Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
As AI systems demonstrate increasingly strong predictive performance, their adoption has grown in numerous domains.
Construct validity in psychological tests
Lee J Cronbach and Paul E Meehl. 1955 · 1955
Earlier work this paper cites.
A quantitative approach to content validity
Charles H Lawshe. 1975 · 1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
Predicting recidivism in north carolina, 1978 and 1980
Peter Schmidt and Ann D Witte. 1988 · 1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
An empirical methodology for writing user-friendly natural language computer applications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 193–196
John F Kelley. 1983 · 1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adult Data Set
UCI Mahcine Learning Repository. 1994 · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
An integrative model of organizational trust
Roger C Mayer, James H Davis, and F David Schoorman. 1995 · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 345–352
Erik Frøkjær, Morten Hertzum, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2000 · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Random forests
Leo Breiman. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance
John D Lee and Katrina A See. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Conditional variable importance for random forests
Carolin Strobl, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Thomas Kneib, Thomas Augustin, and Achim Zeileis. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Why and why not explanations improve the intelligibility of context-aware intelligent systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 2119–2128
Brian Y Lim, Anind K Dey, and Daniel Avrahami. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
State Court Processing Statistics, 1990-2009: Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2014 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure
André Altmann, Laura Toloşi, Oliver Sander, and Thomas Lengauer. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Consumer credit-risk models via machine-learning algorithms
Amir E Khandani, Adlar J Kim, and Andrew W Lo. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Robots in society, society in robots
Selma Šabanović. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients
Holger Schielzeth. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Taking advice from intelligent systems: the double-edged sword of explanations. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces . 125–134
Kate Ehrlich, Susanna E Kirk, John Patterson, Jamie C Rasmussen, Steven I Ross, and Daniel M Gruen. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tell me more? The effects of mental model soundness on personalizing an intelligent agent. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–10
Todd Kulesza, Simone Stumpf, Margaret Burnett, and Irwin Kwan. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Too much, too little, or just right? Ways explanations impact end users’ mental models. In 2013 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human Centric Computing . IEEE, 3–10
Todd Kulesza, Simone Stumpf, Margaret Burnett, Sherry Yang, Irwin Kwan, and Weng-Keen Wong. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Power to the people: The role of humans in interactive machine learning
Saleema Amershi, Maya Cakmak, William Bradley Knox, and Todd Kulesza. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
System and method for predicting consumer credit risk using income risk based credit score
Suresh Kumar Annappindi. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Artificial intelligence in medicine and cardiac imaging: harnessing big data and advanced computing to provide personalized medical diagnosis and treatment
Steven E Dilsizian and Eliot L Siegel. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Improving content-based and hybrid music recommendation using deep learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia . 627–636
Xinxi Wang and Ye Wang. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Investigating user confidence for uncertainty presentation in predictive decision making. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction . 352–360
Syed Z Arshad, Jianlong Zhou, Constant Bridon, Fang Chen, and Yang Wang. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
The role of explanations on trust and reliance in clinical decision support systems. In 2015 International Conference on Healthcare Informatics . IEEE, 160–169
Adrian Bussone, Simone Stumpf, and Dympna O’Sullivan. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err
Berkeley J Dietvorst, Joseph P Simmons, and Cade Massey. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Grouped variable importance with random forests and application to multiple functional data analysis
Baptiste Gregorutti, Bertrand Michel, and Philippe Saint-Pierre. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reinforcement learning trees
Ruoqing Zhu, Donglin Zeng, and Michael R Kosorok. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Machine bias. ProPublica
Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters
Jeffrey Dastin. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Algorithmic transparency via quantitative input influence: Theory and experiments with learning systems. In 2016 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP) . IEEE, 598–617
Anupam Datta, Shayak Sen, and Yair Zick. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In international conference on machine learning . 1050–1059
