Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Process models are frequently used in software engineering to describe business requirements, guide software testing and control system improvement.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al · 1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
Few-shot parameter-efficient fine-tuning is better and cheaper than in-context learning
Haokun Liu, Derek Tam, Mohammed Muqeeth, Jay Mohta, Tenghao Huang, Mohit Bansal, and Colin A Raffel. 2022 · 1965
Earlier work this paper cites.
Petri net theory and the modeling of systems
James Lyle Peterson. 1981 · 1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
UML: unified modeling language
Grady Booch, Jim Rumbaugh, and Ivar Jacobsen. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Verification of workflow task structures: A petri-net-baset approach
Wil MP Van Der Aalst and Arthur HM Ter Hofstede. 2000 · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Process models in software engineering
Walt Scacchi. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
A process model for component-oriented software engineering
Ali H Dogru and Murat M Tanik. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Workflow mining: Discovering process models from event logs
Wil Van der Aalst, Ton Weijters, and Laura Maruster. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Systematic review in software engineering
Jorge Biolchini, Paula Gomes Mian, Ana Candida Cruz Natali, and Guilherme Horta Travassos. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Process modeling using event-driven process chains
August-Wilhelm Scheer, Oliver Thomas, and Otmar Adam. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
YAWL: yet another workflow language
Wil MP Van Der Aalst and Arthur HM Ter Hofstede. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Object management group
OMG Infrastructure Specification. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ws-bpel extension for people (bpel4people) specification version 1.1
Dave Ings, Luc Clément, Dieter König, Vinkesh Mehta, Ralf Mueller, Ravi Rangaswamy, Michael Rowley, and Ivana Trickovic. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Business Process Model and Notation, version 2.0
Object Management Group BPMN Technical Committee et al · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Process model generation from natural language text. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering: 23rd International Conference, CAiSE 2011, London, UK, June 20-24, 2011. Proceedings 23 . Springer, 482–496
Fabian Friedrich, Jan Mendling, and Frank Puhlmann. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Real-Life BPMN2: Using BPMN2 2.0 to Analyze
J Freund and B Rucker. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Process mining: Discovery, conformance and enhancement of business processes
Vojtech Huser. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Discovering block-structured process models from event logs containing infrequent behaviour. In Business Process Management Workshops: BPM 2013 International Workshops, Beijing, China, August 26, 2013, Revised Papers 11 . Springer, 66–78
Sander JJ Leemans, Dirk Fahland, and Wil MP Van Der Aalst. 2014 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Business process modeling using petri nets. In Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency VII . Springer, 116–161
Kees M van Hee, Natalia Sidorova, and Jan Martijn van der Werf. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Integration of business process modeling and web services: a survey
Katarina Grolinger, Miriam AM Capretz, Americo Cunha, and Said Tazi. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mining invisible tasks in non-free-choice constructs. In International Conference on Business Process Management . Springer, 109–125
Qinlong Guo, Lijie Wen, Jianmin Wang, Zhiqiang Yan, and Philip S Yu. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
BPMNDiffViz: a tool for BPMN models comparison
Sergey Y Ivanov, Anna A Kalenkova, and Wil MP van der Aalst. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Process mining using BPMN: relating event logs and process models. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 19th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems . 123–123
Anna A Kalenkova, Wil MP van der Aalst, Irina A Lomazova, and Vladimir A Rubin. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Discovering block–structured parallel process models from causally complete event logs
Julijana Lekić and Dragan Milićev. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Business process modeling languages: A comparative framework. In New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies . Springer, 619–628
José Luís Pereira and Diogo Silva. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A business process re-engineering approach to transform BPMN models to software artifacts. In E-Technologies: Embracing the Internet of Things: 7th International Conference, MCETECH 2017, Ottawa, ON, Canada, May 17-19, 2017, Proceedings 7 . Springer, 170–184
Javier Gonzalez-Huerta, Anis Boubaker, and Hafedh Mili. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Event-driven process chain for modeling and verification of business requirements–a systematic literature review
Anam Amjad, Farooque Azam, Muhammad Waseem Anwar, Wasi Haider Butt, and Muhammad Rashid. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A guidelines framework for understandable BPMN models
Codegen: An open large language model for code with multi-turn program synthesis
Erik Nijkamp, Bo Pang, Hiroaki Hayashi, Lifu Tu, Huan Wang, Yingbo Zhou, Silvio Savarese, and Caiming Xiong. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Approach to generating functional test cases from bpmn process diagrams. In 2022 ieee 30th international requirements engineering conference workshops (rew) . IEEE, 185–189
Pauline von Olberg and Lukas Strey. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Emergent abilities of large language models
