Built on

O. Witzel, “Review on Composite Higgs Models”, PoS LATTICE2018 (2019) 006 [ arXiv:1901.08216 ]
Original
1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. H. Dondi and H. Nicolai, “Lattice Supersymmetry”, Nuovo Cim. A41 (1977) 1
1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Osborn, “Topological Charges for 𝒩 = 4 \mathcal{N}=4 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and Monopoles of Spin 1”, Phys. Lett. B83 (1979) 321–326
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. H. Swendsen, “Monte Carlo Renormalization Group”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 (1979) 859–861
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Veneziano and S. Yankielowicz, “An Effective Lagrangian for the Pure 𝒩 = 1 \mathcal{N}=1 Supersymmetric Yang–Mills Theory”, Phys. Lett. B113 (1982) 231
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Witten, “Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking”, Nucl. Phys. B202 (1982) 253
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Curci and G. Veneziano, “Supersymmetry and the Lattice: A Reconciliation?”, Nucl. Phys. B292 (1987) 555–572
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. de Wit, J. Hoppe and H. Nicolai, “On the Quantum Mechanics of Supermembranes”, Nucl. Phys. B305 (1988) 545
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Witten, “Bound states of strings and p-branes”, Nucl. Phys. B460 (1996) 335–350 [ hep-th/9510135 ]
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker and L. Susskind, “M theory as a matrix model: A Conjecture”, Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 5112–5128 [ hep-th/9610043 ]
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Berkooz and M. R. Douglas, “Five-branes in M(atrix) theory”, Phys. Lett. B395 (1997) 196–202 [ hep-th/9610236 ]
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. R. Farrar, G. Gabadadze and M. Schwetz, “On the effective action of 𝒩 = 1 \mathcal{N}=1 supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory”, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 015009 [ hep-th/9711166 ]
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Maldacena, “The Large- N N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252 [ hep-th/9711200 ]
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Maldacena, “Wilson loops in large N field theories”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4859–4862 [ hep-th/9803002 ]
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory”, Phys. Lett. B428 (1998) 105–114 [ hep-th/9802109 ]
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Fotopoulos and T. R. Taylor, “Comment on two loop free energy in 𝒩 = 4 \mathcal{N}=4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory at finite temperature”, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 061701 [ hep-th/9811224 ]
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Taylor, “The M(atrix) model of M theory”, NATO Sci. Ser. C 556 (2000) 91–178 [ hep-th/0002016 ]
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
S.-J. Rey and J.-T. Yee, “Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large- N N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity”, Eur. Phys. J. C22 (2001) 379–394 [ hep-th/9803001 ]
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. E. Berenstein, J. M. Maldacena and H. S. Nastase, “Strings in flat space and pp waves from 𝒩 = 4 \mathcal{N}=4 super-Yang–Mills”, JHEP 0204 (2002) 013 [ hep-th/0202021 ]
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan, E. Katz and M. Ünsal, “Supersymmetry on a Euclidean space-time lattice. 1. A target theory with four supercharges”, JHEP 0308 (2003) 024 [ hep-lat/0302017 ]
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan, E. Katz and M. Ünsal, “Supersymmetry on a Euclidean space-time lattice. 2. Target theories with eight supercharges”, JHEP 0312 (2003) 031 [ hep-lat/0307012 ]
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Giedt, R. Koniuk, E. Poppitz and T. Yavin, “Less naive about supersymmetric lattice quantum mechanics”, JHEP 0412 (2004) 033 [ hep-lat/0410041 ]
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Sugino, “A Lattice formulation of super-Yang–Mills theories with exact supersymmetry”, JHEP 0401 (2004) 015 [ hep-lat/0311021 ]
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Sugino, “Super-Yang–Mills theories on the two-dimensional lattice with exact supersymmetry”, JHEP 0403 (2004) 067 [ hep-lat/0401017 ]
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Catterall, “A geometrical approach to 𝒩 = 2 \mathcal{N}=2 super-Yang–Mills theory on the two dimensional lattice”, JHEP 0411 (2004) 006 [ hep-lat/0410052 ]
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla and T. Wiseman, “Black-hole–black-string phase transitions in thermal (1+1)-dimensional supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory on a circle”, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 5169–5192 [ hep-th/0406210 ]
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. B. Kaplan and M. Ünsal, “A Euclidean lattice construction of supersymmetric Yang–Mills theories with sixteen supercharges”, JHEP 0509 (2005) 042 [ hep-lat/0503039 ]
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Sugino, “Various super-Yang–Mills theories with exact supersymmetry on the lattice”, JHEP 0501 (2005) 016 [ hep-lat/0410035 ]
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Ünsal, “Twisted supersymmetric gauge theories and orbifold lattices”, JHEP 0610 (2006) 089 [ hep-th/0603046 ]
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Hanada, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, “Non-lattice simulation for supersymmetric gauge theories in one dimension”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 161602 [ arXiv:0706.1647 ]
Original
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Catterall and T. Wiseman, “Towards lattice simulation of the gauge theory duals to black holes and hot strings”, JHEP 0712 (2007) 104 [ arXiv:0706.3518 ]
Original
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Suzuki, “Two-dimensional 𝒩 = ( 2 , 2 ) \mathcal{N}=(2,2) super-Yang–Mills theory on computer”, JHEP 0709 (2007) 052 [ arXiv:0706.1392 ]
