Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Code review is a practice widely adopted in open source and industrial projects.
CodeSearchNet Challenge: Evaluating the State of Semantic Code Search
Hamel Husain, Ho-Hsiang Wu, Tiferet Gazit, Miltiadis Allamanis, and Marc Brockschmidt. 2019 · 1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages
Quinn McNemar. 1947 · 1947
Earlier work this paper cites.
A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure
Sture Holm. 1979 · 1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
BLEU: A Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL ’02) . 311–318
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesis
Shuo Ren, Daya Guo, Shuai Lu, Long Zhou, Shujie Liu, Duyu Tang, Neel Sundaresan, Ming Zhou, Ambrosio Blanco, and Shuai Ma. 2020 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Unit Test Case Generation with Transformers
Michele Tufano, Dawn Drain, Alexey Svyatkovskiy, Shao Kun Deng, and Neel Sundaresan. 2020 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on software engineering . IEEE Press, 712–721
Alberto Bacchelli and Christian Bird. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reducing human effort and improving quality in peer code reviews using automatic static analysis and reviewer recommendation. In 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . 931–940
Vipin Balachandran. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Impact of Peer Code Review on Peer Impression Formation: A Survey. In 2013 ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement . 133–142
A. Bosu and J. C. Carver. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Does bug prediction support human developers? findings from a google case study. In 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . IEEE, 372–381
Chris Lewis, Zhongpeng Lin, Caitlin Sadowski, Xiaoyan Zhu, Rong Ou, and E James Whitehead. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Convergent Contemporary Software Peer Review Practices. In Proceedings of the 2013 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE 2013) . 202–212
Peter C. Rigby and Christian Bird. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Impact of Code Review Coverage and Code Review Participation on Software Quality: A Case Study of the Qt, VTK, and ITK Projects. In Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2014) . 192–201
Shane McIntosh, Yasutaka Kamei, Bram Adams, and Ahmed E. Hassan. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Code Completion with Statistical Language Models. In Proceedings of the 35th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI ’14) . ACM, 419–428
Veselin Raychev, Martin Vechev, and Eran Yahav. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Peer Review on Open-Source Software Projects: Parameters, Statistical Models, and Theory
Peter C. Rigby, Daniel M. German, Laura Cowen, and Margaret-Anne Storey. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Helping Developers Help Themselves: Automatic Decomposition of Code Review Changesets. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1 (ICSE ’15) . 134–144
Mike Barnett, Christian Bird, João Brunet, and Shuvendu K. Lahiri. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Four eyes are better than two: On the impact of code reviews on software quality. In IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution, (ICSME) . 81–90
Gabriele Bavota and Barbara Russo. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Do Code Review Practices Impact Design Quality? A Case Study of the Qt, VTK, and ITK Projects. In Proc. of the 22nd Int’l Conf. on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER) . 171–180
Rodrigo Morales, Shane McIntosh, and Foutse Khomh. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Code review: Veni, vidi, vici. In 2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER) . IEEE, 151–160
Yuriy Tymchuk, Andrea Mocci, and Michele Lanza. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
On the need for a new generation of code review tools. In International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement . Springer, 301–308
Tobias Baum and Kurt Schneider. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
An Empirical Study on Learning Bug-Fixing Patches in the Wild via Neural Machine Translation
Michele Tufano, Cody Watson, Gabriele Bavota, Massimiliano Di Penta, Martin White, and Denys Poshyvanyk. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Workload-aware reviewer recommendation using a multi-objective search-based approach. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering . 21–30
Wisam Haitham Abbood Al-Zubaidi, Patanamon Thongtanunam, Hoa Khanh Dam, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, and Aditya Ghose. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Deep Learning in Software Engineering Research
Cody Watson, Nathan Cooper, David Nader Palacio, Kevin Moran, and Denys Poshyvanyk. 2020a · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
On the optimal order of reading source code changes for review. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME) . IEEE, 329–340
Tobias Baum, Kurt Schneider, and Alberto Bacchelli. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Evaluating how static analysis tools can reduce code review effort. In 2017 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) . IEEE, 101–105
Devarshi Singh, Varun Ramachandra Sekar, Kathryn T Stolee, and Brittany Johnson. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems . 5998–6008
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Taku Kudo and John Richardson. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Information needs in contemporary code review
Luca Pascarella, Davide Spadini, Fabio Palomba, Magiel Bruntink, and Alberto Bacchelli. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Modern Code Review: A Case Study at Google. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP ’18) . 181?190
Caitlin Sadowski, Emma Söderberg, Luke Church, Michal Sipko, and Alberto Bacchelli. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
The effects of change decomposition on code review—a controlled experiment
Marco di Biase, Magiel Bruntink, Arie van Deursen, and Alberto Bacchelli. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
DeepJIT: an end-to-end deep learning framework for just-in-time defect prediction. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) . IEEE, 34–45
Thong Hoang, Hoa Khanh Dam, Yasutaka Kamei, David Lo, and Naoyasu Ubayashi. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
On learning meaningful assert statements for unit test cases. In ICSE ’20: 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Seoul, South Korea, 27 June - 19 July, 2020 , Gregg Rothermel and Doo-Hwan Bae (Eds.). ACM, 1398–1409
Cody Watson, Michele Tufano, Kevin Moran, Gabriele Bavota, and Denys Poshyvanyk. 2020b · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Predicting Defective Lines Using a Model-Agnostic Technique
Supatsara Wattanakriengkrai, Patanamon Thongtanunam, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Hideaki Hata, and Kenichi Matsumoto. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Replication Package
2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
On Multi-Modal Learning of Editing Source Code
Saikat Chakraborty and Baishakhi Ray. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
WhoReview: A multi-objective search-based approach for code reviewers recommendation in modern code review
Moataz Chouchen, Ali Ouni, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Raula Gaikovina Kula, and Katsuro Inoue. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Sampling Projects in GitHub for MSR Studies. In 18th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mining Software Repositories, MSR 2021 . IEEE, 560–564
Ozren Dabic, Emad Aghajani, and Gabriele Bavota. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
A systematic literature review and taxonomy of modern code review
Nicole Davila and Ingrid Nunes. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Towards automating code review at scale. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering . 1479–1482
Vincent J Hellendoorn, Jason Tsay, Manisha Mukherjee, and Martin Hirzel. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Studying the Usage of Text-To-Text Transfer Transformer to Support Code-Related Tasks. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . IEEE, 336–347
Antonio Mastropaolo, Simone Scalabrino, Nathan Cooper, David Nader Palacio, Denys Poshyvanyk, Rocco Oliveto, and Gabriele Bavota. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Rosalia Tufano, Luca Pascarella, Michele Tufano, Denys Poshyvanyk, and Gabriele Bavota. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.