Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
This work is motivated by two key trends.
Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries
Chin-Yew Lin. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatically predicting peer-review helpfulness
Wenting Xiong and Diane Litman. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A dataset of peer reviews (PeerRead): Collection, insights and NLP applications
Dongyeop Kang, Waleed Ammar, Bhavana Dalvi, Madeleine van Zuylen, Sebastian Kohlmeier, Eduard Hovy, and Roy Schwartz. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Argument mining for understanding peer reviews
Xinyu Hua, Mitko Nikolov, Nikhil Badugu, and Lu Wang. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks
Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ape: Argument pair extraction from peer review and rebuttal via multi-task learning
Liying Cheng, Lidong Bing, Qian Yu, Wei Lu, and Luo Si. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hierarchical bi-directional self-attention networks for paper review rating recommendation
Zhongfen Deng, Hao Peng, Congying Xia, Jianxin Li, Lifang He, and S Yu Philip. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Multi-task peer-review score prediction
Jiyi Li, Ayaka Sato, Kazuya Shimura, and Fumiyo Fukumoto. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
ReviewRobot: Explainable paper review generation based on knowledge synthesis
Qingyun Wang, Qi Zeng, Lifu Huang, Kevin Knight, Heng Ji, and Nazneen Fatema Rajani. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert
Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
A deep neural architecture based meta-review generation and final decision prediction of a scholarly article
Tribikram Pradhan, Chaitanya Bhatia, Prashant Kumar, and Sukomal Pal. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
DISAPERE: A dataset for discourse structure in peer review discussions
Neha Nayak Kennard, Tim O’Gorman, Rajarshi Das, Akshay Sharma, Chhandak Bagchi, Matthew Clinton, Pranay Kumar Yelugam, Hamed Zamani, and Andrew McCallum. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
MReD: A meta-review dataset for structure-controllable text generation
Chenhui Shen, Liying Cheng, Ran Zhou, Lidong Bing, Yang You, and Luo Si. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Can we automate scientific reviewing?
Weizhe Yuan, Pengfei Liu, and Graham Neubig. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe?
Signe Altmäe, Alberto Sola-Leyva, and Andres Salumets. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xiaodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, Binyuan Hui, Luo Ji, Mei Li, Junyang Lin, Runji Lin, Dayiheng Liu, Gao Liu, Chengqiang Lu, Keming Lu, Jianxin Ma, Rui Men, Xingzhang Ren, Xuancheng Ren, Chuanqi Tan, Sinan Tan, Jianhong Tu, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Wei Wang, Shengguang Wu, Benfeng Xu, Jin Xu, An Yang, Hao Yang, Jian Yang, Shusheng Yang, Yang Yao, Bowen Yu, Hongyi Yuan, Zheng Yuan, Jianwei Zhang, Xingxuan Zhang, Yichang Zhang, Zhenru Zhang, Chang Zhou, Jingren Zhou, Xiaohuan Zhou, and Tianhang Zhu. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Politepeer: does peer review hurt? a dataset to gauge politeness intensity in the peer reviews
Reviewergpt? an exploratory study on using large language models for paper reviewing
Ryan Liu and Nihar B Shah. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Chatgpt and large language models in academia: opportunities and challenges
Jesse G Meyer, Ryan J Urbanowicz, Patrick CN Martin, Karen O’Connor, Ruowang Li, Pei-Chen Peng, Tiffani J Bright, Nicholas Tatonetti, Kyoung Jae Won, Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez, et al. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A comprehensive overview of large language models
Humza Naveed, Asad Ullah Khan, Shi Qiu, Muhammad Saqib, Saeed Anwar, Muhammad Usman, Nick Barnes, and Ajmal Mian. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
OpenAI. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Gpt4 is slightly helpful for peer-review assistance: A pilot study
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Prabhat Kumar Bharti, Meith Navlakha, Mayank Agarwal, and Asif Ekbal. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
NLPeer: A unified resource for the computational study of peer review
Nils Dycke, Ilia Kuznetsov, and Iryna Gurevych. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models
Gemini Team Google. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatic analysis of substantiation in scientific peer reviews
Yanzhu Guo, Guokan Shang, Virgile Rennard, Michalis Vazirgiannis, and Chloé Clavel. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Challenges and applications of large language models
Jean Kaddour, Joshua Harris, Maximilian Mozes, Herbie Bradley, Roberta Raileanu, and Robert McHardy. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
When reviewers lock horns: Finding disagreements in scientific peer reviews
Sandeep Kumar, Tirthankar Ghosal, and Asif Ekbal. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Summarizing multiple documents with conversational structure for meta-review generation
Miao Li, Eduard Hovy, and Jey Lau. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Weixin Liang, Yuhui Zhang, Hancheng Cao, Binglu Wang, Daisy Ding, Xinyu Yang, Kailas Vodrahalli, Siyu He, Daniel Smith, Yian Yin, et al. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Zachary Robertson. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A dataset of argumentative dialogues on scientific papers
Federico Ruggeri, Mohsen Mesgar, and Iryna Gurevych. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Llama 3 model card
AI@Meta. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Introducing the next generation of claude
Anthropic. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Reviewer2: Optimizing review generation through prompt generation
Zhaolin Gao, Kianté Brantley, and Thorsten Joachims. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Evaluating llms on document-based qa: Exact answer selection and numerical extraction using cogtale dataset
Zafaryab Rasool, Stefanus Kurniawan, Sherwin Balugo, Scott Barnett, Rajesh Vasa, Courtney Chesser, Benjamin M Hampstead, Sylvie Belleville, Kon Mouzakis, and Alex Bahar-Fuchs. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Is llm a reliable reviewer? a comprehensive evaluation of llm on automatic paper reviewing tasks
Ruiyang Zhou, Lu Chen, and Kai Yu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.