Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized code generation, leading to widespread adoption of AI coding tools by developers.
U. C. of Appeals for the Second Circuit. (1946, February) Arnstein v. porter, 154 f.2d 464 (2d cir. 1946). [Online]. Available: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/154/464/1478575/
1946
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. I. Levenshtein et al. , “Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals,” in Soviet physics doklady , vol. 10, no. 8. Soviet Union, 1966, pp. 707–710
1966
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. J. McCabe, “A complexity measure,” IEEE Transactions on software Engineering , no. 4, pp. 308–320, 1976
1976
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Cliff, “Dominance statistics: Ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions.” Psychological bulletin , vol. 114, no. 3, p. 494, 1993
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Z. Broder, “Identifying and filtering near-duplicate documents,” in Annual symposium on combinatorial pattern matching . Springer, 2000, pp. 1–10
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. R. Autry, “Toward a definition of striking similarity in infringement actions for copyrighted musical works,” J. Intell. Prop. L. , vol. 10, p. 113, 2002
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W.-J. Zhu, “Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation,” in Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 2002, pp. 311–318
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. R. Higgins, “Proving copyright infringement: Will striking similarity make your case,” Suffolk J. Trial & App. Advoc. , vol. 8, p. 157, 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Rosen, “Open source licensing,” Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law , 2005
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. M. German and A. E. Hassan, “License integration patterns: Addressing license mismatches in component-based development,” in 2009 IEEE 31st international conference on software engineering . IEEE, 2009, pp. 188–198
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. E. McKnight and J. Najab, “Mann-whitney u test,” The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology , pp. 1–1, 2010
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Reddy. (2015, Augst) The consequences of violating open source licenses. [Online]. Available: https://btlj.org/2015/11/consequences-violating-open-source-licenses/
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Srinath, “Python–the fastest growing programming language,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology , vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 354–357, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Ma, C. Bogart, S. Amreen, R. Zaretzki, and A. Mockus, “World of code: an infrastructure for mining the universe of open source vcs data,” in 2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 143–154
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. J. Meeker, Open (Source) for Business: A Practical Guide to Open Source Software Licensing - Third Edition . United States: Independently Published, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Karpinski. (2021, July) I don’t want to say anything but that’s not the right license mr copilot. [Online]. Available: https://twitter.com/stefankarpinski/status/1410971061181681674
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Eevee. (2021, June) I’m unclear on how it’s not a form of laundering open source code into commercial works. [Online]. Available: https://twitter.com/eevee/status/1410037309848752128
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. V. Pour, Z. Li, L. Ma, and H. Hemmati, “A search-based testing framework for deep neural networks of source code embedding,” in 2021 14th IEEE Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 36–46
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Aleithan, “Explainable just-in-time bug prediction: Are we there yet?” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 129–131
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Xu and X. Zhang, “Multi-granularity code smell detection using deep learning method based on abstract syntax tree.” in SEKE , 2021, pp. 503–509
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Izadi, R. Gismondi, and G. Gousios, “Codefill: Multi-token code completion by jointly learning from structure and naming sequences,” in Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering , 2022, pp. 401–412
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Pearce, B. Ahmad, B. Tan, B. Dolan-Gavitt, and R. Karri, “Asleep at the keyboard? assessing the security of github copilot’s code contributions,” in 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 754–768
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Davis. (2022, October) copilot, with ”public code” blocked, emits large chunks of my copyrighted code, with no attribution, no lgpl license. [Online]. Available: https://twitter.com/DocSparse/status/1581461734665367554
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Green. (2022, June) Explored github copilot,a paid service, to see if it encodes code from repositories with restrictive licenses. [Online]. Available: https://twitter.com/ChrisGr93091552/status/1539731632931803137
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Github. (2022, August) Github copilot. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/features/copilot
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
(2022, November) Github copilot litigation. [Online]. Available: https://githubcopilotlitigation.com/
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Yang, J. Shi, J. He, and D. Lo, “Natural attack for pre-trained models of code,” in Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering , 2022, pp. 1482–1493
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
U. S. C. for the Ninth Circuit. (2022, December) Copying—access and substantial similarity. [Online]. Available: https://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/node/274
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Scheffler, E. Tromer, and M. Varia, “Formalizing human ingenuity: A quantitative framework for copyright law’s substantial similarity,” in Proceedings of the 2022 Symposium on Computer Science and Law , 2022, pp. 37–49
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
K. Lee, D. Ippolito, A. Nystrom, C. Zhang, D. Eck, C. Callison-Burch, and N. Carlini, “Deduplicating training data makes language models better,” in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , S. Muresan, P. Nakov, and A. Villavicencio, Eds. Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Linguistics, May 2022, pp. 8424–8445. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-long.577
A. Al-Kaswan, M. Izadi, and A. V. Deursen, “Traces of memorisation in large language models for code,” in 2024 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) , 2024, pp. 862–862
2024
Closest in time.
