Built on

J. P. Delahaye, M. Diemoz, K. Long, B. Mansoulié, N. Pastrone, L. Rivkin, D. Schulte, A. Skrinsky, and A. Wulzer, “Muon Colliders,” arXiv:1901.06150 [physics.acc-ph]
Original
1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Gérardin, H. B. Meyer, and A. Nyffeler, “Lattice calculation of the pion transition form factor with N f = 2 + 1 N_{f}=2+1 Wilson quarks,” Phys. Rev. D
Original
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Ibe, M. Suzuki, T. T. Yanagida, and N. Yokozaki, “Muon g − 2 g-2 in Split-Family SUSY in light of LHC Run II,” Eur. Phys. J. C
Original
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Biekotter, S. Heinemeyer, and C. Muñoz, “Precise prediction for the Higgs-Boson masses in the μ ν \mu\nu SSM with three right-handed neutrino superfields,” Eur. Phys. J
Original
1906
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Endo and W. Yin, “Explaining electron and muon g − 2 g-2 anomaly in SUSY without lepton-flavor mixings,” JHEP
Original
1906
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, and B. Kubis, “Three-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization,” JHEP
Original
1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Kpatcha, I. , D. E. López-Fogliani, C. Muñoz, N. Nagata, H. Otono, and R. Ruiz De Austri, “Sampling the μ ν \mu\nu SSM for displaced decays of the tau left sneutrino LSP at the LHC,” Eur. Phys. J. C
Original
1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson, and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, “Short-distance constraints for the HLbL contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment,” Phys. Lett. B
Original
1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Badziak and K. Sakurai, “Explanation of electron and muon g − - 2 anomalies in the MSSM,” JHEP
Original
1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Abdughani, K.-I. Hikasa, L. Wu, J. M. Yang, and J. Zhao, “Testing electroweak SUSY for muon g − 2 g-2 and dark matter at the LHC and beyond,” JHEP
Original
1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Colangelo, F. Hagelstein, M. Hoferichter, L. Laub, and P. Stoffer, “Longitudinal short-distance constraints for the hadronic light-by-light contribution to ( g − 2 ) μ (g-2)_{\mu} with large- N c N_{c} Regge models,” JHEP
Original
1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Kpatcha, D. E. López-Fogliani, C. Muñoz, and R. Ruiz De Austri, “Impact of Higgs physics on the parameter space of the μ ν \mu\nu SSM,” Eur. Phys. J. C
Original
1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, “ g − 2 g-2 of charged leptons, α ⁡ ( M Z 2 ) \alpha(M^{2}_{Z}) , and the hyperfine splitting of muonium,” Phys. Rev. D
Original
1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Blum, N. Christ, M. Hayakawa, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, and C. Lehner, “Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment from Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett
Original
1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. A. Gómez-Vargas, D. E. López-Fogliani, C. Muñoz, and A. D. Perez, “MeV-GeV γ \gamma -ray telescopes probing gravitino LSP with coexisting axino NLSP as dark matter in the μ ν \mu\nu SSM,” Astropart. Phys
Original
1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. A. Gómez-Vargas, D. E. López-Fogliani, C. Muñoz, and A. D. Perez, “MeV-GeV γ \gamma -ray telescopes probing axino LSP/gravitino NLSP as dark matter in the μ ν \mu\nu SSM,” JCAP
Original
1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Kpatcha, I. Lara, D. E. López-Fogliani, C. Muñoz, and N. Nagata, “Explaining muon g − 2 g-2 data in the μ ν \mu\nu SSM,” Eur. Phys. J. C
Original
1912
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. P. Nilles, “Supersymmetry, Supergravity and Particle Physics,” Phys. Rept
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. E. Haber and G. L. Kane, “The Search for Supersymmetry: Probing Physics Beyond the Standard Model,” Phys. Rept
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Barbieri, “Looking Beyond the Standard Model: The Supersymmetric Option,” Riv. Nuovo Cim
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Gunion and H. E. Haber, “Higgs Bosons in Supersymmetric Models. 1.,” Nucl. Phys. B
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Gabbiani, E. Gabrielli, A. Masiero, and L. Silvestrini, “A Complete analysis of FCNC and CP constraints in general SUSY extensions of the standard model,” Nucl. Phys
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Moroi, “The Muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in the minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Phys. Rev. D
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. P. Martin, “A Supersymmetry primer,” arXiv:hep-ph/9709356 [hep-ph] . [Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.18,1(1998)]
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Brignole, L. E. Ibañez, and C. Muñoz, “Soft supersymmetry breaking terms from supergravity and superstring models,” Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. G. Cerdeno, E. Gabrielli, S. Khalil, C. Munoz, and E. Torrente-Lujan, “Muon anomalous magnetic moment in supersymmetric scenarios with an intermediate scale and nonuniversality,” Phys. Rev
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto, and T. Kitahara, “Muon g − 2 g-2 vs LHC Run 2 in supersymmetric models,” JHEP
Original
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. T. Yanagida, W. Yin, and N. Yokozaki, “Muon g − 2 g-2 in Higgs-anomaly mediation,” JHEP
Original
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Borsanyi et al
Original
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
http://lepsusy.web.cern.ch/lepsusy/www/gmsb_summer02/lepgmsb.html
ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL Experiments, “Combined LEP GMSB Stau/Smuon/Selectron Results, 189-208 GeV.” Lepsusywg/02-09.2, 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Lehner and A. S. Meyer, “Consistency of hadronic vacuum polarization between lattice QCD and the R-ratio,” Phys. Rev. D
Original
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, C. A. Manzari, and M. Montull, “Hadronic Vacuum Polarization: ( g − 2 ) μ (g-2)_{\mu} versus Global Electroweak Fits,” Phys. Rev. Lett
Original
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Porod, “SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+ e- colliders,” Comput. Phys. Commun
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Melnikov and A. Vainshtein, “Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment revisited,” Phys. Rev. D
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Muon g-2
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Aoyama et al
Original
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Czarnecki, W. J. Marciano, and A. Vainshtein, “Refinements in electroweak contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment,” Phys. Rev. D
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

