Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We introduce the Iterative Clifford Circuit Renormalization (ICCR), a novel technique designed to efficiently handle the dynamics of non-stabilizerness (a.k.a.
J. Biamonte, Lectures on Quantum Tensor Networks (2020), arXiv:1912.10049 [quant-ph]
1912
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. P. Feynman, Simulating physics with computers, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Gottesman, Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction (1997)
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Kohn, Nobel Lecture: Electronic structure of matter—wave functions and density functionals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Zhou, D. W. Leung, and I. L. Chuang, Methodology for quantum logic gate construction, Phys. Rev. A 62
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. M. Terhal and D. P. DiVincenzo, Classical simulation of noninteracting-fermion quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. A 65
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Vidal, Efficient Simulation of One-Dimensional Quantum Many-Body Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. A 70
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas, Phys. Rev. A 71
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. B. Hastings, An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Gross, K. Audenaert, and J. Eisert, Evenly distributed unitaries: On the structure of unitary designs, Journal of Mathematical Physics 48
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Jozsa and A. Miyake, Matchgates and classical simulation of quantum circuits, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 464
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. M. Stoudenmire and S. R. White, Minimally entangled typical thermal state algorithms, New Journal of Physics 12
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. J. Ferris and G. Vidal, Perfect sampling with unitary tensor networks, Phys. Rev. B 85
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Veitch, S. A. H. Mousavian, D. Gottesman, and J. Emerson, The resource theory of stabilizer quantum computation, New Journal of Physics 16
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Bravyi and D. Gosset, Improved Classical Simulation of Quantum Circuits Dominated by Clifford Gates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Howard and E. Campbell, Application of a Resource Theory for Magic States to Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Silvi, F. Tschirsich, M. Gerster, J. Jünemann, D. Jaschke, M. Rizzi, and S. Montangero, The Tensor Networks Anthology: Simulation techniques for many-body quantum lattice systems, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 8 (2019)
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions in the Dynamics of Entanglement, Physical Review X 9
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Dynamical Purification Phase Transition Induced by Quantum Measurements, Physical Review X 10
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
X. Turkeshi, R. Fazio, and M. Dalmonte, Measurement-induced criticality in ( 2 + 1 ) 2 1 (2+1) ( 2 + 1 ) -dimensional hybrid quantum circuits, Physical Review B 102
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
G. Lami and M. Collura, Nonstabilizerness via Perfect Pauli Sampling of Matrix Product States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131
2023
Later among the works it cites.
P. S. Tarabunga, E. Tirrito, T. Chanda, and M. Dalmonte, Many-body magic via pauli-markov chains—from criticality to gauge theories, PRX Quantum 4
2023
Later among the works it cites.
T. Haug and M. Kim, Scalable Measures of Magic Resource for Quantum Computers, PRX Quantum 4
2023
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Zabalo, M. J. Gullans, J. H. Wilson, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, and J. H. Pixley, Critical properties of the measurement-induced transition in random quantum circuits, Physical Review B 101
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Beverland, E. Campbell, M. Howard, and V. Kliuchnikov, Lower bounds on the non-Clifford resources for quantum computations, Quantum Science and Technology 5
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
J. R. Seddon, B. Regula, H. Pashayan, Y. Ouyang, and E. T. Campbell, Quantifying Quantum Speedups: Improved Classical Simulation From Tighter Magic Monotones, PRX Quantum 2
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Nahum, S. Roy, B. Skinner, and J. Ruhman, Measurement and Entanglement Phase Transitions in All-To-All Quantum Circuits, on Quantum Trees, and in Landau-Ginsburg Theory, PRX Quantum 2
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Gidney, Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator, Quantum 5
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Surace and L. Tagliacozzo, Fermionic Gaussian states: an introduction to numerical approaches, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 54 (2022)
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Z.-W. Liu and A. Winter, Many-Body Quantum Magic, PRX Quantum 3
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
A. Paviglianiti and A. Silva, Multipartite entanglement in the measurement-induced phase transition of the quantum Ising chain, Phys. Rev. B 108
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
D. Rattacaso, L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, and A. Hamma, Stabilizer entropy dynamics after a quantum quench, Phys. Rev. A 108
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
X. Qian, J. Huang, and M. Qin, Augmenting Density Matrix Renormalization Group with Clifford Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
For this comparison, we adopted the same trajectories (i.e., the same choices of Clifford gates and measurement outcomes) in the two methods
2024
Closest in time.