Built on

M. Abe et al
Original
1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Ibe, M. Suzuki, T. T. Yanagida, and N. Yokozaki, “Muon g − 2 g-2 in Split-Family SUSY in light of LHC Run II,” Eur. Phys. J. C79
Original
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Abe, S. Chigusa, Y. Ema, and T. Moroi, “Indirect studies of electroweakly interacting particles at 100 TeV hadron colliders,” Phys. Rev. D100
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. de Blas et al
Original
1905
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, and B. Kubis, “Three-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization,” JHEP 08
Original
1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Badziak and K. Sakurai, “Explanation of electron and muon g − 2 g-2 anomalies in the MSSM,” JHEP 10
Original
1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Abdughani, K.-I. Hikasa, L. Wu, J. M. Yang, and J. Zhao, “Testing electroweak SUSY for muon g − 2 g-2 and dark matter at the LHC and beyond,” JHEP 11
Original
1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, “ g − 2 g-2 of charged leptons, α ⁡ ( M Z 2 ) \alpha(M^{2}_{Z}) , and the hyperfine splitting of muonium,” Phys. Rev. D 101
Original
1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Kpatcha, I. Lara, D. E. López-Fogliani, C. Muñoz, and N. Nagata, “Explaining muon g − 2 g-2 data in the μ ν \mu\nu SSM,” Eur. Phys. J. C81
Original
1912
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. R. Coleman, “The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 15
1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. L. Lopez, D. V. Nanopoulos, and X. Wang, “Large ( g − 2 ) μ (g-2)_{\mu} in SU(5) × \times U(1) Supergravity Models,” Phys. Rev. D49
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, “Probing Supergravity Grand Unification in the Brookhaven g − 2 g-2 Experiment,” Phys. Rev. D53
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. M. Nojiri, K. Fujii, and T. Tsukamoto, “Confronting the minimal supersymmetric standard model with the study of scalar leptons at future linear e+ e- colliders,” Phys. Rev. D 54
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Moroi, “The Muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in the minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Phys. Rev. D53
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
H.-C. Cheng, J. L. Feng, and N. Polonsky, “Superoblique corrections and nondecoupling of supersymmetry breaking,” Phys. Rev. D 56
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. M. Nojiri, D. M. Pierce, and Y. Yamada, “Slepton production as a probe of the squark mass scale,” Phys. Rev. D 57
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
H.-C. Cheng, J. L. Feng, and N. Polonsky, “Signatures of multi - TeV scale particles in supersymmetric theories,” Phys. Rev. D 57
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Katz, L. Randall, and S.-f. Su, “Supersymmetric partners of oblique corrections,” Nucl. Phys. B 536
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. T. Yanagida, W. Yin, and N. Yokozaki, “Muon g − 2 g-2 in Higgs-anomaly mediation,” JHEP 06
Original
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto, and T. Kitahara, “Muon g − 2 g-2 vs LHC Run 2 in supersymmetric models,” JHEP 04
Original
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Borsanyi et al
Original
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Muon g-2
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, C. A. Manzari, and M. Montull, “Hadronic Vacuum Polarization: ( g − 2 ) μ (g-2)_{\mu} versus Global Electroweak Fits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125
Original
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Han, et al
Original
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Muon g-2
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Muhlleitner, A. Djouadi, and Y. Mambrini, “SDECAY: A Fortran code for the decays of the supersymmetric particles in the MSSM,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 168
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Aoyama et al
Original
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Keshavarzi, W. J. Marciano, M. Passera, and A. Sirlin, “Muon g − 2 g-2 and Δ α \Delta\alpha connection,” Phys. Rev. D 102
Original
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Muon g-2
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

M. Chakraborti, S. Heinemeyer, and I. Saha, “Improved ( g − 2 ) μ (g-2)_{\mu} Measurements and Supersymmetry,” Eur. Phys. J. C80
Original
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Nagai and N. Yokozaki, “Lepton flavor violations in SUSY models for muon g − 2 g-2 with right-handed neutrinos,” JHEP 01
Original
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
M. M. Mühlleitner, A. Djouadi, and M. Spira, “Decays of Supersymmetric Particles — the Program SUSY-HIT,” Acta Phys. Polon. B38
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, “MicrOMEGAs 2.0: A Program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 176
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Malaescu and M. Schott, “Impact of correlations between a μ a_{\mu} and α QED \alpha_{\text{QED}} on the EW fit,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81

Then

P. Athron, et al
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
M. Endo, T. Moroi, M. M. Nojiri, and Y. Shoji, “Renormalization-Scale Uncertainty in the Decay Rate of False Vacuum,” JHEP 01
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
B. Zhu, R. Ding, and T. Li, “Higgs mass and muon anomalous magnetic moment in the MSSM with gauge-gravity hybrid mediation,” Phys. Rev. D96
Original
2017
Later among the works it cites.
A. Choudhury, L. Darmé, L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo, and S. Trojanowski, “Muon g − 2 g-2 and related phenomenology in constrained vector-like extensions of the MSSM,” JHEP 05
Original
2017
Later among the works it cites.
T. T. Yanagida and N. Yokozaki, “Muon g − 2 g-2 in MSSM gauge mediation revisited,” Phys. Lett. B772

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2021

Supersymmetric Interpretation of the Muon $g-2$ Anomaly

Endo, Motoi, Hamaguchi, Koichi, Iwamoto, Sho et al.

Understand

The Fermilab Muon $g-2$ collaboration recently announced the first result of measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment ($g-2$), which confirmed the previous result at the Brookhaven National Laboratory and thus the discrepancy with its Standard Model prediction.

We revisit low-scale supersymmetric models that are naturally capable to solve the muon $g-2$ anomaly, focusing on two distinct scenarios: chargino-contribution dominated and pure-bino-contribution dominated scenarios.
It is shown that the slepton pair-production searches have excluded broad parameter spaces for both two scenarios, but they are not closed yet.
For the chargino-dominated scenario, the models with $m_{\tilde{\mu}_{\rm L}}\gtrsim m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}$ are still widely allowed.