Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is one of the most influential personality theories reflecting individual differences in thinking, feeling, and behaving.
A technique for the measurement of attitude scales
Rensis Likert · 1932
Earlier work this paper cites.
Description and measurement of personality
William F. Line · 1948
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters
Joseph L. Fleiss · 1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em - algorithm plus discussions on the paper
Arthur P. Dempster, Nan M. Laird, and Donald B. Rubin · 1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
Maximum likelihood estimation of observer error‐rates using the em algorithm
A. Philip Dawid and Allan Skene · 1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gifts differing: Understanding personality type
Isabel Briggs Myers et al · 1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measurement and utility of continuous unipolar ratings for the myers-briggs type indicator
Oliver C. S. Tzeng, Roger Ware, and Jeaw mei Chen · 1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scoring the myers-briggs type indicator: Empirical comparison of preference score versus latent-trait methods
Robert James Harvey and William D. Murry · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the myers-briggs type indicator (mbti) and neo-pi five factor model of personality
Adrian Furnham · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference
James W. Pennebaker and Laura A. King · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
A new psychographic segmentation method using jungian mbti variables in the tourism industry
John Gountas and Sandra Gountas · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms
Klaus R. Scherer · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Lexical predictors ofpersonality type
Shlomo Engelson Argamon, Sushant Dhawle, Moshe Koppel, and James W. Pennebaker · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Personality and comorbidity of common psychiatric disorders
Amir A Khan, Kristen C Jacobson, Charles O Gardner, Carol A Prescott, and Kenneth S Kendler · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Advantages of the mean absolute error (mae) over the root mean square error (rmse) in assessing average model performance
Cort J. Willmott and Kenji Matsuura · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text
François Mairesse, Marilyn A. Walker, Matthias R. Mehl, and Roger K. Moore · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
The self-report method
Delroy L. Paulhus and Simine Vazire · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measuring personality constructs: The advantages and disadvantages of self-reports, informant reports and behavioural assessments
Jennifer McDonald · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology
Philip J Corr and Gerald Ed Matthews · 2009
Cited alongside, same era.
The influence of myers-briggs type indicator profiles on team development processes: An empirical study in the manufacturing industry
Ben S Kuipers, Malcolm J Higgs, Natalia V Tolkacheva, and Marco C de Witte · 2009
Cited alongside, same era.
The psychological functions of function words
Cindy Chung and James Pennebaker · 2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Relationships between mbti profiles , motivation profiles , and career paths
Annamaria Garden and Sloan · 2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior
Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, and Thore Graepel · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
The benefits of a model of annotation
R. Passonneau and Bob Carpenter · 2013
On the usefulness of personality traits in opinion-oriented tasks
Marjan Hosseinia, Eduard Constantin Dragut, Dainis Boumber, and Arjun Mukherjee · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Why is mbti personality detection from texts a difficult task?
Sanja Stajner and Seren Yenikent · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Learning to answer psychological questionnaire for personality detection
Feifan Yang, Tao Yang, Xiaojun Quan, and Qinliang Su · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Large language models are zero-shot reasoners
Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Where to go for the holidays: Towards mixed-type dialogs for clarification of user goals
Zeming Liu, Jun Xu, Zeyang Lei, Haifeng Wang, Zheng-Yu Niu, and Hua Wu · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Personality traits on twitter—or—how to get 1,500 personality tests in a week
Barbara Plank and Dirk Hovy · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
The role of the five-factor model in personality assessment and treatment planning
R Michael Bagby, Tara M Gralnick, Nadia Al-Dajani, and Amanda A Uliaszek · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Twisty: A multilingual twitter stylometry corpus for gender and personality profiling
Ben Verhoeven, Walter Daelemans, and Barbara Plank · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Is big five better than mbti? a personality computing challenge using twitter data
Fabio Celli and B. Lepri · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Taking care of the linguistic features of extraversion
Alastair J. Gill and Jon Oberlander · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Hang Jiang, Xianzhe Zhang, and Jinho D. Choi · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, brian ichter, Fei Xia, Ed H. Chi, Quoc V Le, and Denny Zhou · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Estimating the uncertainty in emotion class labels with utterance-specific dirichlet priors
Wen Wu, C. Zhang, Xixin Wu, and Philip C. Woodland · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Manipulating the perceived personality traits of language models
Graham Caron and Shashank Srivastava · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Automatic evaluate dialogue appropriateness by using dialogue act
Bao Chen, Yuanjie Wang, Zeming Liu, and Yuhang Guo · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Is chatgpt a good personality recognizer? a preliminary study
Yuzhe Ji, Wen Wu, Hong Zheng, Yiqiang Hu, Xi Chen, and Liang He · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
XDailyDialog: A multilingual parallel dialogue corpus
Zeming Liu, Ping Nie, Jie Cai, Haifeng Wang, Zheng-Yu Niu, Peng Zhang, Mrinmaya Sachan, and Kaiping Peng · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Can chatgpt assess human personalities? a general evaluation framework
Haocong Rao, Cyril Leung, and Chunyan Miao · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
MidMed: Towards mixed-type dialogues for medical consultation
Xiaoming Shi, Zeming Liu, Chuan Wang, Haitao Leng, Kui Xue, Xiaofan Zhang, and Shaoting Zhang · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Psycot: Psychological questionnaire as powerful chain-of-thought for personality detection
Tao Yang, Tianyuan Shi, Fanqi Wan, Xiaojun Quan, Qifan Wang, Bingzhe Wu, and Jiaxiang Wu · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Amy Yang, Angela Fan, et al · 2024
Closest in time.
An Yang, Baosong Yang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Zhou, Chengpeng Li, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, et al · 2024
Closest in time.