Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The rapid progress in Large Language Models (LLMs) could transform many fields, but their fast development creates significant challenges for oversight, ethical creation, and building user trust.
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Friedman, P. H. Kahn Jr, and A. Borning, “Value-sensitive design,” Interactions , vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 16–23, 2002
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. McCarthy, M. Minsky, N. Rochester, and C. Shannon, “A proposal for the dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, august 31, 1955,” AI Mag. , vol. 27, pp. 12–14, 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Rajaraman, “Johnmccarthy — father of artificial intelligence,” Resonance , vol. 19, pp. 198–207, 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Cass, “What would marvin minsky read? key works from the ai titan’s favorite authors,” IEEE Spectrum , vol. 53, pp. 22–22, 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin, “Why should i trust you?: Explaining the predictions of any classifier,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 2016. [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/language-models-lazy-learners-analyze-shortcuts-tang/e0a77cd55fd8527f92a0fa7930711a0c/?utm_source=chatgpt
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Corporation, “Deep learning: An introductory guide,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://research.nvidia.com/publication/2017-06_Deep-Learning-Introductory-Guide
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Amidi and S. Amidi, “Deep learning cheatsheet,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://stanford.edu/~shervine/teaching/cs-230/cheatsheet-deep-learning-tips-and-tricks
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Sze, Y. hsin Chen, T.-J. Yang, and J. Emer, “Efficient processing of deep neural networks: A tutorial and survey,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 105, pp. 2295–2329, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/processing-neural-networks-tutorial-survey-sze/1ce800bda3bb5bb584632fb6c5302eb0/?utm_source=chatgpt
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Sundararajan, A. Taly, and Q. Yan, “Axiomatic attribution for deep networks,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning , 2017. [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/towards-better-understanding-attribution-methods-deep-ancona/1a7ebc13a3d352afaa01ec9bbb6810d7/?utm_source=chatgpt
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. e. a. Faust, “Deep learning for healthcare applications based on physiological signals: a review,” Nature Scientific Reports , vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Paudyal and B. L. W. Wong, “Algorithmic opacity: Making algorithmic processes transparent through abstraction hierarchy,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting , vol. 62, 2018, pp. 192–196. [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/algorithmic-opacity-making-algorithmic-processes-paudyal/a1b137e6fcf059e89a9552ba4ffed77d/?utm_source=chatgpt
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Koene, L. Dowthwaite, and S. Seth, “Ieee p7003tm standard for algorithmic bias considerations,” in 2018 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Software Fairness (FairWare) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 38–41
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Wagner, “Ethics as an escape from regulation: From ethics-washing to ethics-shopping?” Being profiling. Cogitas ergo sum , pp. 84–89, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. A. Lewis, J. Imbrie et al. , “Ai and international stability: Risks and confidence-building measures,” CNA Occasional Paper, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Vig, “BERTviz: A tool for visualizing multi-head self-attention in the BERT model,” in Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP , 2019. [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/language-models-lazy-learners-analyze-shortcuts-tang/e0a77cd55fd8527f92a0fa7930711a0c/?utm_source=chatgpt
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Jain and B. C. Wallace, “Attention is not explanation,” in Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies , 2019. [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/language-models-lazy-learners-analyze-shortcuts-tang/e0a77cd55fd8527f92a0fa7930711a0c/?utm_source=chatgpt
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
H.-L. E. G. on Artificial Intelligence, “Ethics guidelines for trustworthy ai,” European Commission, Tech. Rep., 2019. [Online]. Available: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d3988569-0434-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Mitchell, S. Wu, A. Zaldivar, P. Barnes, L. Vasserman, B. Hutchinson, E. Spitzer, I. D. Raji, and T. Gebru, “Model cards for model reporting,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2019, pp. 220–229
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Floridi, “Establishing the rules for building trustworthy ai,” Nature Machine Intelligence , vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 261–262, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Holstein, J. Wortman Vaughan, H. Daum’e III, M. Dudik, and H. Wallach, “Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2019, pp. 1–16
