Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

2018

Electron g-2 with flavor violation in MSSM

Dutta, Bhaskar, Mimura, Yukihiro

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

The muon $g-2$ anomaly is a long-standing discrepancy from its standard model prediction.

The recent improved measurement of the fine structure constant makes the electron $g-2$ anomaly very interesting for both sign and magnitude in comparison to the muon $g-2$ anomaly.
In order to explain both muon and electron $g-2$ anomalies, we introduce flavor violation in the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) as a low energy theory.
The lepton flavor violating process $\tau \to e\gamma$ is one the major constraints to explain both $g-2$ anomalies simultaneously emerging from flavor violating terms.

Electron g-2 with flavor violation in MSSM · Around

Built on

J. L. Lopez, D. V. Nanopoulos and X. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 49
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. L. Everett, G. L. Kane, S. Rigolin and L. T. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. W. Bennett et al
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Aubert et al
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Crivellin, L. Hofer and J. Rosiek, JHEP 1107
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto and T. Yoshinaga, JHEP 1401
Original
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Gogoladze, F. Nasir, Q. Shafi and C. S. Un, Phys. Rev. D 90
Original
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

M. A. Ajaib, B. Dutta, T. Ghosh, I. Gogoladze and Q. Shafi, Phys. Rev. D 92
Original
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Chowdhury and N. Yokozaki, JHEP 1508
Original
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A. M. Sirunyan et al
Original
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Tanabashi et al
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Blum et al
Original
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, Phys. Rev. D 97

Then

H. Davoudiasl and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 98
Original
2018
Closest in time.
M. Aaboud et al
Original
2018
Closest in time.
K. Hagiwara, K. Ma and S. Mukhopadhyay, Phys. Rev. D 97
Original
2018
Closest in time.
G. Bhattacharyya, T. T. Yanagida and N. Yokozaki, Phys. Lett. B 784
Original
2018
Closest in time.
A. M. Sirunyan et al
Original
2018
Closest in time.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Original

2018

Cited alongside, same era.

T. Aoyama, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Phys. Rev. D 97

2018

Cited alongside, same era.

R. H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey and H. Müller, Science 360

2018

Cited alongside, same era.

A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, arXiv:1807.11484 [hep-ph]

Cited in the paper.

J. Liu, C. E. M. Wagner and X. P. Wang, arXiv:1810.11028 [hep-ph]

Cited in the paper.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsSUS

Cited in the paper.

https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CombinedSummaryPlots/SUSY/

Cited in the paper.

M. Aaboud et al

2018

Closest in time.

A. M. Sirunyan et al

2018

Closest in time.

V. Andreev et al

2018

Closest in time.