Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Automated unit test case generation tools facilitate test-driven development and support developers by suggesting tests intended to identify flaws in their code.
1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Pacheco and M. D. Ernst, “Randoop: feedback-directed random testing for java,” in Companion to the 22nd ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming systems and applications companion , 2007, pp. 815–816
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Bruns, A. Kornstadt, and D. Wichmann, “Web application tests with selenium,” IEEE software , vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 88–91, 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Cohn, Succeeding with agile: software development using Scrum . Pearson Education, 2010
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. H. Pinto and S. R. Vergilio, “A multi-objective genetic algorithm to test data generation,” in 2010 22nd IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence , vol. 1. IEEE, 2010, pp. 129–134
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Fraser and A. Arcuri, “Evosuite: automatic test suite generation for object-oriented software,” in Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT symposium and the 13th European conference on Foundations of software engineering , 2011, pp. 416–419
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Martinez, W. Weimer, and M. Monperrus, “Do the fix ingredients already exist? an empirical inquiry into the redundancy assumptions of program repair approaches,” in Companion Proceedings of the 36th international conference on software engineering , 2014, pp. 492–495
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Just, D. Jalali, and M. D. Ernst, “Defects4j: A database of existing faults to enable controlled testing studies for java programs,” in Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis , 2014, pp. 437–440
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Daka, J. Campos, G. Fraser, J. Dorn, and W. Weimer, “Modeling readability to improve unit tests,” in Proceedings of the 2015 10th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering , 2015, pp. 107–118
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Shamshiri, “Automated unit test generation for evolving software,” in Proceedings of the 2015 10th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering , 2015, pp. 1038–1041
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Palomba, D. Di Nucci, A. Panichella, R. Oliveto, and A. De Lucia, “On the diffusion of test smells in automatically generated test code: An empirical study,” in 2016 IEEE/ACM 9th International Workshop on Search-Based Software Testing (SBST) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 5–14
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Palomba, A. Panichella, A. Zaidman, R. Oliveto, and A. De Lucia, “Automatic test case generation: What if test code quality matters?” in Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis , 2016, pp. 130–141
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. M. Almasi, H. Hemmati, G. Fraser, A. Arcuri, and J. Benefelds, “An industrial evaluation of unit test generation: Finding real faults in a financial application,” in 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track (ICSE-SEIP) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 263–272
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Grano, S. Scalabrino, H. C. Gall, and R. Oliveto, “An empirical investigation on the readability of manual and generated test cases,” in 2018 IEEE/ACM 26th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 348–3483
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
X. Hu, G. Li, X. Xia, D. Lo, and Z. Jin, “Deep code comment generation,” in 2018 IEEE/ACM 26th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 200–20 010
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, and I. Sutskever, “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://d4mucfpksywv.cloudfront.net/better-language-models/language-models.pdf
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
——, “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Agitar, “Utilizing Fast Testing to Transform Java Development into an Agile, Quick Release, Low Risk Process,” http://www.agitar.com/ , 2020
2020
Closest in time.
2020
Closest in time.
T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert-Voss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. M. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B. Chess, J. Clark, C. Berner, S. McCandlish, A. Radford, I. Sutskever, and D. Amodei, “Language models are few-shot learners,” 2020
2020
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
G. Grano, F. Palomba, D. Di Nucci, A. De Lucia, and H. C. Gall, “Scented since the beginning: On the diffuseness of test smells in automatically generated test code,” Journal of Systems and Software , vol. 156, pp. 312–327, 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Svyatkovskiy, Y. Zhao, S. Fu, and N. Sundaresan, “Pythia: ai-assisted code completion system,” in Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining , 2019, pp. 2727–2735
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Tufano, C. Watson, G. Bavota, M. D. Penta, M. White, and D. Poshyvanyk, “An empirical study on learning bug-fixing patches in the wild via neural machine translation,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) , vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1–29, 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Chen, S. J. Kommrusch, M. Tufano, L.-N. Pouchet, D. Poshyvanyk, and M. Monperrus, “Sequencer: Sequence-to-sequence learning for end-to-end program repair,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Lewis, Y. Liu, N. Goyal, M. Ghazvininejad, A. Mohamed, O. Levy, V. Stoyanov, and L. Zettlemoyer, “Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension,” 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
M. White, M. Tufano, M. Martinez, M. Monperrus, and D. Poshyvanyk, “Sorting and transforming program repair ingredients via deep learning code similarities,” in 2019 IEEE 26th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 479–490
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Microsoft, “methods2test,” https://github.com/microsoft/methods2test , 2020
2020
Closest in time.
“Rest assured,” http://rest-assured.io , 2020
2020
Closest in time.
“Cobertura,” https://cobertura.github.io/cobertura , 2020
2020
Closest in time.
——, “Azure kubernetes service,” https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/kubernetes-service , 2020
2020
Closest in time.
“Apache commons lang,” https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang , 2021
2021
Closest in time.
“Jfreechart,” https://jfree.org/jfreechart , 2021
2021
Closest in time.
“Apache commons cli,” https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-cli , 2021
2021
Closest in time.
“Apache commons csv,” https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-csv , 2021
2021
Closest in time.
“Google gson,” https://github.com/google/gson , 2021
2021
Closest in time.
Microsoft, “Athenatest website,” https://athenatestdemowebsite.azurewebsites.net , 2021
2021
Closest in time.