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. D. Mittelstadt, “Ai ethics—too principled to fail?” arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.06668 , 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, “The global landscape of ai ethics guidelines,” Nature Machine Intelligence , vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 389–399, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. D. Mittelstadt, “Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical ai,” Nature Machine Intelligence , vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 501–507, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
OECD, “Recommendation of the council on artificial intelligence,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Yeung, A. Howes, and G. Pogrebna, AI governance by human rights-centered design, deliberation, and oversight: An end to ethics washing . Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 75–101
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
X. Pan, M. Zhang, S. Ji, and M. Yang, “Privacy risks of general-purpose language models,” 05 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9152761/
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Caton and C. Haas, “Fairness in machine learning: A survey,” 10 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Fairness-in-Machine-Learning%3A-A-Survey-Caton-Haas/fee8f63972906214b77f16cfeca0b93ee8f36ba2
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Le Bras, S. Swayamdipta, C. Bhagavatula, R. Zellers, M. Peters, A. Sabharwal, and Y. Choi, “Adversarial filters of dataset biases,” in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2020, pp. 1078–1088
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
——, The Assessment List for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (ALTAI) . European Commission, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Assessment_List\ _for_Trustworthy_Arti.html?id=cu8dEAAAQBAJ
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. D. P. Commission, “Companion to the model ai governance framework,” Jan 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/-/media/Files/PDPC/PDF-Files/Resource-for-Organisation/AI/SGIsago.pdf
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Hagendorff, “The ethics of ai ethics: An evaluation of guidelines,” Minds and Machines , vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 99–120, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Rességuier and R. Rodrigues, “Ai ethics should not remain toothless! a call to bring back the teeth of ethics,” Big Data & Society , vol. 7, no. 2, p. 2053951720950798, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. S. ÓhÉigeartaigh, Y. Liu, J. Whittlestone et al. , “International perspectives on artificial intelligence and public standards,” in Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , 2020, pp. 147–154
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Sarker, “Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions,” SN Comput. Sci. , vol. 2, pp. 1–21, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Saxe, S. Nelli, and C. Summerfield, “If deep learning is the answer, what is the question?” Nat. Rev. Neurosci. , vol. 22, pp. 55–67, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Piccialli, V. Di Somma, F. Giampaolo, S. Cuomo, and G. Fortino, “A survey on deep learning in medicine: Why, how and when?” Inf. Fusion , vol. 66, pp. 111–137, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Li, F. Liu, W. Yang, S. Peng, and J. Zhou, “A survey of convolutional neural networks: analysis, applications, and prospects,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. , 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Vilone and L. Longo, “Notions of explainability and evaluation approaches for explainable artificial intelligence,” Inf. Fusion , vol. 76, pp. 89–106, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Arya, R. K. Bellamy, P.-Y. Chen, A. Dhurandhar, M. Hind, S. C. Hoffman, S. Houde, Q. V. Liao, R. Luss, A. Mojsilović et al. , “Ai explainability 360 toolkit,” in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM India Joint International Conference on Data Science & Management of Data (8th ACM IKDD CODS & 26th COMAD) , 2021, pp. 376–379
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Winfield, L. Booth, R. Britter, G. Burnett, M. Chessell, H.-L. Cheung, M. Fisher, M. Fletcher, A. Gill, K. Glover et al. , “Ieee p7001: A proposed standard on transparency,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI , vol. 8, p. 225, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Luckcuck, M. Fisher, L. Dennis, S. Frost, A. White, and D. Styles, “Principles for the development and assurance of autonomous systems for safe use in hazardous environments,” 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Veale, F. Z. Borgesius, and J. Hage, “Demystifying the draft eu artificial intelligence act,” Computer Law Review International , vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 97–112, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.9785/cri-2021-220402/html?lang=en
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Smith and B. Jones, “Challenges in implementing privacy guidelines: The startup perspective,” Journal of Privacy Studies , vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 55–78, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Martin, “Prioritization strategies for privacy guideline implementation,” in Privacy Engineering Handbook . CRC Press, 2021, pp. 77–99
