Humanizing LLMs: A Survey of Psychological Measurements with Tools, Datasets, and Human-Agent Applications

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

IB Myers. 1962 · 1962

Earlier work this paper cites.

Myers-Briggs type indicator

Katharine C Briggs. 1976 · 1976

Earlier work this paper cites.

Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?

David Premack and Guy Woodruff. 1978 · 1978

Earlier work this paper cites.

beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception

Heinz Wimmer and Josef Perner. 1983 · 1983

Earlier work this paper cites.

Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?

Simon Baron-Cohen, Alan M Leslie, and Uta Frith. 1985 · 1985

Earlier work this paper cites.

A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator: Manual

Isabel Briggs Myers. 1985 · 1985

Earlier work this paper cites.

“John thinks that Mary thinks that…” attribution of second-order beliefs by 5-to 10-year-old children

Josef Perner and Heinz Wimmer. 1985 · 1985

Earlier work this paper cites.

Three-year-olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit

Josef Perner, Susan R Leekam, and Heinz Wimmer. 1987 · 1987

Earlier work this paper cites.

Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales

David Watson, Lee Anna Clark, and Auke Tellegen. 1988 · 1988

Earlier work this paper cites.

Big five inventory

Oliver P John, Eileen M Donahue, and Robert L Kentle. 1991 · 1991

Earlier work this paper cites.

The aggression questionnaire

Arnold H Buss and Mark Perry. 1992 · 1992

Earlier work this paper cites.

An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults

Francesca GE Happé. 1994 · 1994

Earlier work this paper cites.

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI): Some psychometric limitations

Gregory J. Boyle. 1995 · 1995

Earlier work this paper cites.

Theory-of-mind deficits and causal attributions

Peter Kinderman, Robin Dunbar, and Richard P Bentall. 1998 · 1998

Earlier work this paper cites.

Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism

Simon Baron-Cohen, Michelle O’riordan, Valerie Stone, Rosie Jones, and Kate Plaisted. 1999 · 1999

Earlier work this paper cites.

A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models

Lewis R. Goldberg. 1999 · 1999

Earlier work this paper cites.

The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives

Oliver P John, Sanjay Srivastava, et al · 1999

Earlier work this paper cites.

The relationship between psychometric and self-estimated intelligence, creativity, personality and academic achievement

Adrian Furnham, Jane Zhang, and Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic. 2005 · 2005

Earlier work this paper cites.

Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from web-based personality inventories

John A Johnson. 2005 · 2005

Earlier work this paper cites.

The strange stories test: A replication study of children and adolescents with Asperger syndrome

Nils Kaland, Annette Møller-Nielsen, Lars Smith, Erik Lykke Mortensen, Kirsten Callesen, and Dorte Gottlieb. 2005 · 2005

Earlier work this paper cites.

Assessing the Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Goldberg’s International Personality Item Pool

Lim Beng-Chong and E. Ployhart Robert. 2006 · 2006

Earlier work this paper cites.

The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures

Lewis R Goldberg, John A Johnson, Herbert W Eber, Robert Hogan, Michael C Ashton, C Robert Cloninger, and Harrison G Gough. 2006 · 2006

Earlier work this paper cites.

The generalizability of the buss–perry aggression questionnaire

József Gerevich, Erika Bácskai, and PÁL Czobor. 2007 · 2007

Earlier work this paper cites.

The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality

Michael C Ashton and Kibeom Lee. 2009 · 2009

Earlier work this paper cites.

Cualidades paramétricas del cuestionario de agresión (AQ) de Buss y Perry en estudiantes universitarios de la ciudad de Medellín (Colombia)

Diego Castrillón M, Paola Ortiz T, and Fernando Vieco G. 2009 · 2009

Earlier work this paper cites.

Theory of mind: An overview and behavioral perspective

Henry D Schlinger. 2009 · 2009

Earlier work this paper cites.

The American Idol Effect: Are students good judges of their creativity across domains?

