Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

Resolving astrophysical uncertainties in dark matter direct detection · Around

2011

Resolving astrophysical uncertainties in dark matter direct detection

Frandsen, Mads T., Kahlhoefer, Felix, McCabe, Christopher et al.

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

We study the impact of the assumed velocity distribution of galactic dark matter particles on the interpretation of results from nuclear recoil detectors.

By converting experimental data to variables that make the astrophysical unknowns explicit, different experiments can be compared without implicit assumptions concerning the dark matter halo.
We extend this framework to include the annual modulation signal, as well as multiple target elements.
Recent results from DAMA, CoGeNT and CRESST-II can be brought into agreement if the velocity distribution is very anisotropic and thus allows a large modulation fraction.

Built on

P. J. Fox, G. D. Kribs, and T. M. Tait, Interpreting Dark Matter Direct Detection Independently of the Local Velocity and Density Distribution
Original
1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. J. Fox, J. Liu, and N. Weiner, Integrating Out Astrophysical Uncertainties
Original
1915
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. March-Russell, C. McCabe, and M. McCullough, Inelastic Dark Matter, Non-Standard Halos and the DAMA/LIBRA Results
Original
1931
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Hernquist, An analytical model for spherical galaxies and bulges
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. D. Lewin and P. F. Smith, Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. White, The Structure of cold dark matter halos
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Kamionkowski and A. Kinkhabwala, Galactic halo models and particle dark matter detection
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Evans, C. Carollo, and P. de Zeeuw, Triaxial haloes and particle dark matter detection
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Gelmini and P. Gondolo, WIMP annual modulation with opposite phase in Late-Infall halo models
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. M. Green, Effect of halo modeling on WIMP exclusion limits
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Belli, R. Cerulli, N. Fornengo, and S. Scopel, Effect of the galactic halo modeling on the DAMA / NaI annual modulation result: an Extended analysis of the data for WIMPs with a purely spin independent coupling
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Yellin, Finding an upper limit in the presence of unknown background
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. M. Green, Calculating exclusion limits for weakly interacting massive particle direct detection experiments without background subtraction
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Kurylov and M. Kamionkowski, Generalized analysis of weakly-interacting massive particle searches
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Giuliani, Are direct search experiments sensitive to all spin-independent WIMP candidates?
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Savage, K. Freese, and P. Gondolo, Annual Modulation of Dark Matter in the Presence of Streams
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Evans and J. H. An, Distribution function of the dark matter
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Drees and C.-L. Shan, Reconstructing the Velocity Distribution of WIMPs from Direct Dark Matter Detection Data
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Diemand, M. Kuhlen, and P. Madau, Dark matter substructure and gamma-ray annihilation in the Milky Way halo
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

M. Drees and C.-L. Shan, Model-Independent Determination of the WIMP Mass from Direct Dark Matter Detection Data
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
J. D. Vergados, S. H. Hansen, and O. Host, The impact of going beyond the Maxwell distribution in direct dark matter detection rates
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Diemand et. al
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
V. Springel et. al
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
XENON Collaboration
Original
2008
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

S. Chaudhury, P. Bhattacharjee, and R. Cowsik, Direct detection of WIMPs : Implications of a self- consistent truncated isothermal model of the Milky Way’s dark matter halo
Original
2010
Later among the works it cites.
M. Felizardo et. al
Original
2010
Later among the works it cites.
N. Bozorgnia, G. B. Gelmini, and P. Gondolo, Channeling in direct dark matter detection I: channeling fraction in NaI (Tl) crystals
Original
2010
Later among the works it cites.
C. Arina, J. Hamann, and Y. Y. Wong, A Bayesian view of the current status of dark matter direct searches
Original
2011
Closest in time.
A. H. Peter, WIMP astronomy with liquid-noble and cryogenic direct-detection experiments

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

M. Fairbairn and T. Schwetz, Spin-independent elastic WIMP scattering and the DAMA annual modulation signal

2009

Cited alongside, same era.

L. E. Strigari and R. Trotta, Reconstructing WIMP Properties in Direct Detection Experiments Including Galactic Dark Matter Distribution Uncertainties

2009

Cited alongside, same era.

J. I. Read, L. Mayer, A. M. Brooks, F. Governato, and G. Lake, A dark matter disc in three cosmological simulations of Milky Way mass galaxies

2009

Cited alongside, same era.

T. Bruch, J. Read, L. Baudis, and G. Lake, Detecting the Milky Way’s Dark Disk

2009

Cited alongside, same era.

J. Stadel et. al

2009

Cited alongside, same era.

C. Savage, G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, and K. Freese, Compatibility of DAMA/LIBRA dark matter detection with other searches

2009

Cited alongside, same era.

CDMS Collaboration

2009

Cited alongside, same era.

2011

Closest in time.

C. Aalseth, P. Barbeau, J. Colaresi, J. Collar, J. Leon, et. al

2011

Closest in time.

XENON100 Collaboration

2011

Closest in time.

CDMS-II Collaboration

2011

Closest in time.

J. Collar. Talk given at the TAUP 2011 Workshop, Munich, Germany, Sep. 5-9, 2011

2011

Closest in time.

C. McCabe, DAMA and CoGeNT without astrophysical uncertainties

2011

Closest in time.

M. T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, J. March-Russell, C. McCabe, M. McCullough, et. al

2011

Closest in time.

T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, Dark Matter attempts for CoGeNT and DAMA

2011

Closest in time.

A. Natarajan, C. Savage, and K. Freese, Probing dark matter streams with CoGeNT

2011

Closest in time.

J. L. Feng, J. Kumar, D. Marfatia, and D. Sanford, Isospin-Violating Dark Matter

2011

Closest in time.

E. Del Nobile, C. Kouvaris, and F. Sannino, Interfering Composite Asymmetric Dark Matter for DAMA and CoGeNT

2011

Closest in time.

M. T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, S. Sarkar, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Direct detection of dark matter in models with a light Z’

2011

Closest in time.

M. Lisanti, L. E. Strigari, J. G. Wacker, and R. H. Wechsler, The Dark Matter at the End of the Galaxy

2011

Closest in time.

XENON10 Collaboration

2011

Closest in time.

F. Ling, E. Nezri, E. Athanassoula, and R. Teyssier, Dark Matter Direct Detection Signals inferred from a Cosmological N-body Simulation with Baryons

2028

Closest in time.