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Lee and L. Kim, “Automation for streamlining privacy guideline implementation,” Journal of Information Security and Applications , vol. 67, pp. 102–112, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. D. Raji et al. , “Closing the ai accountability gap: defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing,” Fat* , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–57, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Commission, “Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence act),” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-regulation-laying-down-harmonised-rules-artificial-intelligence-artificial-intelligence
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. T. Commission and E. Commission, “The ftc and european commission sign agreement to cooperate on artificial intelligence policy,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2021/06/ftc-european-commission-sign-agreement-cooperate-artificial-intelligence-policy
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Maas, “International law does not compute: Artificial intelligence and the development, displacement or destruction of the global legal order,” Melbourne Journal of International Law , vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 29–54, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. N. Schmitt and B. T. O’Donnell, “Ai, cyberspace, and nuclear weapons,” The Adelphi Papers , vol. 61, no. 509-510, pp. 7–134, 2021
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. C. Brock and B. Grad, “Expert systems: Commercializing artificial intelligence,” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing , vol. 44, pp. 5–7, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/systems-commercializing-artificial-intelligence-brock/f9558697b4685c8d930d8a07bf14d053/?utm_source=chatgpt
2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, F. Xia, E. Chi, Q. V. Le, D. Zhou et al. , “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, pp. 24 824–24 837, 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Sorensen, J. Robinson, C. Rytting, A. G. Shaw, K. Rogers, A. P. Delorey, M. Khalil, N. Fulda, and D. Wingate, “An information-theoretic approach to prompt engineering without ground truth labels,” 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
X. Ma, X. Wang, G. Fang, Y. Shen, and W. Lu, “Prompting to distill: Boosting data-free knowledge distillation via reinforced prompt,” 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Zhou, A. I. Muresanu, Z. Han, K. Paster, S. Pitis, H. Chan, and J. Ba, “Large language models are human-level prompt engineers,” 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Ganhor, D. Penz, N. Rekabsaz, O. Lesota, and M. Schedl, “Unlearning protected user attributes in recommendations with adversarial training,” in Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , 2022
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Weng, M. Zhu, S. He, K. Liu, and J. Zhao, “Large language models are reasoners with self-verification,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09561
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Veerasamy and H. Pieterse, “Rising above misinformation and deepfakes,” in International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security , 2022. [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/rising-above-misinformation-deepfakes-veerasamy/02383230aac25b339e6a4edede202de1/?utm_source=chatgpt
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Ganguli, L. Lovitt, J. Kernion, A. Askell, Y. Bai, S. Kadavath, B. Mann, E. Perez, N. Schiefer, K. Ndousse, A. Jones, S. Bowman, A. Chen, T. Conerly, N. DasSarma, D. Drain, N. Elhage, S. El-Showk, S. Fort, Z. Dodds, T. Henighan, D. Hernandez, T. Hume, J. Jacobson, S. Johnston, S. Kravec, C. Olsson, S. Ringer, E. Tran-Johnson, D. Amodei, T. B. Brown, N. Joseph, S. McCandlish, C. Olah, J. Kaplan, and J. Clark, “Red teaming language models to reduce harms: Methods, scaling behaviors, and lessons learned,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/teaming-language-models-reduce-harms-methods-scaling-ganguli/6251220390f857ef96b6fade77a8a60f/?utm_source=chatgpt
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
M. U. Hadi, R. Qureshi, A. Shah, M. Irfan, A. Zafar, M. B. Shaikh, N. Akhtar, J. Wu, S. Mirjalili et al. , “Large language models: a comprehensive survey of its applications, challenges, limitations, and future prospects,” Authorea Preprints , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Later among the works it cites.
V. Jeronymo, L. Bonifacio, H. Abonizio, M. Fadaee, R. Lotufo, J. Zavrel, and R. Nogueira, “Inpars-v2: Large language models as efficient dataset generators for information retrieval,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
N. Maus, P. Chao, E. Wong, and J. R. Gardner, “Adversarial prompting for black box foundation models,” 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
A. Bhat and A. Raychowdhury, “Non-uniform interpolation in integrated gradients for low-latency explainable-ai,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.11107
2023
Later among the works it cites.
