Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Code review is a widespread practice to improve software quality and transfer knowledge.
1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. E. Fagan, “Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development,” IBM Systems Journal , vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 182–211, 1976
1976
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Bacchelli and C. Bird, “Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review,” in 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) , 2013, pp. 712–721
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Bosu and J. C. Carver, “Impact of peer code review on peer impression formation: A survey,” in 2013 ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement , 2013, pp. 133–142
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. C. Rigby and C. Bird, “Convergent contemporary software peer review practices,” in Proceedings of the 2013 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering , ser. ESEC/FSE 2013. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2013, p. 202–212. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2491411.2491444
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Thongtanunam, C. Tantithamthavorn, R. G. Kula, N. Yoshida, H. Iida, and K.-i. Matsumoto, “Who should review my code? a file location-based code-reviewer recommendation approach for modern code review,” in 2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER) , 2015, pp. 141–150
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Baum, O. Liskin, K. Niklas, and K. Schneider, “A faceted classification scheme for change-based industrial code review processes,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS) , 2016, pp. 74–85
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Ying, L. Chen, T. Liang, and J. Wu, “Earec: Leveraging expertise and authority for pull-request reviewer recommendation in github,” in 2016 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on CrowdSourcing in Software Engineering (CSI-SE) , 2016, pp. 29–35
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Ouni, R. G. Kula, and K. Inoue, “Search-based peer reviewers recommendation in modern code review,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME) , 2016, pp. 367–377
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. M. Rahman, C. K. Roy, and J. A. Collins, “Correct: Code reviewer recommendation in github based on cross-project and technology experience,” in 2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (ICSE-C) , 2016, pp. 222–231
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. MacLeod, M. Greiler, M.-A. Storey, C. Bird, and J. Czerwonka, “Code reviewing in the trenches: Challenges and best practices,” IEEE Software , vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 34–42, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Sadowski, E. Söderberg, L. Church, M. Sipko, and A. Bacchelli, “Modern code review: A case study at google,” in International Conference on Software Engineering, Software Engineering in Practice track (ICSE SEIP) , 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Gupta and N. Sundaresan, “Intelligent code reviews using deep learning,” in Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’18) Deep Learning Day , 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
S.-T. Shi, M. Li, D. Lo, F. Thung, and X. Huo, “Automatic code review by learning the revision of source code,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 33, no. 01, pp. 4910–4917, Jul. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/4420
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
H.-Y. Li, S.-T. Shi, F. Thung, X. Huo, B. Xu, M. Li, and D. Lo, “Deepreview: Automatic code review using deep multi-instance learning,” in Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: 23rd Pacific-Asia Conference, PAKDD 2019, Macau, China, April 14-17, 2019, Proceedings, Part II . Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2019, pp. 318–330. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16145-3_25
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Asthana, R. Kumar, R. Bhagwan, C. Bird, C. Bansal, C. Maddila, S. Mehta, and B. Ashok, “Whodo: automating reviewer suggestions at scale,” in Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering , ser. ESEC/FSE 2019. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, p. 937–945. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3338906.3340449
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Jiang, D. Lo, J. Zheng, X. Xia, Y. Yang, and L. Zhang, “Who should make decision on this pull request? analyzing time-decaying relationships and file similarities for integrator prediction,” Journal of Systems and Software , vol. 154, pp. 196–210, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121219300962
“What is coderabbit?” May 2023. [Online]. Available: https://docs.coderabbit.ai/
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
W. H. A. Al-Zubaidi, P. Thongtanunam, H. K. Dam, C. Tantithamthavorn, and A. Ghose, “Workload-aware reviewer recommendation using a multi-objective search-based approach,” in Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering , ser. PROMISE 2020. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 21–30. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3416508.3417115
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Mirsaeedi and P. C. Rigby, “Mitigating turnover with code review recommendation: balancing expertise, workload, and knowledge distribution,” in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 1183–1195. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3377811.3380335
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Davila and I. Nunes, “A systematic literature review and taxonomy of modern code review,” Journal of Systems and Software , vol. 177, p. 110951, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121221000480
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Tufano, L. Pascarella, M. Tufano, D. Poshyvanyk, and G. Bavota, “Towards automating code review activities,” in Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’21. IEEE Press, 2021, p. 163–174. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00027
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Sülün, E. Tüzün, and U. Doğrusöz, “Rstrace+: Reviewer suggestion using software artifact traceability graphs,” Information and Software Technology , vol. 130, p. 106455, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584920300021
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Hong, C. Tantithamthavorn, P. Thongtanunam, and A. Aleti, “Commentfinder: a simpler, faster, more accurate code review comments recommendation,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering , ser. ESEC/FSE 2022. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022, p. 507–519. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3540250.3549119
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Li, S. Lu, D. Guo, N. Duan, S. Jannu, G. Jenks, D. Majumder, J. Green, A. Svyatkovskiy, S. Fu, and N. Sundaresan, “Automating code review activities by large-scale pre-training,” 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
L. Li, L. Yang, H. Jiang, J. Yan, T. Luo, Z. Hua, G. Liang, and C. Zuo, “Auger: Automatically generating review comments with pre-training models,” 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Vijayvergiya, M. Salawa, I. Budiselić, D. Zheng, P. Lamblin, M. Ivanković, J. Carin, M. Lewko, J. Andonov, G. Petrović et al. , “Ai-assisted assessment of coding practices in modern code review,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on AI-Powered Software , 2024, pp. 85–93
2024
Closest in time.
C. Pornprasit and C. Tantithamthavorn, “Fine-tuning and prompt engineering for large language models-based code review automation,” Information and Software Technology , vol. 175, p. 107523, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001289
2024
Closest in time.
M. Nashaat and J. Miller, “Towards efficient fine-tuning of language models with organizational data for automated software review,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , pp. 1–14, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
D. Tang, K. Kim, Y. Song, C. Lothritz, B. Li, S. Ezzini, H. Tian, J. Klein, and T. F. Bissyandé, “Codeagent: Collaborative agents for software engineering,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:267412469
2024
Closest in time.
Z. Rasheed, M. A. Sami, M. Waseem, K.-K. Kemell, X. Wang, A. Nguyen, K. Systä, and P. Abrahamsson, “Ai-powered code review with llms: Early results,” 2024
2024
Closest in time.
OpenAI, “Chatgpt,” https://www.openai.com/chatgpt, 2023, accessed: 2024-04-28
2024
Closest in time.
N. Davila, J. Melegati, and I. Wiese, “Tales from the trenches: Expectations and challenges from practice for code review in the generative ai era,” IEEE Software , vol. PP, pp. 1–8, 01 2024
2024
Closest in time.
“Codium-ai/pr-agent,” September 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent
2024
Closest in time.
M. Watanabe, Y. Kashiwa, B. Lin, T. Hirao, K. Yamaguchi, and H. Iida, “On the use of chatgpt for code review: Do developers like reviews by chatgpt?” in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering , ser. EASE ’24. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024, p. 375–380. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3661167.3661183
2024
Closest in time.
“Branch policies and settings,” may 2024. [Online]. Available: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/git/branch-policies?view=azure-devops&tabs=browser#check-for-comment-resolution
2024
Closest in time.