Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Accurate simulations of atomistic systems from first principles are limited by computational cost.
Generalized cluster description of multicomponent systems
Juan M. Sanchez, François Ducastelle, and Denis Gratias · 1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model
Carlo Adamo and Vincenzo Barone · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces
Jörg Behler and Michele Parrinello · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Handbook of Molecular Descriptors
Roberto Todeschini and Viviana Consonni · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Accurate molecular van der Waals interactions from ground-state electron density and free-atom reference data
Alexandre Tkatchenko and Matthias Scheffler · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gaussian approximation potentials: The accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons
Albert P. Bartók, Mike C. Payne, Risi Kondor, and Gábor Csányi · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Neural network potential-energy surfaces in chemistry: a tool for large-scale simulations
Jörg Behler · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning
Matthias Rupp, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Klaus-Robert Müller, and O. Anatole von Lilienfeld · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Comment on “Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning”
Jonathan E. Moussa · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Finding density functionals with machine learning
John C. Snyder, Matthias Rupp, Katja Hansen, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Kieron Burke · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Active Learning , volume 18 of Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Burr Settles · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
AFLOW: An automatic framework for high-throughput materials discovery
Stefano Curtarolo, Wahyu Setyawan, Gus L. W. Hart, Michal Jahnatek, Roman V. Chepulskii, Richard H. Taylor, Shidong Wang, Junkai Xue, Kesong Yang, Ohad Levy, Michael J. Mehl, Harold T. Stokes, Denis O. Demchenko, and Dane Morgan · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Machine learning of molecular electronic properties in chemical compound space
Grégoire Montavon, Matthias Rupp, Vivekanand Gobre, Alvaro Vazquez-Mayagoitia, Katja Hansen, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Klaus-Robert Müller, and O. Anatole von Lilienfeld · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: The open quantum materials database (OQMD)
James E. Saal, Scott Kirklin, Muratahan Aykol, Bryce Meredig, and Chris Wolverton · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Comprehensive search for new phases and compounds in binary alloy systems based on platinum-group metals, using a computational first-principles approach
Gus L.W. Hart, Stefano Curtarolo, Thaddeus B. Massalski, and Ohad Levy · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Commentary: The materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation
Anubhav Jain, Shyue Ping Ong, Geoffroy Hautier, Wei Chen, William Davidson Richards, Stephen Dacek, Shreyas Cholia, Dan Gunter, David Skinner, Gerbrand Ceder, and Kristin A. Persson · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Quantum chemistry structures and properties of 134 kilo molecules
Raghunathan Ramakrishnan, Pavlo O. Dral, Matthias Rupp, and O. Anatole von Lilienfeld · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
How to represent crystal structures for machine learning: Towards fast prediction of electronic properties
Kristof T. Schütt, Henning Glawe, Felix Brockherde, Antonio Sanna, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Eberhard K.U. Gross · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence
Zoubin Ghahramani · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Michael I. Jordan and Tom M. Mitchell · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Big data meets quantum chemistry approximations: The Δ \Delta -machine learning approach
Raghunathan Ramakrishnan, Pavlo O. Dral, Matthias Rupp, and O. Anatole von Lilienfeld · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Machine learning for quantum mechanical properties of atoms in molecules
Matthias Rupp, Raghunathan Ramakrishnan, and O. Anatole von Lilienfeld · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fourier series of atomic radial distribution functions: A molecular fingerprint for machine learning models of quantum chemical properties
O. Anatole von Lilienfeld, Raghunathan Ramakrishnan, Matthias Rupp, and Aaron Knoll · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Machine learning predictions of molecular properties: Accurate many-body potentials and nonlocality in chemical space
Katja Hansen, Franziska Biegler, Raghunathan Ramakrishnan, Wiktor Pronobis, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Alexandre Tkatchenko · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Big data of materials science: Critical role of the descriptor
Luca M. Ghiringhelli, Jan Vybiral, Sergey V. Levchenko, Claudia Draxl, and Matthias Scheffler · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Identifying structural flow defects in disordered solids using machine-learning methods
Ekin D. Cubuk, Samuel S. Schoenholz, Jennifer M. Rieser, Brad D. Malone, Joerg Rottler, Douglas J. Durian, Efthimios Kaxiras, and Andrea J. Liu · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
The open quantum materials database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies
Scott Kirklin, James E. Saal, Bryce Meredig, Alex Thompson, Jeff W. Doak, Muratahan Aykol, Stephan Rühl, and Chris Wolverton · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Communication: Understanding molecular representations in machine learning: the role of uniqueness and target similarity
Bing Huang and O. Anatole von Lilienfeld · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Comparing molecules and solids across structural and alchemical space
Sandip De, Albert P. Bartók, Gábor Csányi, and Michele Ceriotti · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Machine learning energies of 2 million elpasolite (ABC 2 D 6 ) crystals
Felix A. Faber, Alexander Lindmaa, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld, and Rickard Armiento · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
The NOMAD laboratory: from data sharing to artificial intelligence
Claudia Draxl and Matthias Scheffler · 2019
Closest in time.
Sensitivity and dimensionality of atomic environment representations used for machine learning interatomic potentials
Berk Onat, Christoph Ortner, and James R. Kermode · 2020
Closest in time.
Exchange spin coupling from Gaussian process regression
Marc Philipp Bahlke, Natnael Mogos, Jonny Proppe, and Carmen Herrmann · 2020
Closest in time.