S. Schwettmann, T. Rott Shaham, J. Materzynska, N. Chowdhury, S. Li, J. Andreas, D. Bau, and A. Torralba, “Find: A function description benchmark for evaluating interpretability methods,” arXiv e-prints , pp. arXiv–2309, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
J. Kirchenbauer, J. Geiping, Y. Wen, J. Katz, I. Miers, and T. Goldstein, “A watermark for large language models,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/watermark-large-language-models-kirchenbauer/bca760dbb665526b96e92ca566370fe2/?utm_source=chatgpt
2023
Later among the works it cites.
NetRise, “Netrise releases industry’s first ai-powered semantic search for software supply chain security,” 11 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.netrise.io/en/company/announcements/introducing-netrise-trace
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Vicarius, “Vicarius Introduces vuln_GPT: The World’s First LLM Model to Find and Fix Software Vulnerabilities,” 08 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
EY, “Key takeaways from the biden administration executive order on ai,” https://www.ey.com/en_us/public-policy/key-takeaways-from-the-biden-administration-executive-order-on-ai , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
The White House, “Executive order on the safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence,” https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/10/30/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence/ , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
I. Inuwa-Dutse, “Fate in ai: Towards algorithmic inclusivity and accessibility,” in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization , 2023. [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/fate-towards-algorithmic-inclusivity-accessibility-inuwadutse/e93c38645e6e5a8da9c137b028654558/?utm_source=chatgpt
2023
Later among the works it cites.
H. R. Watch, “Eu: Artificial intelligence regulation should ban social scoring,” Oct 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/10/09/eu-artificial-intelligence-regulation-should-ban-social-scoring
2023
Later among the works it cites.
Euronews, “MEPs endorse blanket ban on live facial recognition in public spaces,” Jun 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2023/06/14/meps-endorse-blanket-ban-on-facial-recognition-in-public-spaces-rejecting-targeted-exempti
2023
Later among the works it cites.
A. 19, “EU: AI Act passed in Parliament fails to ban harmful biometric technologies,” 03 2024, accessed: 2023-04-15. [Online]. Available: https://www.article19.org/resources/eu-ai-act-passed-in-parliament-fails-to-ban-harmful-biometric-technologies/
2023
Later among the works it cites.
S. Mukherjee, M. Coulter, and F. Y. Chee, “What’s next for the eu ai act?” Reuters , 12 2023, accessed: 2024-02-13. [Online]. Available: https://www.reuters.com/technology/whats-next-eu-ai-act-2023-12-14/
2023
Later among the works it cites.
A. Johnson and S. Wu, “Effective partnerships for privacy guideline implementation,” Journal of Applied Privacy , vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 22–39, 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
R. Patel and N. Desai, “Compliance software for implementing privacy guidelines,” in IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops , 2023, pp. 55–61
2023
Later among the works it cites.
OpenAI, “GPT-4 technical report,” OpenAI, 2023, accessed: 2023-02-28
2023
Later among the works it cites.
F. T. Commission, “Ftc warns companies using ai of potential legal action if they don’t limit bias and discrimination in their algorithms,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/01/ftc-warns-companies-using-ai-potential-legal-action-if-they-dont-limit-bias-discrimination-their-algorithms
2023
Later among the works it cites.
D. P. Manager, “20 biggest GDPR fines so far [2023] - Data Privacy Manager,” https://dataprivacymanager.net/5-biggest-gdpr-fines-so-far-2020/ , 2023
2023
Later among the works it cites.
R. Tang, Y.-N. Chuang, and X. Hu, “The science of detecting llm-generated text,” Communications of the ACM , vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 50–59, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
H. Zhang, B. Wu, X. Yuan, S. Pan, H. Tong, and J. Pei, “Trustworthy graph neural networks: Aspects, methods, and trends,” Proceedings of the IEEE , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
M. Turpin, J. Michael, E. Perez, and S. Bowman, “Language models don’t always say what they think: unfaithful explanations in chain-of-thought prompting,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 36, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
P. Gmyrek, C. Lutz, and G. Newlands, “A technological construction of society: comparing gpt-4 and human respondents for occupational evaluation in the uk,” 01 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/working-papers/WCMS_908942/lang--en/index.htm
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
2024
Closest in time.