A. Keshavarzi, W. J. Marciano, M. Passera, and A. Sirlin, “Muon g − 2 g-2 and Δ α \Delta\alpha connection,” Phys. Rev. D
Original
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
D. E. López-Fogliani and C. Muñoz, “Proposal for a supersymmetric standard model,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Chakraborti, S. Heinemeyer, and I. Saha, “Improved ( g − 2 ) μ (g-2)_{\mu} Measurements and Supersymmetry,” Eur. Phys. J. C
Original
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Bechtle, D. Dercks, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, “HiggsBounds-5: Testing Higgs Sectors in the LHC 13 TeV Era,” Eur. Phys. J. C
Original
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Capdevilla, D. Curtin, Y. Kahn, and G. Krnjaic, “A Guaranteed Discovery at Future Muon Colliders,” arXiv:2006.16277 [hep-ph]

Then

P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak, and G. Weiglein, “Applying Exclusion Likelihoods from LHC Searches to Extended Higgs Sectors,” Eur. Phys. J
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
A. Arbey et al
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
N. Arkani-Hamed, T. Han, M. Mangano, and L.-T. Wang, “Physics opportunities of a 100 TeV proton–proton collider,” Phys. Rept
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, “Reevaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the Standard Model predictions of the muon g − 2 g-2 and α ⁡ ( m Z 2 ) {\alpha(m_{Z}^{2})} using newest hadronic cross-section data,” Eur. Phys. J. C
Original
2017
Later among the works it cites.
P. Masjuan and P. Sanchez-Puertas, “Pseudoscalar-pole contribution to the ( g μ − 2 ) (g_{\mu}-2) : a rational approach,” Phys. Rev. D

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2021

The new $(g-2)_\mu$ result and the $\mu\nu$SSM

Heinemeyer, Sven, Kpatcha, Essodjolo, Lara, Iñaki et al.

Understand

The $\mu\nu$SSM is a highly predictive alternative model to the MSSM.

In particular, the electroweak sector of the model can explain the longstanding discrepancy between the experimental result for the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, $(g-2)_\mu$, and its Standard Model prediction, while being in agreement with all other theoretical and experimental constraints.
The recently published MUON G-2 result is within $0.8\,\sigma$ in agreement with the older BNL result on $(g-2)_\mu$.
The combined result was announced as $a_\mu^{\rm exp} = (11659206.1 \pm 4.1) \times 10^{-10}$, yielding a new deviation from the Standard Model prediction of $\Delta a_\mu = (25.1 \pm 5.9) \times 10^{-10}$, corresponding to $4.2\,\sigma$.