobias Gerstenberg, Michael Bernstein, and Ranjay Krishna. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Towards Relatable Explainable AI with the Perceptual Process. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–24
Wencan Zhang and Brian Y Lim. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.