Yarin Gal and Zoubin Ghahramani. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
When (ish) is my bus? user-centered visualizations of uncertainty in everyday, mobile predictive systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 chi conference on human factors in computing systems . 5092–5103
Matthew Kay, Tara Kola, Jessica R Hullman, and Sean A Munson. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Interpretable decision sets: A joint framework for description and prediction. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining . 1675–1684
Himabindu Lakkaraju, Stephen H Bach, and Jure Leskovec. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
The mythos of model interpretability
Zachary C Lipton. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Synthesizing the preferred inputs for neurons in neural networks via deep generator networks
Anh Nguyen, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Jason Yosinski, Thomas Brox, and Jeff Clune. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Why should i trust you?: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of KDD
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Eric L. Loomis, Defendant-Appellant
Supreme Court of Wisconsin. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Investigating the heart pump implant decision process: opportunities for decision support tools to help. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 4477–4488
Qian Yang, John Zimmerman, Aaron Steinfeld, Lisa Carey, and James F Antaki. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Human-Centric Justification of Machine Learning Predictions.. In IJCAI , Vol. 2017. 1461–1467
Or Biran and Kathleen R McKeown. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning
Finale Doshi-Velez and Been Kim. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hafez: an interactive poetry generation system. In Proceedings of ACL 2017, System Demonstrations . 43–48
Marjan Ghazvininejad, Xing Shi, Jay Priyadarshi, and Kevin Knight. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Correlation and variable importance in random forests
Baptiste Gregorutti, Bertrand Michel, and Philippe Saint-Pierre. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
On calibration of modern neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 1321–1330
Chuan Guo, Geoff Pleiss, Yu Sun, and Kilian Q Weinberger. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Understanding black-box predictions via influence functions. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70 . JMLR. org, 1885–1894
Pang Wei Koh and Percy Liang. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. In Advances in neural information processing systems . 6402–6413
Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Alexander Pritzel, and Charles Blundell. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Proceedings of NIPS
Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Insights into human-agent teaming: Intelligent agent transparency and uncertainty
Kimberly Stowers, Nicholas Kasdaglis, Michael Rupp, Jessie Chen, Daniel Barber, and Michael Barnes. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sanity checks for saliency maps
Julius Adebayo, Justin Gilmer, Michael Muelly, Ian Goodfellow, Moritz Hardt, and Been Kim. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
’It’s Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage’ Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–14
Reuben Binns, Max Van Kleek, Michael Veale, Ulrik Lyngs, Jun Zhao, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Do explanations make VQA models more predictable to a human?
Arjun Chandrasekaran, Viraj Prabhu, Deshraj Yadav, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay, and Devi Parikh. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Creative writing with a machine in the loop: Case studies on slogans and stories. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 329–340
Elizabeth Clark, Anne Spencer Ross, Chenhao Tan, Yangfeng Ji, and Noah A Smith. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them
Berkeley J Dietvorst, Joseph P Simmons, and Cade Massey. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism
Julia Dressel and Hany Farid. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
What can AI do for me: Evaluating Machine Learning Interpretations in Cooperative Play
Shi Feng and Jordan Boyd-Graber. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Visual analytics in deep learning: An interrogative survey for the next frontiers
Fred Hohman, Minsuk Kahng, Robert Pienta, and Duen Horng Chau. 2018 · 2018
COGAM: Measuring and Moderating Cognitive Load in Machine Learning Model Explanations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–14
Ashraf Abdul, Christian von der Weth, Mohan Kankanhalli, and Brian Y Lim. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Evaluating saliency map explanations for convolutional neural networks: a user study. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 275–285
Ahmed Alqaraawi, Martin Schuessler, Philipp Weiß, Enrico Costanza, and Nadia Berthouze. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance
Gagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, and Daniel S. Weld. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
A Human-Centered Evaluation of a Deep Learning System Deployed in Clinics for the Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–12
Emma Beede, Elizabeth Baylor, Fred Hersch, Anna Iurchenko, Lauren Wilcox, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, and Laura M Vardoulakis. 2020 · 2020
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
xGEMs: Generating examplars to explain black-box models