R. Rafailov, A. Sharma, E. Mitchell, C. D. Manning, S. Ermon, and C. Finn, “Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 36, 2024
2024
Closest in time.
IEEE Educational Activities, “Continuing education units through ieee,” February 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-org/ieee/web/org/educ/ieee_certificates_program_product.pdf
2024
Closest in time.
“NSF-IEEE WORKSHOP: TOWARD EXPLAINABLE, RELIABLE, AND SUSTAINABLE MACHINE LEARNING IN SIGNAL & DATA SCIENCE,” https://sites.google.com/umd.edu/workshop2023ml/home , 2023, accessed: 2024-03-01
2024
Closest in time.
National Conference of State Legislatures, “Artificial intelligence 2023 legislation,” https://www.ncsl.org/state-legislatures-news/details/state-of-play-an-inside-look-at-artificial-intelligence-policy-and-state-actions , 2024
2024
Closest in time.
“Algorithmic accountability act of 2023, s.6 / h.r. 2231, 118th cong. (2023),” https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/6 , accessed: 2024-02-12
2024
Closest in time.
“Ai in government act of 2023, s. 140/h.r. 414, 118th cong. (2023),” https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/140 , accessed: 2024-02-12
2024
Closest in time.
“Federal artificial intelligence risk management act of 2023, s. 3205, 118th cong. (2023),” https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3205 , accessed: 2024-03-04
2024
Closest in time.
“Justice in forensic algorithms act of 2022, h.r. 8368, 117th cong. (2022),” https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8368 , accessed: 2024-02-12
2024
Closest in time.
EURACTIV, “The ai act needs a practical definition of ‘subliminal techniques’,” Jan 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.euractiv.com/section/artificial-intelligence/opinion/the-ai-act-needs-a-practical-definition-of-subliminal-techniques/
2024
Closest in time.
E. Commission, “Regulatory framework for ai,” Feb 2024. [Online]. Available: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai
2024
Closest in time.
European Commission, “AI Act: Regulatory Framework for Artificial Intelligence,” https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai , 2024, accessed: 2024-02-13
2024
Closest in time.
European Parliament, “Artificial intelligence act: deal on comprehensive rules for trustworthy ai,” https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20231206IPR15699/artificial-intelligence-act-deal-on-comprehensive-rules-for-trustworthy-ai , 2024, accessed: 2024-02-13
2024
Closest in time.
ArtificialIntelligenceAct.com, “Article 53 — artificial intelligence act,” https://artificialintelligenceact.com/title-v/article-53/ , 2024, accessed: 2024-02-13
2024
Closest in time.
White & Case LLP, “Dawn of the eu’s ai act: political agreement reached on world’s first comprehensive horizontal ai regulation,” https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/dawn-eus-ai-act-political-agreement-reached-worlds-first-comprehensive-horizontal-ai , 2024, accessed: 2024-02-13
2024
Closest in time.
Personal Data Protection Commission, “Model AI Governance Framework,” https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/help-and-resources/2020/01/model-ai-governance-framework , February 2024, accessed on 2024-02-14
2024
Closest in time.
A. V. Foundation, “What is ai verify - ai verify foundation,” Feb 2024. [Online]. Available: https://aiverifyfoundation.sg/what-is-ai-verify/
2024
Closest in time.
I. A. of Privacy Professionals, “Global ai governance law and policy: Singapore,” IAPP , Feb 2024. [Online]. Available: https://iapp.org/resources/article/global-ai-governance-Singapore/
2024
Closest in time.
Google, “Right to be forgotten overview - legal help,” https://support.google.com/legal/answer/10769224?hl=en , accessed: 2024-03-06
2024
Closest in time.