Multi-modal Integrated Prediction and Decision-making with Adaptive Interaction Modality Explorations

D. Mayne, “A second-order gradient method for determining optimal trajectories of non-linear discrete-time systems,” Intl. J. Ctrl. , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 85–95, 1966

1966

Earlier work this paper cites.

J. Hardy and M. Campbell, “Contingency planning over probabilistic obstacle predictions for autonomous road vehicles,” IEEE Trans. on Robot. , vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 913–929, 2013

2013

Earlier work this paper cites.

A. G. Cunningham et al. , “MPDM: Multipolicy decision-making in dynamic, uncertain environments for autonomous driving,” in ICRA. IEEE , 2015, pp. 1670–1677

2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

C. Hubmann et al. , “Automated driving in uncertain environments: Planning with interaction and uncertain maneuver prediction,” IEEE Trans. on Intel. Veh. , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5–17, 2018

2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

Y. Luo et al. , “PORCA: Modeling and planning for autonomous driving among many pedestrians,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. , 2018

2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

H. Cui et al. , “Multimodal trajectory predictions for autonomous driving using deep convolutional networks,” in ICRA. IEEE , 2019

2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

N. Rhinehart et al. , “PRECOG: Prediction conditioned on goals in visual multi-agent settings,” in ICCV. IEEE , 2019, pp. 2821–2830

2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

W. Zeng et al. , “DSDNet: Deep structured self-driving network,” in ECCV. Springer . Springer, 2020, pp. 156–172

2020

Earlier work this paper cites.

H. Song et al. , “PiP: Planning-informed trajectory prediction for autonomous driving,” in ECCV. Springer . Springer, 2020, pp. 598–614

2020

Earlier work this paper cites.

T. Salzmann et al. , “Trajectron++: Dynamically-feasible trajectory forecasting with heterogeneous data,” in ECCV. Springer , 2020, pp. 683–700

2020

Earlier work this paper cites.

S. Casas et al. , “Implicit latent variable model for scene-consistent motion forecasting,” in ECCV. Springer . Springer, 2020, pp. 624–641

2020

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Liang et al. , “Learning lane graph representations for motion forecasting,” in ECCV. Springer . Springer, 2020, pp. 541–556

2020

Cited alongside, same era.

J. Gao et al. , “VectorNet: Encoding hd maps and agent dynamics from vectorized representation,” in CVPR , 2020, pp. 11 525–11 533

2020

Cited alongside, same era.

L. Zhang et al. , “Efficient uncertainty-aware decision-making for automated driving using guided branching,” in ICRA. IEEE , 2020, pp. 3291–3297

2020

Cited alongside, same era.

W. Ding et al. , “Epsilon: An efficient planning system for automated vehicles in highly interactive environments,” IEEE Trans. on Robot. , vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1118–1138, 2021

2021

Cited alongside, same era.

A. Cui et al. , “Lookout: Diverse multi-future prediction and planning for self-driving,” in ICCV. IEEE , 2021, pp. 16 107–16 116

2021

S. Hagedorn et al. , “Rethinking integration of prediction and planning in deep learning-based automated driving systems: a review,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05731 , 2023

Original

2023

Later among the works it cites.

Y. Chen et al. , “Tree-structured policy planning with learned behavior models,” in ICRA. IEEE . IEEE, 2023, pp. 7902–7908

2023

Later among the works it cites.

R. Chekroun et al. , “MBAPPE: MCTS-built-around prediction for planning explicitly,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.08452 , 2023

Original

2023

Later among the works it cites.

T. Li et al. , “MARC: Multipolicy and risk-aware contingency planning for autonomous driving,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. , 2023

2023

Later among the works it cites.

W. Luo et al. , “Jfp: Joint future prediction with interactive multi-agent modeling for autonomous driving,” in CoRL , 2023, pp. 1457–1467