Machine learning of molecular properties: locality and active learning

S. Goreinov, I. Oseledets, D. Savostyanov, E. Tyrtyshnikov, and N. Zamarashkin, “How to find a good submatrix,” in Matrix Methods: Theory, Algorithms, Applications (Word Scientific, 2010) pp. 247–256

2010

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Rupp, A. Tkatchenko, K.-R. Müller, and O. A. Von Lilienfeld, “Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning,” Physical review letters 108

2012

Earlier work this paper cites.

L. Ruddigkeit, R. Van Deursen, L. C. Blum, and J.-L. Reymond, “Enumeration of 166 billion organic small molecules in the chemical universe database gdb-17,” Journal of chemical information and modeling 52

2012

Earlier work this paper cites.

R. Ramakrishnan, P. O. Dral, M. Rupp, and O. A. Von Lilienfeld, “Quantum chemistry structures and properties of 134 kilo molecules,” Scientific data 1

2014

Earlier work this paper cites.

K. Hansen, F. Biegler, R. Ramakrishnan, W. Pronobis, O. A. Von Lilienfeld, K.-R. Müller, and A. Tkatchenko, “Machine learning predictions of molecular properties: Accurate many-body potentials and nonlocality in chemical space,” The journal of physical chemistry letters 6

2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

R. Ramakrishnan, P. O. Dral, M. Rupp, and O. A. von Lilienfeld, “Big data meets quantum chemistry approximations: the δ \delta -machine learning approach,” Journal of chemical theory and computation 11

2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

R. Ramakrishnan and O. A. von Lilienfeld, “Machine learning, quantum mechanics, and chemical compound space,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.07512 (2015)

Original

2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Rupp, R. Ramakrishnan, and O. A. von Lilienfeld, “Machine learning for quantum mechanical properties of atoms in molecules,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 6

2015

Cited alongside, same era.

B. Huang and O. A. Von Lilienfeld, “Communication: Understanding molecular representations in machine learning: The role of uniqueness and target similarity,” Journal of Chemical Physics 145

2016

Cited alongside, same era.

S. De, A. P. Bartók, G. Csányi, and M. Ceriotti, “Comparing molecules and solids across structural and alchemical space,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 18

2016

Cited alongside, same era.

A. V. Shapeev, “Moment tensor potentials: a class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials,” Multiscale Modeling & Simulation 14

2016

Cited alongside, same era.

E. V. Podryabinkin and A. V. Shapeev, “Active learning of linear interatomic potentials,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.09346 (2016)

J. Gilmer, S. S. Schoenholz, P. F. Riley, O. Vinyals, and G. E. Dahl, “Neural message passing for quantum chemistry,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.01212 (2017)

Original

2017

Closest in time.

H. Huo and M. Rupp, “Unified representation for machine learning of molecules and crystals,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.06439 (2017)

Original

2017

Closest in time.

N. Lubbers, J. S. Smith, and K. Barros, “Hierarchical modeling of molecular energies using a deep neural network,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.00017 (2017)

Original

2017

Closest in time.

K. Schütt, P.-J. Kindermans, H. E. S. Felix, S. Chmiela, A. Tkatchenko, and K.-R. Müller, “Moleculenet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactions,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2017) pp. 992–1002

2017

Closest in time.