Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Unit testing is crucial for detecting bugs in individual program units but consumes time and effort.
Search-based software engineering
Mark Harman and Bryan F Jones. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Search-based software test data generation: a survey
Phil McMinn. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Feedback-directed random test generation. In 29th International Conference on Software Engineering . IEEE, 75–84
Carlos Pacheco, Shuvendu K Lahiri, Michael D Ernst, and Thomas Ball. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
ReAssert: Suggesting Repairs for Broken Unit Tests. In ASE 2009, 24th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, November 16-20, 2009 . IEEE Computer Society, 433–444
Brett Daniel, Vilas Jagannath, Danny Dig, and Darko Marinov. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Testful: Automatic unit-test generation for java classes. In 2010 ACM/IEEE 32nd International Conference on Software Engineering , Vol. 2. 281–284
Luciano Baresi and Matteo Miraz. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mutation-driven generation of unit tests and oracles. In Proceedings of the 19th international symposium on Software testing and analysis . 147–158
Gordon Fraser and Andreas Zeller. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Genetic algorithms for randomized unit testing
James H Andrews, Tim Menzies, and Felix CH Li. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evosuite: automatic test suite generation for object-oriented software. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT symposium and the 13th European conference on Foundations of software engineering . 416–419
Gordon Fraser and Andrea Arcuri. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Genprog: A Generic Method for Automatic Software Repair
Claire Le Goues, ThanhVu Nguyen, Stephanie Forrest, and Westley Weimer. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Defects4J: A database of existing faults to enable controlled testing studies for Java programs. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Software testing and Analysis . 437–440
René Just, Darioush Jalali, and Michael D Ernst. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A critical review of "automatic patch generation learned from human-written patches": essay on the problem statement and the evaluation of automatic software repair. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering . 234–242
Martin Monperrus. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Instance generator and problem representation to improve object oriented code coverage
Abdelilah Sakti, Gilles Pesant, and Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Grt: Program-analysis-guided random testing (t). In 30th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering . IEEE, 212–223
Lei Ma, Cyrille Artho, Cheng Zhang, Hiroyuki Sato, Johannes Gmeiner, and Rudolf Ramler. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems . 6000–6010
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Precise Condition Synthesis for Program Repair. In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering . IEEE, 416–426
Yingfei Xiong, Jie Wang, Runfa Yan, Jiachen Zhang, Shi Han, Gang Huang, and Lu Zhang. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatic Software Repair: A Bibliography
Martin Monperrus. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatic Software Repair: A Survey
Luca Gazzola, Daniela Micucci, and Leonardo Mariani. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Unit test case generation with transformers and focal context
Michele Tufano, Dawn Drain, Alexey Svyatkovskiy, Shao Kun Deng, and Neel Sundaresan. 2020a · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Unit test case generation with transformers and focal context
Michele Tufano, Dawn Drain, Alexey Svyatkovskiy, Shao Kun Deng, and Neel Sundaresan. 2020b · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Unified Pre-training for Program Understanding and Generation. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies . 2655–2668
Wasi Uddin Ahmad, Saikat Chakraborty, Baishakhi Ray, and Kai-Wei Chang. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
SBST challenges from the perspective of the test techniques. In 2021 12th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Technology . IEEE, 119–123
Sepideh Kashefi Gargari and Mohammd Reza Keyvanpour. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generation. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing . 8696–8708
Yue Wang, Weishi Wang, Shafiq Joty, and Steven C.H. Hoi. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Prompt Injection: Parameterization of Fixed Inputs
Eunbi Choi, Yongrae Jo, Joel Jang, and Minjoon Seo. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Basic block coverage for search-based unit testing and crash reproduction
Pouria Derakhshanfar, Xavier Devroey, and Andy Zaidman. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Coderl: Mastering code generation through pretrained models and deep reinforcement learning
Hung Le, Yue Wang, Akhilesh Deepak Gotmare, Silvio Savarese, and Steven Chu Hong Hoi. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Pynguin: Automated unit test generation for python. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings . 168–172
Stephan Lukasczyk and Gordon Fraser. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning to break the loop: Analyzing and mitigating repetitions for neural text generation
Jin Xu, Xiaojiang Liu, Jianhao Yan, Deng Cai, Huayang Li, and Jian Li. 2022 · 2022
Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhancing the Understandability of Generated Unit Tests
Amirhossein Deljouyi, Roham Koohestani, Maliheh Izadi, and Andy Zaidman. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Rethinking the Influence of Source Code on Test Case Generation
Dong Huang, Jie M. Zhang, Mingzhe Du, Mark Harman, and Heming Cui. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of Large Language Models on Directed Test Input Generation. In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering . 1408–1420
Zongze Jiang, Ming Wen, Jialun Cao, Xuanhua Shi, and Hai Jin. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Harnessing the Power of LLMs: Automating Unit Test Generation for High-Performance Computing
Rabimba Karanjai, Aftab Hussain, Md. Rafiqul Islam Rabin, Lei Xu, Weidong Shi, and Mohammad Amin Alipour. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
CIRCLE: Continual repair across programming languages. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis . 678–690
Wei Yuan, Quanjun Zhang, Tieke He, Chunrong Fang, Nguyen Quoc Viet Hung, Xiaodong Hao, and Hongzhi Yin. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Lei Huang, Weijiang Yu, Weitao Ma, Weihong Zhong, Zhangyin Feng, Haotian Wang, Qianglong Chen, Weihua Peng, Xiaocheng Feng, Bing Qin, et al · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
CodaMosa: Escaping Coverage Plateaus in Test Generation with Pre-trained Large Language Models. In 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering . 919–931
Caroline Lemieux, Jeevana Priya Inala, Shuvendu K. Lahiri, and Siddhartha Sen. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Prompting Code Interpreter to Write Better Unit Tests on Quixbugs Functions
Vincent Li and Nick Doiron. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
OpenAI. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Adaptive test generation using a large language model
Max Schäfer, Sarah Nadi, Aryaz Eghbali, and Frank Tip. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
An Empirical Evaluation of Using Large Language Models for Automated Unit Test Generation
Max Schäfer, Sarah Nadi, Aryaz Eghbali, and Frank Tip. 2024 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Fixminer: Mining Relevant Fix Patterns for Automated Program Repair
Anil Koyuncu, Kui Liu, Tegawendé F Bissyandé, Dongsun Kim, Jacques Klein, Martin Monperrus, and Yves Le Traon. 2020 · 2024
Closest in time.
