Built on

P. J. Fox, J. Liu and N. Weiner, Integrating Out Astrophysical Uncertainties,
Original
1915
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. H. Helm, Inelastic and Elastic Scattering of 187-Mev Electrons from Selected Even-Even Nuclei,
1956
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ya. B. Zel’Dovich, Sov. Phys. JETP 6
1958
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. De Forest, Jr. and J. D. Walecka, Electron scattering and nuclear structure,
Original
1966
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Angloher et al
Original
1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. W. Donnelly and J. D. Walecka, Electron Scattering and Nuclear Structure,
1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Masso, S. Mohanty and S. Rao, Dipolar Dark Matter,
Original
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. W. Donnelly and I. Sick, Elastic Magnetic Electron Scattering From Nuclei,
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
A.K. Drukier, K. Freese, and D.N. Spergel, Detecting Cold Dark Matter Candidates,
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. S. Wood, S. C. Bennett, D. Cho, B. P. Masterson, J. L. Roberts, C. E. Tanner and C. E. Wieman, Measurement of parity nonconservation and an anapole moment in cesium,
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, Direct and indirect limits on the electromagnetic form-factors of WIMPs,
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Yellin, Finding an upper limit in the presence of unknown background,
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Bernabei et al
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Kurylov and M. Kamionkowski, Generalized analysis of weakly interacting massive particle searches,
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Gelmini and P. Gondolo, DAMA dark matter detection compatible with other searches,
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Sigurdson, M. Doran, A. Kurylov, R. R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, Dark-matter electric and magnetic dipole moments,
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. C. Smith et al
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Bernabei et al
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Gardner, Shedding Light on Dark Matter: A Faraday Rotation Experiment to Limit a Dark Magnetic Moment,
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Savage, G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo and K. Freese, Compatibility of DAMA/LIBRA dark matter detection with other searches,
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

R. Bernabei et al
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
H. An, S. L. Chen, R. N. Mohapatra, S. Nussinov and Y. Zhang, Energy Dependence of Direct Detection Cross Section for Asymmetric Mirror Dark Matter,
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Chang, N. Weiner and I. Yavin, Magnetic Inelastic Dark Matter,
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
J. H. Heo, Minimal Dirac Fermionic Dark Matter with Nonzero Magnetic Dipole Moment,
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
A. L. Fitzpatrick and K. M. Zurek, Dark Moments and the DAMA-CoGeNT Puzzle,
Original
2010

Then

V. Barger, W. Y. Keung, D. Marfatia and P. Y. Tseng, Dipole Moment Dark Matter at the LHC,
Original
2012
Later among the works it cites.
E. Del Nobile, C. Kouvaris, P. Panci, F. Sannino and J. Virkajarvi, Light Magnetic Dark Matter in Direct Detection Searches,
Original
2012
Later among the works it cites.
J. M. Cline, Z. Liu and W. Xue, Millicharged Atomic Dark Matter,
Original
2012
Later among the works it cites.
N. Weiner and I. Yavin, How Dark Are Majorana WIMPs? Signals from MiDM and Rayleigh Dark Matter,
Original
2012
Later among the works it cites.
J. M. Cline, G. D. Moore and A. R. Frey, Composite magnetic dark matter and the 130 GeV line,
Original

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2014

Direct detection of Light Anapole and Magnetic Dipole DM

Del Nobile, Eugenio, Gelmini, Graciela B., Gondolo, Paolo et al.

Understand

We present comparisons of direct detection data for "light WIMPs" with an anapole moment interaction (ADM) and a magnetic dipole moment interaction (MDM), both assuming the Standard Halo Model (SHM) for the dark halo of our galaxy and in a halo-independent manner.

In the SHM analysis we find that a combination of the 90% CL LUX and CDMSlite limits or the new 90% CL SuperCDMS limit by itself exclude the parameter space regions allowed by DAMA, CoGeNT and CDMS-II-Si data for both ADM and MDM.
In our halo-independent analysis the new LUX bound excludes the same potential signal regions as the previous XENON100 bound.
Much of the remaining signal regions is now excluded by SuperCDMS, while the CDMSlite limit is much above them.