Shalmali Joshi, Oluwasanmi Koyejo, Been Kim, and Joydeep Ghosh. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Menaka Narayanan, Emily Chen, Jeffrey He, Been Kim, Sam Gershman, and Finale Doshi-Velez. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Comparing automatic and human evaluation of local explanations for text classification. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) . 1069–1078
Dong Nguyen. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep k-nearest neighbors: Towards confident, interpretable and robust deep learning
Nicolas Papernot and Patrick McDaniel. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Manipulating and measuring model interpretability
Forough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G Goldstein, Jake M Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, and Hanna Wallach. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Explanations as mechanisms for supporting algorithmic transparency. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–13
Emilee Rader, Kelley Cotter, and Janghee Cho. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Anchors: High-precision model-agnostic explanations. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 32
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
Proxy tasks and subjective measures can be misleading in evaluating explainable ai systems. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 454–464
Zana Buçinca, Phoebe Lin, Krzysztof Z Gajos, and Elena L Glassman. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Feature-Based Explanations Don’t Help People Detect Misclassifications of Online Toxicity. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media , Vol. 14. 95–106
Samuel Carton, Qiaozhu Mei, and Paul Resnick. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Leveraging rationales to improve human task performance. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 510–518
Devleena Das and Sonia Chernova. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic Scores. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–12
Maria De-Arteaga, Riccardo Fogliato, and Alexandra Chouldechova. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Mental Models of AI Agents in a Cooperative Game Setting. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–12
Katy Ilonka Gero, Zahra Ashktorab, Casey Dugan, Qian Pan, James Johnson, Werner Geyer, Maria Ruiz, Sarah Miller, David R Millen, Murray Campbell, et al · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Bhavya Ghai, Q Vera Liao, Yunfeng Zhang, Rachel Bellamy, and Klaus Mueller. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Human Evaluation of Spoken vs. Visual Explanations for Open-Domain QA
Ana Valeria Gonzalez, Gagan Bansal, Angela Fan, Robin Jia, Yashar Mehdad, and Srinivasan Iyer. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
An empirical study on the perceived fairness of realistic, imperfect machine learning models. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 392–402
Galen Harrison, Julia Hanson, Christine Jacinto, Julio Ramirez, and Blase Ur. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?
Peter Hase and Mohit Bansal. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
The limits of human predictions of recidivism
Jongbin Jung, Sharad Goel, Jennifer Skeem, et al · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists’ Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–14
Harmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana, Hanna Wallach, and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Impact of a deep learning assistant on the histopathologic classification of liver cancer
Amirhossein Kiani, Bora Uyumazturk, Pranav Rajpurkar, Alex Wang, Rebecca Gao, Erik Jones, Yifan Yu, Curtis P Langlotz, Robyn L Ball, Thomas J Montine, et al · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
“Why is ‘Chicago’ deceptive?” Towards Building Model-Driven Tutorials for Humans. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13
Vivian Lai, Han Liu, and Chenhao Tan. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Co-Design and Evaluation of an Intelligent Decision Support System for Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment
Min Hun Lee, Daniel P Siewiorek, Asim Smailagic, Alexandre Bernardino, and Sergi Bermúdez i Badia. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
Q Vera Liao, Daniel Gruen, and Sarah Miller. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Why does my model fail? contrastive local explanations for retail forecasting. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 90–98
Ana Lucic, Hinda Haned, and Maarten de Rijke. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Do I Look Like a Criminal? Examining how Race Presentation Impacts Human Judgement of Recidivism. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13
Keri Mallari, Kori Inkpen, Paul Johns, Sarah Tan, Divya Ramesh, and Ece Kamar. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Sean McGrath, Parth Mehta, Alexandra Zytek, Isaac Lage, and Himabindu Lakkaraju. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
When Explanations Lie: Why Many Modified BP Attributions Fail. In International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 9046–9057
Leon Sixt, Maximilian Granz, and Tim Landgraf. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
No Explainability without Accountability: An Empirical Study of Explanations and Feedback in Interactive ML. In Proceedings of CHI
Alison Smith-Renner, Ron Fan, Melissa Birchfield, Tongshuang Wu, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Dan Weld, and Leah Findlater. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Should We Trust (X) AI? Design Dimensions for Structured Experimental Evaluations