Jason Wei, Yi Tay, Rishi Bommasani, Colin Raffel, Barret Zoph, Sebastian Borgeaud, Dani Yogatama, Maarten Bosma, Denny Zhou, Donald Metzler, et al · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Flavio Corradini, Alessio Ferrari, Fabrizio Fornari, Stefania Gnesi, Andrea Polini, Barbara Re, and Giorgio O Spagnolo. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Process discovery from event data: Relating models and logs through abstractions
Wil MP Van Der Aalst. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Towards a New Adaptation Engine for Self-Adaptation of BPMN Processes Instances.. In ENASE . 218–225
Jamila Oukharijane, Imen Ben Said, Mohamed Amine Chaabane, Eric Andonoff, and Rafik Bouaziz. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Efficient algorithms for finding differences between process models. In 2019 Ivannikov Ispras Open Conference (ISPRAS) . IEEE, 60–66
Andrey Skobtsov and Anna Kalenkova. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Software process simulation modeling: systematic literature review
Julián A García-García, José Gonzalez Enríquez, Mercedes Ruiz, Carlos Arevalo, and Andrés Jiménez-Ramírez. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
From text to visual BPMN process models: Design and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM/IEEE international conference on model driven engineering languages and systems . 229–239
Ana Ivanchikj, Souhaila Serbout, and Cesare Pautasso. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
An approach for process model extraction by multi-grained text classification. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering: 32nd International Conference, CAiSE 2020, Grenoble, France, June 8–12, 2020, Proceedings 32 . Springer, 268–282
Chen Qian, Lijie Wen, Akhil Kumar, Leilei Lin, Li Lin, Zan Zong, Shu’ang Li, and Jianmin Wang. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Effective requirement engineering process model in software engineering
Isonkobong Udousoro. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Just tell me: Prompt engineering in business process management. In International Conference on Business Process Modeling, Development and Support . Springer, 3–11
Kiran Busch, Alexander Rochlitzer, Diana Sola, and Henrik Leopold. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Agentverse: Facilitating multi-agent collaboration and exploring emergent behaviors in agents
Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jingwei Zuo, Cheng Yang, Chenfei Yuan, Chen Qian, Chi-Min Chan, Yujia Qin, Yaxi Lu, Ruobing Xie, et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways
Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey
Yunfan Gao, Yun Xiong, Xinyu Gao, Kangxiang Jia, Jinliu Pan, Yuxi Bi, Yi Dai, Jiawei Sun, and Haofen Wang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Lei Huang, Weijiang Yu, Weitao Ma, Weihong Zhong, Zhangyin Feng, Haotian Wang, Qianglong Chen, Weihua Peng, Xiaocheng Feng, Bing Qin, et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
POWL: partially ordered workflow language. In International Conference on Business Process Management . Springer, 92–108
Humam Kourani and Sebastiaan J van Zelst. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Chain of Natural Language Inference for Reducing Large Language Model Hallucinations. In NeurIPS 2023 Workshop on Instruction Tuning and Instruction Following
Deren Lei, Yaxi Li, Mengya Hu, Mingyu Wang, and Xi Yun. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Camel: Communicative agents for" mind" exploration of large scale language model society
Guohao Li, Hasan Abed Al Kader Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin, and Bernard Ghanem. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Knowledge injection to counter large language model (LLM) hallucination. In European Semantic Web Conference . Springer, 182–185
Ariana Martino, Michael Iannelli, and Coleen Truong. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A comprehensive overview of large language models
Humza Naveed, Asad Ullah Khan, Shi Qiu, Muhammad Saqib, Saeed Anwar, Muhammad Usman, Nick Barnes, and Ajmal Mian. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Communicative agents for software development
Chen Qian, Xin Cong, Cheng Yang, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Juyuan Xu, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Large language models for business process management: Opportunities and challenges. In International Conference on Business Process Management . Springer, 107–123
Maxim Vidgof, Stefan Bachhofner, and Jan Mendling. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models
Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang, Ajay Mandlekar, Chaowei Xiao, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, and Anima Anandkumar. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Proagent: From robotic process automation to agentic process automation
Yining Ye, Xin Cong, Shizuo Tian, Jiannan Cao, Hao Wang, Yujia Qin, Yaxi Lu, Heyang Yu, Huadong Wang, Yankai Lin, et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
FlowMind: Automatic Workflow Generation with LLMs. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on AI in Finance . 73–81
Zhen Zeng, William Watson, Nicole Cho, Saba Rahimi, Shayleen Reynolds, Tucker Balch, and Manuela Veloso. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Alleviating hallucinations of large language models through induced hallucinations
Yue Zhang, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi, and Shuming Shi. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Process Modeling With Large Language Models
Humam Kourani, Alessandro Berti, Daniel Schuster, and Wil MP van der Aalst. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools
Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Eric Hambro, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Language models in the loop: Incorporating prompting into weak supervision
Ryan Smith, Jason A Fries, Braden Hancock, and Stephen H Bach. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.