Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Despite the success of language models using neural networks, it remains unclear to what extent neural models have the generalization ability to perform inferences.
Assessing BERT’s syntactic abilities
Yoav Goldberg. 2019 · 1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?
Dieuwke Hupkes, Verna Dankers, Mathijs Mul, and Elia Bruni. 2019 · 1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mathijs Mul and Willem Zuidema. 2019 · 1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
Monalog: a lightweight system for natural language inference based on monotonicity
Hai Hu, Qi Chen, Kyle Richardson, Atreyee Mukherjee, Lawrence S. Moss, and Sandra Kübler. 2019 · 1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
Determiners and logic
Johan van Benthem. 1983 · 1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis
Jerry A. Fodor and Zenon W. Pylyshyn. 1988 · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Language of thought: The connectionist contribution
Murat Aydede. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Long short-term memory
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science
Gary Marcus. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Representation and Inference for Natural Language: A First Course in Computational Semantics
Patrick Blackburn and Johan Bos. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Compositionality I: Definitions and variants
Peter Pagin and Dag Westerståhl. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Recognizing Textual Entailment: Models and Applications
Ido Dagan, Dan Roth, Mark Sammons, and Fabio Massimo Zanzotto. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Recent progress in monotonicity
Thomas Icard and Lawrence Moss. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Glove: Global vectors for word representation
Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A tableau prover for natural logic and language
Lasha Abzianidze. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Recursive neural networks can learn logical semantics
Samuel R. Bowman, Christopher Potts, and Christopher D. Manning. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Assessing the ability of LSTMs to learn syntax-sensitive dependencies
Tal Linzen, Emmanuel Dupoux, and Yoav Goldberg. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Generalization without systematicity: On the compositional skills of sequence-to-sequence recurrent networks
Brenden M. Lake and Marco Baroni. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Can recurrent neural networks learn nested recursion
Jean-Philippe Bernardy. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A broad-coverage challenge corpus for sentence understanding through inference
Adina Williams, Nikita Nangia, and Samuel Bowman. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Jacob Devlin, Chang Ming-Wei, Lee Kenton, and Toutanova Kristina. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Posing fair generalization tasks for natural language inference
Atticus Geiger, Ignacio Cases, Lauri Karttunen, and Christopher Potts. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Inoculation by fine-tuning: A method for analyzing challenge datasets
Nelson F. Liu, Roy Schwartz, and Noah A. Smith. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Right for the wrong reasons: Diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference
R. Thomas McCoy, Ellie Pavlick, and Tal Linzen. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
How well do NLI models capture verb veridicality?
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Can neural networks understand logical entailment?
Richard Evans, David Saxton, David Amos, Pushmeet Kohli, and Edward Grefenstette. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Breaking NLI systems with sentences that require simple lexical inferences
Max Glockner, Vered Shwartz, and Yoav Goldberg. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Visualisation and ‘diagnostic classifiers’ reveal how recurrent and recursive neural networks process hierarchical structure
Dieuwke Hupkes, Sara Veldhoen, and Willem Zuidema. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Rearranging the familiar: Testing compositional generalization in recurrent networks
João Loula, Marco Baroni, and Brenden Lake. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Hypothesis only baselines in natural language inference
Adam Poliak, Jason Naradowsky, Aparajita Haldar, Rachel Rudinger, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
The importance of being recurrent for modeling hierarchical structure
Ke Tran, Arianna Bisazza, and Christof Monz. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Alexis Ross and Ellie Pavlick. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Diversify your datasets: Analyzing generalization via controlled variance in adversarial datasets
Ohad Rozen, Vered Shwartz, Roee Aharoni, and Ido Dagan. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Analysing mathematical reasoning abilities of neural models
David Saxton, Edward Grefenstette, Felix Hill, and Pushmeet Kohli. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
GLUE: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding
Alex Wang, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel Bowman. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Can neural networks understand monotonicity reasoning?
Hitomi Yanaka, Koji Mineshima, Daisuke Bekki, Kentaro Inui, Satoshi Sekine, Lasha Abzianidze, and Johan Bos. 2019a · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
HELP: A dataset for identifying shortcomings of neural models in monotonicity reasoning
Hitomi Yanaka, Koji Mineshima, Daisuke Bekki, Kentaro Inui, Satoshi Sekine, Lasha Abzianidze, and Johan Bos. 2019b · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Probing natural language inference models through semantic fragments
Kyle Richardson, Hai Hu, Lawrence S. Moss, and Ashish Sabharwal. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.
Higher-order logical inference with compositional semantics
Koji Mineshima, Pascual Martínez-Gómez, Yusuke Miyao, and Daisuke Bekki. 2015 · 2061
Closest in time.