Original
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Kawahara, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, “Phase structure of matrix quantum mechanics at finite temperature”, JHEP 0710 (2007) 097 [ arXiv:0706.3517 ]
Original
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Fukaya, I. Kanamori, H. Suzuki, M. Hayakawa and T. Takimi, “Note on massless bosonic states in two-dimensional field theories”, Prog. Theor. Phys. 116 (2007) 1117–1129 [ hep-th/0609049 ]
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Hori and D. Tong, “Aspects of Non-Abelian Gauge Dynamics in Two-Dimensional 𝒩 = ( 2 , 2 ) \mathcal{N}=(2,2) Theories”, JHEP 0705 (2007) 079 [ hep-th/0609032 ]
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Kato, M. Sakamoto and H. So, “Taming the Leibniz Rule on the Lattice”, JHEP 0805 (2008) 057 [ arXiv:0803.3121 ]
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. W. Elliott, J. Giedt and G. D. Moore, “Lattice four-dimensional 𝒩 = 4 \mathcal{N}=4 SYM is practical”, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 081701 [ arXiv:0806.0013 ]
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Bergner, T. Kaestner, S. Uhlmann and A. Wipf, “Low-dimensional Supersymmetric Lattice Models”, Annals Phys. 323 (2008) 946–988 [ arXiv:0705.2212 ]
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. N. Anagnostopoulos, M. Hanada, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, “Monte Carlo studies of supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics with sixteen supercharges at finite temperature”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 021601 [ arXiv:0707.4454 ]
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Catterall and T. Wiseman, “Black hole thermodynamics from simulations of lattice Yang–Mills theory”, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 041502 [ arXiv:0803.4273 ]
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Catterall, “From Twisted Supersymmetry to Orbifold Lattices”, JHEP 0801 (2008) 048 [ arXiv:0712.2532 ]
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. H. Damgaard and S. Matsuura, “Geometry of Orbifolded Supersymmetric Lattice Gauge Theories”, Phys. Lett. B661 (2008) 52–56 [ arXiv:0801.2936 ]
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Kanamori, F. Sugino and H. Suzuki, “Observing dynamical supersymmetry breaking with euclidean lattice simulations”, Prog. Theor. Phys. 119 (2008) 797–827 [ arXiv:0711.2132 ]
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Pineda, “Static potential in 𝒩 = 4 \mathcal{N}=4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills at weak coupling”, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 021701 [ arXiv:0709.2876 ]
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Matsuura, “Two-dimensional 𝒩 = ( 2 , 2 ) \mathcal{N}=(2,2) Supersymmetric Lattice Gauge Theory with Matter Fields in the Fundamental Representation”, JHEP 0807 (2008) 127 [ arXiv:0805.4491 ]
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Catterall, D. B. Kaplan and M. Ünsal, “Exact lattice supersymmetry”, Phys. Rept. 484 (2009) 71–130 [ arXiv:0903.4881 ]
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Giedt, “Progress in four-dimensional lattice supersymmetry”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24 (2009) 4045–4095 [ arXiv:0903.2443 ]
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Hanada, Y. Hyakutake, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, “Higher Derivative Corrections to Black Hole Thermodynamics from Supersymmetric Matrix Quantum Mechanics”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 191602 [ arXiv:0811.3102 ]
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Hanada and I. Kanamori, “Lattice study of two-dimensional 𝒩 = ( 2 , 2 ) \mathcal{N}=(2,2) super-Yang–Mills at large- N N ”, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 065014 [ arXiv:0907.4966 ]
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Kanamori and H. Suzuki, “Restoration of supersymmetry on the lattice: Two-dimensional 𝒩 = ( 2 , 2 ) \mathcal{N}=(2,2) supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory”, Nucl. Phys. B811 (2009) 420–437 [ arXiv:0809.2856 ]
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Kanamori and H. Suzuki, “Some physics of the two-dimensional 𝒩 = ( 2 , 2 ) \mathcal{N}=(2,2) supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory: Lattice Monte Carlo study”, Phys. Lett. B672 (2009) 307–311 [ arXiv:0811.2851 ]
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Kanamori, “Vacuum energy of two-dimensional 𝒩 = ( 2 , 2 ) \mathcal{N}=(2,2) super-Yang–Mills theory”, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 115015 [ arXiv:0902.2876 ]
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Catterall, “First results from simulations of supersymmetric lattices”, JHEP 0901 (2009) 040 [ arXiv:0811.1203 ]
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Giedt, R. Brower, S. Catterall, G. T. Fleming and P. Vranas, “Lattice super-Yang–Mills using domain wall fermions in the chiral limit”, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 025015 [ arXiv:0810.5746 ]
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. G. Endres, “Dynamical simulation of 𝒩 = 1 \mathcal{N}=1 supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory with domain wall fermions”, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 094503 [ arXiv:0902.4267 ]
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Bajnok and R. A. Janik, “Four-loop perturbative Konishi from strings and finite size effects for multiparticle states”, Nucl. Phys. B807 (2009) 625–650 [ arXiv:0807.0399 ]
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. N. Velizhanin, “The four-loop anomalous dimension of the Konishi operator in 𝒩 = 4 \mathcal{N}=4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory”, JETP Lett. 89 (2009) 6–9 [ arXiv:0808.3832 ]
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Sugino, “Lattice Formulation of Two-Dimensional 𝒩 = ( 2 , 2 ) \mathcal{N}=(2,2) SQCD with Exact Supersymmetry”, Nucl. Phys. B808 (2009) 292–325 [ arXiv:0807.2683 ]
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