(2024, March) The Apache 2.0 license. [Online]. Available: https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
2024
Closest in time.
H. Yu, B. Shen, D. Ran, J. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Y. Ma, G. Liang, Y. Li, Q. Wang, and T. Xie, “Codereval: A benchmark of pragmatic code generation with generative pre-trained models,” in Proceedings of the 46th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering , 2024, pp. 1–12
2024
Closest in time.
J. Wu, L. Bao, X. Yang, X. Xia, and X. Hu, “A large-scale empirical study of open source license usage: Practices and challenges,” in 2024 IEEE/ACM 21th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Xiao, H. He, W. Xu, X. Tan, J. Dong, and M. Zhou, “Recommending good first issues in github oss projects,” in Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering , 2022, pp. 1830–1842
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
K. Gao, Z. Wang, A. Mockus, and M. Zhou, “On the variability of software engineering needs for deep learning: Stages, trends, and application types,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 760–776, 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Jin, S. Shahriar, M. Tufano, X. Shi, S. Lu, N. Sundaresan, and A. Svyatkovskiy, “Inferfix: End-to-end program repair with llms,” in Proceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering , 2023, pp. 1646–1656
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
C. S. Xia, Y. Wei, and L. Zhang, “Automated program repair in the era of large pre-trained language models,” in 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 1482–1494
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Wei, C. S. Xia, and L. Zhang, “Copiloting the copilots: Fusing large language models with completion engines for automated program repair,” in Proceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering , 2023, pp. 172–184
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
(2023, June) Survey reveals ai’s impact on the developer experience. [Online]. Available: https://github.blog/2023-06-13-survey-reveals-ais-impact-on-the-developer-experience/
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Perry, M. Srivastava, D. Kumar, and D. Boneh, “Do users write more insecure code with ai assistants?” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security , 2023, pp. 2785–2799
2023
Cited alongside, same era.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
CodeParrot. (2024, January) Codeparrot. [Online]. Available: https://huggingface.co/codeparrot/codeparrot
2024
Closest in time.
Bigcode. (2024, January) The stack. [Online]. Available: https://huggingface.co/datasets/bigcode/the-stack
2024
Closest in time.
——. (2024, January) The stack v2. [Online]. Available: https://huggingface.co/datasets/bigcode/the-stack-v2
2024
Closest in time.
(2024, March) Codeparrot dataset cleaned. [Online]. Available: https://huggingface.co/datasets/codeparrot/codeparrot-clean
2024
Closest in time.
bigcode. (2024, March) starcoderdata. [Online]. Available: https://huggingface.co/datasets/bigcode/starcoderdata
2024
Closest in time.
(2024, April) GNU general public license version 3. [Online]. Available: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html
2024
Closest in time.
K. Gao, R. He, B. Xie, and M. Zhou, “Characterizing deep learning package supply chains in pypi: Domains, clusters, and disengagement,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology , vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1–27, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
U. C. Office. (2024, March) What does copyright protect? [Online]. Available: https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-protect.html
2024
Closest in time.
S. Chacon and B. Straub, “Git - git objects,” https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Internals-Git-Objects , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
K. Gao, W. Xu, W. Yang, and M. Zhou, “Pyradar: Towards automatically retrieving and validating source code repository information for pypi packages,” Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering , vol. 1, no. FSE, pp. 2608–2631, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
swsc, “swsc / overview — bitbucket,” https://bitbucket.org/swsc/overview/src/master/ , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
(2024, March) Sample size calculator. [Online]. Available: https://www.calculator.net/sample-size-calculator.html
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Anthropic. (2024, June) Claude 3.5 sonnet. [Online]. Available: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-3-5-sonnet
2024
Closest in time.
Q. Team. (2024, June) Hello qwen2. [Online]. Available: https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwen2/
2024
Closest in time.
G. Team, A. Zeng, B. Xu, B. Wang, C. Zhang, D. Yin, D. Rojas, G. Feng, H. Zhao, H. Lai et al. , “Chatglm: A family of large language models from glm-130b to glm-4 all tools,” arXiv e-prints , pp. arXiv–2406, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
AI@Meta, “Llama 3 model card,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/meta-llama/llama3/blob/main/MODEL_CARD.md
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
Q. Team. (2024, April) Code with codeqwen1.5. [Online]. Available: https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/codeqwen1.5/
2024
Closest in time.
M. A. team. (2024, May) Codestral: Hello, world! [Online]. Available: https://mistral.ai/news/codestral/
2024
Closest in time.
C. Team, “Codegemma: Open code models based on gemma,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11409 , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
(2024, Augest) Licoeval. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/osslab-pku/LiCoEval
2024
Closest in time.
M. Allamanis, H. Peng, and C. Sutton, “A convolutional attention network for extreme summarization of source code,” in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2016, pp. 2091–2100
2091
Closest in time.