Active learning of many-body configuration space: Application to the Cs + -water MB-nrg potential energy function as a case study
Yaoguang Zhai, Alessandro Caruso, Sicun Gao, and Francesco Paesani · 2020
Closest in time.
Augmenting machine learning of energy landscapes with local structural information
Shreyas J. Honrao, Stephen R. Xie, and Richard G. Hennig · 2020
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Automated discovery and construction of surface phase diagrams using machine learning
Zachary W. Ulissi, Aayush R. Singh, Charlie Tsai, and Jens K. Nørskov · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Machine learning of accurate energy-conserving molecular force fields
Stefan Chmiela, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Huziel E. Sauceda, Igor Poltavsky, Kristof Schütt, and Klaus-Robert Müller · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Prediction errors of molecular machine learning models lower than hybrid DFT error
Felix A. Faber, Luke Hutchison, Bing Huang, Justin Gilmer, Samuel S. Schoenholz, George E. Dahl, Oriol Vinyals, Steven Kearnes, Patrick F. Riley, and O. Anatole von Lilienfeld · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
The many-body expansion combined with neural networks
Kun Yao, John E. Herr, and John Parkhill · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks
Kristof T. Schütt, Farhad Arbabzadah, Stefan Chmiela, Klaus R. Müller, and Alexandre Tkatchenko · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Accurate interatomic force fields via machine learning with covariant kernels
Aldo Glielmo, Peter Sollich, and Alessandro De Vita · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Constant size descriptors for accurate machine learning models of molecular properties
Christopher R. Collins, Geoffrey J. Gordon, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld, and David J. Yaron · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Antti Pihlajamäki, Joonas Hämäläinen, Joakim Linja, Paavo Nieminen, Sami Malola, Tommi Kärkkäinen, and Hannu Häkkinen · 2020
Closest in time.
Incompleteness of atomic structure representations
Sergey N. Pozdnyakov, Michael J. Willatt, Albert P. Bartók, Christoph Ortner, Gábor Csányi, and Michele Ceriotti · 2020
Closest in time.
FCHL revisited: Faster and more accurate quantum machine learning
Anders S. Christensen, Lars A. Bratholm, Felix A. Faber, and O. Anatole von Lilienfeld · 2020
Closest in time.
Differentiable optimization for the prediction of ground state structures (DOGSS)
Junwoong Yoon and Zachary W. Ulissi · 2020
Closest in time.
Atomistic structure learning algorithm with surrogate energy model relaxation
Henrik Lund Mortensen, Søren Ager Meldgaard, Malthe Kjær Bisbo, Mads-Peter V. Christiansen, and Bjørk Hammer · 2020
Closest in time.
Atomic structures and orbital energies of 61,489 crystal-forming organic molecules
Annika Stuke, Christian Kunkel, Dorothea Golze, Milica Todorović, Johannes T. Margraf, Karsten Reuter, Patrick Rinke, and Harald Oberhofer · 2020
Closest in time.
Deep learning total energies and orbital energies of large organic molecules using hybridization of molecular fingerprints
Obaidur Rahaman and Alessio Gagliardi · 2020
Closest in time.
Size-extensive molecular machine learning with global representations
Hyunwook Jung, Sina Stocker, Christian Kunkel, Harald Oberhofer, Byungchan Han, Karsten Reuter, and Johannes T. Margraf · 2020
Closest in time.
Gaussian process regression for materials and molecules
Volker L. Deringer, Albert P. Bartók, Noam Bernstein, David M. Wilkins, Michele Ceriotti, and Gábor Csányi · 2021
Closest in time.
Machine learning force fields
Oliver T. Unke, Stefan Chmiela, Huziel E. Sauceda, Michael Gastegger, Igor Poltavsky, Kristof T. Schütt, Alexandre Tkatchenko, and Klaus-Robert Müller · 2021
Closest in time.
Predicting gas-particle partitioning coefficients of atmospheric molecules with machine learning
Emma Lumiaro, Milica Todorović, Theo Kurten, Hanna Vehkamäki, and Patrick Rinke · 2021
Closest in time.
Conformational analysis of tannic acid: Environment effects in electronic and reactivity properties
Romana Petry, Bruno Focassio, Gabriel R. Schleder, Diego Stéfani T. Martinez, and Adalberto Fazzio · 2021
Closest in time.
Global property prediction: A benchmark study on open-source, perovskite-like datasets
Felix Mayr and Alessio Gagliardi · 2021
Closest in time.
Evolutionary computing and machine learning for discovering of low-energy defect configurations
Marco Arrigoni and Georg K. H. Madsen · 2021
Closest in time.
Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectra
Kristof T. Schütt, Oliver T. Unke, and Michael Gastegger · 2021
Closest in time.
Geometry optimization in internal coordinates based on Gaussian process regression: Comparison of two approaches
Daniel Born and Johannes Kästner · 2021
Closest in time.
Representations of molecules and materials for interpolation of quantum-mechanical simulations via machine learning
Marcel F. Langer, Alex Goeßmann, and Matthias Rupp · 2022
Closest in time.
Geometry meta-optimization
Daniel Huang, Junwei Lucas Bao, and Jean-Baptiste Tristan · 2022
Closest in time.
Development and evaluation of geometry optimization algorithms in conjunction with ANI potentials
Dongxiao Hao, Xibing He, Adrian E. Roitberg, Shengli Zhang, and Junmei Wang · 2022
Closest in time.
Machine learning for compositional disorder: A comparison between different descriptors and machine learning frameworks
Mostafa Yaghoobi and Mojtaba Alaei · 2022
Closest in time.