Need Help? Designing Proactive AI Assistants for Programming

Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 159–166

Eric Horvitz. 1999 · 1999

Earlier work this paper cites.

What would other programmers do: suggesting solutions to error messages. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1019–1028

Björn Hartmann, Daniel MacDougall, Joel Brandt, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2010 · 2010

Earlier work this paper cites.

Iterative development and evaluation of a social conversational agent. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing . 1223–1229

Annika Silvervarg and Arne Jönsson. 2013 · 2013

Earlier work this paper cites.

Flow and the foundations of positive psychology . Vol. 10

Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Reed Larson. 2014 · 2014

Earlier work this paper cites.

A human factors analysis of proactive support in human-robot teaming. In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 3586–3593

Yu Zhang, Vignesh Narayanan, Tathagata Chakraborti, and Subbarao Kambhampati. 2015 · 2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

Initiative in robot assistance during collaborative task execution. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI) . IEEE, 67–74

Jimmy Baraglia, Maya Cakmak, Yukie Nagai, Rajesh Rao, and Minoru Asada. 2016 · 2016

Earlier work this paper cites.

GenderMag: A method for evaluating software’s gender inclusiveness

Margaret Burnett, Simone Stumpf, Jamie Macbeth, Stephann Makri, Laura Beckwith, Irwin Kwan, Anicia Peters, and William Jernigan. 2016 · 2016

Earlier work this paper cites.

What can you do? Studying social-agent orientation and agent proactive interactions with an agent for employees. In Proceedings of the 2016 acm conference on designing interactive systems . 264–275

Q Vera Liao, Matthew Davis, Werner Geyer, Michael Muller, and N Sadat Shami. 2016 · 2016

Earlier work this paper cites.

" Like Having a Really Bad PA" The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 5286–5297

Ewa Luger and Abigail Sellen. 2016 · 2016

Earlier work this paper cites.

Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial

Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick, Alison Darcy, and Molly Vierhile. 2017 · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

Writing Reusable Code Feedback at Scale with Mixed-Initiative Program Synthesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) (L@S ’17) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 89–98

Andrew Head, Elena Glassman, Gustavo Soares, Ryo Suzuki, Lucas Figueredo, Loris D’Antoni, and Björn Hartmann. 2017 · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

Searchbots: User engagement with chatbots during collaborative search. In Proceedings of the 2018 conference on human information interaction & retrieval . 52–61

Sandeep Avula, Gordon Chadwick, Jaime Arguello, and Robert Capra. 2018 · 2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

The ethnobot: Gathering ethnographies in the age of IoT. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–13

Ella Tallyn, Hector Fried, Rory Gianni, Amy Isard, and Chris Speed. 2018 · 2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

Understanding chatbot-mediated task management. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–6

Carlos Toxtli, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, and Justin Cranshaw. 2018 · 2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–13

Saleema Amershi, Dan Weld, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Adam Fourney, Besmira Nushi, Penny Collisson, Jina Suh, Shamsi Iqbal, Paul N Bennett, Kori Inkpen, et al · 2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

Intelligent failures: Clippy memes and the limits of digital assistants

Nancy Baym, Limor Shifman, Christopher Persaud, and Kelly Wagman. 2019 · 2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

Design and evaluation of service robot’s proactivity in decision-making support process. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13

Zhenhui Peng, Yunhwan Kwon, Jiaan Lu, Ziming Wu, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2019 · 2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

Bringing AI into the classroom: Designing smart personal assistants as learning tutors

Rainer Winkler and Julian Roos. 2019 · 2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

Characterizing the pedagogical benefits of adaptive feedback for compilation errors by novice programmers. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training . 139–150

Umair Z Ahmed, Nisheeth Srivastava, Renuka Sindhgatta, and Amey Karkare. 2020 · 2020

Earlier work this paper cites.

Projection Boxes: On-the-fly Reconfigurable Visualization for Live Programming. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7

Sorin Lerner. 2020 · 2020

Cited alongside, same era.

Exploring user expectations of proactive AI systems

Christian Meurisch, Cristina A Mihale-Wilson, Adrian Hawlitschek, Florian Giger, Florian Müller, Oliver Hinz, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2020 · 2020

Cited alongside, same era.

How should my chatbot interact? A survey on social characteristics in human–chatbot interaction design

Ana Paula Chaves and Marco Aurelio Gerosa. 2021 · 2021

Cited alongside, same era.

GitHub copilot - your AI pair programmer

Github. 2022 · 2022

Cited alongside, same era.

Coauthor: Designing a human-ai collaborative writing dataset for exploring language model capabilities. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–19

Mina Lee, Percy Liang, and Qian Yang. 2022 · 2022

LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Dataset

Original

Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Tianle Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zhuohan Li, Zi Lin, Eric. P Xing, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Ion Stoica, and Hao Zhang. 2023 · 2023

Later among the works it cites.

Webarena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents

Original

Shuyan Zhou, Frank F Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou, Robert Lo, Abishek Sridhar, Xianyi Cheng, Tianyue Ou, Yonatan Bisk, Daniel Fried, et al · 2023

Later among the works it cites.

The Productivity Effects of Generative AI: Evidence from a Field Experiment with GitHub Copilot

Kevin Zheyuan Cui, Mert Demirer, Sonia Jaffe, Leon Musolff, Sida Peng, and Tobias Salz. 2024 · 2024

Closest in time.

Validating AI-Generated Code with Live Programming. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’24) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 143, 8 pages

Kasra Ferdowsi, Ruanqianqian (Lisa) Huang, Michael B. James, Nadia Polikarpova, and Sorin Lerner. 2024 · 2024