Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We address whether neural models for Natural Language Inference (NLI) can learn the compositional interactions between lexical entailment and negation, using four methods: the behavioral evaluation methods of (1) challenge test sets and (2) systematic generalization tasks, and the structural evaluation methods of (3) probes and (4) interventions.
MonaLog: A lightweight system for natural language inference based on monotonicity
Hai Hu, Qi Chen, Kyle Richardson, Atreyee Mukherjee, Lawrence S. Moss, and Sandra Kübler. 2019b · 1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
Huggingface’s transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing
Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, R’emi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, and Jamie Brew. 2019 · 1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information
David Marr. 1982 · 1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis
Jerry A. Fodor and Zenon W. Pylyshyn. 1988 · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Studies in Natural Logic and Categorial Grammar
Víctor Sánchez-Valencia. 1991 · 1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
WordNet: An Electronic Database
Christiane Fellbaum, editor. 1998 · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Direct and indirect effects
Judea Pearl. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
A brief history of natural logic
Johan van Benthem. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Modeling semantic containment and exclusion in natural language inference
Bill MacCartney and Christopher D. Manning. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Natural Language Inference
Bill MacCartney. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
An extended model of natural logic
Bill MacCartney and Christopher D. Manning. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Natural logic and semantics
Lawrence S Moss. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Inclusion and exclusion in natural language
Thomas F. Icard. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Recent progress on monotonicity
Thomas F. Icard and Lawrence S. Moss. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference
Samuel R. Bowman, Gabor Angeli, Christopher Potts, and Christopher D. Manning. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Enhancing and combining sequential and tree LSTM for natural language inference
Qian Chen, Xiaodan Zhu, Zhen-Hua Ling, Si Wei, and Hui Jiang. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Most “babies” are “little” and most “problems” are “huge”: Compositional entailment in adjective-nouns
Ellie Pavlick and Chris Callison-Burch. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A monotonicity calculus and its completeness
Thomas Icard, Lawrence Moss, and William Tune. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
From programs to causal models
Thomas F. Icard. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Adversarial examples for evaluating reading comprehension systems
Robin Jia and Percy Liang. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
What does BERT look at? an analysis of BERT’s attention
Kevin Clark, Urvashi Khandelwal, Omer Levy, and Christopher D. Manning. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Posing fair generalization tasks for natural language inference
Atticus Geiger, Ignacio Cases, Lauri Karttunen, and Christopher Potts. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Designing and interpreting probes with control tasks
John Hewitt and Percy Liang. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?
Dieuwke Hupkes, Verna Dankers, Mathijs Mul, and Elia Bruni. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Systematic generalization: What is required and can it be learned?
Dzmitry Bahdanau, Shikhar Murty, Michael Noukhovitch, Thien Huu Nguyen, Harm de Vries, and Aaron Courville. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Under the hood: Using diagnostic classifiers to investigate and improve how language models track agreement information
Mario Giulianelli, Jack Harding, Florian Mohnert, Dieuwke Hupkes, and Willem Zuidema. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Breaking NLI systems with sentences that require simple lexical inferences
Max Glockner, Vered Shwartz, and Yoav Goldberg. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Annotation artifacts in natural language inference data
Suchin Gururangan, Swabha Swayamdipta, Omer Levy, Roy Schwartz, Samuel Bowman, and Noah A. Smith. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Analysing the potential of seq-to-seq models for incremental interpretation in task-oriented dialogue
Dieuwke Hupkes, Sanne Bouwmeester, and Raquel Fernández. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Generalization without systematicity: On the compositional skills of sequence-to-sequence recurrent networks
Brenden M. Lake and Marco Baroni. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Stress test evaluation for natural language inference
Aakanksha Naik, Abhilasha Ravichander, Norman Sadeh, Carolyn Rose, and Graham Neubig. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Nelson F. Liu, Roy Schwartz, and Noah A. Smith. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Probing natural language inference models through semantic fragments
Kyle Richardson, Hai Hu, Lawrence S. Moss, and Ashish Sabharwal. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
olmpics – on what language model pre-training captures
Alon Talmor, Yanai Elazar, Yoav Goldberg, and Jonathan Berant. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
BERT rediscovers the classical NLP pipeline
Ian Tenney, Dipanjan Das, and Ellie Pavlick. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Can neural networks understand monotonicity reasoning?
Hitomi Yanaka, Koji Mineshima, Daisuke Bekki, Kentaro Inui, Satoshi Sekine, Lasha Abzianidze, and Johan Bos. 2019a · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
HELP: A dataset for identifying shortcomings of neural models in monotonicity reasoning
Hitomi Yanaka, Koji Mineshima, Daisuke Bekki, Kentaro Inui, Satoshi Sekine, Lasha Abzianidze, and Johan Bos. 2019b · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Probing linguistic systematicity
Emily Goodwin, Koustuv Sinha, and Timothy J. O’Donnell. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.
Causal mediation analysis for interpreting neural nlp: The case of gender bias
Jesse Vig, Sebastian Gehrmann, Yonatan Belinkov, Sharon Qian, Daniel Nevo, Yaron Singer, and Stuart Shieber. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.
Do neural models learn systematicity of monotonicity inference in natural language?
Hitomi Yanaka, Koji Mineshima, Daisuke Bekki, and Kentaro Inui. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.