Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
In this paper, we show that with the ability to jailbreak a GenAI model, attackers can escalate the outcome of attacks against RAG-based GenAI-powered applications in severity and scale.
J. F. Shoch and J. A. Hupp, “The “worm” programs—early experience with a distributed computation,” Communications of the ACM
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Bishop, “Analysis of the iloveyou worm,” Internet: http://nob. cs. ucdavis. edu/classes/ecs155-2005-04/handouts/iloveyou. pdf
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. M. Kienzle and M. C. Elder, “Recent worms: a survey and trends,” in Proceedings of the 2003 ACM workshop on Rapid Malcode
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Weaver, V. Paxson, S. Staniford, and R. Cunningham, “A taxonomy of computer worms,” in Proceedings of the 2003 ACM workshop on Rapid Malcode
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Orman, “The morris worm: A fifteen-year perspective,” IEEE Security & Privacy
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. F. C. F. M. GA, “Iloveyou virus lessons learned report,” 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Klimt and Y. Yang, “The enron corpus: A new dataset for email classification research,” in European conference on machine learning
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Smith, A. Matrawy, S. Chow, and B. Abdelaziz, “Computer worms: Architectures, evasion strategies, and detection mechanisms,” Journal of Information Assurance and Security
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Matrosov, E. Rodionov, D. Harley, and J. Malcho, “Stuxnet under the microscope,” ESET LLC (September 2010)
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Kelty, “The morris worm,” Limn
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Falliere, L. O. Murchu, and E. Chien, “W32. stuxnet dossier,” White paper, symantec corp., security response
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Kushner, “The real story of stuxnet,” ieee Spectrum
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Fredrikson, S. Jha, and T. Ristenpart, “Model inversion attacks that exploit confidence information and basic countermeasures,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Shokri, M. Stronati, C. Song, and V. Shmatikov, “Membership inference attacks against machine learning models,” in 2017 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP)
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Antonakakis, T. April, M. Bailey, M. Bernhard, E. Bursztein, J. Cochran, Z. Durumeric, J. A. Halderman, L. Invernizzi, M. Kallitsis, et al
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Q. Chen and R. A. Bridges, “Automated behavioral analysis of malware: A case study of wannacry ransomware,” in 2017 16th IEEE International Conference on machine learning and applications (ICMLA)
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
D.-Y. Kao and S.-C. Hsiao, “The dynamic analysis of wannacry ransomware,” in 2018 20th International conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT)
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
S.-C. Hsiao and D.-Y. Kao, “The static analysis of wannacry ransomware,” in 2018 20th international conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT)
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Akbanov, V. G. Vassilakis, and M. D. Logothetis, “Wannacry ransomware: Analysis of infection, persistence, recovery prevention and propagation mechanisms,” Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Lewis, E. Perez, A. Piktus, F. Petroni, V. Karpukhin, N. Goyal, H. Küttler, M. Lewis, W.-t. Yih, T. Rocktäschel, et al
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Carlini, F. Tramer, E. Wallace, M. Jagielski, A. Herbert-Voss, K. Lee, A. Roberts, T. Brown, D. Song, U. Erlingsson, et al
2024
Closest in time.
S. Zeng, J. Zhang, P. He, Y. Xing, Y. Liu, H. Xu, J. Ren, S. Wang, D. Yin, Y. Chang, et al
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Li, Z. Li, K. Zhang, R. Dan, S. Jiang, and Y. Zhang, “Chatdoctor: A medical chat model fine-tuned on a large language model meta-ai (llama) using medical domain knowledge,” Cureus
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
A. Wei, N. Haghtalab, and J. Steinhardt, “Jailbroken: How does llm safety training fail?,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Z. Nussbaum, J. X. Morris, B. Duderstadt, and A. Mulyar, “Nomic embed: Training a reproducible long context text embedder,” 2024
2024
Closest in time.
techcrunch, “Apple brings chatgpt to its apps, including siri.” https://techcrunch.com/2024/06/10/apple-brings-chatgpt-to-its-apps-including-siri/
2024
Closest in time.
Zenity, “Summary zenity research published blackhat.” https://labs.zenity.io/p/summary-zenity-research-published-blackhat-2024
2024
Closest in time.
J. Lee, Z. Dai, X. Ren, B. Chen, D. Cer, J. R. Cole, K. Hui, M. Boratko, R. Kapadia, W. Ding, Y. Luan, S. M. K. Duddu, G. H. Abrego, W. Shi, N. Gupta, A. Kusupati, P. Jain, S. R. Jonnalagadda, M.-W. Chang, and I. Naim, “Gecko: Versatile text embeddings distilled from large language models,” 2024
2024
Closest in time.