Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Active perception enables robots to dynamically gather information by adjusting their viewpoints, a crucial capability for interacting with complex, partially observable environments.
R. S. Sutton, D. Precup, and S. Singh, “Between mdps and semi-mdps: A framework for temporal abstraction in reinforcement learning,” Artificial intelligence , vol. 112, no. 1-2, pp. 181–211, 1999
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Calli, A. Singh, A. Walsman, S. Srinivasa, P. Abbeel, and A. M. Dollar, “The ycb object and model set: Towards common benchmarks for manipulation research,” in 2015 international conference on advanced robotics (ICAR) . IEEE, 2015, pp. 510–517
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Bohg, K. Hausman, B. Sankaran, O. Brock, D. Kragic, S. Schaal, and G. S. Sukhatme, “Interactive perception: Leveraging action in perception and perception in action,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics , vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1273–1291, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Bisk, R. Zellers, J. Gao, Y. Choi et al. , “Piqa: Reasoning about physical commonsense in natural language,” in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , vol. 34, no. 05, 2020, pp. 7432–7439
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. Kroemer, S. Niekum, and G. Konidaris, “A review of robot learning for manipulation: Challenges, representations, and algorithms,” Journal of machine learning research , vol. 22, no. 30, pp. 1–82, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Chen, C. Ma, J. Avery, L. Hull, and G. Carneiro, “Uncertainty-aware multi-modal learning via cross-modal random network prediction,” in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2022, pp. 200–217
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Liang, W. Huang, F. Xia, P. Xu, K. Hausman, B. Ichter, P. Florence, and A. Zeng, “Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 9493–9500
C. Celemin and J. Kober, “Knowledge-and ambiguity-aware robot learning from corrective and evaluative feedback,” Neural Computing and Applications , vol. 35, no. 23, pp. 16 821–16 839, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
M. Li, X. Zhao, J. H. Lee, C. Weber, and S. Wermter, “Internally rewarded reinforcement learning,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2023, pp. 20 556–20 574
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. R. Wang, J. Duan, D. Fox, and S. Srinivasa, “Newton: Are large language models capable of physical reasoning?” 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Singh, V. Blukis, A. Mousavian, A. Goyal, D. Xu, J. Tremblay, D. Fox, J. Thomason, and A. Garg, “Progprompt: Generating situated robot task plans using large language models,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 11 523–11 530
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Wu, R. Antonova, A. Kan, M. Lepert, A. Zeng, S. Song, J. Bohg, S. Rusinkiewicz, and T. Funkhouser, “Tidybot: Personalized robot assistance with large language models,” Autonomous Robots , vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1087–1102, 2023
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2024
Closest in time.