Fabian Sperrle, Mennatallah El-Assady, Grace Guo, Duen Horng Chau, Alex Endert, and Daniel Keim. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Re-examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 chi conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–13
Qian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, Carolyn Rosé, and John Zimmerman. 2020b · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Yunfeng Zhang, Q Vera Liao, and Rachel KE Bellamy. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Data-Centric Explanations: Explaining Training Data of Machine Learning Systems to Promote Transparency. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13
Ariful Islam Anik and Andrea Bunt. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
The values encoded in machine learning research
Abeba Birhane, Pratyusha Kalluri, Dallas Card, William Agnew, Ravit Dotan, and Michelle Bao. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Zana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
I Think I Get Your Point, AI! The Illusion of Explanatory Depth in Explainable AI. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 307–317
Michael Chromik, Malin Eiband, Felicitas Buchner, Adrian Krüger, and Andreas Butz. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Soumya Ghosh, Q Vera Liao, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Jiri Navratil, Prasanna Sattigeri, Kush R Varshney, and Yunfeng Zhang. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
The Flaws of Policies Requiring Human Oversight of Government Algorithms
Ben Green. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Formalizing trust in artificial intelligence: Prerequisites, causes and goals of human trust in ai. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 624–635
Alon Jacovi, Ana Marasović, Tim Miller, and Yoav Goldberg. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
A Human-AI Collaborative Approach for Clinical Decision Making on Rehabilitation Assessment. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–14
Min Hun Lee, Daniel PP Siewiorek, Asim Smailagic, Alexandre Bernardino, and Sergi Bermúdez Bermúdez i Badia. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Explanation-Based Human Debugging of NLP Models: A Survey
Piyawat Lertvittayakumjorn and Francesca Toni. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Assessing the Impact of Automated Suggestions on Decision Making: Domain Experts Mediate Model Errors but Take Less Initiative. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13
Ariel Levy, Monica Agrawal, Arvind Satyanarayan, and David Sontag. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Han Liu, Vivian Lai, and Chenhao Tan. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Human Reliance on Machine Learning Models When Performance Feedback is Limited: Heuristics and Risks. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–16
Zhuoran Lu and Ming Yin. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Anchoring Bias Affects Mental Model Formation and User Reliance in Explainable AI Systems. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 340–350
Mahsan Nourani, Chiradeep Roy, Jeremy E Block, Donald R Honeycutt, Tahrima Rahman, Eric Ragan, and Vibhav Gogate. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scans
Michael Roberts, Derek Driggs, Matthew Thorpe, Julian Gilbey, Michael Yeung, Stephan Ursprung, Angelica I Aviles-Rivero, Christian Etmann, Cathal McCague, Lucian Beer, et al · 2021
Closest in time.
A Survey of Human-Centered Evaluations in Human-Centered Machine Learning. In Computer Graphics Forum , Vol. 40. Wiley Online Library, 543–567
Fabian Sperrle, Mennatallah El-Assady, Grace Guo, Rita Borgo, D Horng Chau, Alex Endert, and Daniel Keim. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their Needs. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–16
Harini Suresh, Steven R Gomez, Kevin K Nam, and Arvind Satyanarayan. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Visual, textual or hybrid: the effect of user expertise on different explanations. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 109–119
Maxwell Szymanski, Martijn Millecamp, and Katrien Verbert. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Exploring and Promoting Diagnostic Transparency and Explainability in Online Symptom Checkers. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–17
Chun-Hua Tsai, Yue You, Xinning Gui, Yubo Kou, and John M Carroll. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Effect of Information Presentation on Fairness Perceptions of Machine Learning Predictors. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13
Niels van Berkel, Jorge Goncalves, Daniel Russo, Simo Hosio, and Mikael B Skov. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
How to Evaluate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision Making? A Survey of Empirical Methodologies
Oleksandra Vereschak, Gilles Bailly, and Baptiste Caramiaux. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Are Explanations Helpful? A Comparative Study of the Effects of Explanations in AI-Assisted Decision-Making. In 26rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
Xinru Wang and Ming Yin. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
A Survey of Human-in-the-loop for Machine Learning
Xingjiao Wu, Luwei Xiao, Yixuan Sun, Junhang Zhang, Tianlong Ma, and Liang He. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Advances in Variational Inference
C. Zhang, Judith Bütepage, H. Kjellström, and S. Mandt. 2019 · 2026
Closest in time.