Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We present a thorough investigation of nonstabilizerness - a fundamental quantum resource that quantifies state complexity within the framework of quantum computing - in a one-dimensional U(1) lattice gauge theory.
J. Schwinger, Gauge invariance and mass. II, Phys. Rev. 128
1962
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. G. Wilson, Confinement of quarks, Phys. Rev. D 10
1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 11
1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Horn, Finite matrix models with continuous local gauge invariance, Physics Letters B 100
1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Orland and D. Rohrlich, Lattice gauge magnets: Local isospin from spin, Nucl. Phys. B 338
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Montvay and G. Münster, Quantum fields on a lattice (Cambridge University Press, 1994)
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Chandrasekharan and U. Wiese, Quantum link models: A discrete approach to gauge theories, Nuclear Physics B 492
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. J. Hamer, Z. Weihong, and J. Oitmaa, Series expansions for the massive Schwinger model in Hamiltonian lattice theory, Phys. Rev. D 56
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Brower, S. Chandrasekharan, and U. Wiese, QCD as a quantum link model, Phys. Rev. D 60
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Fendley, K. Sengupta, and S. Sachdev, Competing density-wave orders in a one-dimensional hard-boson model, Phys. Rev. B 69
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Ardonne, P. Fendley, and E. Fradkin, Topological order and conformal quantum critical points, Annals of Physics 310
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. L. Henley, From classical to quantum dynamics at Rokhsar–Kivelson points, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 16
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Castelnovo, C. Chamon, C. Mudry, and P. Pujol, From quantum mechanics to classical statistical physics: Generalized Rokhsar–Kivelson Hamiltonians and the “Stochastic Matrix Form” decomposition, Annals of Physics 318
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Osterloh, M. Baig, L. Santos, P. Zoller, and M. Lewenstein, Cold atoms in non-abelian gauge potentials: From the hofstadter ”moth” to lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Byrnes and Y. Yamamoto, Simulating lattice gauge theories on a quantum computer, Phys. Rev. A 73
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of physics 326
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Banerjee, M. Dalmonte, M. Müller, E. Rico, P. Stebler, U.-J. Wiese, and P. Zoller, Atomic quantum simulation of dynamical gauge fields coupled to fermionic matter: From string breaking to evolution after a quench, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
U. J. Wiese, Ultracold quantum gases and lattice systems: quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories, Annalen der Physik 525
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Quantum simulations of gauge theories with ultracold atoms: Local gauge invariance from angular-momentum conservation, Phys. Rev. A 88
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Banerjee, M. Bögli, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Stebler, U.-J. Wiese, and P. Zoller, Atomic quantum simulation of u(n) and su(n) non-abelian lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Tagliacozzo, A. Celi, P. Orland, M. Mitchell, and M. Lewenstein, Simulation of non-abelian gauge theories with optical lattices, Nature communications 4
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Nigg, M. Mueller, E. A. Martinez, P. Schindler, M. Hennrich, T. Monz, M. A. Martin-Delgado, and R. Blatt, Quantum computations on a topologically encoded qubit, Science 345
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Orús, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Annals of physics 349
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Mezzacapo, E. Rico, C. Sabín, I. Egusquiza, L. Lamata, and E. Solano, Non-abelian su(2) lattice gauge theories in superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, et al. , Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Nature 534
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Ła̧cki, B. Damski, and J. Zakrzewski, Locating the quantum critical point of the Bose-Hubbard model through singularities of simple observables, Scientific Reports 6
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, et al. , Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Zohar, A. Farace, B. Reznik, and J. I. Cirac, Digital lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. A 95
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
T. V. Zache, F. Hebenstreit, F. Jendrzejewski, M. K. Oberthaler, J. Berges, and P. Hauke, Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories using Wilson fermions, Quantum Science and Technology 3
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Lamm, S. Lawrence, and Y. Yamauchi (NuQS Collaboration), General methods for digital quantum simulation of gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 100
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
M. C. Banuls, R. Blatt, J. Catani, A. Celi, J. I. Cirac, M. Dalmonte, L. Fallani, K. Jansen, M. Lewenstein, S. Montangero, et al. , Simulating lattice gauge theories within quantum technologies, The European Physical Journal D 74
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Z. Davoudi, A. F. Shaw, and J. R. Stryker, General quantum algorithms for Hamiltonian simulation with applications to a non-Abelian lattice gauge theory, Quantum 7
2023
Later among the works it cites.
D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kalinowski, D. Hangleiter, et al. , Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature 626
2024
Closest in time.
R. S. Gupta, N. Sundaresan, T. Alexander, C. J. Wood, S. T. Merkel, M. B. Healy, M. Hillenbrand, T. Jochym-O’Connor, J. R. Wootton, T. J. Yoder, et al. , Encoding a magic state with beyond break-even fidelity, Nature 625
2024
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi, and M. Dalmonte, Lattice Gauge Theories and String Dynamics in Rydberg Atom Quantum Simulators, Phys. Rev. X 10
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Mil, T. V. Zache, A. Hegde, A. Xia, R. P. Bhatt, M. K. Oberthaler, P. Hauke, J. Berges, and F. Jendrzejewski, A scalable realization of local U (1) gauge invariance in cold atomic mixtures, Science 367
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Yang, H. Sun, R. Ott, H.-Y. Wang, T. V. Zache, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, P. Hauke, and J.-W. Pan, Observation of gauge invariance in a 71-site Bose–Hubbard quantum simulator, Nature 587
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
S.-J. Ran, E. Tirrito, C. Peng, X. Chen, L. Tagliacozzo, G. Su, and M. Lewenstein, Tensor network contractions: methods and applications to quantum many-body systems (Springer Nature, 2020)
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Aidelsburger, L. Barbiero, A. Bermudez, T. Chanda, and A. Dauphin e t a l . et\,al. , Cold atoms meet lattice gauge theory, Phil. Tras. R. Soc. A 380
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
C. D. White, C. Cao, and B. Swingle, Conformal field theories are magical, Physical Review B 103
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Ła̧cki and B. Damski, Evidence from on-site atom number fluctuations for a quantum Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in the one-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 104
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
P. S. Tarabunga, E. Tirrito, M. C. Bañuls, and M. Dalmonte, Nonstabilizerness via matrix product states in the pauli basis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133
2024
Closest in time.
P. S. Tarabunga, Critical behaviors of non-stabilizerness in quantum spin chains, Quantum 8
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
P. S. Tarabunga and C. Castelnovo, Magic in generalized Rokhsar-Kivelson wavefunctions, Quantum 8
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
G. Passarelli, R. Fazio, and P. Lucignano, Nonstabilizerness of permutationally invariant systems, Physical Review A 110
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
M. Frau, P. S. Tarabunga, M. Collura, M. Dalmonte, and E. Tirrito, Nonstabilizerness versus entanglement in matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 110
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
M. Bejan, C. McLauchlan, and B. Béri, Dynamical magic transitions in monitored clifford+ t circuits, PRX Quantum 5
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
E. Tirrito, P. S. Tarabunga, G. Lami, T. Chanda, L. Leone, S. F. Oliviero, M. Dalmonte, M. Collura, and A. Hamma, Quantifying nonstabilizerness through entanglement spectrum flatness, Phys. Rev. A 109
2024
Closest in time.
T. Haug, S. Lee, and M. Kim, Efficient quantum algorithms for stabilizer entropies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132
2024
Closest in time.
G. Calajó, G. Magnifico, C. Edmunds, M. Ringbauer, S. Montangero, and P. Silvi, Digital quantum simulation of a (1+ 1)d su(2) lattice gauge theory with ion qudits, PRX Quantum 5
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.