Augmenting LLMs to Repair Obsolete Test Cases with Static Collector and Neural Reranker
Jun Liu, Jiwei Yan, Yuanyuan Xie, Jun Yan, and Jian Zhang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Andrea Lops, Fedelucio Narducci, Azzurra Ragone, Michelantonio Trizio, and Claudio Bartolini. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
CasModaTest: A Cascaded and Model-agnostic Self-directed Framework for Unit Test Generation
Chao Ni, Xiaoya Wang, Liushan Chen, Dehai Zhao, Zhengong Cai, Shaohua Wang, and Xiaohu Yang. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
CoverUp: Coverage-Guided LLM-Based Test Generation
Juan Altmayer Pizzorno and Emery D. Berger. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Automatic Generation of Test Cases based on Bug Reports: a Feasibility Study with Large Language Models. In ICSE Companion . 360–361
Laura Plein, Wendkûuni C. Ouédraogo, Jacques Klein, and Tegawendé F. Bissyandé. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Code-Aware Prompting: A Study of Coverage-Guided Test Generation in Regression Setting using LLM
Gabriel Ryan, Siddhartha Jain, Mingyue Shang, Shiqi Wang, Xiaofei Ma, Murali Krishna Ramanathan, and Baishakhi Ray. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
TestSpark: IntelliJ IDEA’s Ultimate Test Generation Companion. In ICSE Companion . 30–34
Arkadii Sapozhnikov, Mitchell Olsthoorn, Annibale Panichella, Vladimir Kovalenko, and Pouria Derakhshanfar. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Retrieval-Augmented Test Generation: How Far Are We?
Jiho Shin, Reem Aleithan, Hadi Hemmati, and Song Wang. 2024a · 2024
Closest in time.
ChatGPT vs SBST: A Comparative Assessment of Unit Test Suite Generation
Yutian Tang, Zhijie Liu, Zhichao Zhou, and Xiapu Luo. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Chat-like Asserts Prediction with the Support of Large Language Model
Han Wang, Han Hu, Chunyang Chen, and Burak Turhan. 2024a · 2024
Closest in time.
Optimizing Search-Based Unit Test Generation with Large Language Models:An Empirical Study. In Internetware
Danni Xiao, Yimeng Guo, Yanhui Li, and Lin Chen. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Enhancing LLM-based Test Generation for Hard-to-Cover Branches via Program Analysis
Chen Yang, Junjie Chen, Bin Lin, Jianyi Zhou, and Ziqi Wang. 2024a · 2024
Closest in time.
An Empirical Study of Unit Test Generation with Large Language Models
Lin Yang, Chen Yang, Shutao Gao, Weijing Wang, Bo Wang, Qihao Zhu, Xiao Chu, Jianyi Zhou, Guangtai Liang, Qianxiang Wang, and Junjie Chen. 2024b · 2024
Closest in time.
Automated Test Case Repair Using Language Models
Ahmadreza Saboor Yaraghi, Darren Holden, Nafiseh Kahani, and Lionel C. Briand. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Evaluating and Improving ChatGPT for Unit Test Generation
Zhiqiang Yuan, Mingwei Liu, Shiji Ding, Kaixin Wang, Yixuan Chen, Xin Peng, and Yiling Lou. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
TestBench: Evaluating Class-Level Test Case Generation Capability of Large Language Models
Quanjun Zhang, Ye Shang, Chunrong Fang, Siqi Gu, Jianyi Zhou, and Zhenyu Chen. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
An LLM-based Readability Measurement for Unit Tests’ Context-aware Inputs
Zhichao Zhou, Yutian Tang, Yun Lin, and Jingzhu He. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.