James C Kaufman, Michelle L Evans, and John Baer. 2010 · 2010

Earlier work this paper cites.

The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version

Young-Jin Lim, Bum-Hee Yu, Doh-Kwan Kim, and Ji-Hae Kim. 2010 · 2010

Earlier work this paper cites.

It doesn’t hurt to ask… But sometimes it hurts to believe: Polish students’ creative self-efficacy and its predictors

Maciej Karwowski. 2011 · 2011

Earlier work this paper cites.

Short assessment of the Big Five: Robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing

Frieder R Lang, Dennis John, Oliver Lüdtke, Jürgen Schupp, and Gert G Wagner. 2011 · 2011

Earlier work this paper cites.

The Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire: construct validity and gender invarianceamong Argentinean adolescents

Cecilia Reyna, Anahi Sanchez, Maria Gabriela Lello Ivacevich, and Silvina Brussino. 2011 · 2011

Earlier work this paper cites.

Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the International Personality item Pool (IPIP) Big-five Factor Markers in Nigeria

Akinsulore A., Fatoye O., Awaa O., Aloba Olutayo, Mapayi B., and Ibigbami O. 2012 · 2012

Earlier work this paper cites.

Structural validity and reliability of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Evidence from a large Brazilian community sample

Hudson W. de Carvalho, Sérgio B. Andreoli, Diogo R. Lara, Christopher J. Patrick, Maria Inês Quintana, Rodrigo A. Bressan, Marcelo F. de Melo, Jair de J. Mari, and Miguel R. Jorge. 2013 · 2012

Earlier work this paper cites.

Evaluarea personalită

Rusu S., P. Maricu · 2012

Earlier work this paper cites.

The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review

Adrian Furnham, Steven C Richards, and Delroy L Paulhus. 2013 · 2013

Earlier work this paper cites.

The brief aggression questionnaire: psychometric and behavioral evidence for an efficient measure of trait aggression

Gregory D. Webster, C. Nathan DeWall, Richard S. Pond, Jr., Timothy Deckman, Peter K. Jonason, Bonnie M. Le, Austin Lee Nichols, Tatiana Orozco Schember, Laura C. Crysel, Benjamin S. Crosier, C. Veronica Smith, E. Layne Paddock, John B. Nezlek, Lee A. Kirkpatrick, Angela D. Bryan, and Renée J. Bator. 2013 · 2013

Earlier work this paper cites.

Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120

John A Johnson. 2014 · 2014

Earlier work this paper cites.

Introducing the short dark triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits

Daniel N Jones and Delroy L Paulhus. 2014 · 2014

Earlier work this paper cites.

Differences in within- and between-person factor structure of positive and negative affect: Analysis of two intensive measurement studies using multilevel structural equation modeling

Jonathan Rush and Scott M. Hofer. 2014 · 2014

Earlier work this paper cites.

Psychometric Properties of the International Personality Item Pool Big-Five Personality Questionnaire for the Greek population

Ypofanti M., Zisi V., Zourbanos N., Mouchtouri B., Tzanne P., Theodorakis Y., and Lyrakos G. 2015 · 2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

Psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in a heterogeneous sample of substance users

Kelly Serafini, Bo Malin-Mayor, Charla Nich, Karen Hunkele, and Kathleen M. Carroll. 2016 · 2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

The lazy mindreader. A humanities perspective on mindreading and multiple-order intentionality

Max J van Duijn. 2016 · 2016

Earlier work this paper cites.