Then

M. Hanada, “What lattice theorists can do for superstring/M-theory”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A31 (2016) 1643006 [ arXiv:1604.05421 ]
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
E. Berkowitz, E. Rinaldi, M. Hanada, G. Ishiki, S. Shimasaki and P. Vranas, “Precision lattice test of the gauge/gravity duality at large N N ”, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 094501 [ arXiv:1606.04951 ]
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
V. G. Filev and D. O’Connor, “The BFSS model on the lattice”, JHEP 1605 (2016) 167 [ arXiv:1506.01366 ]
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
M. Hanada, Y. Hyakutake, G. Ishiki and J. Nishimura, “Numerical tests of the gauge/gravity duality conjecture for D0-branes at finite temperature and finite N N ”, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 086010 [ arXiv:1603.00538 ]
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2018

Progress and prospects of lattice supersymmetry

Schaich, David

Understand

Supersymmetry plays prominent roles in the study of quantum field theory and in many proposals for potential new physics beyond the standard model, while lattice field theory provides a non-perturbative regularization suitable for strongly interacting systems.

Lattice investigations of supersymmetric field theories are currently making significant progress, though many challenges remain to be overcome.
In this brief overview I discuss particularly notable progress in three areas: supersymmetric Yang--Mills (SYM) theories in fewer than four dimensions, as well as both minimal N=1 SYM and maximal N=4 SYM in four dimensions.
I also highlight super-QCD and sign problems as prominent challenges that will be important to address in future work.