Using Item Response Theory to Develop a 60-Item Representation of the NEO PI–R Using the International Personality Item Pool: Development of the IPIP–NEO–60

Jessica L Maples-Keller, Rachel L Williamson, Chelsea E Sleep, Nathan T Carter, W Keith Campbell, and Joshua D Miller. 2019 · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

Measuring creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity

Maciej Karwowski, Izabella Lebuda, and Ewa Wiśniewska. 2018 · 2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

Assessing the Structure of the Five Factor Model of Personality (IPIP-NEO-120) in the Public Domain

Petri J. Kajonius and John A. Johnson. 2019 · 2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

Revisiting the evaluation of theory of mind through question answering. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) . 5872–5877

Matthew Le, Y-Lan Boureau, and Maximilian Nickel. 2019 · 2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

Examining the crosscultural validity of the positive affect and negative affect schedule between an Asian (Singaporean) sample and a Western (American) sample

Sean T. H. Lee, Andree Hartanto, Jose C. Yong, Brandon Koh, and Angela K.y. Leung. 2019 · 2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

Meta-analytic investigations of the HEXACO Personality Inventory (-Revised)

Morten Moshagen, Isabel Thielmann, Benjamin E Hilbig, and Ingo Zettler. 2019 · 2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

Socialiqa: Commonsense reasoning about social interactions

Original

Maarten Sap, Hannah Rashkin, Derek Chen, Ronan LeBras, and Yejin Choi. 2019 · 2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

CONTENT VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF BUSS AND PERRY AGRESSIVE QUESTIONNAIRE (BPAQ) INVENTORY

Ibrahim Abd Ghani and Norsayyadatina Che Rozubi. 2020 · 2020

Earlier work this paper cites.

Language models are few-shot learners

Original

Tom B Brown. 2020 · 2020

Earlier work this paper cites.

Multigroup multilevel structure of the child and parent versions of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in adolescents with and without ADHD

Hana-May Eadeh, Rosanna Breaux, Joshua M. Langberg, Molly A. Nikolas, and Stephen P. Becker. 2020 · 2020

Earlier work this paper cites.

Questionário de Agressão de Buss-Perry versão reduzida (QA-R): análises estruturais

Tomaz Paiva Tamyres, Eduardo Pimentel Carlos, de Sousa Bezerra de Menezes Thaís, Costa A.C.R., das Graças Carvalho Costa Dinara, and H. Vasconcelos M. 2020 · 2020

Cited alongside, same era.

Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire: Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Among Portuguese Male Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence

Olga Cunha, Manuela Peixoto, Ana Rita Cruz, and Rui Abrunhosa Gonçalves. 2021 · 2021

Cited alongside, same era.

Aggression Amongst Outpatients With Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses in a Tertiary Mental Health Institution

Anitha Jeyagurunathan, Jue Hua Lau, Edimansyah Abdin, Saleha Shafie, Sherilyn Chang, Ellaisha Samari, Laxman Cetty, Ker-Chiah Wei, Yee Ming Mok, Charmaine Tang, Swapna Verma, Siow Ann Chong, and Mythily Subramaniam. 2022 · 2021

Cited alongside, same era.

An Initial Analysis of Reliability and Validity of a Personality Instrument Using the Rasch Measurement Model

Mohamed N., Sulaiman W., Halim F., and Saidfudin Masodi Mohd. 2021 · 2021

Cited alongside, same era.

Identifying and manipulating the personality traits of language models

Evaluating Language Model Agency Through Negotiations. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024 . OpenReview.net

Tim R. Davidson, Veniamin Veselovsky, Michal Kosinski, and Robert West. 2024 · 2024

Later among the works it cites.

Gtbench: Uncovering the strategic reasoning limitations of llms via game-theoretic evaluations

Original

Jinhao Duan, Renming Zhang, James Diffenderfer, Bhavya Kailkhura, Lichao Sun, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Mohit Bansal, Tianlong Chen, and Kaidi Xu. 2024 · 2024

Later among the works it cites.

Can large language models serve as rational players in game theory? a systematic analysis. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 38. 17960–17967

Caoyun Fan, Jindou Chen, Yaohui Jin, and Hao He. 2024 · 2024

Later among the works it cites.

Large Language Models as Simulated Economic Agents: What Can We Learn from Homo Silicus?. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC 2024, New Haven, CT, USA, July 8-11, 2024 , Dirk Bergemann, Robert Kleinberg, and Daniela Sabán (Eds.). ACM, 614–615